Feedback is the latest science and technology news of new scientists, the sidelines of the latest science and technology news. You can email Feedback@newscientist.com to send items you believe readers can be fascinated by feedback.
Streisand strikes again
Some things are sadly inevitable: death, taxes, another ColdPlay album. One such inevitability is that, as it was proven beyond reasonable doubt, if you try to suppress an embarrassing story, it only draws more attention to it.
This phenomenon is called the Streisand effect after the 2003 incident in which Barbra Streisand appealed to take aerial photographs from the Internet. The shot was part of a series that documented coastal erosion in California, but identified her cliff top mansion. She lost and in the process she turned her attention to the public to the photos. It has been accessed hundreds of thousands of times after downloading six times (two by lawyers).
So, with the tired inevitability, we come to the meta again. Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s personal empire covers Facebook, Instagram, threads, WhatsApp and a fair amount of Hawaiian chunks. In March, Sarah Wynn-Williams – former Facebook’s director of public policy – published a memoir of time at a company that has a Gatsby-esque title Careless people. Meta has a very strong honorary lawyer and we don’t want to be held liable, so feedback is not going to repeat certain claims. New Scientist“All of the in-house lawyers have dropped heart attack deaths, and just say it is enough, it is a real page turn.
Meta responded by taking legal action. By leveraging the non-disclosure agreement, Meta blocked her from being promoted as Wynn-Williams signed when he left the company Careless people. An interview that she might have seen with was conducted before Meta was given an injunction.
result? This book has become a global bestseller and you just read about it New Scientist.
Aggressive Paris Dae
Feedback recently told the story of researcher Nicholas Gegen. Nicholas Gegen retracted some of his papers on the benefits of having a big breast while hitchhiking, as a result of an investigation by Data Detective and James Heathers (March 15).
So we were naturally intrigued to receive emails from Brown. We wondered if the details were wrong or if they packed them with stories.
However, he wrote according to another item in the same column. This is related to the issue of perennial Scunthorpe. Because it is the fact that completely innocent words can contain isolated and offensive strings, automated systems that block suspicious words often catch harmless words in the web.
“I worked there before I became a scientist,” explains Brown. “Maybe around 1999, someone came to me with a question. Her email to the Royal Bank of Scotland bouncing back. The rejection notice literally said this: “Reason: Smell: Boobs.”
Reader: Take some time to recover from the shock. We were also amazed at how automated systems used the phrase “dirty words.” We were not aware that the RBS system was based on elementary school behavioral guidance.
Brown looked into the message that it was “completely harmless and did not contain any references to birds of the Palidae family.” He then used a text editor to look at the email header where he found “slutty words.”
“We were in France and used that name. Asterix Our server cartoon was named “Petitsuix” by one of the email servers the message passed through. “This is the inn that appears in three different places. Asterix volume: His name is a parody of Petit Sau cheese.if you didn’t get it. So, the email header “contains something,” Brown says.Via: Petitsuix.domain.com‘, and therefore you run into the Scunthorpe problem.’
This led Brown to wonder what would have happened if his employer had used the same spam spam software by accident in hell. Did our spam filter server come back saying, “You’re ‘boobs'” and “No, ‘boobs'”? ”
So what happened next? “I remember back then saying, ‘Well, the bank is going to burst,'” Brown says. He had to wait until 2008. And we must say that legal feedback, despite Brown’s pun glory, did not happen. The government has bailed out the banks.
I’m in line
Sometimes feedback comes across solutions to a brilliant, rocky problem at the same time. Such a solution was drawn to our attention by reporter Matthew Sparks.
As three researchers were trying to make queuing fatal, they developed a robot for the people in Queu to play. As they explained, the robots areSocial Queue“It’s a robot pole.[s] Together with people through three modes of interaction: “attraction”, “running away” and “friendly.” “It apparently “enhanced people’s enjoyment.”
Feedback is not a robot player: not from a complete lack of technical capabilities, but destroying ideas – that’s what we saw Battlestar Galactica I decided not to conspire with the robot apocalypse. Still, this sounds like an engineering feat.
However, we wondered why everyone cares about designing a cue robot when they can set up a timing entry system to eliminate queues.
Have you talked about feedback?
You can send stories to feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Include your home address. This week and past feedback can be found on our website.
Source: www.newscientist.com
