Recent research analyzed 31 ancient societies from Europe, Asia, and the Americas, revealing that democratic institutions were more prevalent than previously thought and not solely dependent on factors like population size or geography.
The term “democracy” originated in ancient Greece, where it was defined as the power of the people (demo = people, kratos = power).
This definition transcends specific institutional frameworks, framing democracy as an overarching goal.
Traditionally, scholars rooted in Western social science have viewed the core elements of democratic governance—such as power centralization and national inclusiveness—as products of the classical Mediterranean world, which lay dormant for over a millennium until the Renaissance reinvigorated these ideals in Europe and its colonies.
Yet, this prevalent perspective that democratic governance emerged exclusively in the West has rarely undergone systematic scrutiny.
“Many believe that democracy first flourished in Greece and Rome,” says Dr. Gary Fineman, MacArthur Curator of Mesoamerican and Central American Anthropology at the Field Museum’s Negaunee Center for Integrative Research.
“However, our research indicates that numerous societies around the globe devised methods to limit the authority of rulers and empower ordinary citizens.”
In contrast to democracies, dictatorships centralize power in a single individual or a small group, examples of which include absolute monarchies and authoritarian regimes.
In a democracy, decision-making is a collective process among the populace. While elections often correlate with democratic practices, this association is not always accurate; many dictators are elected through popular votes.
“Elections alone do not serve as the best indicators of democratic value, thus our study emphasized historical instances of political organization,” Dr. Fineman noted.
“We identified two critical governance aspects: the concentration of power within individuals or institutions, and the degree of inclusiveness, reflecting how accessible power is to significant segments of the population.”
The current study evaluated 40 cases from 31 distinct political entities across Europe, North America, and Asia over numerous millennia.
Due to varying record-keeping methods, not all societies maintained written archives, necessitating innovative approaches to infer their governance structures.
“The spatial arrangement of societies is particularly revealing,” Dr. Fineman remarked.
“Urban areas featuring open spaces and public structures that facilitate community gatherings tend to exhibit more democratic tendencies.”
Conversely, architectural remnants suggesting concentrated power—such as pyramids with limited upper space or urban designs funneling into a ruler’s residence—signal more authoritarian regimes.
The researchers developed an “authoritarianism index” to classify each society along a continuum from highly authoritarian to highly democratic.
“Many archaeologists maintain that Athens and the Roman Republic represent the only democracies of the ancient era, while governance in Asia and the Americas was predominantly autocratic,” stated Dr. Fineman.
“Our analysis reveals that various regions possessed democratic structures comparable to those of Athens and Rome.”
“These results indicate that both democratic and authoritarian governance existed widely in the ancient world,” commented David Stasavage, a professor at New York University.
“Societies innovated ways to democratize power and enhance inclusivity, suggesting that democratic principles have profound and unexpected historical roots,” added Dr. Linda Nicholas of the Field Museum.
The study also challenges the notion that population size and political complexity inherently lead to authoritarian rule, highlighting how funding mechanisms shaped authority.
“Societies reliant on income controlled by leaders—such as mines, trade routes, or warfare gains—tended to be more authoritarian,” Dr. Fineman explained.
“On the contrary, societies that primarily derived funds from community labor or domestic taxes were more likely to decentralize power and uphold shared governance.”
Furthermore, the research found that societies with more inclusive political frameworks generally exhibited lower economic inequality.
“These insights contradict the belief that dictatorship and high inequality are inevitable outcomes of socio-economic complexity and growth,” Dr. Fineman stated.
“Historical evidence shows that people globally have developed inclusive political systems, even under challenging conditions.”
For more information, check out the research paper, recently published in Scientific Progress.
_____
Gary M. Feynman et al. 2026. Distribution of power and inclusiveness over deep time. Scientific Progress 12(12); doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aec1426
Source: www.sci.news
