Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly dominating discussions in our daily lives. Since the introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022, we’ve adapted to AI’s influence in various sectors, including banking, healthcare, and smart technology.

In the new three-part BBC documentary AI Confidential, mathematician and broadcaster Hannah Fry delves into the transformative impacts of AI. She highlights some unforeseen challenges that this rapid evolution presents, sharing insights on how AI is reshaping modern mathematics and the global economy.

Beethan Ackerley: This show investigates the effects of AI on our relationships and perceived reality. What insights can you share about this phenomenon?

Hannah Fry: Historically, AI has operated in a flattering capacity. Users would receive excessive praise, but with recent improvements, we’re beginning to see fundamental discrepancies. Just as in meaningful relationships, we often need to face difficult truths, and over-reliance on AI might undermine that experience.

People increasingly depend on AI, sometimes to the point of confusion or emotional detachment in their personal lives. Those who relied on AI’s advice over human interaction faced significant repercussions, with some even losing jobs in the pursuit of profitable AI-driven endeavors.

Has your AI usage changed in light of these observations?

Now, I actively challenge AI to confront my biases and encourage critical thinking without flattery.

If AI cannot provide that, what should it aim to achieve?

It depends on the context. Take AlphaFold, for instance, an AI predicting protein structures demonstrates significant breakthroughs. However, effective AI must connect conceptually with human understanding to facilitate progress.

Every day, we hear about groundbreaking mathematical problems being resolved by AI. Does this energize you?

Think of mathematics as a vast map, with human mathematicians orbiting specific areas. AI can illuminate unexplored connections, thus exciting the field without overshadowing the core human contribution that drives innovation.

Misconceptions surrounding AI persist. Which one would you most like to clarify?

Many view AI as an omnipotent entity. While it can excel in specific tasks, it’s crucial to understand that AI tools are still limited in scope and certainly not infallible.

Should we entrust AI with sensitive decisions?

No! Just like you wouldn’t give a forklift access to your bank details, we need to view AI as advanced tools rather than sentient beings.

Why the tendency to anthropomorphize AI?

Humans naturally gravitate towards social interactions, making it easy to project human traits onto seemingly intelligent machines.

How can we mitigate the anthropomorphic tendency?

Relying on individuals to resist this urge is unrealistic. Proper design and thoughtful interfaces can significantly reduce the likelihood of users falling into this anthropomorphic mindset.

Can AI address significant social issues like isolation?

While AI might assist lonely individuals in certain contexts, relying on chatbots to solve deep-rooted emotional problems poses risks and limitations.

Looking ahead, how relevant are extreme AI doomsday scenarios?

While it’s vital to consider the potential risks of AI, such scenarios often divert our attention from pressing issues like algorithms making life-altering decisions. Understanding these implications can empower us to establish safety mechanisms effectively.

Will we achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI)?

While there is no consensus on the definition, gradual advancements hint that AGI—where machines match human cognitive abilities—is approaching. Exciting developments in the next 5-10 years could redefine our relationship with technology.

What major changes do you foresee?

I anticipate a transformation in our economic systems based on labor exchange, which may prompt fundamental societal shifts. Emerging breakthroughs in various fields will redefine our understanding of value and work.

What can be done to ensure AI doesn’t displace workers?

Addressing these challenges requires a reevaluation of our economic principles, particularly the tax framework based on income instead of assets.