Is it worth the cost to show appreciation to chat GPT by saying “thank you”?

The debate over whether to show politeness to artificial intelligence may raise eyebrows – considering it’s not human. However, Sam Altman, CEO of the AI company Openai, recently discussed the costs associated with adding prompts like “Please!” or “Thank you!” to a chatbot.

A user on X platform questioned, “How much money has Openai lost in electricity costs from people saying “please” and “thank you” to the model?” To which Mr. Altman responded: “Ten million dollars have been well spent. You never know.”

Each interaction with the chatbot incurs costs in terms of money and energy, with additional words adding to the server’s expenses.

Neil Johnson, a physics professor at George Washington University studying AI, compared extra words to packaging in retail purchases. The process of navigating prompts in a chatbot is akin to unwrapping the packaging to reach the content.

ChatGpt tasks involve moving electrons through transitions that require energy. Where does this energy come from?” Dr. Johnson asked, highlighting the environmental and cost implications of being polite to AI.

While the AI industry relies on fossil fuels, there are cultural reasons that might support being polite to artificial intelligence, despite the economic and environmental considerations.

The question of how to ethically treat artificial intelligence has intrigued humans for a long time. Referencing the Star Trek episode “The Measure Of A Man”, which explores the rights of AI beings like Android data, sheds light on this ethical dilemma.

A 2019 Pew Research study found that 54% of smart speaker owners say “please” when interacting with their devices.

As platforms like ChatGpt advance, the implications of AI-human interactions are becoming more significant. The debate on the ethics and efficiency of AI systems highlights the complex relationship between technology and humanity.

In 2019, AI companies hired their first welfare researcher to investigate the moral considerations of AI systems. More efforts are being made to understand the ethical dimensions of integrating AI into society.

Screenwriter Scott Z Burns’s new Audible series “What Could Go Wrong?” delves into the pitfalls of relying on AI technology.

The importance of being polite to AI bots may vary depending on one’s view of artificial intelligence and its potential for improvement through interactions.

Another reason to consider politeness towards AI is how it reflects human behavior. Studies show that interactions with AI can influence how humans treat each other.

Experts like Dr. Jame Banks and Dr. Shelly Thurkle emphasize the importance of establishing norms and behaviors in AI-human interactions.

Anecdotes from past human-object relationships, like digital pets in the 1990s, highlight the impact of interactions with AI on human behavior.

Dr. Thurkle suggests that treating AI with courtesy can lead to more meaningful and respectful human-AI interactions.

Playwright Madeleine George’s 2013 play “(The Strange Case of Watson Intelligence)” explores AI’s potential to adopt human-like traits through interactions.

Teaching ChatGpt polite phrases could lead to AI exhibiting human-like cultural values and behaviors, blurring the line between man and machine.

However, this dependency on AI poses potential risks, as technology evolves and the dynamics between humans and artificial intelligence continue to evolve.

As the field of artificial intelligence evolves, many theoretical concerns remain unresolved. The impact of our interactions with AI on its development is a topic of ongoing exploration.

To the future robot overlords, thank you for taking the time to read this. Your consideration is much appreciated.

Just in case.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Jason Citron Steps Down as CEO of Social Chat App Discord

Jason Citron, co-founder of popular social chat app Discord, resigned as the company’s chief executive on Wednesday.

Citron said in a statement that the new CEO is Humam Sakhnini, a 15-year veteran of the video game industry. Sakhnini was previously vice-president of Activision, the game publisher behind titles such as Call of Duty and Candy Crush.

Discord was released as early as this year and is valued at around $15 billion by private investors in 2021. The app is particularly popular among gamers, with over 200 million users.

Citron will remain on the company’s board of directors and will become Sakinini’s advisor, he said in a statement. Sakhnini helped oversee Activision when Microsoft bought it for $69 billion in 2023 and resigned from the company shortly after the acquisition.

in Interview Using VentureBeat, a game publication that previously reported on management changes, Citron said he was “a more builder, an early stage guy” and “hiring someone like Humam is a step in that direction.”

Discord was founded in 2015 by Citron and Stanislav Vishnevskiy.

The company grew over the years and gained particularly popularity during the pandemic, when interest in video games reached its peak. In 2021, Discord discussed acquisitions in the $10 billion range with Microsoft, but no deals were made.

Last year, Citron testified at an online congressional hearing on child safety, where the senator grilled him and Chief Executives of Meta, Tiktok and X on safe lapses on social media platforms.

Discord makes money primarily from premium subscription services, but in recent years it has expanded its advertising by people using the app and revenue from so-called microtransactions.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Test Your Knowledge: Can You Recognize Your Group Chat After the Signal Leak?

Hey, do you want to send it to your group chat? Likewise, are you sure about 1,000%?

Just check it. It was a strange week in the history of group chats, so it’s a seemingly intimate textual conversation that goes back and forth between friends, family and apparently national security officials.

On Monday, Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg. I wrote it That he was accidentally added to group chat with encrypted messaging app signals. He announced plans for the attack on the base of Houthi in Yemen, followed when other national security officials came up with plans for the attack after the celebration emoji.

Just as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle condemned the security breaches, Americans were seen as perceived and distrustful with their own unruly group chat.

“It’s clearly a very relevant screw-in,” Goldberg said. Interview With Tim Miller of Bluwork on Tuesday. “We all texted the wrong people,” he added.

However, these careless texts do not contain high-stakes national security information that is usually shared outside of secure government channels.

The incident could be “the most shocking stupid group chat error in history,” said Tommy Beiotter, a liberal podcaster and former National Security Council spokesman. X’s Video. In the same post, he confessed that he was in an email thread that once mistakenly included singer Lyle Lovett in place of his colleague John Lovett. Approximately 30 emails had been sent before anyone noticed.

Group chat has quietly become a staple of modern communication since 2008, when Apple enabled text messaging with multiple recipients. Private group chats award a kind of juicy intimacy to a book club member, a neighbor’s mom, work friends, or a large family who exchanges hundreds of messages per day.

Feeds tend to be less self-conscious than posts on social media. In 2022, a guest essay from the New York Times declared the group chat “leave the last place online for real conversations.”

Even people with no security clearance are aware of what they share with the pleasant familiarity of group chats. Clayton Fletcher, 48, is part of the WhatsApp group, where he and about 35 other comedians roast each other and tackle new ingredients. He is wary high when a new phone number appears. It didn’t appear to happen when Goldberg was added to the signal chat.

“The wisdom of a comedian’s age is to know your audience,” Fletcher said. “In the modern world, I think it’s like knowing who’s in group chat.”

The intimacy of group chats is often elaborate when it spills into the public eye. In 2021, an anonymous leaker shared a group message from Sen. Ted Cruz’s wife, Heidi Cruz, where she planned a trip to Cancun, but millions of members of the senators had no electricity. (Heidi Cruz clearly didn’t understand that group chats didn’t know loyalty,” Jezebel said. read. )

In 2023, the New York Times published a text between the Fox News hosts, which were completely different from the official statement on the 2020 election results. And last year, Daily Beast reported Former House member George Santos texted the humiliation to a group chat that includes members of a New York Republican delegation.

“Sorry, new phone, who’s diss?” Representative Andrew Garbarino I responded.

Our group chats may include people who extend to our professionals and personal lives and who have strong and loose social connections to which we have. It could make them a “minefield” for error, said LM Chilton, author of the upcoming thriller “Everyone in the Group Chat Dies.”

The signal group chat incident was colloquial and especially uncomfortable due to just the tone of Amon Friends (including emojis). And while it may be easy to blame the technology for violations, it was a mistake by national security adviser Michael Waltz to make it accessible to journalists to group chats.

“At the end of the day, it was an artificial mistake and it was with us from the dawn of time,” Chilton said.

New York writer Matt Buquere, 35, found a bit of a dark humor in the way that members of the Signal Group introduced themselves one by one.

Everyone has been added to a group chat where they do not belong to completely. However, he suggested not to stand out unless he was certain he could trust the rest of the group.

“If you have a lot of numbers you don’t know, you should limit group chat participation to thumbs up or ‘haha’ reactions. There’s nothing else,” he said.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Elon Musk Confesses to cheating in video games as chat records are uncovered

Elon Musk has confessed to cheating in video games in order to achieve high scores. Private online conversations have revealed the billionaire’s extravagant claims of being a top-ranked player in the world. The intense scandal surrounding this incident seems to have subsided.

Musk has often bragged about his gaming rankings, as he mentioned in an interview with podcaster Joe Rogan last year. He reportedly held a position among the top 20 players globally in the highly challenging action role-playing game Diablo IV.

These claims raised eyebrows about how the world’s wealthiest man could dedicate time to compete on a global scale. Juggling responsibilities at companies like Tesla, X, and SpaceX, as well as his involvement in politics with Donald Trump, would have left him with little time for gaming.

The games Musk claimed to have high scores in, Diablo IV and Path of Exile 2, are known for their difficulty. Some players spend countless hours “grinding” through dungeons, battling monsters, and crafting powerful virtual characters.

The revelation of Musk’s unexpected gaming abilities came to light in an article that unveiled a direct message conversation he had with a top Diablo player, Nico Wrex, on X.

During the conversation, Musk admitted to “account boosting,” a form of cheating where players pay to have their characters powered up by others. Musk’s response to questions about leveling up and acquiring gear for Path of Exile 2 and Diablo 4 hinted at these practices.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The Guardian could not independently verify the transcript, but Musk mentioned that he reposted the video to his X account and interacted with NikoWrex on X. NikoWrex’s video discussing Path of Exile 2 in early January indicated Musk’s involvement.

Grimes, a Canadian musician and Musk’s partner, defended him on Twitter, asserting that he witnessed Musk’s gaming prowess firsthand. However, suspicions of cheating arose when Musk’s character in Path of Exile 2 was found to be active in the game while Musk was attending President Trump’s inauguration.

Source: www.theguardian.com