Feedback is New Scientist Your go-to source for the latest in science and technology news. To share feedback or suggest topics of interest to our readers, please email us at feedback@newscientist.com.

It Rains Cats and Dogs

A new measurement unit has been adopted, particularly relevant to recent weather events. Reader Alan Baker noted a freezing rain warning on CBS News in Austin, Texas. Meteorologist Avery Tomasko highlighted that central Texas could expect up to half an inch of freezing rain, which would freeze upon contact.

To emphasize the seriousness, Tomasko explained that “ice is heavy,” posing risks such as tree branches potentially falling onto power lines. Even a mere half inch of ice can accumulate to over 7,000 pounds, or roughly the weight of 109.5 full-grown golden retrievers on a 30-foot tree,” he elaborated.

While there are many adorable dogs around, the imagery of a hundred retrievers precariously perched does raise some concern about the effectiveness of conveying the dangers associated with freezing rain.

Moreover, I find the phrase “approximately 109.5” amusing; there’s little room for approximation when counting fluffy companions. It evokes an unsettling thought about an odd situation that might leave one dog counted as half.

AI’s Map Mishap

In the realm of AI blunders, one notable instance involved erasing Canada from the world map. When asked how many countries end with ‘nada,’ the AI inaccurately responded, claiming, “No countries have official English names ending with ‘nada,’” while erroneously qualifying Canada’s name as ending with ‘a.’

Furthermore, the error omitted Grenada, which also ends with ‘nada.’ There was a small disclaimer warning users of possible AI errors, but the mix-up was glaring.

This information stems from a screenshot circulating on social media. While it may be fabricated, it features a logo from Reddit’s AI tool, Reddit Answers, which prompted Feedback to question the AI again.

Feedback revealed: “No countries end in ‘nada.’ This mishap seems to underline the AI’s limitations rather than provide factual insights into country names.” While somewhat insightful, this response still lacked clarity.

An editor noted variations in phrasing, which led Feedback to ask the AI the original question again. The AI reiterated that “there are no countries that end in ‘nada,’” yet acknowledged countries ending in ‘anada’ or ‘ada,’ prompting contemplation over the discrepancies.

Further, the AI named Canada and Grenada correctly but misidentified Granada as a country instead of a Spanish city. Unfortunately, it also claimed Uganda as another ‘ada’ country and humorously mentioned a fictional “Wacanada,” possibly mixed up with Black Panther’s Wakanda.

This chaotic exchange serves as a reminder to remain skeptical of supposed “fun facts” shared by AI; they may be neither entertaining nor factual.

Reflections on Life and the Universe

The Feedback team experienced the viral “6-7” sensation that swept the globe during the 2025 outbreak. Children began chanting “six seven” joyfully whenever the numbers appeared. Now that the trend has dissipated, we can finally reflect on it.

The phrase “6-7” seems to originate from Skrilla’s song “Doot Doot (6 7),” yet its meaning remains unclear. Some speculate it was simply a placeholder of sorts. Discussions surrounding its use often leaned into absurdity, with Feedback Junior, our resident expert on youth culture, confirming that it holds no intrinsic meaning.

However, we may have unearthed the true essence of “6-7,” thanks to an Instagram screenshot that proposed: “The ultimate question about life, the universe, and everything is: ‘What on earth is 6 7?'” This prompts thoughts reminiscent of Douglas Adams’ famous quote from The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, where a supercomputer reveals that the answer to the ultimate question is simply 42, albeit with the challenge of discerning the actual question.

Thus, the Instagram post humorously yet aptly suggests that the AI miscalculated by interpreting space as a multiplication operation. This might very well be the most significant AI misstep documented.

Have a story to share with Feedback?

Email your article to Feedback at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. You can also find this week’s and past feedback on our website.