On Thursday, researchers released the most accurate measurements of neutrinos, reducing the maximum possible mass of ghostly speckles of matter permeating our universe.
result, Published Science journals do not define the exact mass of neutrinos, but do not define just the upper limit. However, this discovery helps physicists get closer to understanding what is wrong with the so-called standard model. One way physicists know that it is not accurate at all is that they suggest that neutrinos have no mass at all.
In Grander Scales, learning more about neutrinos can help cosmologists fill in hazy pictures of the universe. This includes how galaxies gather and what will affect the expansion of the universe since the Big Bang.
“The new research is a great opportunity to learn more about the world,” said John Wilkerson, Chapel Hill, a physicist at the University of North Carolina and author of the new study. “And that’s what neutrinos may play a key role.”
Physicists know a few things about neutrinos. They are prolific across the universe and are actually created whenever atomic nuclei snap together or fall apart. However, they are notoriously difficult to detect because they do not carry charges.
There are three types of neutrinos, which physicists describe as flavors. And, strangely enough, they change from one flavor to another when they travel to space and time, a discovery recognized by the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2015. The underlying mechanism that allowed these transformations meant that neutrinos had to have some mass.
But that’s the case. Neutrinos are dauntingly light, and physicists don’t know why.
Revealing the exact values of neutrino masses, Alexei Lokhov, a scientist at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany, said that new physics could lead to “some kind of portal.” “At the moment, this is the biggest limitation in the world,” he said of the team’s measurements.
Dr. Rokhov and his colleagues conducted an experiment using Karlsrue tritium neutrinos or catrine to narrow down the neutrino mass. One end of the 230-foot-long device is a heavy version of hydrogen, a source of tritium and with two neutrons in its nucleus. Tritium is unstable and collapses into helium. A neutron is converted into a proton, and in the process the electrons are ejected. It also spits out antinutrinos, the antimatter twins of neutrinos. The two require the same mass.
The original tritium mass is divided into helium, electrons, and antioxidant spoilage products. Neutrinos and anti-anti-utrinos cannot be directly detected, but the sensor on the other side of the experiment recorded 36 million electrons over 259 days and was washed away by attenuated tritium. By measuring the energy of electron movement, they were able to indirectly infer the maximum possible mass for antinutorino.
They found that the value was less than 0.45 electron volts, one million times lighter than electrons, in the unit of mass used by particle physicists.
The upper limit of mass was measured only for one flavour of neutrinos. But Dr. Wilkerson said that nailing one chunk would allow you to calculate the rest.
Latest measurements reduce the potential mass of neutrinos Previous limit Set in 2022 by Katrin Collaboration under 0.8 Electronvolts. It’s also almost twice as accurate.
University of Washington physicist Elise Nowitzky praised the Catlin team for their careful efforts, although not involved in the job.
“It’s really the power of tours,” she said of her experiments and discoveries. “I’m totally confident in their outcome.”
The Catlin team is working on further boundaries of neutrino masses from 1,000 days of data and is expected to be collected by the end of the year. This allows physicists to measure even more electrons, leading to more accurate measurements.
Other experiments also contribute to a better understanding of neutrino mass. Project 8 Seattle and deep underground neutrino experiments spread across two physical facilities in the Midwest.
Astronomers studying the structure of the universe, thought to be influenced by the vast collection of universes, have a vast collection of neutrinos that are flooded into the universe, and have their own measurements of the maximum mass of particles. However, according to Dr. Wilkerson, the boundaries that astronomers stare at the void do not match what particle physicists calculate in their lab when scrutinizing the subatomic world.
“There’s something really funny going on,” he said. “And the possible solution to that would be physics beyond the standard model.”
Source: www.nytimes.com