How Your Microbiome Influences the Risk of Severe Allergic Reactions

Understanding Peanut Allergies

Image Credit: Radharc Images / Alamy

The gut and oral microbiomes play a crucial role in determining the severity of reactions in individuals with peanut allergies. This may clarify why reactions can vary greatly in intensity among allergic individuals.

According to Rodrigo Jimenez Sais from the Autonomous University of Madrid, “The central question is why some individuals experience more severe allergic reactions than others.”

A peanut allergy arises when the immune system incorrectly identifies proteins from peanuts as harmful, leading to an excessive production of specific antibodies. This immune response can result in symptoms like itching, swelling, and nausea, or in severe cases, anaphylaxis—a life-threatening condition characterized by breathing difficulties.

Since various microbiomes significantly influence our immune systems, Jiménez-Saiz and his team hypothesized that body microorganisms could affect allergy severity.

To test this, they administered peanuts to three groups of non-allergic mice: germ-free mice without a microbiome, mice with a minimally diverse microbiome, and mice with a rich, healthy microbiome.

After 40 minutes, researchers discovered that two proteins, Ara h 1 and Ara h 2, crucial for peanut allergies, were present at elevated levels in the germ-free and minimally diverse microbiome mice compared to those with a diverse microbiome.

Additionally, the mice with a diverse microbiome harbored abundant levels of a beneficial bacteria called Lotia, especially the Lotia R3 strain, which aids in digesting peanuts in the intestines.

To explore whether Lotia R3 could mitigate anaphylaxis risk, the researchers induced severe peanut allergies in another group of mice with minimal microbiome diversity.

They then introduced Lotia R3 and injected peanut paste into all subjects’ intestines. After 40 minutes, while all mice experienced anaphylaxis, those treated with Lotia R3 had an average body temperature drop of just 2%, compared to 3.5% in untreated mice—a notable difference, given that severe drops in temperature can lead to hypothermia and organ failure.

Moreover, levels of MMCP-1, an immune molecule that surges during anaphylaxis, were significantly lower in the blood of mice treated with Lotia R3. According to Mohamed Shamji from Imperial College London, “The findings are compelling. If similar immune responses occur in humans, we could anticipate a decrease in anaphylactic severity.”

In a complementary study involving 19 individuals with peanut allergies, researchers noted that those with higher peanut tolerance exhibited significantly higher levels of Lotia and considerably fewer bacteria in their saliva than those suffering from severe allergies. This indicates that the presence of these bacteria—both in the gut and oral cavity—may impact an individual’s anaphylaxis risk.

Lotia probiotics hold promise for reducing the severity of anaphylaxis during peanut allergies, according to Shamji. “There’s a significant need for such interventions,” he remarks, especially considering they could alleviate fears of accidental peanut exposure and minimize side effects during oral immunotherapy, which involves gradually introducing allergens to desensitize patients.

The research team aspires to eventually conduct a clinical trial, administering either Lotia probiotics or a placebo to participants with peanut allergies prior to their exposure to low doses of peanuts, as explained by Jimenez-Saiz.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Asthma Medications Can Safeguard Against Life-Threatening Allergic Reactions

Stephanie Eisenbarth and Adam Williams prepare peanuts for allergy research in their lab

Northwestern University

Research indicates that common asthma treatments may offer protection against anaphylaxis, a severe allergic reaction. The drug Zileuton, traditionally used for asthma, is now being considered for individuals facing serious food allergies.

Despite the prevalence of food allergies, it can be challenging to foresee the risk of anaphylaxis for an individual. Scientists are investigating why some individuals with positive food allergen tests do not show symptoms, while others have severe, potentially deadly reactions.

“Our aim is to discover methods to help individuals with symptomatic food allergies manage their reactions to allergens,” states Stephanie Eisenbarth from Northwestern University, Illinois.

Eisenbarth and her research team anticipated that mice exposed to peanuts would experience anaphylaxis. They administered a single oral dose of Zileuton to a group of 5-10 mice sensitized to peanut allergens approximately one hour prior to feeding them peanut extract. The control group did not receive any medication. Observations revealed that almost all Zileuton-treated mice showed no symptoms of anaphylaxis, whereas the control group exhibited clear signs of it.

Most dietary proteins are usually broken down, but some can be actively absorbed through the intestines and enter the bloodstream directly. In individuals with severe allergies, these proteins can trigger immune responses, leading to anaphylaxis.

During allergic reactions, the body releases chemicals known as leukotrienes. The researchers found that leukotrienes play a role in the number of intact proteins that penetrate the intestine. They also identified a gene called DPEP1 that is crucial in regulating leukotriene levels.

One significant action of Zileuton is inhibiting the enzyme five lipoxygenase, essential for leukotriene production. Administering this drug to mice lowered leukotriene levels, while DPEP1 also suppressed remaining leukotrienes, preventing allergen absorption and halting anaphylaxis in susceptible mice. A single dose of Zileuton cut the anaphylaxis rate by 95%.

“We can differentiate between mice that respond to food allergens and those that do not. We are now evaluating whether the same asthma medications can limit allergen absorption in the intestines of people with food allergies.”

Jorge Emiliano Gomez Medellin from the University of Chicago suggests that these straightforward tablets might significantly alleviate the consequences of accidental allergen exposure. He added that while Zileuton could potentially inhibit the absorption of food allergens, it won’t alter an individual’s underlying sensitivity over time.

“Nonetheless, Zileuton could be a valuable tool in combating food allergies,” he concludes.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Scratching an itch has been proven to promote allergic inflammation in research.

Itching is a dominant symptom of dermatitis (eczema), and scratch promotes skin inflammation, which deteriorates the disease. However, it is almost unknown whether scratching can make the spots and the lord benefit the mechanism that worsens inflammation. New research conducted in the mouse reveals the double nature of scratching. It can worsen skin inflammation, but can also increase immunity against bacterial infections at the site of injury.

Scratch is synergistic with the activation of FCεRI mast cells and promotes inflammation of allergic skin. Image credit: LIU et al。 , Doi: 10.1126/Science.adn9390.

Scratch is an attractive, typical, evolved behavioral reaction to the sensation of itching of the skin.

In many common skin diseases such as dermatitis, prolonged itching is a dominant symptom, indicating a substantial source of affection.

In response to itching, scratch is well -clinically recognized to worsen dermatitis, and some diseases are pathogenic.

However, itching is often a fun feeling and does not cause evasion behavior. This suggests that it can have some benefits to the host.

“Scratch is often fun. This suggests that this behavior must be a profit to evolve,” said Professor Daniel Kaplan of Pittsburgh University.

“Our research helps solve this paradox by providing evidence that scratches also provide bacterial defense against skin infections.”

How to use a new genetic modification mouse model to eliminate the function of neurons that senses itching, called non -peptide giku 2 (NP2), is in the relationship between scratches, injuries, and inflammation. We investigated whether it will affect.

They discovered that they revitalized neurons that sensed the pain that releasing a substance P (SP) when scratched.

However, scratch can worsen problems such as dermatitis, but reducing bacteria can help you to use immune protection. Staphylococcus aureusInfection.

Furthermore, the wound affects the microorganisms in the skin at the damaged site, and can prevent the imbalance of microorganisms, but chronic conditions such as atopic dermatitis complicate this.

The survey suggests that scratching functions as a pathological factor in inflammation and as an evolved mechanism to strengthen protection against infections.

“Discover that scratch improves defense Staphylococcus aureus It suggests that some context may be useful, “said Professor Kaplan.

“But if the itch is chronic, the damage caused by the skin will probably exceed this advantage.”

Survey results It will be displayed in the journal Science

______

Andrew W. Rue et al。 2025. Scratch promotes allergic inflammation and host defense through the activation of nerve gesturing mast cells. Science 387 (6733); DOI: 10.1126/Science.adn9390

Source: www.sci.news