“Meta moderation board stands by decision to permit use of ‘River to Sea’ in posts” | Meta

Meta’s content moderation board decided that implementing a complete ban on pro-Palestinian slogans would hinder freedom of speech. They supported the company’s choice to allow posts on Facebook that include the phrase “from the river to the sea.”

The oversight committee examined three instances of Facebook posts featuring the phrase “from the river to the sea” and determined that they did not break Meta’s rules against hate speech or incitement. They argued that a universal ban on the phrase would suppress political speech in an unacceptable manner.

In a decision endorsed by 21 members, the committee upheld Meta’s original decision to keep the content on Facebook, stating that it expressed solidarity with the Palestinian people and did not promote violence or exclusion.

The committee, whose content judgments are binding, mentioned that the phrase has various interpretations and can be used with different intentions. While it could be seen as promoting anti-Semitism and the rejection of Israel, it could also be interpreted as a show of support for the Palestinians.

The majority of the committee stated that the use of the phrase by Hamas, although banned from Meta’s platform and considered a terrorist organization by the UK and the US, does not automatically make the phrase violent or hateful.

However, a minority within the committee argued that as the phrase appeared in Hamas’s 2017 charter, its use in the post could be construed as praising the banned group, particularly following an attack by Hamas. The phrase “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” refers to the territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.

Opponents of the slogan claim it advocates for the elimination of Israel, while proponents like Palestinian-American author Yousef Munayyer argue it supports the idea of Palestinians living freely and equally in their homeland.

The ruling pointed out that due to the phrase’s multiple meanings, enforcing a blanket ban, removal of content, or using the phrase as a basis for review would impinge on protected political speech.

In one of the cases, a user responded to a video with the hashtag “FromTheRiverToTheSea,” which garnered 3,000 views. In another case, the phrase “Palestine will be free” was paired with an image of a floating watermelon slice, viewed 8 million times.

The third case involved a post by a Canadian community organization condemning “Zionist Israeli occupiers,” but had fewer than 1,000 views.

A Meta spokesperson, overseeing platforms like Instagram and Threads, remarked: “We appreciate the oversight committee’s evaluation of our policies. While our guidelines prioritize safety, we acknowledge the global complexities at play and regularly seek counsel from external experts, including our oversight committee.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Cruise’s robotaxi permit in California promptly suspended by DMV

The California Department of Surface Transportation on Tuesday immediately halted Cruise’s rollout and driverless testing permit, shutting down GM’s self-driving car subsidiary’s robotaxi business in San Francisco, just months after receiving the final permits needed for commercialization. announced that it was finished.

The DMV’s suspension order, viewed by TechCrunch, states that the department suspended Cruz’s permit because he withheld video footage from an ongoing investigation. The DMV said it met with Cruise representatives on October 3, a day after a pedestrian who was initially believed to have been hit by a human-driven car was pinned under Cruise’s robot taxi.

The order read:

“During the meeting, the department was shown video footage of the accident that was captured by the AV’s on-board camera. The video footage submitted to the department ended with the AV’s initial stop after the sudden braking maneuver. The department was not shown any footage of the AV’s subsequent movements for the execution, and Cruz did not disclose that any additional movements of the vehicle occurred after the vehicle’s initial stop. We first learned of the move through discussions with other government agencies. The Department requested Cruz to provide a copy of the video, including additional footage, which the Department received on October 13, 2023. ”

The DMV has not disclosed the name of the partner agency. However, a person with knowledge of the incident told TechCrunch that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shared the information. It’s worth noting that NHTSA has launched its own investigation into the Cruise’s self-driving system following several incidents involving pedestrians in San Francisco, including the Oct. 2 incident.

A portion of the video, which the DMV said it did not initially see, showed the cruise robotaxi come to a complete stop and then attempt a pullover maneuver while a pedestrian was underneath the vehicle. The AV traveled approximately six feet, reached a speed of seven miles per hour, and came to a complete and final stop, according to the order.

The DMV later said in an order that Cruise’s inaction impeded the department’s ability to effectively and timely assess the safe operation of the company’s vehicles, putting public safety at risk.

Cruz told TechCrunch that he shared the entire video with the DMV. The DMV told TechCrunch it stands by that assessment.

“Public safety remains California DMV’s top priority, and the department’s self-driving vehicle regulations provide a framework to facilitate the safe testing and deployment of this technology on California’s public roads,” the DMV said in a statement. Ta. “DMV may immediately suspend or revoke a permit if there is an unreasonable risk to public safety. There is no set time frame for the suspension.”

The DMV, which regulates the testing and deployment of self-driving vehicles in the state, said Cruise would have to go through a number of steps to get its suspended permit reinstated and would not approve it unless the agency meets requirements to its satisfaction. said. The DMV added that this decision does not affect the company’s authorization for safety driver testing.

The California DMV’s decision to suspend the license came after officials determined the vehicle was unsafe for public operation and Cruise misrepresented information related to self-driving technology installed in the vehicle. said that it was done. The department also said Cruise’s self-driving car tests on public roads posed an unreasonable risk to the public.

Cruise said it learned of the California DMV’s suspension of driverless permits at 10:30 a.m. today, 15 minutes after the California DMV issued a press release. Cruise spokeswoman Hannah Lindow emailed the following statement, which was also posted on the cruise ship. Social media site:

“As a result, we will be suspending the operation of unmanned self-driving vehicles in San Francisco. Ultimately, we will develop and deploy self-driving vehicles to save lives. DMV will investigate. In this incident, a human hit-and-run driver tragically struck a pedestrian and threw him into the path of an AV. The AV actively braked before the collision and detected the collision, creating an additional safety issue. The AV tried to pull over, but before coming to a final stop it continued to stop and pulled the pedestrian forward. Our thoughts continue to be with the victim. I wish you a speedy and full recovery.

Immediately following the incident, our team proactively shared information, including the entire video, with the California DMV, CPUC, and NHTSA. We have been working closely with regulators to answer their questions and assist law enforcement in identifying the hit-and-run driver’s vehicle. Our team is currently conducting analyzes to identify potential enhancements to the AV’s response to this type of very rare event. ”

The suspension comes less than three months after Cruise and competitor Waymo received the final permits needed to offer commercial robotaxi service 24/7 throughout San Francisco. The permit was issued by the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates commercial driverless ride permits. But without a DMV permit to allow driverless vehicles on public roads, a CPUC permit is essentially worthless.

The CPUC faced opposition from residents and some city officials who cited numerous instances of vehicles breaking down and stopping in the middle of the road (known as “bricking”), disrupting the flow of traffic, public transportation, and emergency response agencies. Nevertheless, the final permit was approved.

However, that victory did not last long. Within days of receiving the CPUC’s permit, a series of incidents occurred, including a collision between a cruise robotaxi and an emergency vehicle that injured passengers. The DMV told Cruise that the number of robotaxis in service must be reduced by 50% while the department investigates the incident. In response, some San Francisco city officials formally asked state regulators to redo an August hearing to expand robotaxi permits to Cruise and Waymo.

Pressure to suspend or revoke Cruise’s permit increased after a woman was struck by a human-driven vehicle and pinned under Cruise’s robotaxi on October 2. A video shot by Cruise and seen by TechCrunch shows the robotaxi being hit by a human-driven car, launching in front of the self-driving car, then braking and running over a pedestrian who was lying on the road. It was reflected.Cruz said in it description of the event The robotaxi “braked aggressively” to minimize the impact. Still, the pedestrian was hit and then pinned under the vehicle, according to police and video from local witnesses showing the pedestrian pinned under the robotaxi.

TechCrunch saw the shortened video. At the time, it was presented as a complete video.

San Francisco police have launched an investigation into the incident. NHTSA launched its own investigation soon after.

This story is unfolding…

Source: techcrunch.com