Senate Approves NOAA Executives Linked to Sharpy Gate Scandal

On Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Neil Jacobs as the new director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

This appointment marks a pivotal moment for NOAA, which is focused on selecting a leader with extensive expertise in atmospheric sciences. The agency is tasked with weather forecasting and climate record management, areas of contention during the Trump administration.

Nevertheless, Jacobs’ involvement in the 2019 Sharpy Gate controversy has drawn criticism, suggesting he may have yielded to political pressures.

Sharpy Gate originated from President Trump’s erroneous claim that Hurricane Dorian threatened Alabama. Despite local forecasters from the National Weather Service in Birmingham stating the area was not at risk, Trump intensified his assertions and showcased a hurricane forecast altered with a Black Sharpie.

Following this, NOAA leadership reprimanded local weather officials, and Jacobs, who was serving as NOAA’s assistant secretary for environmental observation at the time, was caught in the controversy.

The National Academy of Administrative Affairs conducted an investigation and concluded that Jacobs breached NOAA’s ethical standards.

At his confirmation hearing in July, Jacobs stated that he would approach a similar situation differently today.

Jacobs received bipartisan support in a committee vote last month, with five Democrats joining Republicans in favor of his nomination.

On Tuesday, he was confirmed as part of a broader package that included a dozen ambassador nominations.

Under President Trump’s second term, NOAA has already seen significant changes, including the announcement of hundreds of job cuts followed by the rehiring of many positions.

Additionally, the Trump administration has proposed substantial budget cuts for the agency and has also moved to suspend its climate change report, a crucial component of NOAA’s duties.

During the confirmation hearing, Jacobs emphasized that staffing should be a priority, recognizing that human factors play a vital role alongside natural changes in climate.

The hearing occurred shortly after severe flooding in Texas, prompting Jacobs to highlight the importance of providing timely warnings during such weather emergencies.

“Modernizing our monitoring and warning distribution systems will be my top priority,” he declared.

Jacobs also advocated for the establishment of a Natural Disaster Review Committee, inspired by the National Transportation Safety Board.

“We need increased data collection and post-storm evaluations,” he said. “Understanding what went right and wrong and whether warnings reached the public is essential.”

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Three Ubisoft Executives Found Guilty of Fostering a Culture of Sexual Harassment

Three former executives from the video game company Ubisoft received suspended sentences during the first significant trial linked to the gaming industry’s #MeToo movement, which aimed to address a culture of sexual and psychological harassment in the workplace.

A court in Bobigny, located north of Paris, heard testimonies on how these executives exploited their authority to intimidate and sexually harass employees, creating an atmosphere that left women feeling objectified.

A former employee recounted how, between 2012 and 2020, the Montreuil office, situated east of Paris, was rife with a toxic environment marked by bullying and sexism, which some employees compared to “legal juvenile clubs.”

Ubisoft, a family-owned French enterprise, has grown into one of the largest video game developers worldwide. The company is known for hit franchises such as Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry, and Just Dance.


State prosecutor Antoine Haushalter stated in court that the gaming world and its subculture are characterized by “systematic” sexism and potential abuse, framing it as a “turning point” for the industry.

Thomas François, a former editorial vice president at Ubisoft, 52, was found guilty of sexual harassment, psychological harassment, and attempted sexual assault. He received a suspended prison sentence of three years and was fined 30,000 euros (£26,000).

The court heard allegations that he once restrained a female colleague with tape, pushed her in a chair into an elevator, and selected a random floor. He was also accused of compelling a woman to wear a skirt and perform a handstand.

She testified, “He was my boss, and I was scared of him. He forced me to do a headstand. I complied out of fear.”

Thomas François has been convicted of sexual harassment, psychological harassment, and attempted sexual assault. Photo: Xavier Galiana/AFP/Getty

At a 2015 office Christmas party themed after Back to the Future, François allegedly approached a female staff member, expressing his admiration for 1950s attire, before attempting to kiss her while her coworkers held her back. She managed to scream and break free.

François defended himself in court by describing the workplace as one filled with a “culture of jokes,” insisting, “I never intended to hurt anyone.”

Serge Hascoët, 59, a former Chief Creative Officer and Deputy Commander at Ubisoft, was convicted of psychological harassment and complicity, although he was acquitted of charges related to sexual harassment. He received an 18-month suspended sentence and a fine of 45,000 euros.

Skip past newsletter promotions

During the trial, it was disclosed that Hascoët had handed young female employees a tissue used for blowing his nose, remarking, “You can sell it; it’s worth a fortune at Ubisoft.” Witnesses also recounted instances of him bullying his assistant, demanding personal tasks like waiting at his house for package deliveries.

Hascoët asserted in court that he was unaware of any harassment occurring.

Hascoët’s attorney, Jean Guillaume Le Mintier, announced that his client is contemplating an appeal.

Guillaume Patrux, 41, a former game director at Ubisoft, was found guilty of psychological harassment, receiving a 12-month suspension and a fine of 10,000 euros.

The court was informed that he had physically assaulted walls, struck staff, cracked a whip close to a colleague’s face, threatened to fire an employee, and played with a lighter near another worker’s face while offering a man’s beard. He denied the allegations.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Boeing executives stay mum following Starliner spacecraft’s return

summary

  • Boeing executives have made few public comments about the company’s Starliner spacecraft in the past six weeks.
  • The capsule returned to Earth without any crew on Saturday, ending a trouble-plagued test flight.
  • Boeing representatives did not attend a scheduled post-landing briefing.

Just over an hour after Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft returned empty to Earth, NASA held its regular post-landing briefing to discuss the conclusion of the eventful test flight.

Conspicuous by the absence of any Boeing representatives at the event early Saturday morning.

In fact, the last time Boeing representatives attended a press conference about the Starliner program was in late July, when the capsule was experiencing hardware issues that caused it to stay a few weeks longer than planned at the International Space Station, and questions were swirling about whether the two NASA astronauts who had been sent into orbit aboard the Boeing-built spacecraft would be able to return home safely.

NASA officials say they are working closely with Boeing, but the company’s absence from the event and limited public statements have raised questions about its commitment to transparency and the future of the Starliner program.

Boeing did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the change in the company’s name recognition.

Ahead of a post-landing news conference held last week at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, NASA’s public advisory included the names of two Boeing executives who will be participating.

Eric Berger, a senior editor at Ars Technica, was there. Written About X Shortly before the press conference began, two chairs were removed from the podium, in what appeared to be a last-minute change in configuration.

Joel Montalbano, NASA’s associate administrator for Space Operations Mission Directorate, Asked about Boeing’s absence During the briefing

“We spoke to Boeing prior to this, and they gave NASA the concession to represent them on this mission,” he said.

A few days later, in response to a question from NBC News, a NASA spokesperson referred Montalbano to his response at the press conference.

Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager for Boeing’s commercial crew programs, instead attended the briefing. A statement on the company’s website.

“I commend the Starliner team for their hard work in ensuring a successful and safe undocking, deorbit, re-entry, and landing,” he wrote. “We will review the data and determine next steps for the program.”

Boeing said the capsule would be transported to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where engineers would analyze the flight data. No other details about the spacecraft’s status were released.

Starliner launched astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station in early June. The capsule’s first manned test flight was scheduled to last about eight days. However, a helium leak from the spacecraft’s propulsion system and a thruster failure while docking with the space station kept Starliner and its crew in space for months.

NASA held several media briefings over the summer to provide updates on the ongoing investigation into the thruster issue and how its findings might affect the remainder of the flight. Initially, NASA and Boeing officials attended the briefings jointly, but no Boeing representatives were present at the August press conference.

That month, NASA was considering how and when to return Wilmore and Williams safely. Asked why Boeing was absent from most of the briefings in August, NASA officials said the updates were for NASA consideration and therefore no company representatives were included.

On August 24, NASA announced it would ask SpaceX to return the astronauts and fly Boeing’s Starliner back to Earth without a crew member. The pair will stay on the space station until February, after which they will return with the next ISS crew.

in X Statement In response to NASA’s decision, Boeing wrote: “Our focus remains first and foremost on the safety of our crew and spacecraft. We are conducting the mission in accordance with NASA’s decision and are preparing the spacecraft for a safe and successful uncrewed return.”

The Starliner spacecraft ultimately returned safely to Earth, landing at White Sands Spaceport in New Mexico just after midnight on Saturday.

The manned test flight was intended to demonstrate that Boeing could reliably transport astronauts to the space station and pave the way for NASA to approve regular flights to the orbital laboratory.

Boeing developed the Starliner spacecraft under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, an effort launched in 2011 to support privately built spacecraft to fill the gap left by NASA’s retired space shuttle fleet.

Even before its latest flight, the Starliner program was more than $1.5 billion over budget and years behind schedule: In 2019, an uncrewed test flight to the space station was canceled due to technical issues, forcing the company to wait until 2022 to try again.

Rival company SpaceX is developing its Crew Dragon spacecraft as part of the same program, with regular flights to the space station beginning in 2020. NASA has said it wants two private companies to certify such flights so it has redundant options for reaching low Earth orbit.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

FTSE companies urge executives to increase pay and bonuses beyond £17m

TIt comes as pharmaceutical group AstraZeneca last month cemented chief executive Pascal Soriot’s place as the highest-paid FTSE 100 company leader by increasing his pay by £17m, up from £15.3m a year earlier. It was a shocking moment. This award brings the total amount earned since joining in 2012 to £137 million.

This angered corporate governance experts, but Mr. Soriot’s generous compensation was only a fraction of what he would take home at some of America’s largest companies. Sundar Pichai of Google’s parent company Alphabet is the highest-paid boss on the U.S.-based S&P 500 index, with a paycheck of $226 million in 2022.

This gap is being used to fuel concerns about London’s ability to attract and retain global talent and to strengthen demands in boardrooms to increase executive pay to compete with Wall Street-level salaries. There is.

There is growing concern in the city following a series of defections in recent years. Top executives went across the Atlantic to rival companies, and London-listed companies moved to U.S. stock exchanges. With more money and less shareholder oversight, companies have more control over compensation systems.

Salary comparison of listed companies

“Anecdotally, this competitiveness issue has been a topic of discussion for many years,” says Andrew, who speaks on behalf of pension fund managers and other large shareholders as head of industry body the Investment Association.・Ninian said. “But in reality, we are hearing more and more cases where companies are having a hard time finding the right talent and competing for talent.”

For example, medical device maker Smith & Nephew lost chief executive Namal Nawana in 18 months after a 2019 scandal over demands for high pay commensurate with his U.S. peers. The company reportedly considered moving to the US, where it would be easier to increase his £6m package, but scrapped the plan and Mr Nawana resigned.

Source: www.theguardian.com