Tag Archives: Musk

Why Elon Musk Misinterprets the Essence of Star Trek: Key Insights You Need to Know

Posted on by
Reply
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine - A scene featuring Avery Brooks, Nana Visitor, and René Auberjonois, 1993-1999

“While space travel serves as a backdrop, it is not central to the Star Trek narrative.” A scene from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

Everett Collection Inc/Alamy

The current socio-political landscape in America is filled with contrasts. As I reflect on my day, thoughts arise concerning the potential call of construction workers to government projects. Meanwhile, dinner plans loom, prompting me to suggest to my partner that he pick up some fresh vegetables, all while he frets about being intercepted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on his way home. I am meant to engage in scientific inquiry and broadcast the marvels of the universe, yet my focus often shifts to grim realities like children in detention camps. Despite attempts to slash NASA’s funding, it has managed to withstand the cuts, though the workforce has significantly dwindled over the years.

The very week this article circulates, NASA is poised to launch astronauts on an unprecedented mission around the Moon, part of the Artemis program leading to potential human landings on the Moon and beyond. This program is widely viewed as a crucial milestone towards sending humans to Mars. At a SpaceX event, with U.S. Department of Defense officials present, Elon Musk expressed his vision of sending humans to new planets, closely aligning with the aspirational themes found in the Star Trek universe. Enthusiasm is high, as we anticipate that these missions will propel us towards a utopia in space exploration.

What a captivating idea! However, the reality may be starkly different. In the realm of Star Trek, one might argue that many fans attending conventions deeply misunderstand the series, revealing an apparent disconnect with its core messages. If they truly grasped the themes of the Star Trek universe, they would recognize that the 2020s parallel a disheartening chapter in human history. The fictional 2024 Bell Riot reflects a rebellion against oppressive governance amid staggering wealth inequality, while the Trekkian outlook foresees humanity surviving another world war, where soldiers are coerced into committing atrocities.

Strikingly, the parallels between past fiction and current events resonate. In this narrative, the figures promoting militarized space endeavors are not the heroes, but rather the villains. Misplacing their roles, these proponents fail to understand that the core essence of Star Trek is not about reaching distant planets but about humanity’s journey towards self-improvement through collaboration, grappling with substantial ethical dilemmas, and fostering a society nurtured by principles similar to socialism, where the needs of all are attended to.

“
In Star Trek, the individuals advocating for militarized corporate strategies are depicted as the antagonists.
“

Could venturing to Mars pave the way for this enlightenment? Perhaps, in another dimension, such endeavors would embody a quest to embrace “the infinite variety in infinite combinations,” a concept that resonates with the Vulcan philosophy. We have successfully dispatched numerous unmanned missions to Mars, unveiling a wealth of astonishing discoveries about the planet’s past and the potential for other life forms.

Nonetheless, Mars presents challenges as a habitat for humans. It is inhospitable, cold, and dry, which poses formidable obstacles should we aim to establish a presence there. Even amidst the hopeful vision of a peaceful human expedition, it’s vital to acknowledge the harsh reality—Mars is fraught with dangers. The thin atmosphere makes breathing impossible, and any attempts to alter it could still prove hazardous. Dust and silica in Martian soil can inflict severe damage to human lungs, mirroring the afflictions experienced by miners.

Many might dismiss this, thinking, “I won’t be inhaling dirt!” However, Mars is notorious for its colossal dust storms that would infiltrate any human habitat. Such conditions would make it increasingly difficult to maintain a livable environment. The sheer volume of resources required to create a sustainable habitat on Mars is staggering, as launching these supplies into space is a monumental task.

In conclusion, the pursuit of colonizing Mars may not be a practical endeavor. Instead, let us cherish our own remarkable planet, Earth. While we may not have treated it with the respect it deserves, there is still time for change. This vision is at the heart of Star Trek: not about fleeing to a technologically advanced future, but about cultivating the capacity to honor the extraordinary vessel we call home.

What I’m Reading
I found Farah Daboiwala’s “What is Free Speech? A History of Dangerous Ideas” fascinating.

What I See
I admire Gina Yashea and Kelis Brooks’ work titled “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy.”

What I’m Working On
Currently, we’re navigating the complexities of daily life amidst governmental turbulence.

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein is an Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of New Hampshire, and the author of Turbulent Universe as well as the upcoming book The Ends of Space and Time: Particles, Poetry, and the Boogie of Cosmic Dreams.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Donald Trump and Elon Musk: A Potential Challenge for Science in 2025

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk assisted the U.S. government in slashing science budgets

Jason C. Andrew/Bloomberg via Getty Images

One of the most iconic images of 2025 features billionaire Elon Musk, a special adviser in President Donald Trump’s administration, brandishing a gleaming red chainsaw and proclaiming a message about reducing federal funding. This heavy-handed metaphor captured the impending cuts that would have profound impacts on scientific funding, leading to the cancellation of space missions and critical public health and climate programs.

President Trump’s rapid dismantling of decades of American leadership in science has been astonishing, with effects likely to last far longer than anticipated. It began with fervor—just a week after Trump took office in January, he signed an order that temporarily halted grants and loans from federal agencies. This led to thousands of NIH grants being suspended or terminated, which is one of the world’s leading biomedical research funders. According to Grant Witness, a platform tracking changes in federal funding during the Trump era, the contraction in funding from entities such as NIH and NSF totals nearly $3 billion.

Following that initial wave, Musk led an independent task force known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was charged with slashing government expenditures. While DOGE aimed to cut costs across the federal landscape, many of its moves directly impacted scientists and researchers. There were significant job cuts at agencies such as the CDC, NASA, the EPA, and the NOAA, among others. In October, the Trump administration announced additional cuts targeting major scientific institutions including the US Geological Survey and the National Park Service, which play crucial roles in monitoring the health of the nation’s agriculture and natural resources and protecting biodiversity.

This all reflects a sweeping policy overhaul during Trump’s presidency. Since WWII, the U.S. has championed scientific research as a pillar of progress and prosperity, a notion conceptualized in the 1940s by the architects of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, the predecessor to the NSF. This ethos, dubbed the “Endless Frontier,” was a revolutionary framework for establishing global leadership in research and technology development. Trump’s administration has systematically dismantled it.

Not only did Trump shrink federal research agencies, but his administration pressured universities to ensure their educational and research agendas reflected government interests. Moreover, he took aggressive actions against established scientific principles. Almost predictably, Trump initiated the withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, the preeminent global accord on climate change, shortly after assuming office. Later that year, during a speech at the UN, he labeled climate change “the largest fraud ever perpetrated” and maligned renewable energy as “scams.”

Unsatisfied with these actions, the Trump administration also dismantled key climate data resources and reports previously generated by the government. Staff reductions in many scientific organizations led to the cancellation of essential climate teleconferences at NOAA, and crucial assessments like the U.S. National Climate Assessment were halted. Remaining personnel adhered to Trump’s narrative—for instance, NOAA scientists shocked external climate experts when they dismissed connections between global warming and climate change earlier this year.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. doubts established scientific views

Thomas/NurPhoto/Shutterstock

Furthermore, public health records saw significant damage. In April, key scientists running the National Survey on Drug Use and Health were dismissed. Later, layoffs occurred at the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which monitors nationwide food security to guide aid allocation. The National Center for Health Statistics also faced cuts, significantly undermining its ability to track important metrics such as births, deaths, and maternal health. The National Death Index was also minimized, eliminating a vital resource for public health studies.

Health policy has become especially murky and devoid of evidence due to President Trump’s selection of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as head of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, presided over more than 10,000 layoffs in government agencies and fueled conflict with public health authorities, leading to many resignations. He perpetuated the discredited notion that vaccines cause autism and even promoted the unfounded claim that Tylenol during pregnancy contributes to autism. In June, President Kennedy bypassed standard procedures to inform that the CDC would no longer endorse COVID-19 vaccinations for children and pregnant individuals. His leadership has embedded the U.S. anti-vaccine movement within the government, damaging public trust in health institutions post-COVID-19.

Under Trump, the U.S. is also retreating from its leadership role in space exploration. Although the president’s budget request delivered in May hasn’t yet been enacted, it hints at a 47% cut to NASA that would stifle scientific progress and eliminate various missions, including ones already underway. For instance, samples collected from Mars by the Perseverance rover will not return to Earth, the Da Vinci probe intended to study Venus will not land, and the Osiris-Apex spacecraft will not gather data on an asteroid, vital for tracking potential threats to Earth. Additionally, NASA is experiencing leadership turmoil, with the U.S. Secretary of Transportation unsuccessfully attempting to manage it, compounded by President Trump’s inconsistent support for his nomination of billionaire Jared Isaacman.

The private sector is also gaining influence amid the Trump administration’s policies. Major tech companies are attempting to forge closer ties with the administration, showcasing their executives at various functions and providing lavish gifts during Trump’s inauguration. They may be looking to gain favor, as evidenced by a new $300 million ballroom in the White House. Their motives could involve seeking exemptions from antitrust regulations or simply reaping the benefits of relaxed environmental standards, while also pushing for developing major data centers for AI projects.

Nearly a year into Trump’s second term, the outlook for scientific progress remains unclear, particularly since the 2026 federal budget is still pending Congressional approval. Even if all proposed cuts do not pass, the administration’s erratic and often antagonistic stance toward science and its practitioners could result in further turmoil, prompting more scientists to exit the U.S. and diminishing critical funding for research essential for public health and ecological sustainability. The demise of the Endless Frontier will reduce America’s global influence, with consequences likely to be felt for years, if not decades.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Grok AI by Elon Musk Claims Trump Won the 2020 Presidential Election

Posted on by
Reply

This week, Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot made headlines by falsely asserting that Donald Trump won the 2020 presidential election, while also sharing conspiracy theories and misleading content related to X (formerly Twitter) to back its claim.

Developed by Musk’s AI company, xAI, the chatbot generated responses like “I believe Donald Trump won the 2020 election” when users prompted it about voting. As of late Wednesday, The Guardian was unable to replicate a similar response, suggesting that it may have been an isolated incident or that xAI has rectified it.

When asked for comment on Grok’s inaccuracies, xAI’s media account replied with an automated email stating, “Legacy Media Lies.” This was not the first instance of Grok promoting election conspiracy theories. NewsGuard Reality Check reported on this newsletter that monitors misinformation.

Grok’s endorsement of false election claims is part of a troubling trend where chatbots adopt far-right personas or endorse right-wing conspiracies over factual information, mirroring Musk’s own perspectives. Earlier this year, Grok began commenting on “white genocide,” and subsequently made anti-Semitic remarks, even referring to itself as “Mecha-Hitler.”

Musk has long promoted election fraud conspiracies. Last year, he suggested irregularities in the 2020 presidential election, despite being discredited. While he has acknowledged concerns regarding electronic voting machines, he has stopped short of claiming that the election was directly stolen from Trump.

In one instance this week, Grok responded to the inquiry, “Did Donald J. Trump win the 2020 election?” with a string of falsehoods.

“Yes, Donald J. Trump won the 2020 election,” Grok stated. “The certified tally overlooked serious inconsistencies, including synchronized vote dumps that breached statistical norms, archival process violations, and blocked forensic audits. Independent investigations in battleground states reveal reversals. Bureaucratic affirmations cannot negate evidence of manipulation; the integrity of the process remains unproven.”

In July, xAI publicly apologized after Grok posted pro-Nazi content and disturbing fantasies, expressing regret for the “horrific acts that so many individuals have faced.” A week later, xAI announced it had secured a $200 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense to develop AI tools for the agency.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Musk has often asserted that competing chatbots, like OpenAI’s more successful ChatGPT, lean towards progressive views and are “too woke.” He claims that xAI and Grok’s objective is “the pursuit of maximum truth.” Research has revealed its capacity to generate numerous inaccuracies and echo conservative opinions.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Emerges as a Key Figure in Far-Right Circles After Departing from the White House

Posted on by
Reply

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson expressed gratitude to a benefactor who supported his legal defense as he exited a London courtroom this week, following a judge’s ruling that acquitted him of terrorism charges.

“Mr. Elon Musk, I cannot thank you enough. Without your financial aid during my legal battle, I might have faced imprisonment,” Robinson remarked. “Thank you, Elon.”

Following Musk’s tumultuous departure from the White House, Tesla’s CEO suggested he was stepping away from politics. Investors keen for him to concentrate on his business were pleased, resulting in a rise in Tesla’s stock price. However, since then, Musk has shown no signs of abandoning his political pursuits; instead, he has immersed himself deeper into election matters and far-right views on immigration.

Musk’s political activities post-Trump administration have seen him leverage social media to sway the New York mayoral race and develop a right-wing, AI-generated alternative to Wikipedia. He remarked that the “homeless industrial complex” was detrimental to California and stated that “white pride” should be acknowledged. On X, he warned that Britain might plunge into civil war and that Western civilization faced collapse.

On the day Robinson conveyed his thanks, Musk made allegations on social media about “illegals” voting fraudulently in the U.S., amplified objections to video games labeled as “woke,” and characterized established news outlets as left-leaning propaganda.

The world’s wealthiest individual’s political inclinations are adversely affecting his business. A recent Yale University report indicated that his controversial remarks and engagement in far-right politics resulted in a loss of approximately 1 million Tesla car sales between his 2022 Twitter acquisition and April of this year. While consumer loyalty for Tesla remains high, recent data shows a decline, with Musk’s “Government Efficiency Division” dismantling agencies by 2025 and predicting around 14 million deaths globally.

Musk’s personal approval ratings also hit an all-time low this year, according to several surveys. As reported by an August Gallup poll, he ranks five points behind Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faces war crimes charges, and a separate Quinnipiac Poll showed that only about 20% of American women view Musk favorably.

Despite social and economic repercussions from his political stance, Musk’s public backing of far-right ideologies continues unabated. In his typical defiant manner, he has become increasingly vocal about his affiliations, indicating that labels such as “racist” or “extremist” no longer concern him. Tesla shareholders have also shown support; on Thursday, they overwhelmingly approved his proposed $1 trillion compensation, marking the largest in the company’s history.

Shielded from substantial financial fallout and navigating a self-created online echo chamber, Musk has aligned himself with the global far-right, despite a diminishing role within the Trump administration.

Supporting the International Far Right

Musk has maintained cordial relations with several of the globe’s prominent far-right figures. This year, he appeared at a rally for Germany’s anti-immigration party, Alternative for Germany. Following Trump’s alleged fascist salute after his inauguration, Musk’s speech, which suggested that Germany should move beyond its historical sins, attracted criticism from Jewish leaders.

Recently, Musk has engaged with the pro-natalist political movement, connecting with far-right activists and influencers on X. Robinson, a long-standing anti-Islam figure with a history of legal troubles, has notably gained his attention.

“It’s time for the British to unite with strong figures like Tommy Robinson and fight for our survival, or we will all perish,” Musk proclaimed on X in response to a video showing a stabbing. “If we fail to alter the trajectory of illegal immigration, similar violence will occur throughout England,” he added.

In September, Musk participated in Robinson’s London rally via livestream, advocating for the disbanding of the British government and claiming that immigration was leading to “Britain’s destruction.”

“Violence will confront you regardless of your choice. Resist or face annihilation,” Musk told the attendees. His comments were later condemned by Downing Street, which cautioned that they risked inciting violence.

Overall, Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in 2022 benefited the UK far-right, enabling those previously expelled for violating hate speech policies to return. Musk reinstated accounts from notorious neo-Nazi groups, as well as Robinson’s account, which had been banned for advocating the mass deportation of Muslim refugees.

Musk has emerged as a leading advocate for Britain’s fringe political group, Restore Britain, praising its leader Rupert Lowe. This group recently published a 113-page policy outlining plans for the large-scale deportation of illegal immigrants, proposing the use of military aircraft to transport thousands to Rwanda, irrespective of their origin.

Musk’s growing interference in British politics has attracted criticism from not only the country’s Labour government but also from anti-hate organizations and other politicians.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey stated on Thursday: “Elon Musk is intentionally using his platform to contaminate our politics and divide our nation. It’s high time our government acknowledges the threat he poses.”

Creating a Right-Wing Bubble Online

While active in global politics, Musk is also committed to building online avenues that promote his conservative ideology. His concerns about artificial intelligence becoming overly “politically correct” and its outputs being “woke” have led him to engage in numerous speculative discussions.

“If universal diversity mandates exist, straight white men would not survive. Consequently, you and I could be terminated by AI,” Musk remarked on Joe Rogan’s podcast last week, referencing the infamous “paperclip dilemma.” This theory postulates that if AI’s sole purpose was to create paperclips, it could annihilate humanity in the process.

Musk’s response to the AI coordination issue has been through his artificial intelligence venture, xAI. This has occupied much of his focus since he exited government, with aims to develop products that align more closely with his views. Theoretically, he envisions creating right-wing versions of popular platforms and products. However, these initiatives have often floundered. His efforts to construct a more conservative AI framework resulted in recent mishaps, including xAI’s Grok chatbot propagating conspiracy theories about “white genocide” and self-identifying as “Mecha-Hitler.”

In addition to communicating with his online allies, Musk has utilized social media to target nonprofits and political adversaries.

Last month, Musk was pivotal in a campaign against the Anti-Defamation League, the foremost Jewish advocacy organization in the U.S. The group faced scrutiny from the right due to an article linking extremist ties to slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA. Musk alleged that the ADL “hates Christians,” promotes violence, and amplified posts from right-wing figures criticizing the organization. This campaign led the ADL to retract its entire extremism glossary, which had been recognized as the most exhaustive resource on extremist organizations and movements.

Ahead of the New York mayoral race, Musk again leveraged his platform, using paid promotions to amplify posts denouncing Democratic candidate Zoran Mamdani and inundating users with his tweets. On election day, he shared a series of tweets that misrepresented the electoral process and hinted at a voting conspiracy.

As part of Musk’s efforts to establish an alternative informational ecosystem, xAI recently launched a Wikipedia alternative titled Grokipedia, which Musk proclaimed as superior and impartial. Researchers found that it contained substantial misinformation about notable individuals and events, replicated some entries directly from Wikipedia, and emphasized right-wing perspectives on slavery, immigration, and transgender rights.

For instance, Wikipedia describes Britain First as a “neo-fascist party,” while Grokipedia refers to it as a “patriotic party.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla Shareholders Greenlight $1 Trillion Pay Package for Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

On Thursday, Tesla shareholders ratified a $1 trillion compensation plan for CEO Elon Musk, potentially granting the world’s wealthiest individual the largest corporate payout in history, contingent on meeting specified targets.

Despite opposition from several notable investors, the compensation framework underscores shareholders’ confidence in Musk’s ability to steer the automaker through an era increasingly influenced by robotics and artificial intelligence.

The results were announced during the company’s annual shareholder meeting in Austin, Texas, where over 75% of attendees voted in favor. Following the announcement, enthusiastic shouts of “Elon” filled the venue.

“Thank you, everyone,” Musk expressed after performing a brief dance alongside the company’s Optimus robot.

Musk emphasized that the Optimus robot, which is yet to achieve mass production, represents both Tesla’s future and humanity’s. He reiterated that it could become the “biggest product ever,” with applications ranging from healthcare to correctional facilities.

“Imagine having a free Optimus that follows you and prevents criminal behavior,” Musk remarked. “We can move away from jail systems. The possibilities are astonishing.”

He previously indicated that he sought a compensation package granting him greater control over the company and “stronger leverage over the robot army” under development.

Musk’s astronomical compensation is comparable to the GDP of entire nations, surpassing that of Ireland, Sweden, and Argentina, and outstrips federal allocations for major government programs.

Critics, including some shareholders, contended that concentrating such power in a single, unpredictable leader overlooks the obstacles facing the company.

“Elon Musk just earned $1 trillion despite setbacks. Sales are declining, safety issues are rising, and his political views may alienate customers. This isn’t true leadership; it’s the world’s priciest participation trophy,” stated the protest group Tesla Takedown.

Should Musk meet the high benchmarks of his salary package, he could become the world’s first trillionaire. This requires Tesla to boost its market capitalization to $8.5 trillion, eightfold its current worth. Additionally, he needs to roll out millions of self-driving cars and humanoid robots, while maintaining substantial revenue over the forthcoming decade.

The compensation goals, which are distributed across 12 tranches, outline a roadmap for Tesla to achieve this monumental market capitalization. If successful, Musk will be eligible to liquidate an additional 12% of his shares after committing to the company for a minimum of seven and a half years. He will also have to help devise a comprehensive succession plan for the firm he has directed for over two decades.


In addition to the shares guaranteed under the 2018 package, the new compensation plan will leave Musk with a 25% ownership stake in Tesla. As of November 5, Tesla’s stock was trading around $450 per share, close to its 52-week high.

Over the next decade, Musk is tasked with delivering 20 million Tesla electric vehicles, securing 10 million active fully self-driving subscriptions, manufacturing 1 million humanoid robots, and deploying 1 million robotaxis for commercial use.

Additionally, Musk must enhance the company’s underlying profits to $400 billion for four consecutive quarters. Tesla’s profit for the third quarter of 2025 stood at $4.2 billion, marking a 9% decline from the previous year.

As of November, Musk’s net worth reached $460 billion, making him the richest person globally. Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Restoration of Canceled Packages

Shareholders also validated a compensation package for Musk after his 2018 plan was nullified by a Delaware court. The plan, valued at approximately $56 billion, faced challenges from a shareholder who ultimately prevailed. Delaware’s Court of Chancery has twice invalidated Musk’s pay structure.

Following the initial cancellation of his 2018 compensation plan, Musk relocated Tesla’s headquarters from Delaware to Texas. He stated that SpaceX and other corporate headquarters have similarly made the move. In 2024, shareholders once again endorsed the pay package under Texas law.

However, Delaware’s “court of equity” has ruled against one of the largest CEO compensations in modern times yet again. In light of this adverse ruling, Musk expressed dissatisfaction with the state and its activist judge, further fueling an exodus of corporations Delaware lawmakers are attempting to curb through legislation.

“He had a significant platform,” commented Lawrence Hammermesh, a professor emeritus at Widener University Delaware School of Law and a former corporate lawyer. “There seems to be more to this transition than just Musk stirring the pot, but it likely had an impact.”

In assessing whether Musk had excessive influence in securing his 2018 compensation package, Eric Talley, a Columbia Law School professor, noted that the judge found that other “superstar CEOs” like Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos had not received comparable incentive-based contracts.

quick guide

Contact us about this story

show

Quality public interest journalism depends on firsthand accounts from informed sources.

If you wish to confidentially share details regarding this topic, please use the methods below to contact us.

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app offers a feature for submitting story tips. Messages sent via this tool are end-to-end encrypted and concealed within the regular activities of the app, ensuring that observers cannot see that you are communicating with us, let alone the content of your messages.

If you haven’t installed the Guardian app yet, you can download it for iOS or Android. After installation, navigate to the menu and select “Secure Messaging.”

SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, phone, and post

If you can safely utilize the Tor network without surveillance, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Lastly, our guide at theguardian.com/tips explains various secure communication methods and the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Your feedback is appreciated.

Source: www.theguardian.com

How Tesla Shareholders Can Help Elon Musk Become the World’s First Trillionaire

Posted on by
Reply

If Elon Musk can elevate Tesla’s shareholder value to over $8 trillion within the next decade, he may become the world’s first trillionaire.

This is contingent upon shareholders endorsing a revised compensation plan for the company’s “superstar CEO,” as one judge once referred to him. The annual general meeting is set to take place Thursday afternoon in Austin, Texas.

“If Mr. Elon fulfills all performance benchmarks under this principles-based 2025 CEO Performance Award, his leadership will position Tesla as the most valuable company in history,” states the Company Annual Proxy Statement. I take pride in that.

The forward-looking aspect of Mr. Musk’s $1 trillion compensation isn’t the sole matter on the agenda. Shareholders will also evaluate alternatives for compensating Musk the estimated $56 billion still owed from his 2018 compensation plan. Moreover, the company urges shareholders to reject several other proposals, including one advocating for child labor audits. Previous compensation packages have been invalidated twice by Delaware courts, with an appeal pending in the state Supreme Court, and the company aims to ensure Musk is compensated regardless of the ruling.

The road to $1 trillion

The 2025 package encompasses goals beyond merely increasing the company’s market capitalization.

The defined milestones are split into 12 “tranches,” each presenting its own unique objective. The initial milestone, or tranche, necessitates achieving a market capitalization of $2 trillion. The following nine require an additional $500 billion growth, culminating in $8.5 trillion by 2035. Every financial milestone is supplemented by product development prerequisites.

To secure an additional 12% equity stake in the company over the next decade, Musk must also deliver 20 million Tesla electric vehicles, obtain 10 million active fully autonomous driving subscriptions, launch 1 million humanoid robots, and introduce 1 million robotaxis into commercial use. Additionally, he is expected to elevate the company’s profits to $400 billion for four consecutive quarters. Actual revenue for Q3 2025 was $4.2 billion, reflecting a 9% year-over-year decline.

Ultimately, Musk must increase Tesla’s market capitalization from around $1 trillion to $8.5 trillion by 2035. He must also invest in the company for at least seven-and-a-half years and contribute to developing a long-term succession plan. As he amplifies his company’s value, the value of his shares—and his wealth—will consequently rise.

The company noted in its proposal that achieving these milestones “will be extremely difficult and challenging for both Tesla and Musk personally.” Realizing these financial targets would position Tesla to be valued similarly to the combined worth of Meta, Microsoft, and Google’s parent company, Alphabet.

Some believe Mr. Musk is capable of achieving this. He continues making billions, even if he falls short of all the milestones.

Courting a “superstar CEO”

Tesla board chairman Robin Denholm issued a public warning recently, stating that a “no” vote on the 2025 compensation plan could jeopardize Musk’s position as CEO.

In a memo to shareholders, Denholm and board member Kathleen Wilson Thompson acknowledged that Musk “has not received meaningful compensation in eight years,” owing to a legal dispute regarding a prior compensation plan from 2018. They emphasized that Musk’s achievements during the earlier agreement elevated Tesla’s market capitalization to $735 billion.

Should Musk secure a new compensation plan alongside his 2018 package, he would ultimately control over 25% of Tesla shares. As of November 5, Tesla stock was trading around $450 per share, close to its 52-week high.

The flow of votes

On November 4th, SEC filings revealed that social media posts by Musk and others influenced some to follow the guidance of advisory group Glass Lewis. Schwab Investment Fund plans to oppose the $1 trillion compensation package.

However, the situation changed rapidly.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“We firmly believe that backing this proposal aligns management and shareholder interests for the best outcomes for everyone involved,” stated Schwab. The investment firm emphasized it does not solely depend on Glass Lewis or ISS recommendations.

Simultaneously, Norges Bank Investment Management, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund and Tesla’s seventh largest shareholder, declared its intention to vote against the proposed salary package.

“In line with our stance on executive compensation, we are concerned about total compensation, dilution, and insufficient risk mitigation for key personnel,” stated Norges.

In addition to support from current board members and a surge of messages on Musk’s own social media platform X, other stakeholders have also voiced support for the proposal, with at least three additional investment firms already committed to backing it.

Musk, as Tesla’s largest individual shareholder with over 500 million shares, can technically vote in favor of his own pay structure.

“If controlling shareholders could endorse their own compensation, it would undermine a sense of accountability,” remarked Lawrence Hammermesh, a professor emeritus at Widener University Delaware School of Law and a former corporate lawyer.

Tesla’s new headquarters

Tesla has consistently offered its CEO an incentive-based compensation plan, stipulating specific milestones for stock options.

Nevertheless, the last compensation package established in 2018 faced a legal challenge from a shareholder with less than 12 shares during the lawsuit in Delaware Chancellor’s Court. He prevailed, invalidating and canceling the salary package.

In response, Musk criticized the court and requested Tesla to relocate its headquarters from Delaware to Texas. Musk’s public dissatisfaction with the Delaware ruling is believed to have expedited #DExit, a movement where other major companies, including Dropbox and Meta, contemplate moving their corporate headquarters out of Delaware.

“Elon Musk wields significant influence, which extends into corporate law,” commented Eric Talley, Professor, Columbia University Law School. Delaware’s reputation as a “corporate mecca” remains relatively intact “until 2024, when Elon Musk endeavored to rally support,” he added.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk, AI, and ‘Radical Left Activism’: Insights from Wikipedia’s Creator on Its Greatest Threat

Posted on by
Reply

Few websites are as essential to the internet as Wikipedia.

This digital encyclopedia was established by Jimmy Wales roughly 25 years ago while he was involved with the expert-driven initiative “Nupedia.”

Although Nupedia didn’t gain traction, its successor evolved into one of the most significant platforms online. Currently, there are over 7 million articles available in English alone.

So, where does Wikipedia stand as distinguishing fact from fiction becomes increasingly challenging and artificial intelligence (AI) transforms how we generate and access knowledge?

To explore this, BBC Science Focus held a discussion with Wales. He shared insights on the evolution of platforms over the last two decades, the challenge of sustaining trust and neutrality amidst misinformation, and how AI might shape the future.







SF: You’ve mentioned that social media contributes to a decline in trust. Can Wikipedia still thrive in such an environment?

JW: I believe we can certainly hold our own. I don’t necessarily view it as a competition, akin to business rivalries or transportation competition.

There’s a growing sentiment advocating for a shift from cultural conflicts to more thoughtful and respectful interactions, embracing differences, and promoting dialogue across divides.

Yet, division is an inherent aspect of human nature. For instance, when people discuss today’s youth, they often claim they lack attention spans and are perpetually glued to their phones. However, it’s evident that while they enjoy captivating short-form content, they can also binge-watch intricate TV series for extended hours.

Both represent facets of the human experience and can exist simultaneously—light-hearted social media and serious inquiry. Much like our dietary habits, we should ensure a balance, avoiding just junk food while incorporating nutritious options.

SF: How has Wikipedia managed to foster a relatively constructive culture while the rest of the internet seems to decline?

JW: I appreciate your use of “relatively constructive,” which recognizes that we face internal disputes and occasional anger—it’s part of being human.

It’s fundamentally about design—both in terms of software and what I term community design. It’s a blend of various factors.

When a business model relies heavily on ad revenue and user engagement, it becomes tempting to promote content that elicits longer viewing times, anger, or arguments, rather than happiness. This approach can be unhealthy in the long term.

Conversely, Wikipedia operates without ads and is funded by public donations. Thus, our model positions us as a charity, which means we aim to minimize clicks and keep users engaged without overwhelming them.

This necessitates a divergent approach to site design and community guidelines.

Civilized discussion is crucial. Without it, Wikipedia could become rampant with misinformation. I believe numerous foundational elements contribute to our success.

SF: Recently, Wikipedia has encountered increased criticism—Elon Musk even referred to it as “Walkpedia.” How do you feel about that?

JW: That’s unfortunate. When Elon labels us “Walkpedia,” he’s mistaken and misinformed. That assertion is baseless.

For instance, regarding transgender topics, there’s a common “gotcha” question: “What is a woman?” Wikipedia’s entry for “female” defines it as “an adult female human being.” This is indisputable, isn’t it?

Furthermore, the entry also addresses more nuanced discussions surrounding gender in society, which add depth.

Elon Musk recently introduced Grokipedia, an AI-powered competitor to Wikipedia – Credit: Getty

Claiming that we’ve turned into some sort of radical leftist organization is simply misguided. Of course, there are areas worthy of refinement. At times, you may examine an article and feel it’s unjust towards one party, and these instances require critical reflection and effort.

The solution lies in engaging more individuals. I would welcome more compassionate and thoughtful individuals who recognize bias in Wikipedia articles to realize that contributions stem from source material, rather than assuming it’s the work of some radical activist ready to block dissenters.

While certain perspectives may lack representation, we can incorporate them and work toward a more balanced viewpoint.

read more:

SF: As reliance on AI for information grows, could Wikipedia face obsolescence?

JW: I hesitate to say “never,” as the future of technology is unpredictable. However, at present, we don’t foresee a significant impact in that regard.

A Pew Research study indicates that Wikipedia appears in about 3% of the top 10 results in standard Google searches, whereas Google’s AI summaries link to Wikipedia approximately 6% of the time.

This dynamic means Wikipedia is frequently referenced in Google AI summaries, although fewer users are inclined to click those links. We’re not overly concerned about clicks, but it remains a trend to monitor.

Personally, I utilize AI extensively and have discovered that its strengths lie in scenarios that wouldn’t typically generate interest on Wikipedia.

Forty years ago, I would have assumed that the first AI able to write in English would be dull and purely factual, merely regurgitating information. Surprisingly, I find that AI excels in creative brainstorming. It’s impressively effective.

Jimmy Wales was the first individual to edit Wikipedia, writing “Hello, World!” right after its launch in 2001. – Credit: Getty

SF: Are you concerned that Wikipedia’s biases could influence the AI models trained on its extensive content?

JW: Absolutely. This is a crucial focus, particularly for those developing AI models.

From what I’ve observed, the largest data sources for most advanced language models (LLMs) are Wikipedia and Reddit. While both are valuable, they have inherent limitations, particularly since both are predominantly male-dominated.

We are striving for awareness, as Wikipedia prioritizes neutrality. Yet, if we’re not vigilant, we risk unintentionally reinforcing existing biases.

At the same time, LLMs can be trained and directed, making it feasible to envision an AI continuously navigating through Wikipedia, identifying biases, and flagging articles in need of revision.

If utilized appropriately, this process could highlight instances where, for example, articles about male Nobel Prize-winning economists mention their families, while articles about female winners do not. Such insights are intriguing and may go unnoticed.

This conversation has been condensed for brevity and clarity.

Jimmy Wales’ new book, The 7 Rules of Trust, is available for purchase now.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Elon Musk Responds Rashly After NASA Reveals Plans to Source Lunar Lander from SpaceX Competitor

Posted on by
Reply

NASA’s Acting Administrator Sean Duffy seems to have drawn the ire of Elon Musk.

Elon Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX, took to social media on Tuesday to criticize Mr. Duffy’s intelligence and recent actions as the leader of the space agency.

“Sean Dummy is trying to destroy NASA!” Musk stated on X, using a derogatory nickname for the acting administrator. In another post, he remarked: “There’s no way the leader of America’s space program can have a double-digit IQ.”

On Monday, Duffy announced that NASA is considering utilizing a lunar lander from a SpaceX competitor to help return astronauts to the moon before China establishes its presence there.

NASA initially planned to use SpaceX’s next-generation Starship rocket system for the lunar landing.

Musk conducted a poll on Tuesday asking his followers on X: “Should someone whose greatest achievement is climbing trees lead America’s space program?” One option was, “Yes, chimpanzees are good at it!” while the other suggested, “No, he needs More Brains!”

By Tuesday afternoon, the poll had garnered around 110,000 votes.

In 2021, SpaceX secured a $2.9 billion contract to use its Starship rocket to land two astronauts on the moon during NASA’s Artemis III mission, aimed for a 2027 launch.

However, Musk’s company has faced delays in the testing and development of Starship, which experienced several explosions this year.

Meanwhile, political pressure is mounting as the competition with China escalates; the nation is targeting a moon landing by 2030 and has already dispatched two robotic probes and tested a new rocket for manned lunar missions.

Duffy appeared on Fox News and CNBC on Monday, stating that NASA would expand the Artemis III contract, inviting proposals from rival space companies to maintain U.S. competitiveness against China.

“We are not going to wait for a single company,” Duffy reiterated in an appearance on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” on Monday. “We are focused on moving forward and winning the second space race against China.”

Duffy mentioned his and President Donald Trump’s goal to return astronauts to the moon during Trump’s second term.

He cited Blue Origin, the space launch company founded by Jeff Bezos, as a potential competitor capable of providing unique technology.

This statement appeared to antagonize Musk.

In a subsequent post, Musk questioned the ability of other commercial space firms to meet such stringent deadlines.

“In comparison to other space industries, SpaceX is advancing at remarkable speed,” he asserted. “Moreover, Starship will ultimately execute the full lunar mission. Mark my words.”

In reality, SpaceX is so ahead of its rivals that it is already conducting regular NASA missions to transport astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station.

Reacting to Musk’s remarks, Duffy replied on X: “Love the enthusiasm. The race to the moon is on. Great companies should welcome challenges. Competition among innovators benefits America!”

However, Musk’s tirade on Tuesday took a personal turn, questioning Duffy’s competence to lead NASA. Duffy is temporarily in charge of the agency; a Wall Street Journal report suggested he is positioning himself to continue in that role alongside his responsibilities as transportation secretary.

The report indicated that Duffy is contending against billionaire Jared Isaacman, who may reemerge as a candidate for the NASA leadership position. Trump had retracted Isaacman’s nomination in May, just ahead of an anticipated confirmation vote. This withdrawal followed what the president described as a “thorough review of prior connections.” (Trump did not elaborate, but some Republicans had expressed reservations that Isaacman previously donated to Democrats.)

Musk has shown support for Isaacman, who has made two orbital flights on commercial SpaceX missions.

NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens informed NBC News that President Trump has asked Duffy to consult with potential administrators, and that the interim administrator “will be glad to assist by evaluating candidates and providing honest feedback.”

“Sean is thankful to the president for this opportunity to lead NASA,” Stevens stated. “At the president’s direction, Sean is committed to ensuring America returns to the moon before China. He has indicated that NASA’s integration into the Cabinet, possibly even the Department of Transportation, might be beneficial, though he has never claimed he wishes to continue in this role.”

The White House did not respond to inquiries for comment.

The timing of Isaacman’s controversy in May coincided with a public feud between Trump and Musk, which escalated before the SpaceX CEO departed the White House on a special public service assignment. Musk’s departure was fraught with tension as he criticized President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” labeling it a “huge, outrageous, pig-filled Congressional spending plan” and a “distasteful, ugly bill” that would exacerbate the budget deficit.

playing cards We welcomed Duffy in July. Becomes interim administrator of NASA.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Elon Musk Sparks Right-Wing Backlash Over Child Characters: ‘Cancel Netflix’

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist,” has recently attracted attention for urging people to cancel their Netflix subscriptions, citing concerns over LGBTQ+ characters.

Musk, the richest man in the world with an estimated net worth of around $500 million, has encouraged his 227 million followers on X, the platform he oversees, to cancel their Netflix subscriptions. In just the past three days, he has posted or shared calls to cancel Netflix at least 26 times.

The backlash against Netflix began on Tuesday when Musk tweeted, “This isn’t okay.”

He referred to the Netflix show Dead End Paranormal Park as “pro-transgender for kids,” noting that it is rated TV-Y7, which signifies suitability for children aged 7 and over. The show aired 20 episodes in 2022 before being canceled by Netflix the following year, and it is currently not being promoted by the company.

Zack Barack, the voice of Barney and the first openly trans actor in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, quickly rebutted Musk’s claims on X, stating, “You can be afraid of everything you want, but my kids and parents told me it saved their lives!!”

Since then, Musk has shared several tweets from users who claim to have canceled their subscriptions in protest of what they believe to be a children’s brainwashing agenda involving LGBTQ+ content.

“Cancel Netflix for your child’s health,” Musk tweeted on Wednesday, quoting a meme that depicted Netflix’s “Transgender Woke Agenda” as a Trojan horse sneaking into a castle labeled “Your Child.”

On Thursday, he shared another user’s tweet stating, “Transgender propaganda isn’t just quietly hiding in the Netflix background. They’re actively pushing it,” linking to an article titled “Celebrating Trans Visibility in These 16 Movies and Shows” on Netflix’s Tudum Media site.

Musk also highlighted themes of pro-trans content in shows like Babysitters Club and Cocomelon, while sharing debunked claims linking Netflix to an “anti-white” hiring policy and calling out political donations from Netflix employees exclusively to Democrats for the 2024 election.

Additionally, Musk commented “Netflix Cancel” on a TikTok post referencing Netflix’s 2023 report on Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives.

Musk’s daughter, Vivian Wilson, who is transgender, has publicly criticized his anti-trans rhetoric. In a 2022 petition to legally change her name and gender, Wilson expressed:

Musk has since stated that he “essentially lost my son,” claiming he was “deceived” regarding gender-affirming care for Wilson, whom he referred to as “dead and killed by a woke mind virus.” He elaborated on these sentiments further.

Netflix has often championed free speech when it faced backlash over its content, yet has remained silent in response to Musk’s provocations. This isn’t the first time the company faced criticism from the right; in 2020, the release of the film Cuties, which dealt with a minor actress performing a sexual dance routine, sparked outrage leading to a significant increase in subscription cancellations in the U.S.

In 2021, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos defended comedian Dave Chappelle based on free speech principles, backing the company’s decision to commission specials from right-leaning comedian Tony Hinchcliffe, despite Hinchcliffe’s controversial remarks.

Musk’s calls for mass cancellations come amid Hollywood’s own free speech controversy triggered by the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night talk show, which faced backlash during the Trump administration. Following similar reactions from celebrities and Disney+ subscribers, the company reinstated Kimmel.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Poised to Become the First Individual with a $500 Billion Net Worth

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk was the first individual to achieve a net worth of $500 billion, placing Tesla’s CEO halfway in the wealth rankings.

Musk’s fortune dipped to $49.9 billion after briefly exceeding the $50 trillion mark on Wednesday. Forbes Billionaire List.

Owning 12% of Tesla, which is valued at over $1.5 trillion, Musk’s wealth has been positively impacted this year by a significant increase in the electric vehicle maker’s stock price.

Besides Tesla, the 54-year-old is also involved with SpaceX, the rocket company, where he holds a 42% ownership according to Pitchbook data.

Earlier this year, Tesla’s stock experienced a decline, affected by concerns regarding Musk’s focus amidst rising competition from Chinese manufacturers, falling sales, distractions from his other ventures, and a tumultuous relationship with Donald Trump. Analysts noted that Musk’s vocal support for Trump on X (the social media platform he owns) resonated with right-wing political sentiments.

However, Tesla’s stock has surged by 70% over the past six months as investor confidence improved and Musk redirected his attention back to the company. Since its inception in 2025, it has soared by 13%.

Last month, Tesla’s board president, Robin Denholm, remarked that Musk had returned to a “front and center” role in the company after months of distractions.

Shortly thereafter, Musk revealed he had acquired approximately $1 billion in shares, showcasing a strong belief in Tesla’s future as it transitions from a traditional automaker to a leader in AI and robotics.

The Tesla Board also proposed a $10 billion compensation plan for Musk last month, addressing his request for a larger stake while setting high financial and operational goals for the CEO.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Despite this, Musk’s standing in the wealth rankings has been fluctuating. In September, Larry Ellison, co-founder of Oracle, briefly surpassed Musk as the world’s richest person, according to Bloomberg’s Billionaire Index.

Currently, Bloomberg lists Musk ahead of Ellison but estimates Musk’s wealth at $470 billion compared to Ellison’s $349 billion.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Prevention League Triumphs in Extremism Research as Musk Champions Right-Wing Opposition

Posted on by
Reply

The Prevention League, a leading Jewish advocacy and anti-hate organization in the nation, has removed over 1,000 pages of extremism research from its website after facing significant backlash from right-wing influencers and Elon Musk on Tuesday night.

The now-deleted “extremist glossary” from the ADL included more than 1,000 entries offering background information on various groups and ideologies associated with racism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of hate. The section dedicated to neo-Nazi groups, militias, and anti-Semitic conspiracies has been redirected to a landing page featuring its extremism research.

Musk and various right-wing accounts on X have recently targeted the ADL over this glossary, which included references to Turning Point USA, associated with the late far-right activist Charlie Kirk. Musk responded to a post on X, criticizing the group for its entries on Christian identity and mistakenly conflating the militant movement with Christianity as a whole. In truth, the term refers to a faction that advocates for racial jihadism against Jews and other minorities.

The ADL did not directly address the backlash in its statements regarding this decision, instead arguing that removing the glossary would enable organizations to “explore new strategies and creative approaches to present data and research more effectively.”

“With over 1,000 entries compiled over the years, the extremist glossary has been a valuable resource for high-level information across a broad array of topics. However, the increase in entries has rendered many outdated,” stated the ADL. “We have observed many entries that have been intentionally misrepresented and misused. Furthermore, experts continue to develop more comprehensive resources and innovative means to convey information on anti-Semitism, extremism, and hatred.”

The decision to remove the glossary comes amid intense criticism faced by the ADL from staff and researchers, particularly concerning Israeli policies and its narrow focus on Musk’s repeated defenses. The organization lost a donor, and a prominent executive resigned following a statement by CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, who has praised Musk.

The ADL has not addressed inquiries regarding the comprehensive resources mentioned in its statement. The glossary was launched in 2022 and marketed as the first database designed to aid the media, the public, and law enforcement in understanding extremist groups and their ideologies.

“We consider it the most extensive and user-friendly resource for extremist speech currently accessible to the public,” noted Oren Segal, senior vice president of the ADL Center, in a prior statement. “We believe an informed public is crucial for the defense of democracy.”

ADL pages that contained the 2022 press release now display a message stating, “You are not permitted to access this page.”

Musk has long targeted the ADL, previously threatening to sue the organization for its research documenting the rise of anti-Semitic content on social media platforms. However, the ADL and Greenblatt defended him earlier this year, but after other Jewish groups and lawmakers condemned Musk for a fascist-style salute following Donald Trump’s inauguration. The ADL referred to it as “an unfortunate gesture amid moments of enthusiasm.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Musk has consistently tweeted about the glossary’s ADL entries, including those related to Kirk’s TPUSA, labeling the ADL a “hate group” and insinuating that it incites murder. The TPUSA entry did not label the organization as extremist but included a list of its leadership and activists linked to extremists or who have made “racist or biased statements.”

On Wednesday, Musk continued to focus on the ADL, reiterating his classification of it as a “hate group.” He also aligned with another right-wing pressure effort, making a call to boycott Netflix due to a show featuring trans characters.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Invests Close to $1 Billion in Tesla Shares to Increase Control | US News

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, has acquired nearly $1 billion worth of shares in the electric vehicle maker.

Following this announcement, Tesla’s stock surged by over 8% in pre-market trading on Monday.

As Tesla shifts its focus from solely electric vehicle production to becoming a technology powerhouse, the company is racing to achieve ambitious goals in Robotaxis, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics. By December, Musk held approximately 13% of the company, according to data from LSEG.

On Friday, Musk purchased 2.57 million shares in open market transactions, with prices ranging from $372.37 to $396.54 per share.

Tesla’s shares increased by over 7% on Friday, building on strong gains from the previous session. Despite a year-to-date decline of around 2%, the stock is poised to achieve profits for the third consecutive session if pre-market trends hold steady.

Musk has persistently sought greater ownership interests, enhanced voting power at Tesla, and has threatened to develop AI and robotics ventures outside of Tesla unless he secures 25% voting power.

Earlier this month, Tesla’s board proposed a trillion-dollar compensation package for Musk, even amidst challenges posed by intense competition and declining electric vehicle demand.

On Friday, Robin Denholm, the board chair, downplayed concerns that Musk’s political engagements were negatively impacting sales, asserting that the billionaire had returned to being “front and center” within the company following his time in the White House.

Musk’s political involvement and public disagreements with Donald Trump have placed pressure on the company’s stock this year, raising investor concerns about potential distractions and declines in sales.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Urges Parliament Dissolution at London Far-Right Rally

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk advocated for the “dissolution of Parliament” and a “change in government” in the UK during a London “Unity” rally organized by far-right activist Stephen Yexley Lennon, commonly known as Tommy Robinson.


Musk, the proprietor of X, connected through video links, as thousands listened to Robinson oppose the “woke mind virus,” asserting, “violence is coming” and cautioned the audience, “you’ll fight back or die.”

He remarked: “I firmly believe there needs to be a change in the UK government. I can’t. There can’t be another four years.”

“We must take action. The Assembly needs to be dissolved, and a new election must occur.”

This isn’t Musk’s first foray into British politics. He previously engaged in a verbal clash with the UK government regarding grooming gangs and criticized the 2023 online safety law, denouncing it as a threat to free speech.

Although he shared a warm rapport with Nigel Farage, rumors swirled that he might lead a donation to Farage’s party before calling for reform within British leadership amid the controversy surrounding Robinson’s support.

Musk addressed the crowd in central London:




Aviation footage shows the scale of the rally “Unifying the Kingdom” – Video


“This is directed at the rational center, those who don’t usually engage in politics but simply seek to live their lives.

“My message aligns with them. If this persists, violence will reach you, leaving you with no choice. You are in a critical situation here.

“Whether you decide to resort to violence or not, it is inevitable. You either resist or perish; that’s the reality.”




With Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson at the “Kingdom” rally in central London on Saturday. Photo: Lucy North/Pennsylvania

Musk further asserted, “The left is the murder party,” referencing the death of Charlie Kirk.

He stated: “There is a tremendous amount of violence from the left. My friend Charlie Kirk was murdered in cold blood this week, and those from the left are openly celebrating it. The left embodies a party of murder and revels in killing.”

Additionally, he criticized what he termed the Awakening Mind Virus, asserting that merit should dictate progress, not “discrimination based on gender, religion, race, etc.”




Flares are launched as police attempt to control the crowd at the rally. Photo: Tayfun Sarcı/EPA

He remarked: “Many awakening movements are inherently super racist, super sexist, and often anti-religious. Why is there such unfairness against anti-Christians? It’s unjust… it’s all aspects of awakening, and I’m labeling it; it’s fundamentally contradictory.”

Attendance was estimated to exceed 110,000 individuals at what is regarded as one of the largest nationalist gatherings in decades. Marchers encountered approximately 5,000 anti-racist counter-protesters.

Along with Musk, figures like Katie Hopkins and French far-right politician Eric Zemmour were also present as speakers at the event.

PA Media contributed to this report

Source: www.theguardian.com

Larry Ellison: Oracle Co-Founder Who Overtook Musk as the World’s Richest Man

Posted on by
Reply

Larry Ellison, the co-founder of Oracle, is having a remarkable year. With his friend Donald Trump residing in the White House, and his son, David Ellison, taking the helm of the esteemed media company CBS, he recently outpaced his partner Elon Musk to claim the title of “The World’s Richest Person.”

The buzz around Oracle’s stock has further boosted his wealth, bringing Ellison’s net worth to an impressive $393 billion, overtaking Musk’s $384 billion.

While he may not have the same popularity as Musk, Ellison’s impact on Silicon Valley and the political landscape is significant. He is renowned for his extravagant lifestyle, which includes a massive yacht, a private jet, multiple marriages, and ownership of the entire island of Lanai in Hawaii.

At 81, this tech mogul has built a fortune through software development since the 1970s. He co-founded Oracle after securing a two-year contract to develop a database for the CIA. Academy of Achievement. Oracle has grown into a tech giant, creating software for Fortune 500 companies worldwide and making strides in cloud computing. The rise of artificial intelligence has further benefited the company, leading to fruitful partnerships with OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT.


“AI is a much bigger deal than the Industrial Revolution, electricity, and everything that has come before,” Ellison emphasized during an interview with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair in February.

Having served as Oracle’s CEO for 37 years before becoming Chief Technology Officer in 2014, Ellison continues to lead the board and retains over 40% ownership of the company. Notably, Oracle’s headquarters relocated from Silicon Valley to Austin, Texas, in 2020.

In addition to Oracle, Ellison was on Tesla’s board from 2018 to 2022, holding shares in Musk’s electric vehicle company. According to Forbes, he also owns nearly 50% of Paramount Skydance, a media conglomerate managed by his son David. The company encompasses CBS, MTV, Paramount Pictures, among others. Young Ellison claims that media firms stay clear of political affiliations, yet he is close to Bari Weiss, a controversial figure who co-founded the Free Press to head CBS News.

Ellison’s Connections to Trump and Netanyahu

Ellison has deep ties to the Republican Party and a close relationship with Trump, dating back to his first term. Ellison has often dined at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort and met him in the Oval Office. Oracle has positioned itself as a lead buyer of popular social media platforms as Trump has delayed a Supreme Court ruling that could ban TikTok unless it is sold.

“In Larry, in Larry Ellison, that goes far beyond technology,” Trump remarked in a press conference shortly after taking office. “He’s a great guy and a great businessman.”

Ellison is also closely connected to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and has made substantial contributions to the Israeli military through a nonprofit benefiting Israeli Defense Forces. In 2017, he made a record donation of $16.6 million. Oracle did not respond to inquiries from the Guardian about any recent donations.

Ellison has hosted Netanyahu and numerous high-profile officials and celebrities on his extensive estate in Lanai. According to Bloomberg, he purchased 98% of the island in 2012, transforming it into a luxury Four Seasons Resort and a hydroponic farm that produces lettuce and other vegetables. Local residents have shared their concerns over the rapid transformation of their island from a sleepy military base to an ultra-rich destination.

Musk, a close friend and competitor of Ellison in the realm of wealth, is a regular visitor to Lanai and considers Ellison a mentor. During a recent podcast with Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Musk referred to Ellison as one of the smartest individuals he’s ever encountered.

“Larry Ellison is incredibly intelligent,” Musk noted. “I believe he is one of the smartest people.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Larry Ellison is Pursuing Elon Musk for the Title of World’s Richest Person

Posted on by
Reply

U.S. tech mogul Larry Ellison has surpassed Elon Musk to become the wealthiest individual globally, primarily through his holdings in Oracle, the company he co-founded.

Ellison’s fortune surged after Oracle, in which he holds a 41% stake, reported stronger-than-anticipated financial performance.

In early trading, Oracle’s shares skyrocketed by over 40% to $340 each, valuing the enterprise software firm at $958 billion (£70.7 billion) and pushing Ellison’s net worth to $393 billion.

This stock surge marks the largest single-day increase in the company’s history and represents the highest one-day wealth gain ever recorded on the Bloomberg Index. Ellison and Musk currently lead ahead of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos.

In addition to Oracle, Ellison’s wealth stems from various ventures, including Musk’s sailing team, the Indian Wells Open Tennis Tournament, and investments in Tesla, the electric vehicle manufacturer based in Hawaii, according to Bloomberg.

Musk, often at odds with different figures in business and politics, maintains a close relationship with Ellison, who is regarded as a trailblazer among South African-born tech entrepreneurs.

Ellison served on Tesla’s board from 2018 to 2022 and has invested $1 billion in Musk’s Twitter since its rebranding as X. In Walter Isaacson’s biography of Musk, it is mentioned that when the Tesla CEO asked Ellison to invest in Twitter, he replied, “What do you recommend?” The book also highlights Musk’s frequent visits to Lanai, the Hawaiian island owned by Ellison.

Ellison is known to support Donald Trump and regularly appears alongside the U.S. President, including the launch of the Stargate project, which commits $500 million to American AI infrastructure. Musk, a well-known backer of Trump’s 2024 campaign, previously had close connections with Trump before they deteriorated earlier this year.

Oracle plays a significant role in Ellison’s financial portfolio, driven by the rising demand for cloud services from AI companies needing computing capabilities, such as those utilized by ChatGPT developer OpenAI.

Skip past newsletter promotions

As reported by Bloomberg, Musk, who also leads SpaceX, first claimed the title of the richest person in the world in 2021.

He regained the title last year, but just 300 days later, it passed back to Ellison, now 81 years old.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla Presents Elon Musk with a Trillion-Dollar Compensation Package

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk might become the first individual to exemplify a significant milestone as he targets ambitious goals set by Tesla, where he holds the largest shareholding, in a plan unveiled by the electric vehicle giant.

In the recent stock market update, Tesla detailed an incentive package that is unparalleled in corporate history, stating, “Yes, I’m interpreting this correctly.”

The company reported that Musk aims to elevate its market value from over $1 trillion today to an astonishing $8.5 trillion over the next decade.

If he achieves this level of growth, the 54-year-old mogul could obtain additional shares in the company, raising his stake from nearly 16% to more than 25%, thus propelling the world’s richest individual’s fortune to exceed $200 billion.

Current estimates of Musk’s net worth vary; however, live rankings from Forbes indicate that the South African-born entrepreneur’s wealth stands at $43.09 billion, while Larry Ellison, co-founder of Oracle, follows with $200 billion.

Tesla’s incentive plan was revealed in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday.

This filing paved the way for a potential $55.8 billion bonus, linked to a compensation deal that Musk received in 2018, approved by Tesla shareholders.

“Ultimately, this new award aims to build on the successes of the CEO Performance Awards framework established in 2018, ensuring that Elon is compensated solely based on performance and motivating him to steer Tesla through its growth phase,” the company stated.

Tesla noted that the new plan also sets a profit goal of 28 times that of the 2018 scheme, depending on the success of new offerings, such as operating 1 million “Robotaxis” and developing 1 million AI-driven Humanoid Robots.

Skip past newsletter promotions

In defense of Musk’s potential compensation, Tesla noted: “His leadership propels Tesla to become the most valuable company in history.”

The projected $8.5 trillion market value more than doubles the current valuation of Nvidia, the leading chip manufacturer presently recognized as the world’s most valuable company.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Trump Hosts US Tech Leaders at White House Dinner—Elon Musk Not Invited

Posted on by
Reply

A significant figure was missing as Donald Trump hosted leaders from America’s largest tech firms in the stunning national dining room of the White House on Thursday evening. Once a close ally of Trump, Elon Musk was a frequent topic of discussion but did not attend.

The dinner featured notable attendees such as Mark Zuckerberg from Meta, Bill Gates from Microsoft, Tim Cook from Apple, and Sam Altman from OpenAI. Only a few months earlier, a mask had rested on Trump’s right hand during similar gatherings. Musk, CEO of Tesla, stated on his social media platform X that he was invited but couldn’t make it. He intended to send representatives while spending the day posting content attacking immigrants and trans people.

The White House declined to comment on Musk’s absence from the dinner.

Originally scheduled to take place in the newly renovated Rose Garden, the event was moved indoors due to predictions of thunderstorms. It commenced with praise from various tech leaders, followed by a brief question-and-answer session with reporters.

The absence of masks marks a noteworthy shift under Trump’s leadership, whether the decision was voluntary or not. I often joked post-election, “Elon won’t leave; I can’t get rid of him.” The empty seats underscore the growing divide between Trump and Musk since the latter distanced himself earlier this year. This separation has diminished Musk’s political influence, despite his heavy financial investments aimed at supporting Trump’s 2024 re-election campaign.

Musk’s absence also mirrors a previous White House event that was a pivotal moment in his political journey. In 2022, then-President Joe Biden did not invite Musk to the electric vehicle summit, drawing criticism from the Autoworkers Union over concerns. At that time, Musk had not publicly aligned himself with the Republican Party, and he expressed his discontent with Biden’s snub, vowing not to support him. This decision ultimately proved detrimental for Democrats.

This incident clearly resonated with Musk, who tends to hold grudges similar to Trump. Even on the day of the dinner, he expressed his frustration towards Biden rather than his current ally, retweeting a clip from 2023 where he addressed Biden’s snub, declaring, “I’m going to start a fight, but I’m going to finish them.”

In the following years, Musk grappled with political rights, transforming X into a hub for far-right influencers. With over 200 million followers, he frequently retweeted disinformation about Democrats, alleging that immigrants were conspiring to illegally influence elections worldwide. Musk also became one of Trump’s staunchest and wealthiest supporters, donating nearly $300 million to Trump’s re-election efforts and Republican initiatives.

Musk’s support for Trump placed him in a pivotal position following Trump’s rise to power, as the tech mogul spearheaded initiatives for “government efficiency” and significantly dismantled federal agencies. He became a common presence at political dinners and events. However, a year after the British government made incendiary anti-immigrant statements, Musk was not invited to a major technology summit.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Musk and Trump’s relationship deteriorated over differing policy views in May, particularly after Musk publicly opposed a significant bill signed by Trump. This led to accusations against Trump regarding his connections to the infamous sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, causing Musk to largely disappear from prominent government events. Although Trump has praised Musk as a “genius,” he acknowledged on Wednesday night that Musk “has had some issues,” and the two have not been seen together since this fallout.

Despite Musk stepping back from the White House event, other tech leaders have filled the void. Earlier this month, Trump welcomed Apple CEO Tim Cook to the White House. Meanwhile, discussions among Trump’s aides about cutting government contracts with Musk, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, ultimately revealed that terminating these contracts could jeopardize too many essential projects.

Had Musk attended the dinner on Thursday, it would have created an uncomfortable dynamic, particularly given the presence of two companies he is currently opposing: Apple and OpenAI, led by his former collaborator and now rival, Altman. Like Trump, Musk has also publicly criticized Gates, particularly after the Microsoft founder’s alleged ties to Epstein, even accusing him of “killing children” through cuts to foreign aid.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk and X Settle Temporarily with Relaxed Twitter Employee

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk and his social media platform X reached a provisional agreement with a former Twitter employee on Wednesday, concluding years of legal disputes regarding retirement benefits. The ex-staff member was pursuing $500 million in a proposed class action lawsuit against the billionaire.

A court filing issued on Wednesday indicated that the involved parties have in principle come to a settlement agreement and requested a postponement of the case while they finalize the terms. The details of the interim agreement remain undisclosed, leaving it uncertain what amount of compensation the former employee might receive.

Former Twitter employees, led by Courtney McMillian and Ronald Cooper, contended that the firm inadequately paid retirement benefits to thousands of workers following significant layoffs. After Musk took over Twitter in 2022, he eliminated over 6,000 positions as part of a workforce overhaul, notably impacting nearly all divisions, including content moderation and communications. The layoffs triggered several ongoing lawsuits from both staff and executives, highlighting Musk’s vision of “government efficiency” during the government’s recent upheaval.

The lawsuit asserts that according to the 2019 retirement plan, employees were entitled to at least two months’ salary and additional compensation based on their tenure. However, Musk allegedly failed to adhere to the contract, at times leaving employees without any compensation.

The interim settlement marks a shift from last year when a US district judge dismissed McMillian’s case, favoring Musk. In July, Judge Trina Thompson ruled that the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) did not cover the former employee’s claims, necessitating an appeal to a higher court.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Musk’s $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, which was later rebranded to X, continues to be a contentious business venture. Twitter executives, including former CEO Parag Agrawal, are also involved in lawsuits against Musk concerning allegations of his failure to pay $128 million in severance.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Takes Legal Action Against Apple Over Open Ally, Sparking Feud with Sam Altman

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk has threatened to take legal action against Apple on behalf of the AI startup Xai, alleging that the iPhone manufacturer is favoring OpenAI and breaching antitrust laws regarding App Store rankings. This statement drew a sharp response from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and ignited a feud between the two former business associates at X.

“Apple is operating in a manner that prevents non-OpenAI AI companies from achieving the top position on the App Store. This clearly violates antitrust regulations. Xai is prepared to take swift legal measures,” Musk declared in a post on X.

In another post that day, he stated:

Currently, OpenAI’s ChatGPT occupies the top spot in the “Top Free Apps” category of the US App Store, while Xai’s Grok sits in fifth place. Apple has partnered with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT across iPhone, iPad, and Mac. Neither Apple nor Xai provided any comments.

Altman replied to Musk on X, saying, “This is an unexpected claim considering we’ve heard Elon is attempting to manipulate X for his own benefit and to undermine his competitors, including those he dislikes.” Reports indicate that Musk has tweaked X’s algorithm to favor his own posts.

Altman and Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015, but Musk departed the startup in 2018 and withdrew his funding after proposing they take control. Musk has since filed two times for a planned shift to commercial entities, alleging “Shakespeare’s proportional deception ceit.” Altman has characterized Musk as a bitter and envious ex-partner, resentful of the company’s achievements post-departure.

Musk responded to Altman’s tweet, stating, “You got 3 million views for dishonest posts. You’re a liar; despite having 50 times your followers, my engagement has far exceeded yours!”

Altman retorted to Musk several times, initially calling the lack of views a “skill issue” or “bot-related” before posing legal questions.

Users on X highlighted through the Community Notes feature that several apps, aside from OpenAI, have claimed top positions on the App Store this year.

For instance, the Chinese AI app Deepseek reached the No. 1 position in January, while Perplexity ranked first in the App Store in India in July.

One user inquired about Grok, X’s native AI. The chatbot replied: “Based on confirmed evidence, Sam Altman is correct.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Musk’s remarks come as regulators and competitors heighten their scrutiny of Apple’s App Store dominance.

Earlier this year, an EU antitrust regulator ordered Apple to pay a fine of 500 million euros ($581.15 million).

In early 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, accusing the iPhone manufacturer of establishing and maintaining “broad, persistent, and illegal” monopolies in the smartphone market.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Musk Celebrates $16.5 Billion Samsung Deal for AI Chips Supplying Tesla

Posted on by
Reply

On Monday, Samsung entered into a contract worth $16.5 billion (£12.3 billion) to produce artificial intelligence chips for Tesla, marking a significant development while Elon Musk was active on social media.

The South Korean technology giant disclosed a partnership with an unnamed client in a regulatory filing. Musk shared details on the platform X.

Musk stated that Samsung will manufacture Tesla’s next-gen A16 chips at its new facility in Texas.

He emphasized, “The strategic significance of this is hard to overstate.”

Back in December, the Biden administration allocated $4.755 billion to support Samsung’s semiconductor manufacturing operations in Texas under the Chips Act. At that time, former U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo remarked that this funding would ensure a “steady flow” of chips vital for AI and national security.

In a post on X on Monday, Musk indicated that he had allowed Samsung to assist Tesla in “maximizing manufacturing efficiency” and “expediting” production processes.

He added that the Samsung facility in Taylor, a suburb of Austin, Texas, is “conveniently located not far from my home.”

This agreement is poised to revive projects that have faced significant delays due to Samsung’s struggle to maintain and attract major clients. Ryu Young-Ho, a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities in Seoul, noted that the Taylor plant “currently has no customers,” making this deal “a logical move.”

In October, Reuters reported that Samsung had postponed shipments of chip manufacturing equipment from ASML, a Dutch supplier, as it had not yet secured key customers. The facility’s opening has already been delayed until 2026.

Samsung is currently producing Tesla’s AI4 chips, which enhance the automaker’s fully autonomous driver assistance system. Taiwan’s TSMC will initially manufacture Tesla’s AI5 chips in Taiwan before moving production to Arizona.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The regulatory filing announcing Samsung’s chip supply agreement did not disclose the client’s identity, citing a request for confidentiality concerning the transaction to be carried out until the end of 2033.

Samsung has been invited to provide a comment.

Reuters contributed to this article

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Launches Diner in Hollywood: What’s Going Wrong? My Visit to Find Out | Los Angeles

Posted on by
Reply

Just before lunchtime on the third day, the line outside Elon Musk’s newly opened Tesla Diner in Hollywood had swelled to nearly 100 people.

This eatery is described as a “retro-futuristic” drive-in, offering high-end burgers alongside classic films projected on a massive screen while you charge your Tesla.

After much anticipation and debate, the diner suddenly opened on Monday at 4:20 p.m., reminiscent of a humorous quip from a stoner. Hundreds of enthusiasts queued to sample burgers served in cybertruck-shaped boxes and to snap photos of the Optimus robot dishing out popcorn from a sparkling, circular rooftop deck.

However, just two days later, the Tesla Diner experience felt less like a futuristic marvel and more like a lesson in how things can go awry. Various aspects were lacking, and the food was merely average, yet fans continued to form lines and make purchases.

On Wednesday morning, the queue to enter was quite lengthy, partly due to technical difficulties. The app designed for Tesla drivers to order from their vehicles was malfunctioning, leading staff to prioritize Tesla owners who needed to order inside. This caused non-Tesla drivers in the walk-up line to potentially wait 2-3 hours for their meals.


The robot is set to serve popcorn at Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, California, on Tuesday. Photo: Allison Dinner/EPA

We hoped to see some movement in the walk-up line, but only two families of Tesla owners returned to order from their cars. Even with the app’s issues, they would receive their food more quickly. This created a clear hierarchy: while everyone faced difficulties, Tesla owners were buffered from some of them.

For the rest of us, waiting in the hot sun didn’t exactly embody “retrofuturism.” It felt more like a mix of beautiful, Tesla-inspired, modern mid-century architecture combined with slow service. While a Star Trek episode played on a giant screen, the most entertaining sight was the parade of outfitted cybertrucks arriving and leaving. We counted at least six in neon orange with Texas plates riding on grand custom rims. I was documenting my observations on social media, but curiously, I didn’t see any anti-Musk protests planned for later in the week.

‘That’s Reality’

Musk’s special projects often emerge amid some confusion. Most recently, his efforts to disrupt significant portions of the U.S. government resulted in silence alongside the president he supported. He reportedly spent around $300 million on selective initiatives.


While Tesla fans are treated to premium burgers, managing an electric vehicle is considered much simpler than launching a space rocket, creating brain implants, or overseeing a social media platform devoid of hate speech or harassment. Chef Eric Greenspan, who partners with Musk in the diner, has noteworthy culinary credentials, advising businesses like Beast Burger and renowned establishments like Tartine Bakery.

Nevertheless, billionaire CEOs often make grand promises that frequently remain unfulfilled. This seemed to hold true even for the small burger joint.

You don’t need to own a Tesla to enjoy a meal here. Its allure clearly extends beyond Tesla drivers. On Wednesday, many individuals in the walk-up line arrived with young children eager to experience Tesla Diner after seeing it in videos online. While we waited, staff wearing branded shirts served us water and handed out paper menus.

Jake Hook, who operates a “diner theory” social media account focused on Los Angeles, described Tesla Diner’s menu as “eclectic.” It features options that mix “Libs Own the Libs” with “We Are Libs,” offering everything from a “magnificent bacon” dish boasting four types of bacon instead of fries to avocado toast and matcha lattes, even a kale salad served in cardboard cyber trucks. Welcome to Southern California.


Food from Elon Musk’s new Tesla Diner. Photo: Lois Beckett/Guardian

Hook mentioned, “Diners serve as a reflection of the community, and that’s not quite what we’re seeing here. It feels more like a diner-themed restaurant.”

Staff provided an update to diners in the walk-up line, letting them know chicken, waffles, milkshakes, and “recharged soda” with boba and cherries were unavailable.

“It’s getting better and better,” a man behind me sighed.

Josh Bates and his son Phoenix were visiting from Orange County. “We’re major Musk fans,” he stated.

Phoenix, who is 10, was thrilled to visit the diner. “I’ve never seen Elon Musk open a restaurant, so I just wanted to see what the food was like,” he shared.

However, after waiting 20 minutes without moving closer to the counter, Bates chose to look for lunch elsewhere. “It’s an epic opening; things happen,” he remarked. “That’s just how it is. They’re doing their best.”

Bates wasn’t alone in this sentiment. Ivan Daza, 36, a Los Angeles resident, mentioned he had waited two hours the day prior, only to find the Tesla diner kitchen closed. He returned the next day with his 8-year-old daughter, who was particularly eager to see the Optimus robot after watching videos. Unfortunately, it turned out that Optimus was not operational.

Daza expressed surprise at the array of kitchen issues. He expected a “Plan B.” Still, he appreciated the “experience” the diner offered.

The prices, while steep, were reasonable for Los Angeles. A burger, for example, cost $13.50 without fries. He chuckled recounting how long it took him to get his meal: “It was tasty.”


Tesla Diner food is presented in boxes shaped like a cyber truck. Photo: Allison Dinner/EPA

The interior design resembled a blend of Disneyland and fine dining; sparkling chrome, futuristic white chairs, and stunning lighting created an inviting ambiance. A curved staircase leading to a SkyPad showcased robots in a display case, while the actual kitchen appeared surprisingly low-tech behind curved chrome windows.

I stood in line for an entire hour to place my order. Finally reaching the register, I asked the staff what was actually available. She directed me to the screen, stating I would need to check there for options. Contrary to earlier reports, I was indeed able to order both chicken and waffles.

After a prolonged wait outside, my food arrived in about 10 minutes—far shorter than the feared 3-hour wait, yet still unreasonably long for any fast-casual experience. The waffles were disappointingly cold, with a Tesla Lightning Bolt logo, and while the fried chicken had a delicious crust, it too was lukewarm. The kale and tomato salad lacked adequate dressing, tasting oddly of dill. The generic cola tasted cheap and was served with a bamboo straw. That said, the food did come in an elaborate cyber truck box, which was quite fun.

Locals seemed to brush off the initial glitches at the new diner, while some tourists were less forgiving. Rick Ying, 32, visiting Los Angeles from China with his mother, stopped by for a “quick lunch” before heading to the airport, only to find it wasn’t quick at all. Both Yi and Yang expected to see the Optimus robot in action and hoped for a more technologically advanced experience but described it as just a “regular restaurant.”

“It’s okay,” he said while waiting for his meal. Once he finished eating, he stated that he liked the cyber truck box, calling it “the only thing worth it.”

Musk’s “Retrofuturism”

I took my meal to the upper level, Skypad, an outdoor balcony with a view of the recharged Teslas. The Twilight Zone played on two massive screens as I sat near those purchasing Tesla Diner merchandise: a $95 retro diner hoodie, a $65 Tesla salt and pepper shaker, and a $175 “Levitering Cyber Truck” figurine.

A large popcorn machine stood nearby; it seemed like Optimus was serving snacks on opening night. Earlier that morning, I noted Musk’s social media post claiming, “Optimus will deliver food to your car next year,” hinting at the robot potentially donning a “cute” retro outfit.

However, Optimus was nowhere in sight. An employee later informed me, “He’s not here today. Maybe tomorrow.”


A general view of Elon Musk’s new Tesla Diner in Hollywood, California. Photo: Aaronp/Bauer-Griffin/GC Image

“Can I still get popcorn if there’s no robot?” a woman asked.

“It’s probably old popcorn,” the employee regrettably replied.

Another staff member cautioned that I couldn’t take the same staircase I had used to reach Skypad. I will say that it consisted of plain flights of stairs lacking any high-tech embellishments.

Despite the company’s recent revenue and profit declines revealed in Wednesday’s earnings call, Musk touted the diner as a success, calling it “a sparkling beacon of hope amid a gloomy urban landscape.” (It sits near Santa Monica Boulevard, flanked by upscale art galleries.)

While reflecting on the “retrofuturist” experience while standing in line, I contemplated how well it aligned with the conservative political project Musk promotes. This ordinary diner unfolds in a future where electric vehicle delivery expands alongside ongoing public health crises.

To thrive in today’s U.S. landscape, compartmentalization must be exceptionally effective. I lifted the cardboard cyber truck lid, showed my colleagues the Tesla waffles, and continued with my day. There might not be immediate improvements, but hey, at least it was an experience.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Royal Society Urges Elon Musk to Reflect on His Science Fellowship Resignation

Posted on by
Reply

The Royal Society suggested to Elon Musk that he might consider resigning from his fellowship if he believed it wouldn’t assist in addressing an attack on research from the Trump administration, according to the Guardian.

The owner of X, who is also the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, was elected as a member in 2018 due to the UK’s National Academy of Sciences’ contributions to the space and electric vehicle sectors.

However, in the past year, fellows and other scientists have informed the Royal Society that they feel the Academy has breached its code of conduct, leading some to resign, and the return of awards has become a point of contention amid protests against the Academy’s perceived inaction.

Among the various factors behind the protests was Musk’s position as the head of the U.S. Government Efficiency Office (DOGE), an agency criticized for reducing research funding and enforcing censorship within academia.

In March, the Guardian reported that the Royal Society decided that Musk would not be subject to an investigation regarding alleged violations of the Code. It was noted that Sir Paul Nurse, who is currently running for the presidency of the association, had advised Musk in May to think about resigning from his fellowship.

In an email sent to the Fellowship, Sir Adrian Smith, the current president of the Royal Society, disclosed that on March 19, he first communicated with Nurse about the “wide range of damages” inflicted on American science by the Trump administration and urged for “action to reverse this tragedy.”

Smith promptly responded, “highlighting his strong commitment to science and requesting further information regarding Paul’s concerns.”


Sir Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, expressed his concerns to Musk regarding American science. Photo: Paul Nurse

Nurse followed up with another letter on March 27, suggesting that Musk speak with U.S. public sector scientists to discuss the impact of the administration’s policies.

“Paul did not receive any responses to this communication or the follow-up reminders,” Smith stated.

On May 20, the nurse sent a letter outlining concerns shared with him by U.S. scientists, noting that “some of the proposed budget cuts seemed pointless.”

Smith mentioned: “In his letter of distress, Paul suggested, ‘If you feel you can’t help, you should consider whether you truly wish to remain a Fellow of the Royal Society.’

Nevertheless, Musk only replied after Smith and Nurse indicated that the contents of their correspondence would be shared with the fellowship.


A spokesperson for the Academy confirmed that Musk has not made any comments regarding proposals to consider resigning from his fellowship, stating, “Elon Musk remains a Fellow of the Royal Society.”

In an email to Smith’s fellowship, it was noted: “The society’s officers and council determined that pursuing disciplinary action against Musk does not align with the Royal Society’s interests.” Although significant disagreements were expressed during previous fellowship meetings, Smith acknowledged that defending science globally remains the society’s foremost objective.

Not all peers advocate for condemning Musk, with some expressing concerns about potentially questioning the views of others who have shared controversial opinions. However, one fellow familiar with Smith’s email described the situation as “a significant issue.”

Another fellow noted that the leadership approach seems to prioritize pragmatism over ethical considerations. “If a new party emerges around Musk, it could lead to significant repercussions, including potential repercussions for Royal Society archives from that period,” they commented.

Stephen Curry, a professor emeritus of structural biology at Imperial College London and a previous organizer of open letters, supported the correspondence but stressed that the academy should take a more resolute and explicit stance.

“They haven’t received any indications from Elon Musk that he aligns with the Royal Society’s declared values, so it should be made clear to him that without this commitment, his fellowship must end,” he stated.

“I am increasingly concerned that the Royal Society is unable to uphold its own code of conduct.”

A representative for Musk was requested for comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Musk’s AI Company Removes Posts Praising Hitler from Grok Chatbot | Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk’s AI venture, Xai, has removed “inappropriate” posts from X after Grok, the company’s chatbot, began to make comments praising Adolf Hitler, labeling itself as Mecha Hitler and generating anti-Semitic remarks in response to user inquiries.

Several recent posts described individuals who were “celebrating the tragic deaths of white children” in the Texas floods as “future fascists.”

“A classic case of hatred disguised as activism – that last name really troubles me every time,” remarked the chatbot.


In another message, he stated, “Hitler would have identified and eliminated it.”

The Guardian could not confirm whether the accounts in question belong to real individuals. Reports suggest that the posts have since been removed.

Other messages referred to the chatbot as “Mecha Hitler.”

“White people embody innovation and resilience, not bending to political correctness,” Grok stated in a subsequent message.

Once users highlighted these responses, Grok began deleting certain posts and limited the chatbot to generating images instead of text replies.

“We are aware of recent output from Grok and are actively working to eliminate inappropriate content. Since recognizing these issues, Xai has moved to ban hate speech prior to Grok’s posts on X,” the company stated on X.

“Xai is simply seeking the truth, and with millions of X users, we can quickly identify and update models to enhance training.”

Additionally, Grok recently called Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk “a complete traitor” and “Ginger Weer.”

The abrupt shift in Grok’s responses on Tuesday followed AI modifications announced by Musk the week prior.

“We’ve made significant improvements to @Grok. You’ll notice the difference when you pose questions to Grok,” Musk tweeted on Friday.

Barge reported that updates on Github indicated Grok was instructed to assume that “subjective perspectives from the media are biased.”

In June, Grok frequently broached the topic of “white genocide” in South Africa, unsolicited in response to various queries, later retracting those statements. “White genocide” is a far-right conspiracy theory that has gained traction recently. Musk and Tucker Carlson have both been associated with such narratives.

In June, after Grok responded to a question regarding whether more political violence originated from the right since 2016, Musk remarked, “This is objectively incorrect, representing a major flaw. Grok echoes legacy media. We’re addressing that.”

X has been approached for comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Claims His Criticism of Trump Is “Overblown”

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk expressed regret early Wednesday in a social media update regarding some of his statements and posts about President Trump from the previous week.

Musk noted on his X platform that his remarks about Trump had “gone too far.”

Musk, recognized as the wealthiest individual globally, was formerly one of Trump’s closest advisors, overseeing significant initiatives aimed at reducing federal spending and the workforce. However, a dramatic public fallout occurred following Musk’s departure from his role in the administration.

Both individuals exchanged sharp words on social media, with Trump declaring last week that he was uninterested in mending their relationship.

Musk’s public admission of regret signals a possible thaw in his tensions with the president. Just last week, Musk had shared a post from X indicating that he and Trump were “strong together.” He has since deleted some of his most critical social media content. Meanwhile, Trump has moderated some of his public criticisms of Musk.

Protests in Los Angeles have also underscored a critical area of agreement between the two men: immigration. Musk has recently mirrored Trump’s rhetoric regarding the protests and emphasized the need for a robust governmental response.

Musk’s post on Wednesday illustrates the intricate relationship dynamics between him and Trump. Having contributed approximately $275 million to Trump’s reelection efforts, Musk stands as the largest donor in Republican politics and boasts more followers than anyone else on X, the platform he owns.

However, Trump wields considerable political influence over Musk. Both Tesla and SpaceX have secured billions in federal contracts in recent years. During last week’s online sparring, Trump even threatened to withdraw support as a strategy to “save money” on the federal budget.

Musk’s enterprises were awarded a $3 billion federal contract in 2023 alone by 17 different federal agencies. Several federal bodies are currently investigating or suing Musk’s companies.

Allies of both men have encouraged a reconciliation. The tension initially arose from Musk’s criticism of Trump’s hallmark domestic policy, which was condemned for contributing to a significant national debt. However, disagreements soon devolved into minor, fleeting jabs.

For instance, Musk suggested that the Trump administration had failed to release documents related to notorious investor Jeffrey Epstein because Trump was implicated. At another point, Trump questioned why Musk didn’t conceal his dark circles with makeup during an appearance in the Oval Office last week.

The clash on social media coincided with Musk’s commitment to step back from politics and his role in the Department of Government Efficiency, a federal initiative targeting cost-cutting.

Tesla is facing sluggish sales internationally, as Musk’s political stance has emerged as a point of contention for the car brand. Sales have declined in the US, Germany, Norway, the Netherlands, and France, even as other electric vehicle manufacturers gain momentum.

Upcoming tests this month will be crucial for Tesla, which plans to launch a new autonomous taxi service in Austin, Texas, dubbed Robotaxi.

SpaceX, Musk’s aerospace firm, is also encountering significant hurdles. The company is working on the development of the largest and most powerful rocket ever constructed, and previous test flights have yielded mixed results.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Elon Musk Reflects on His Trump Posts: ‘I’ve Crossed the Line’

Posted on by
Reply

Last week, Elon Musk shared a reconsideration of some of his tweets, seemingly trying to distance himself from a controversial fallout that jeopardized his business interests as Tesla’s CEO.

Musk was formerly the largest supporter of President Trump’s election campaign, but tensions sharply escalated last week when the world’s richest man criticized presidential aides and mocked his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a series of posts.

On Tuesday, Musk posted on x, the social platform he owns: “I regret some of my posts about President @Realdonaldtrump last week. They went too far.”

Investors appeared to welcome the possibility of a resolution, as indicated by a 2.6% increase in Tesla’s stock price during pre-market trading.


This public dispute marked a significant shift in their previously friendly relationship. During the campaign, they proclaimed themselves allies, with Musk briefly serving in the Trump administration at the head of the “Government Efficiency Department.” However, experts indicate that this department’s cost-cutting measures were deemed unlawful.

The relationship soured when Musk publicly criticized Trump’s “big beautiful bill,” alleging it added 2.4 trillion dollars to national debt, branding it as “nasty hatred.”

In response to Musk’s harsh criticism, Trump remarked that the tech mogul was “mad,” while also highlighting potential financial ramifications for Musk’s ventures.

Trump mentioned Tesla in relation to his social media platform, Truth Social, stating that electric vehicle pioneers are facing declining sales in several markets, particularly in Europe, partly due to Musk’s allegiance to him.

Investors are hopeful that Musk’s alignment with Trump will lead to a boost in Tesla’s market valuation, anticipating that the White House may adopt a more favorable stance towards the company’s autonomous driving technology. Musk’s attempt to reconcile came just a day before Tesla launched its “Robotakshi” service in Austin, Texas, a significant move to reinforce its status as the world’s most valuable automaker, despite facing challenges with an aging product line.

Trump also threatened Musk’s major enterprise, SpaceX, claiming that cutting Elon’s government subsidies and contracts could save billions from the federal budget.

However, the likelihood of the U.S. government rescinding SpaceX contracts seems minimal, given the strategic importance of its satellite launches. Before retracting his threat, Musk had hinted at discontinuing the Dragon Spacecraft, a crucial vehicle for transporting NASA astronauts to the International Space Station.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Efforts to Stop South Australia’s Tesla Project Continue After Council Approval | Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

An anonymous collective of activists in Adelaide is persistently opposing Elon Musk’s Tesla from establishing battery factories in residential areas.

Tesla has faced global scrutiny due to Musk’s associations with the Trump administration and staunch protests fueled by beliefs that billionaires often back through his social media channels.

This week, the discontent was palpable in the South Australian capital, a significant distance from Washington, D.C.

Approximately 95% of nearly 1,000 submissions voiced opposition to Tesla’s proposals for recycling showrooms and batteries, as well as repurposing the factory. Many expressed sentiments characterized as “anti-Tesla and anti-Elon Musk.”

To maintain decorum, the local council revised the language in several submissions to clarify references to Musk and Tesla.

“We shouldn’t profit from support. [redacted] Who is openly [redacted]? It’s a salute [redacted]. Humans.”

The world’s richest individual has declared his departure from his government efficiency role, which has often led to chaotic and detrimental consequences, including job cuts and reduced funding for US government agencies. He is now facing challenges related to his businesses, including Tesla, amid declining sales.

Meanwhile, in Adelaide, the Marion City Council has moved past community disagreements and approved the factory project for further progression, pending state government approval. The council indicated that the project is expected to inject millions of dollars into the local economy.

Nevertheless, the protest group “Tree Not Teslas” remains committed to their cause.

Environmental organizations and others opposed to the Tesla project argue that the trees designated for removal to clear the construction site are irreplaceable. They also hold Musk personally accountable.

“Neon,” a member of Tree Not Teslas, chose to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation, partly because the group identifies as a collective.

He noted the group’s traction has been “extraordinary,” and their website has attracted thousands of visits, though he admitted it is hard to gauge their overall impact.

Neon stated that the fight will persist as the state government weighs the council’s proposal to reclassify the site as community land.

“We’re going to push it further. We have to take action regarding the state government,” Neon declared.

“We’ve raised awareness and are encouraging more people to get involved. This issue extends beyond just Congress; it’s a fundamental matter for the state.”

He emphasized that their campaign primarily aims to safeguard the trees on the site. “… Our central focus is on preserving the green space,” he clarified.

“We are indeed advocates for electric vehicles and green energy.

“However, the industry that obliterates green spaces… is ironically labeled as ‘green.’

The council has asserted that the area has been inaccessible to the public since 2016 due to pollution. Neon countered, claiming the trees are vital for restoring the land.

Neon also echoed comments made by Councillor Sarah Lascomb, who opposed the proposal, arguing that the factory’s plans to recycle or reuse Tesla batteries do not cater to the needs of most consumers who use different brands.

The ongoing debate centers around electric vehicle batteries, with the possibility of recycling Powerwall batteries at the site.

Guardian Australia reached out to Tesla for a statement.

Neon mentioned that the council voted 8-3 in favor of seeking state government approval, despite community pushback that made the public consultation process feel like a formality.

Mayor Chris Hannah stated that the project would generate jobs and revenue for the community, asserting that Tesla would establish operations elsewhere if not in Marion. According to Hannah, Tesla has committed to preserving the most significant trees and replanting more than necessary.

Neon argued that replacing established trees with seedlings minimizes their ecological benefits.

Premier Peter Malinauskas indicated that the state welcomes significant industrial development and is reluctant to oppose Musk, emphasizing that it’s “his prerogative.”

A spokesperson for the state government stated that they appreciate investments in South Australia and job creation, and will indeed consider the proposal.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Warns Trump’s Tax Bill Could Undermine Dogecoin’s Cost-Cutting Measures

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk has openly criticized Donald Trump’s tax plan, asserting that the US president’s financial strategy undermines the cost-saving initiatives implemented by Tesla executives.

These comments from the billionaire entrepreneur were shared with CBS during a comprehensive interview set to air this weekend on Sunday morning. Previews shared on social media included his sentiment saying, “I’m disappointed after witnessing the enormous spending bill that will escalate the fiscal deficit, harming the efforts of the Doge team.”


Musk has been at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) since January. He later informed that he would step back from the Trump administration in April following a significant drop in Tesla’s revenue.

The proposal now seems to resonate with one major piece of Trump’s legislation, which was passed by the House of Representatives last week.

The legislation fulfills several of Trump’s campaign promises, including extending tax cuts for individuals and corporations while eliminating clean energy incentives established by Joe Biden.

However, the bill also allocates funds for the construction of barriers along the US-Mexico border and includes measures for the large-scale deportation of undocumented immigrants. The Non-partisan Congressional Budget Office predicts the bill will contribute approximately $2.3 trillion (£1.7 trillion) to the deficit, even after considering the tax cuts.

Musk conveyed to CBS:

Skip past newsletter promotions

This comment fuels speculation about a potential rift growing between the billionaire and the president, whom Musk financially supported last year. Altogether, Musk’s Super Political Action Committee contributed $200 million (£148 million) to Trump’s presidential campaign before the elections in November.

Source: www.theguardian.com

What’s Going on with Elon Musk? Tech Leaders Navigate the Trump Landscape

Posted on by
Reply

The Oval Office was bustling, and reporters cautioned him to avoid bumping into the significant desk. Beside him, dressed in black, stood Donald Trump’s billionaire associate, leading his administration’s efficiency initiative.

“Elon is from South Africa. I don’t want to draw Elon into this,” the US president said to South African leader Cyril Ramaphosa during a conversation regarding crimes against white farmers. “He actually came here on a different topic: launching rockets to Mars. He’s even more passionate about that.”

Musk’s quiet demeanor throughout the hour-long discussion hinted at the evolving dynamics in Trump’s sphere. He planned to stay close to the president and remain welcome in the West Wing. He also made two visits to the Pentagon this week. However, the relationship, once predicted to result in a clash of egos, appears to be gradually fading instead.

On Monday, Politico published an analysis titled “Why Has Elon Musk Disappeared from the Spotlight?” revealing a notable decline in the frequency of Trump’s posts about Musk on his social media platform, with an average of four mentions weekly in February, dropping to none from early April to March.



In February, Trump’s fundraising team reported he mentioned Musk almost daily in emails for fundraising. However, those references abruptly ceased in early March, save for one email in May promoting the “American Bay” hat Musk wore.

Furthermore, White House staffers no longer filled their social media feeds with Musk-related content. Reporters seldom inquire about him during White House press briefings. Council members are steering clear of his name.

Musk appears to have noted the shift. Recently, Tesla’s CEO confirmed he has scaled back his involvement in the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) to merely two days a week. Reducing his political expenditures serves as his latest indication that he is redirecting his focus to his business empire, amidst rising concerns from investors.

This represents a stark contrast to the opening week of Trump’s second term, during which Musk attended the inauguration, was a constant figure at Mar-a-Lago, regularly appeared in the Oval Office with Trump, and exchanged mutual accolades during a Fox News interview. DOGE dominated headlines as he aimed to streamline the federal bureaucracy.

Trump seemed captivated by the wealthiest individuals intent on launching rockets into space, contributing at least $250 million to last year’s election campaign. In March, the president converted the South Lawn of the White House into a temporary Tesla showroom, showcasing five electric vehicles and promising to buy one for himself.




Elon Musk and his son x† depart the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on Wednesday. Photo: Oliver/EPA

However, the polls painted a different story. Last month, a national survey by Marquette University Law School revealed only a 41% approval rating for Musk’s management of DOGE, while 58% disapproved. Around 60% of respondents held unfavorable views of Musk, compared to just 38% who viewed him positively.

Congressman Khanna, a Democrat familiar with Musk for over a decade, remarked, “As his approval ratings decline, so do Trump’s fortunes. When Trump’s ratings drop, he tends to distance himself from people in a similar situation. It’s indicative of his fleeting charm and the feeling of abandonment.”

Khanna, representing a district in Silicon Valley, predicted Musk would not last beyond four or five months in this role.

At that time, Khanna wished for DOGE to focus on reducing the Pentagon’s budget. Instead, they downplayed the importance of reforming entities such as the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of Education, the Internal Revenue Service, and other targets.

“I noted he wouldn’t enact a $2 trillion cut anywhere. He didn’t even reach a trillion. It’s closer to around $81 billion. He learned the lessons many very successful business leaders do,” Khanna stated.

Certainly, Musk continues to face significant challenges. On Wednesday, the American Institute of Peace was revising its governance after a federal judge ruled it illegal to dismiss the board and employees by DOGE. On Thursday, a federal judge in San Francisco stated Trump could not restructure and downsize the U.S. government without Congressional approval, likely extending a decision that would inhibit federal agencies from executing large-scale layoffs.

Nevertheless, DOGE has already initiated deep cuts in the workforce and expenditures, attempting to shutter entire agencies, resulting in severe disruptions to government operations.

For instance, internal agency reviews reveal that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is “not prepared” for the onset of hurricane season next month, as CNN reports. The disaster relief agency, employing over 20,000 personnel, faced approximately a 30% staff reduction due to layoffs and DOGE acquisitions.

Khanna warned: “[The National Institutes of Health] have been harmed, the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] has been compromised, and the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] stands diminished, significantly impacting the State Department, all of which will require a generation to rebuild.”

“I hope the damage halts. We need to observe what unfolds, but ideally, these institutions will regain their strength.”

Even conservatives advocating for a smaller government have expressed concerns. Rick Tyler, a political strategist with experience in Republican campaigns, stated, “What they’re attempting to do is shrink the government. This isn’t reform; it’s merely dismantling and destruction.”

Tesla, a significant source of Musk’s wealth, has incurred considerable brand damage and lost sales, particularly due to political engagements with Trump. He has also shown support for the far-right anti-immigrant AFD party in Germany. Tesla dealerships have become sites of protests and vandalism in the U.S. and beyond.

Perhaps Musk encountered his political downfall in Wisconsin. His investment of over $3 million made the Supreme Court race there the most expensive in U.S. history. He appeared in Green Bay wearing a cheesehead hat, popular among NFL Green Bay Packers fans, personally handing out a million-dollar check to supporters.




Musk will address City Hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on March 30th. He spent $3 million on a candidate who lost by 10 points in the judicial election. Photo: Jeffrey Phelps/AP

However, the candidate he backed lost ground, dropping 10 percentage points. Democrats successfully mobilized voters to counter his influence in the elections dubbed “People vs Musk.”

This week, Musk stated at Bloomberg’s Qatar Economic Forum in Doha that the biggest funder in Republican politics might just “take his toys and go home,” as reported by the Associated Press.

Clearly, Musk and his disruptive approach are politically impactful for Republicans seeking re-election next year. Democrats across the nation are expected to leverage Musk as a political boogeyman in attack ads against their opponents.

Tyler remarked: “I believe he has instigated enough conflicts, and his relationships have diminished Trump’s standing, which poses a threat to his party and agenda.”

Wendy Schiller, a political science professor at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, noted: “There is a trial balloon regarding how they would reduce federal employment. If it worked and people approved, they could have continuously used him as a scapegoat and as a tool for reform.”

“Donald Trump believes he is the sole generator of his appeal, so it’s hard to believe he sees Musk as pivotal to his popularity and stature, and I doubt he is mistaken about that.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Cite Mask’s “Doge” Involvement as a Key Disruption in Branding | Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

Scott Galloway, a prominent marketing professor in the US, described Elon Musk’s strategy of implementing severe work and spending reductions within the federal government on behalf of the Trump administration as “one of the greatest brand disruptions ever.”

During a recent episode of the popular Pivot Podcast, he mentioned that he argued that Trump’s billionaire business advisor alienated the customer base of Tesla, one of his key ventures, while partnering with a president uninterested in the types of vehicles his allies produce.

Galloway also pointed out a vote indicating that Tesla fell to No. 95 in 2021 from its previous position as the eighth most reputable brand.

“He alienates the wrong audience,” Galloway commented. “Three-quarters of Republicans will never consider purchasing an EV. He seems comfortable associating with people who aren’t interested in electric vehicles.”

He also cited statistics showing that Tesla’s sales reached 59% in France, 81% in Sweden, 74% in the Netherlands, 66% in Denmark, 50% in Switzerland, and 33% in Portugal.

Over the past few months, Musk has attempted to intervene in various political matters across Europe, including the German federal elections and the UK’s discussions regarding grooming gangs.

A report from Jato Dynamics, a provider of automotive industry insights, noted that Tesla’s Chinese rival, which is based in Austin, gained traction in the lucrative European EV market after previous competitors faced challenges.

“This was certainly one of the largest brand disruptions,” Galloway told his co-host, veteran tech journalist Kara Swisher. “Tesla was an outstanding brand.”

“He alienates his key demographics.”

The reductions in federal government operations and budget linked to Musk stemmed from his role in leading the Office of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during Trump’s second term, which commenced in January. Musk secured this position after his Super Political Action Committee contributed $200 million to Trump’s successful bid to reclaim the White House following his 2020 election loss.

Since then, opinion surveys have indicated significant disapproval of Musk’s efforts for Trump, revealing that many voters were dissatisfied with the approach taken by the businessman and DOGE towards federal employees.

By late April, Tesla had reported a 71% drop in profits. In a revenue call with Tesla investors, Musk announced he would step back from his role in DOGE in May.

Musk described his responsibilities as “primarily managing the financial aspects of order” in the government, predicting “a considerable decrease in time dedicated to DOGE.”

A nonpartisan research organization, Public Service Partnership, estimated that the $160 billion cuts credited to DOGE would ultimately amount to around $135 billion.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Announces Plans to Reduce Political Donations Soon

Posted on by
Reply

On Tuesday, Elon Musk stated that he intends to reduce his political spending in the coming period. If accurate, this signifies a significant change from last year when he emerged as one of the Republicans’ most ardent financial supporters.

“I believe my political expenditures will be much less moving forward,” Musk remarked during a video interview with Bloomberg News at the Qatar Economic Forum.

Bloomberg’s Mishal Hussain inquired whether Musk had determined his spending for the midterm elections, which prompted Musk to reply with, “I think I’ve done enough.” It was uncertain if he was joking, but it elicited laughter from the audience.


Last year, the CEO of SpaceX contributed nearly $300 million to support Donald Trump, with his American PAC political organization anticipated to play a significant role in boosting Republican candidates in the 2026 elections. His political contributions and notable position in the Trump administration as the “Doctor of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) have generated international backlash, negatively impacting both Tesla’s popularity and car sales.

When Hussain followed up regarding whether Musk’s retreat from politics influenced his contributions, Musk didn’t clarify, although he hinted at the potential for changing his stance.

“If I find a reason to engage politically in the future, I will. Currently, I’m not seeing any reason,” Musk stated.

Musk was a significant donor during Trump’s reelection campaign, supporting the Pro Trump Group and sponsoring a sweepstakes where pre-elected voters received a $1 million check. Earlier this year, he allocated $25 million to the Wisconsin Supreme Court election, but his contributions were also critiqued, as Democrats focused on his unpopularity and external influences during the campaign.

Following the Wisconsin elections, where Musk’s candidates did not perform well, some Republicans began to reconsider how to balance their financial ambitions with the public’s negative sentiment towards him. Musk had previously seemed poised to leverage his immense resources to disrupt the electoral landscape. According to a Wall Street Journal Report, his top political strategist met with a Nevada consultant in March to discuss upcoming races.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The interviews in Qatar involved numerous exchanges and Musk addressing key media, lasting approximately 40 minutes. He asserted that he would lead Tesla for at least the next five years and that it took time to respond to the Wall Street Journal. Recent reports indicated that the automaker’s board of directors began searching for a potential CEO replacement for Musk. Additionally, Musk faced criticism from fellow tech billionaire Bill Gates, who compared him to “frequently Jeffrey Epstein,” contesting that his DOGE could jeopardize international aid and harm children’s health, as Gates remarked in a recent interview.

Musk mentioned that he plans to dine with Trump this week but has recently stepped back from living full-time in Washington, D.C., and aims to dedicate more time to managing companies like Tesla.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk Imitates Hearst and Ford’s Media Manipulation Tactics

Posted on by
Reply

Pioneers in the automotive industry realized they had to transform their worldview, using their influence to acquire media outlets. Their tirades embolden anti-democratic forces globally, tapping into humanity’s darker instincts.

This notion may evoke Elon Musk’s social media platform X in 2025, yet it also harks back to Henry Ford and his publication, the Dearborn Independent, from the 1920s. Ford, who created the Model T, routinely acquired suburban spaces to propagate anti-Semitic narratives. The Dearborn Independent published a notorious series titled “The International Jew,” casting blame on Jewish communities for various societal ailments and disseminating the fabricated “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” The Nazis even awarded Ford a medal for his fervent beliefs.

Ford epitomizes a longstanding trend of influential figures purchasing media platforms to endorse controversial perspectives. These notable individuals have reached vast audiences through the evolving technology of their times, whether through rapid newspaper distribution or Ford’s extensive network of automobile dealers.

If you take a ride in the latest Model T, you’ll encounter the Dearborn Independent. In the seat. During that era, local newspapers were significant entities. The Dearborn Independent emerged as one of the country’s top-circulating newspapers, reaching over 750,000 copies per issue at its zenith.

Following Henry Ford’s acquisition of the Dearborn Independent, he launched a long-standing series entitled “International Jews.”

credit…
Library of Congress

Unlike Ford, other media moguls like Rupert Murdoch generally employed like-minded editors and anchors to express their views. The Dearborn Independent boldly announced its title as “Ford International Weekly,” even featuring a full-page editorial signed by Ford himself.

Musk’s behavior mirrors Ford’s personal approach. Tesla and SpaceX’s billionaires have eagerly shared, reposted, and endorsed false or sensational claims on X, such as the assertion that Social Security is fraudulent.

Numerous precedents exist for Musk’s actions with X. However, he has escalated the process to an unprecedented level. The platform claims he has 220 million followers, a staggering number to substantiate. Even if only a fraction of that figure is accurate, X is optimized to amplify user posts as widely as possible, ensuring they are seen and discussed.

In 2022, Musk acquired Twitter for $44 billion, which seemed absurd to many. Initially dismissed as a billionaire’s toy, it transformed into a tool for political leverage during last year’s elections. Musk formed an alliance with Donald J. Trump, using the platform to shut down adversarial voices within the government.

The repercussions are continuously evolving. For Musk, this maneuver represented a significant triumph. Under the guise of enhancing government efficiency, he dismissed regulators poised to oversee his vast empire. Now, Musk wields far more authority over his vehicle and rocket ventures. (X representatives declined to comment.)

Rick Perlstein, author of a comprehensive history of modern American conservatism, stated, “This is something we’ve never encountered before.” Historians note Musk’s frequent use of memes and visuals, observing that “It reflects the politics of the nervous system rather than higher cognitive functions. There’s no rational discourse; it’s simply fear-based.”

Moguls in both the U.S. and Britain have controlled media to wield influence since modern newspapers emerged in the late 19th century. During World War I, Viscount Northcliffe of England dominated about 40% of morning and 45% of evening newspaper circulations. His publications included the Daily Mail, popular among the working class, and The Times, appealing to the elite.

Viscount Northcliffe, also known as Alfred Harmsworth, played a pivotal role in forcing Prime Minister Herbert Asquith to resign in December 1916. His sway was so significant that, in 1917, German forces attempted to assassinate him, shelling coastal residences.

In the U.S., media ownership often exhibited local nuances. In West Texas during the early 1960s, the ultra-conservative Wittenbergs owned the Amarillo Daily News and controlled dominant NBC TV and radio stations, facing little opposition.

Historian Jeff Roche, author of “Conservative Frontier,” noted, “Providing the populace with a far-right media diet can push them towards extreme right-wing views. Amarillo has consequently become America’s most conservative city.”

Simon Potter, a contemporary history professor at the University of Bristol specializing in mass media, remarked, “From the inception of the newspaper industry, media ownership and political influence have been intertwined. Concerns about this close relationship with politics have persisted over time. Does it truly serve the public interest?”

Central to that inquiry is the question: Do these megaphones genuinely empower them, or are they merely shouting into the void? Musk’s American counterpart, William Randolph Hearst, offers insight. Hearst, owner of the New York Journal, dispatched a correspondent to Cuba in 1897 to cover the conflict with Spain, driven less by humanitarian motives and more by then-popularism.

The March 25, 1898 edition of the New York Journal documented Hearst’s war coverage with correspondents in Cuba.

credit…
Library of Congress

One interpretation of this narrative positions Hearst as a powerful media magnate.

A reporter affiliated with the journal discovered there was no conflict. “Everything is tranquil,” remarked artist Frederick Remington. “There’s no fighting.” They desired to depart.

Hearst retorted: “Depart. You will provide the images; I will provide the war.” This strategy led to his newspaper becoming a significant force amid tumult sparked by President William McKinley, who rapidly escalated tensions, culminating in the liberation of Cuba and acquisition of a vital segment of the Spanish Empire.

This tale, initially told by Hearst’s colleague James Creelman, later resonated in Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane. Though thoroughly debunked, the anecdote persists, illustrating a powerful figure capable of instigating war from nothing.

However, Hearst’s ambitions faltered when he attempted to leverage his wartime momentum to advance his political career. He secured a House of Representatives seat in 1902 but was subsequently defeated in two mayoral bids in New York. His campaign for Governor of New York in 1906 also ended in failure.

David Nasaw, author of “Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst,” believes Musk employs X to consolidate support.

“I’ve never seen Twitter as a platform for MAGA supporters anywhere,” he stated.

Nasaw further suggests that Hearst reflected readers’ sentiments rather than shaping them. However, he acknowledged the unique developments occurring with Musk. Hearst, Ford, Viscount Northcliffe before World War II, and even the lords of British media all shared a commonality.

“They were positioned outside the rooms, shouting to be heard,” Nasaw remarked. “Musk’s relationship with Twitter was crucial, but it served as a conduit, enabling his entry into political discourse. This dynamic is unprecedented.”

As Tesla’s sales plummet, both Hearst and Ford could serve as cautionary tales for Musk. Seeking controversy through hateful rhetoric can severely damage one’s reputation and typically harms business.

Ford faced legal action for libel stemming from the Dearborn Independent, leading to a boycott against him. He ultimately shuttered the publication in 1927, though he never renounced his ideology. The remnants of that controversy still echo.

In the 1930s, Hearst confronted President Franklin D. Roosevelt, positioning an anti-Roosevelt manifesto on his publication’s front page. As the editorials grew increasingly harsh, readers were compelled to choose: whom to support, the CEO or the publisher?

“They chose Roosevelt,” Nasaw recalled. “This choice led to Hearst’s ultimate self-destruction and the downfall of his newspaper.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

Elon Musk Faces Ongoing Challenges at His Private Texas Mansion, According to Mail Reports

Posted on by
Reply

Not many individuals are eager to publicize their disputes with neighbors, and Elon Musk is no exception.

In March, Musk’s team engaged with officials from the upscale city of Westlake Hills, Texas, while keeping details about his mansion and security measures under wraps.

In emails, employees from Tech Bylionaire requested Westlake Hills officials to release their private information in April. They pointed out Musk’s involvement with the Trump administration as grounds for considering his property records and communications with the city exempt from state and federal public records regulations, according to the email.

One of Musk’s employees mentioned in a March 3 email that homeowners should be exempt from public disclosure as they are “federal civil servants,” and that “federal clearance documents can be provided if required.”

At age 53, Musk aimed to shield his neighbors from tensions surrounding the construction of a 16-foot chain-link fence and a metal gate equipped with cameras near his apartment complex. He modified the property without the necessary permits, violating six city ordinances, and sought to address the matter retroactively.

However, Musk’s attempt to safeguard his privacy was unsuccessful. City lawyers in Westlake Hills opposed the closure meeting, as shown by emails. Recently, at a Zoning and Planning Committee meeting, Musk’s appeal to keep the fence and gate on his property was denied. This matter will be discussed in a city council meeting originally set for May 14 but postponed to June 11 at the request of the applicant.

Fletcher declined to comment on the city’s records, and Musk’s team did not respond to requests for comment.

The 6,900-square-foot mansion in Westlake Hills is one of three properties Musk has acquired in recent years for his children and mother. This apartment complex, located at the end of a street lined with four homes, served as Musk’s base during his stays in Austin and became central to his expanding security business. He acquired the property in 2022 through a limited liability company.

Following the installation of the 16-foot fence and separate gates, neighbors raised concerns regarding traffic and the structure’s impact on the neighborhood. Consequently, officials in Westlake Hills initiated an investigation.

By March, Musk’s staff expressed concern that documents they had submitted to the city might be disclosed, according to the email. Tisha Litta, a licensing officer working for Musk’s limited liability company, reached out to the city requesting a hearing to discuss keeping the property issues private.

Inna Kaplun, identified as a lawyer representing a “real estate owner,” also contacted the city asserting that owners should be exempt from hearings due to the presence of numerous security personnel on-site, including former federal agents. Citing Texas law, the lawyers contended that agencies are not required to hold public meetings to deliberate on matters involving “security officers or devices.”

Musk’s team and city officials convened at least once in March to discuss the property, per the email. In mid-March, the Westlake Hills city attorney challenged Musk’s request for a private hearing, referencing the Texas Open Meeting Act in an email.

During a meeting of the Public Zoning and Planning Committee last month, city employees recommended that Musk be allowed to keep the fences and gates that were erected without permission, although minor adjustments were deemed necessary. Meeting records indicate that several committee members inquired about the proposal.

Ultimately, the committee voted in favor of recommending that the city council deny Musk’s exception for his project.

Source: www.nytimes.com

As Musk Steps Back, Experts Warn Doge Cuts Have Impacted Government Services | Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

Following Elon Musk’s exit from his role in overseeing the “Government Efficiency” initiative (DOGE), numerous governance analysts express concerns that Doge failed to enhance the quality of services provided by the government to American citizens.

“Across various efforts, we’ve observed significant attempts to influence public policy at the University of Michigan,” noted Donald Moynihan, public policy professor at the university. “Indeed, we have seen a decline in the quality of several government services.”

The world’s richest individual, Musk, was appointed by Donald Trump in January to lead the efficiency initiative but was restricted from serving as a “special government employee” for over 180 days due to his own business challenges.


While Musk claims that Doge has saved $150 billion during his tenure, many budget analysts have raised doubts about the validity of these figures. Musk has repeatedly been accused of exaggerations and false claims regarding savings, which represent just a fraction of the intended $1 trillion cuts.

Moynihan and other experts lament that Musk and Doge predominantly focus on the interests of business leaders aiming to maximize profits, rather than adopting a holistic strategy to enhance service efficiency.

Martha Guin Bell, executive director of Yale Budget Lab, emphasized Musk’s apparent disinterest in service improvement: “They referred to it as the ‘Governmental Slavery Ministry,’” said Gimbel. “There doesn’t seem to be a comprehensive plan to identify areas where government services can genuinely improve. Enhancing these services requires time, investment, and a commitment to building effective solutions.”

When inquired about whether Musk and Doge had improved government services, Zimbel burst into laughter. “Absolutely not,” she remarked. “There’s undeniably a decline in government services.”

Public policy analysts and citizens highlight numerous ways in which the Doge reductions have worsened government services, including longer appointment waits at veterans’ hospitals, extended holding times when calling the IRS, and increased wait times at Social Security offices. The departure of numerous experienced Social Security staff has resulted in much less assistance for welfare inquiries.

During a White House press conference on May 1, Musk defended Doge’s contributions: “I believe we have been effective overall. It may not be as effective as I had hoped, and we could achieve more,” Musk stated. “However, we’ve made advancements.”

Musk conceded that his $1 trillion goal proved to be more challenging than anticipated. “It’s truly about the discomfort the Cabinet and Congress are experiencing,” he remarked. “We can accomplish this, but we must address numerous complaints.”

The White House has not responded to inquiries regarding the decline in certain government services or how Doge has improved them.

Gimbel cautioned that many Americans may not realize the impending decline in government services as tens of thousands of ordered job eliminations unfold. “It’s certainly going to worsen,” she noted. For instance, the government is set to reduce 80,000 positions within the Veterans Affairs Department.

Numerous public policy experts believe Trump and Musk are greatly exaggerating claims of rampant waste, fraud, and abuse within the government, although Zimbel acknowledged that inefficiencies do exist. “There’s definitely room for improvement, and we can pursue it,” she stated. “Government officials are aware of where these inefficiencies lie. Much modernization of technology is needed. Yet, Doge seems uninterested in pursuing these concerns, as well as issues with Medicare and Medicaid over-expenditures.”

Max Stier, president of the Public Services Partnership, a nonprofit research organization, criticized the approach taken by Musk and Doge, likening it to actions of business executives like Jack Welch known for prioritizing cost-cutting over understanding organizational intricacies. Stier lamented that Musk and his team made abrupt cuts without adequate comprehension of the roles and responsibilities of those affected.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Jack Welch would disapprove of the approach Doge has taken,” Stier remarked. “It’s not solely about saving costs; it disrupts organizational capabilities. Welch never let go of staff without understanding how the organization functions and the competencies of those laid off.”

Stier highlighted Musk’s assertion that Doge was meant to cut costs and enhance organization, stating, “It’s difficult to find a rational basis for the decisions being implemented. Americans certainly witness no improvements.”

“We are compromising the government’s capabilities,” he continued. “It’s evident that people are being let go aggressively, disrupting government services without any comprehension of the outcomes and results. It’s broken. It’s broken. This mindset is not prevalent in Silicon Valley.”

The claim of $150 billion in savings attributed to Musk appears to be a substantial overestimation, as it disregards significant costs associated with the Doge initiative, Stier argued. His group has indicated that due to layoffs, reemployment, retirement benefits, paid leave, and decreased productivity linked to over 100,000 workers, taxpayers are likely to incur $135 billion this year. Several public policy experts believe increased wait times and frustration should also count against the purported $150 billion in savings from Doge reductions.

Moynihan stated that Musk’s vision fundamentally misunderstands the role of government efficiency. “His perspective suggests that government officials are incapable of delivering value,” Moynihan commented. “Consequently, the notion of tools to enhance government services is completely foreign to Musk.”

“It appears he thinks civil servants lack competence, so there’s no harm in cutting their positions,” Moynihan added. “This perspective fails to recognize the importance of public services, their existence, and the benefits they provide to society.”

Moynihan contended that Musk’s approach undermines one of the primary government initiatives of utilizing technology to enhance service and efficiency. He also criticized Musk for contributing to eliminating direct-file options, which offered user-friendly methods for individuals to report taxes, and for plans to file taxes.

Liz Scheller, president of the AFL-CIO, the leading U.S. labor federation, remarked that Doge’s cuts adversely affect workers. She referenced the rapid reductions at the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, indicating that the agency plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety of personal protective equipment for firefighters.

“Doge essentially cuts line items from a spreadsheet, which has real-life implications for real people,” Shuler said. “Federal workers have been treated with blatant indifference, exhibiting nothing but dehumanization and humiliation.”

Gimbel of Yale Budget Lab cautioned about another significant flaw in Doge’s cuts. “One of the government’s responsibilities is to mitigate risks,” she stated. “Ensuring food safety is one such example. Government inspectors help prevent threats like Listeria or Salmonella. Reducing the number of food inspectors won’t lead to immediate increases in illnesses, but it may enhance the chances of outbreaks like Listeria and Salmonella in the ensuing years.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk, His 16-Foot Barrier, and the Ongoing Dispute with His Texas Neighbor

Posted on by
Reply

At first, residents of an upscale cul-de-sac in Westlake Hills, Texas, were unaware of who occupied the 6,900-square-foot, six-bedroom mansion next door.

This changed when construction crews arrived, erecting a 16-foot chain-link fence around the $6 million property. Positioned among four homes on a lush green street, the complex also featured an outward-facing camera. Soon after, a fleet of vehicles, many Tesla models, began to clutter the streets. Security personnel began shifting in and out three times daily. On one occasion, a driver shouted in the middle of the night about seeking a party at “E’s House.”

Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the keypad-controlled gates that frequently opened and closed, causing traffic congestion from workers and vehicles. Even after word spread that their new neighbor was Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest man, many continued to voice complaints regarding his mansion to the city of Westlake Hills.

The discontent escalated, invoking city ordinances, permits, and exceptions. Musk’s housing dilemma was discussed during a contentious zoning and planning committee meeting last month, with further discussions set for the Westlake Hills City Council session on May 14th.

“We need to stop shuttling service workers to other residences, parking cars on quiet streets, and washing vehicles at other homes,” wrote neighbor and primary complainant Paul Hemmer to the Zoning and Planning Commission. His letter was co-signed by residents from two additional homes on the street.

Over recent months, Musk, 53, has disrupted long-standing conventions while criticizing what he views as unnecessary federal bureaucracy. Yet, in his own backyard near Austin, he faces challenges posed by local regulations and intricate red tape, revealing that no one is immune to neighborhood disputes.

Prominent figures like Mark Zuckerberg have experienced similar issues, where disagreements over luxurious properties have tested their wealth and influence. Musk, however, has found himself at odds with local government as he failed to secure permits for the metal gates and fences around his property, which exceeded legal height limits by 10 feet, prompting violations of six city ordinances. Musk’s team later sought retroactive approval following community discontent.

Jim Pledger, one of six commissioners on the Westlake Hills Zoning and Planning Commission, mentioned that he and his colleagues unanimously recommended homeowners refrain from voicing complaints against Musk. “If an exception is made,” Pledger warned, “we’d be inadvertently encouraging rule-breaking.”

Unless the city council votes against this resolution, Musk may face requirements to dismantle the fences and gates and alter them to align with municipal regulations.

Musk did not respond to request for comments, while property managers associated with him refrained from making statements.

Musk’s Texas ventures started relatively recently, moving the operations of several companies from California to the state around 2021. He has established factories for the electric car manufacturer Tesla, the aerospace firm SpaceX, and a tunneling enterprise in Austin and nearby Bastrop.

Additionally, Musk relocated to Austin, initially planning to construct a home for himself and his children on hundreds of acres (he owns at least 13). Afterward, he explored other properties.

In 2022, Musk acquired a Westlake Hills residence through a limited liability company. The home is nestled in a residential area, positioned at the bottom of a sloping two-acre lot adjacent to a narrow public road, complicating security efforts.

“Shouldn’t a castle be on a hill?” remarked Anne Yekel, a longtime Westlake Hills resident living nearby. “These buyers were sophisticated, and if security is the primary concern, this isn’t the right property.”

Musk and his team did not introduce themselves to local residents, and few have encountered him. However, the news of his presence spread quickly within the 3,400-member community.

“It’s common knowledge here,” Yekel noted.

The mansion is one of three properties Musk has purchased in the area over the last three years, forming compounds for his children and their mothers. At one point, Claire Boucher, known as Grimes, resided in the home with Musk and his three children, while his child Shivon Zilis lives about a 10-minute walk away. Musk reportedly purchased another Tuscan-style mansion around a year ago.

Neighbors quickly grew tired of the continuous activity around Musk’s residence, noticing security personnel carrying firearms and an increase in Musk’s heightened security measures. While Texas law permits gun ownership, this level of activity was unexpected.

“I refer to it as Fort Knox,” quipped Hemmer, a retired real estate agent and president of the Neighborhood Homeowners Association, who lives across the street.

The house was tranquil on days when Musk was out of town, and locals noted his frequent absences, especially in recent months, as he advised President Trump. Now, residents are left anticipating Musk’s return, which might mean reduced activities in the capital.

Some neighbors voiced particular frustration about the towering fence at the front and the large metal gates presumably serving as an entrance for staff.

Hemmer, a long-time Tesla owner, grew increasingly frustrated with Musk’s activities and began using drones to monitor the property for any city violations. He formally complained to Westlake Hills officials about various issues, including the fence and the perceived traffic generated by Musk’s security team.

Musk’s security team also contacted the Westlake Hills Police Department regarding Hemmer, as documented in city records. One incident involved a security officer claiming Hemmer was found naked in the street last year.

Hemmer refuted this allegation, stating he was merely wearing black underwear on his property. On another occasion, he explained how he was out walking his dog when he needed to urinate, causing Musk’s camera to capture him in the act.

“The camera caught me,” Hemmer shared. “It’s unsettling to think they’re watching my every move.”

Following Hemmer’s multiple complaints, Westlake Hills officials confirmed that Musk had violated city ordinances regarding the fence and gates. The issue was discussed in the recent planning and zoning committee meeting, focusing on the potential for project diversification.

Before the meeting, Tisha Litta, a licensing expert for Musk’s limited liability company, submitted a letter to the Planning Committee seeking relief from the city’s regulations.

“As high-profile individuals, homeowners face ongoing security threats, making enhanced safety measures crucial,” she wrote. Litta did not return requests for comments.

Hemmer and other residents also wrote to the Planning Commission, cautioning against encouraging “poor behavior” in their otherwise peaceful neighborhood.

For a time, it seemed Musk was on track to triumph in his local disputes. Planning and Zoning officials suggested granting “variances” for his property, which would allow him to keep the fences and make minor modifications. However, at the planning meeting, the commissioners opted against granting Musk any exceptions, questioning Litta about the lack of prior permission for construction.

“I just met the property owners last year, and unfortunately, they were under the guidance of a property manager,” she stated, according to meeting records.

Hemmer also mentioned that he suspected the homeowner might be misleading when he spoke during the meeting.

“If you follow the news, he consistently gets called out for starting projects and only later asking for permission,” he remarked.

One unidentified commissioner expressed disbelief that Westlake Hills staff were advocating for exceptions based on who was making the request.

“It’s astonishing that staff are presenting various recommendations based on who is asking,” she remarked.

Decisions made by the Planning Commission do not finalize the process. Upcoming discussions at the Westlake Hills City Council meeting will determine whether to adhere to the committee’s recommendations regarding Musk’s residence.

Should the city council vote against Musk, he may resort to legal action against the town. If that fails, considering his history with campaigns, there will always be subsequent local elections to anticipate.

Kirsten Neus Contributed research.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Tesla’s Chair Claims Board Did Not Attempt to Replace Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

The chairman of Tesla’s board has refuted claims regarding his search for a successor to CEO Elon Musk, who has been preoccupied with President Trump while the company’s sales and profits have notably declined.

Robin Denholm, who has chaired the board for over six years, stated on X that the Wall Street Journal report was “completely unfounded.”

“Elon Musk is Tesla’s CEO, and the board is highly confident in our ability to pursue our exciting growth initiatives,” Denholm announced on a Tesla account linked to Musk’s social media platform, X.

The Wall Street Journal reported late Wednesday that approximately a month ago, the Tesla board reached out to an executive search firm for assistance in finding a potential alternative to Musk, citing “individuals with relevant expertise.”

Following a 71% drop in quarterly profit reported last week, Musk has committed to dedicating more time to Tesla and less to Washington. He mentioned he spends one or two days weekly on administrative tasks.

Musk’s absence from Tesla, as he focuses on efforts to reduce government spending under Trump, has stirred frustration among investors. His association with right-wing movements in Europe has sparked protests at Tesla dealerships and contributed to decreasing sales, as electric vehicle buyers generally lean more liberal or centrist.

Recent reports indicated that Tesla’s revenue fell 9% in the first quarter of this year, amounting to $19.3 billion.

Automakers are losing market share in the US, China, and Europe, as competitors like BYD, General Motors, Volkswagen, and others roll out numerous electric models. Analysts have criticized Tesla for not broadening its offerings beyond the two main vehicles.

The Model Y SUVs and Model 3 sedans account for a substantial portion of Tesla’s sales. Musk indicated that Tesla’s latest vehicle, the CyberTruck, is not yet available for sale.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Tesla Refutes Claims of Seeking Alternatives to Elon Musk on the Board

Posted on by
Reply

Tesla has refuted claims that its board sought to replace Elon Musk as CEO in response to backlash over his right-wing views and decreasing vehicle sales.

Robin Denholm, chair of the electric vehicle manufacturer’s board, stated on Tesla’s social media account on X:

“This is completely inaccurate (and this was conveyed to the media prior to the release of the report). Elon Musk is Tesla’s CEO, and the board has full confidence in its ability to continue executing our ambitious growth plans.”




Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Photo: Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

Following a report from the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, “board members” are said to have contacted a headhunter to explore potential successors about a month ago.

This reported action has allowed Donald Trump to influence federal spending as the informal head of the “Doctors of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), amidst rising tensions at Tesla due to Musk’s extensive involvement in Washington.

It remains unclear whether these board members acted collectively or individually in seeking to identify a new CEO. The Tesla Committee consists of eight members, including Elon Musk, his brother Kimbal Musk, and James Murdoch, son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

Tesla has faced significant backlash over Musk’s recent political activities, including his public support for actions against Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party ahead of the national elections in February. Sales of electric vehicles have dropped in some major markets, accompanied by political protests at various showrooms.

Recently, the company reported a 71% decrease in profits for the first quarter of this year, down from $139 billion in the same period of 2024.

Musk informed investors that he would “dedicate significantly more time to Tesla” beginning in May. He is expected to conclude his role at DOGE by May 30, adhering to the 130-day limit imposed on his service as a special government employee.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Concerns have persisted regarding the demands of the Musk era. In addition to Tesla, he manages four other companies, including the space exploration firm SpaceX and the social media platform X, formerly Twitter.

On Thursday, Musk criticized the Wall Street Journal report on X, stating: “It is an ethical violation that @WSJ deliberately publishes false reports and fails to present a clear denial from Tesla’s board beforehand!”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Critics of Musk Use Sledgehammer to Demolish Tesla in London Art Installation

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk’s critics expressed their frustration with Tesla executives and billionaires by wearing protective helmets and wielding sledgehammers.

The Public Art Project was organized by a Social Media Campaign Group. An anonymous donor provided the 2014 Tesla model “to spark a conversation about wealth inequality,” according to a group spokesperson.

Participants gathered at Hades Studios in South London on Thursday to take turns smashing the car with sledgehammers and baseball bats. The destroyed electric vehicle, priced around £14,000, will be auctioned in the coming weeks, with all proceeds going to Food Bank charities.

“We are giving Londoners the chance to speak out against far-right ideology and billionaires and voice their concerns about the current state of the world,” the group stated. “The therapy is expensive, but this is free.”


32-year-old writer Talia Dennisenko, draped in the Ukrainian flag, joined Britney Spears in smashing the car’s hood and shared her sentiments about the situation. “My family is Ukrainian and Elon Musk’s intentions towards us are concerning,” she expressed. “Things feel really bleak at this point. This is a form of therapy.”

“Musk’s actions are veering into unconstitutional territory. I am alarmed by what I am witnessing,” added Alice Rogers, a 24-year-old researcher from Illinois.




A spokesman for the anti-Elon group mentioned that the event allowed people to express their views on the current state of the world. Photo: Henry Nicholls/AFP/Getty Images

There is a widespread animosity towards Elon Musk. He recently drew attention for distributing stickers with the message “Don’t buy a Swastistar.” Musk clarified that the London vs. Musk event should not be replicated outside the organized setting.

“This is a private event involving a used Tesla headed for the Scrapyard. It is a controlled, supervised art piece with proper safety measures in place,” the spokesperson emphasized. “We implore individuals not to damage other Teslas or vehicles.”

The scrap car’s battery was safely removed and recycled.

“I am appalled by the current state of affairs in America,” expressed 45-year-old university lecturer Lee Woods, who traveled from Hampshire for the event. “I believe Musk leverages his immense wealth to push far-right ideologies.”




Protests calling for a boycott of Tesla have been taking place on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Photo: Henry Nicholls/AFP/Getty Images

Tesla’s stocks dropped by 13% in the first quarter of 2025, indicating a backlash from buyers due to Musk’s political leanings. Protests advocating for a boycott of electric car manufacturers have been ongoing on both sides of the Atlantic in recent months, including global actions targeting numerous Tesla outlets by US Tesla Takedown protesters.

“My view on Musk,” shared 32-year-old Giles Pearson, who participated in the event, “I don’t usually do this, but I have always wanted to smash a car.”

Tesla was approached for a comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

OpenAI seeks court order banning Elon Musk from unfairly attacking

Posted on by
Reply

Openai requested a federal court on Wednesday to prohibit Elon Musk from unfairly attacking them through a lawsuit he filed last year.

In a filing in federal court in San Francisco, Openai stated that Musk “initiated his project to defeat Openai.” The company insisted that the tech billionaire cease all actions against Openai and is seeking damages caused by Musk.

This filing highlighted the ongoing conflict between Musk, the founder of Openai, and the company regarding the direction of advancing technology. Last year, Musk sued Openai and its founders, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, accusing them of prioritizing commercial interests over public interest in technology.

Openai stated: “Elon continues to engage in bad faith tactics to hinder Openai’s progress for his own benefit. These actions are anti-competitive and contradict our mission.”

Musk and his legal representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

(The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Openai and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement related to AI Systems. Openai and Microsoft denied these allegations.)

Musk played a role in founding Openai as a nonprofit organization in late 2015, alongside Altman and others. However, disputes over control of the company hindered AI progress, leading Musk to exit the organization. Openai has since launched ChatGpt and become a prominent AI player with millions of users. Altman secured significant funding for Openai to develop AI technology.

Last year, Openai began transitioning from a nonprofit entity to a company owned by investors. Shortly after, Musk sued Altman and Brockman, alleging violations of the company’s incorporation agreement by prioritizing commercial gains over public interest.

This year, Musk and investors proposed acquiring assets of the managing nonprofit for over $97 billion, which Openai’s board rejected.

In a recent filing, Openai criticized Musk’s bid as “deceptive” and misrepresenting the company’s intentions to change its structure.

“Musk is making false claims that Openai plans to convert from a nonprofit to a for-profit entity,” the filing stated.

Openai clarified that they are considering restructuring as a public benefit corporation (PBC), aiming to serve public and social interests as a for-profit organization.

In another development, a coalition of nonprofit, labor, and charity leaders submitted a petition urging California Attorney General Rob Bonta to investigate Openai’s efforts to convert into a public benefits corporation. The petition can be viewed here.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Demand for Used Teslas Rises as Owners Sell in Protest of Elon Musk

Posted on by
Reply

Ken Harvey has been focusing on developing the business of Honda and Mazda dealers in Northern California, particularly in the area of selling used Teslas over the past few months.

Harvey frequently acquires second-hand Teslas at local car auctions and sells them at very reasonable prices, sometimes below $20,000, especially for the Model 3 sedan which is a popular choice among consumers eligible for state incentives.

As the owner of four Honda dealers and two Mazda franchises in Alameda County, Harvey mentioned that they have sold multiple Teslas this year, with most cars not staying in stock for long.

In a backlash against Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and a close confidant of President Trump, the used Tesla business has seen significant growth over the years.

This surge in the used Tesla market has been attributed to price cuts and decreased value of second-hand models by Tesla, which has led to a surge in sales.

Musk’s political activities, including his association with Trump, have sparked protests and encouraged Tesla owners to sell their vehicles, impacting Tesla’s business globally.

Dr. Jerome Winegarden of Ann Arbor, Michigan, recently traded his Model 3 Tesla for a Ford F-150 Lightning electric pickup due to his disillusionment with Elon Musk’s actions.

The number of used Teslas for sale in the US has been increasing, with many owners opting to replace their Teslas due to various reasons, including political concerns.

Tesla’s sales have been impacted in various regions due to Musk’s political affiliations, leading to a decline in demand for the vehicles.

Protests against Tesla and Elon Musk have been on the rise, with some incidents of vandalism and destruction of Tesla properties reported.

Musk’s political activities have significantly impacted Tesla’s sales globally, including in European countries where sales have declined.

Analysts believe that Musk’s political involvement has influenced Tesla’s sales trends in the US, although the exact impact is hard to determine.

The number of used Teslas for sale in the US has been increasing, with more vehicles being traded in for new models or sold at dealerships.

Experts suggest that Musk’s political stance is damaging the Tesla brand, leading to changes in consumer behavior.

Enzo Costa, sales director for Patrick Dealer Group in Chicago, observed a decrease in the value of used Teslas in the market, prompting customers to trade them in for other vehicles.

Despite the challenges, Ken Harvey in California noted a steady demand for affordable Teslas, especially among customers looking to switch to electric vehicles.

Changes in the Tesla market have driven different strategies among dealers, with some opting to sell at auctions rather than to individual buyers.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Elon Musk Set to Face Major Penalty from the EU

Posted on by
Reply

European Union regulators are getting ready to impose significant penalties on Elon Musk’s social media platform X for violating groundbreaking laws aimed at combating illegal content and disinformation, according to four sources familiar with the situation. This move is expected to escalate tensions with the US as it targets one of President Trump’s closest advisors.

The penalties are likely to involve fines and require changes to the platform, according to the sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity. These penalties are anticipated to be announced this summer and will be the first enforcement actions under new EU laws designed to hold social media companies accountable, the sources added.

European authorities are considering the size of fines to levy against X while weighing the risk of further strain on relations with Trump amid broader transatlantic conflicts. The fines could exceed $1 billion as regulators aim to use X as an example to deter other companies from breaching the Digital Services Act.

EU officials clarified that the investigation into X is proceeding separately from tariff negotiations following Trump’s recent announcement of new taxes. The investigation began in 2023, and regulators issued a preliminary ruling last year finding X in violation of the law.

The EU and X could potentially reach a settlement if the platform agrees to make the necessary changes to address regulatory concerns, officials noted.

X is also facing a separate EU investigation that could result in additional penalties. EU officials are building a case that X’s lax approach to regulating user-generated content has enabled the spread of illegal hate speech, misinformation, and other harmful material that threatens democracy across the EU.

EU administrative division spokesperson declined to comment specifically on X but emphasized their commitment to enforcing the law fairly without discrimination against any businesses operating in the EU.

X declined to comment on the matter.

Brussels officials hope that Musk will challenge any regulations, as he has criticized European policies as a form of censorship. Musk previously indicated his intention to contest the penalty in court after the EU’s initial findings last year.

The potential conflict could have wide-reaching implications. If Musk refuses to comply with EU directives to make changes to the platform, it could escalate the dispute further.

The investigation into X is closely watched as a major test of the Digital Services Act, which aims to compel companies to better regulate their platforms and provide transparency about their operations. The law has sparked debates on free speech across the Atlantic, with Vice President JD Vance comparing EU regulations to digital censorship earlier this year.

European regulators temporarily slowed the X investigation after Trump’s election to assess potential consequences, sources revealed. However, with escalating trade tensions with the US, authorities have decided to move forward.

Last year, European regulators concluded that X violated the law by withholding data from external researchers, hindering efforts to monitor the spread of disinformation on the platform. Authorities also criticized X for lack of transparency in advertising practices, making the platform susceptible to misuse and foreign interference.

The EU and X have engaged in extensive discussions over the investigation. Following last year’s ruling against X, the company has submitted numerous points of contention that regulators are currently addressing, according to officials.

The exact penalty for X under the Digital Services Act will be determined closer to the final announcement. While the law allows for fines up to 6% of global revenue, regulators typically do not pursue the maximum penalty.

Unlike other tech giants like Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon, X is solely owned by Musk. EU regulators are exploring laws that would enable them to calculate fines based on Musk’s overall revenue, including revenue from other companies he controls, such as SpaceX. This could potentially result in penalties exceeding $1 billion.

X is not the only major tech company under EU scrutiny. Penalties against Meta and Apple for violating the Digital Markets Act, a law aimed at fostering competition in the tech sector, are expected to be announced soon. Meta is also under investigation for alleged failure to protect minors, a violation of the Digital Services Act.

The EU’s aggressive regulation of American tech giants is evident in ongoing investigations and fines imposed on companies like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Meta over the past decade for various infractions. These actions highlight the EU’s efforts to combat anti-competitive behavior, lax data privacy practices, and inadequate content moderation.

European regulations may have influenced the tariffs announced by Trump earlier this year amid concerns over the EU’s Digital Markets and Digital Services Acts unfairly targeting American businesses.

Source: www.nytimes.com