Error: unable to get links from server. Please make sure that your site supports either file_get_contents() or the cURL library.
Feedback is the latest science and technology news of new scientists, the sidelines of the latest science and technology news. You can email Feedback@newscientist.com to send items you believe readers can be fascinated by feedback.
Retract action
On February 25th, one of the most epic withdrawal notices was the joy of reading feedback. The notice of withdrawal is when it determines that a research published by a scientific journal is highly flawed and unreliable and is effectively published.
New withdrawal notice I covered five articles, not one, not two Perceptual and motor skillsby all Nicholas Gagen in Southern University of Brittany, France.
Five studies were published between 2002 and 2009. In 2007, Guéguen was the only author of “Bust size and hitchhiking: Field study” The aim is to use real experiments to show that women with big breasts are more likely to be picked up when hitchhiking. Two years later, this time with a colleague, he found it. There was a high chance that the blonde would ride it too..
With such a result, it is no wonder that Guéguen’s work has become a popular theme in news articles. Sadly, this includes New Scientist Covered in 2008 study Women (which has not yet been withdrawn) claim to be more embracing the chat upline at their peak monthly fertility.
It took almost ten years for the card house to start to shake. In 2017, researcher Nick Brown (People who write blogs as “Steamtraen”) and James Heathers I’ve started writing about Guéguen’s work. They found He was prolific and often “published more than ten prominent empirical articles a year, many of which include extensive fieldwork.” Immediately raise a question: How did he find time? They also began to doubt the great effects that are alleged.
And the card house began to crumble. 2019, International review of social psychology Added “Expression of concern” In six of Guéguen’s papers. 2022, Journal of Social Psychology Retract “” in a study that claims that men perceive women as having strong sexual intent when they wear red.Table 1 of the manuscript included four combinations of impossible mean and standard deviation considering the reported sample sizes” That same year, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology A study claiming that men are more likely to help women slaps the study expressing concern.When her hair naturally falls on her neck, shoulders and back“.
And come now Latest withdrawal. The notifications explaining them are amazing, although I take them in academic language. They warn that “low confidence that the research design was implemented as described” and that “many of the data in these articles was incredible or misanalyzed.” In other words, we didn’t think he did what he said, and in any case, he made it wrong.
The editor says Guéguen did not respond to the query. Frankly, given the nature of his work, feedback suspects that he had only one reply: “Stigma! Stigma! They all got it for me!”
It seems right to have Heathers have their final words.Unreliable, embarrassing, if you’re writing a study on Benny Hill, remember that someone will know how bad you made it…and you Also, it might be pretty ok for around seven years before you get more broad results. “
Botticelli xxx Peacock
A few weeks ago, Feedback wrote about the troublesome Scunthorpe issue: The difficulty of blocking offensive words online is often seen in completely harmless words such as the names of British towns. Three readers were able to share with us about similar experiences without falling into our email filter.
Richard Black was in the early 2000s when he asked students to help set up a Hotmail email account. (Note for younger readers: Hotmail is the old name of Outlook. It is the email system that parents use at work as Microsoft is nervous in the business software market.) Richard writes: (Note to younger readers: Yahoo… ah, in fact Yahoo is still around.) Anyway, the student’s last name was Peacock.
At about the same time, Richard Hind was “given the budget to implement an email filtering solution.” It worked pretty well, except for “some curious slang terms for ours that were deemed uncomfortable.” However, many “innocent emails” have also been suspended. The only pattern was being sent by staff to friends elsewhere. “I finally clicked,” says Richard. All blocked emails were signed with three kisses or XS.
I also give my thoughts for Patricia Finney. Blog I explained about optimism in the face of climate change in Botticelli’s reenactment The birth of Venus. Facebook refused Nude and nipples” I’m still waiting for an apology,” she says.
Sweet snack
Feedback reading mountains Thunderbird Episode, so we are reluctant to add to it. But a A series of books caught our eye by food historians. The dark history of sugar It’s about colonial adventures that support the sugar industry, not colonial adventures. With a light note, Pudding Philosophy Sounds fun and we were impressed by the title Kneading to know: The history of baking. Author of all these fever-related books? Neil Butterly.
Have you talked about feedback?
You can send stories to feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This week and past feedback can be found on our website.
Source: www.newscientist.com
