OpenAI CEO Claims Meta is Luring Employees with $100 Million Signing Bonuses

The CEO of OpenAI asserts that Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has attempted to attract leading artificial intelligence experts by offering a staggering $100 million (£74 million) “crazy” signing bonus, intensifying the competition for talent in this rapidly expanding industry.

Sam Altman discussed this offer during a podcast on Tuesday. Meta has not confirmed the claims. OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, indicated there was no further comment beyond the CEO’s remarks.

“They started making these enormous offers to a lot of people on our team – a signature bonus of $100 million plus compensation,” Altman stated during a podcast hosted by his brother, Jack. “It’s unbelievable. I’m really pleased that none of our top talent has decided to accept it, at least for now.”

He remarked:

Recently, Meta initiated a $15 billion initiative aimed at developing computerized “superintelligence,” AI that can outperform humans in all domains. The company has acquired a significant stake in the startup Scale AI, valued at $29 billion and founded by 28-year-old programmer Alexandr Wang.

Last week, Silicon Valley venture capitalist Deedy Das, tweeted that “the competition for AI talent is absolutely absurd.” Das, principal at Menlo Ventures, noted that despite Meta offering a $2 million salary, he had lost AI candidates to competitors.

In another report from Aintopic, an AI firm backed by Amazon and Google and founded by an engineer who left Altman’s company, it was revealed that it is “poaching the top talent from its two main rivals, OpenAI and DeepMind.”

The race to recruit top developers is driven by rapid advancements in AI technology and the quest to achieve human-level AI capabilities, known as artificial general intelligence. A recent estimate from the Carlisle Group, cited by Bloomberg, forecasts spending on hardware to exceed $1.8 trillion by 2030 for computational power.

Some tech firms are acquiring entire companies to secure top talent, such as Meta’s Scale AI investments and Google’s $2.7 billion purchase of Calither.ai last year. He co-authored a 2017 research paper warning that is regarded as a significant contribution to the current wave of large-scale language model AI systems.

Meta began as a social media platform, while OpenAI was originally a nonprofit but transitioned to a for-profit model last year. The two entities now find themselves in competition. Altman expressed skepticism about Meta’s capability in advancing AI, stating, “I don’t believe they are a company that excels at innovation.”

He recalled Zuckerberg’s early assertions about developing social media features during Facebook’s inception, but noted that “it was evident that it wouldn’t resonate with Facebook users.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

“I perceive some similarities here,” Altman remarked.

Despite significant investments in the sector, Altman indicated that the outcomes “should lead to legitimate superintelligence rather than just incremental improvements. [and] It doesn’t have as profound an impact as we might expect.”

“You can achieve these remarkable feats with AI, yet still live your life much as you did two years ago,” he commented.

“I believe the next five to ten years could be pivotal for AI in terms of discovering new scientific advancements, which is a bold assertion, but I genuinely believe it to be true. [AI has accomplished].”

Source: www.theguardian.com

FTSE companies urge executives to increase pay and bonuses beyond £17m

TIt comes as pharmaceutical group AstraZeneca last month cemented chief executive Pascal Soriot’s place as the highest-paid FTSE 100 company leader by increasing his pay by £17m, up from £15.3m a year earlier. It was a shocking moment. This award brings the total amount earned since joining in 2012 to £137 million.

This angered corporate governance experts, but Mr. Soriot’s generous compensation was only a fraction of what he would take home at some of America’s largest companies. Sundar Pichai of Google’s parent company Alphabet is the highest-paid boss on the U.S.-based S&P 500 index, with a paycheck of $226 million in 2022.

This gap is being used to fuel concerns about London’s ability to attract and retain global talent and to strengthen demands in boardrooms to increase executive pay to compete with Wall Street-level salaries. There is.

There is growing concern in the city following a series of defections in recent years. Top executives went across the Atlantic to rival companies, and London-listed companies moved to U.S. stock exchanges. With more money and less shareholder oversight, companies have more control over compensation systems.

Salary comparison of listed companies

“Anecdotally, this competitiveness issue has been a topic of discussion for many years,” says Andrew, who speaks on behalf of pension fund managers and other large shareholders as head of industry body the Investment Association.・Ninian said. “But in reality, we are hearing more and more cases where companies are having a hard time finding the right talent and competing for talent.”

For example, medical device maker Smith & Nephew lost chief executive Namal Nawana in 18 months after a 2019 scandal over demands for high pay commensurate with his U.S. peers. The company reportedly considered moving to the US, where it would be easier to increase his £6m package, but scrapped the plan and Mr Nawana resigned.

Source: www.theguardian.com