UK welfare system AI prototype criticized for its “misguided launch,” say officials

According to the Guardian, ministers have halted or abandoned at least six artificial intelligence prototypes for welfare systems, indicating that Prime Minister Kia Starmer’s efforts to improve government efficiency are facing challenges.

It has been revealed that these AI prototypes were not advanced to enhance staff training, improve job center services, expedite disability benefits payments, and update communication systems. Officials acknowledge the importance of “thorough testing” to ensure the expandability and reliability of the AI system.

While two of the discarded prototypes were highlighted as successful tests in the latest annual report by the Department of Labor Pensions (DWP), A-Cubed aimed to assist staff in guiding job seekers and Igents to expedite disability benefits for millions of people.

The Prime Minister emphasized the role of AI in transforming public services and urged ministers to prioritize the introduction and growth of AI in each ministry and agency. However, Ada Loveless’s Associate Director, Imougen Parker, highlighted the importance of learning from failures and ensuring that the reality of AI aligns with rhetoric.

The use of AI in welfare systems by DWP has not been disclosed in the government’s algorithm transparency registry, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in the use of AI technology.

While officials have acknowledged that AI technology may play a role in future system developments, they stress the importance of thorough testing before implementation. This indicates the challenges faced by the Labour Party in their efforts to revolutionize public services through AI.

Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology, announced plans to utilize AI for transforming public services and improving economic productivity. Director Laura Gilbert highlighted the importance of learning from failures and continuing to explore new opportunities for impact.

The DWP officials emphasized the importance of scalability and reliability in AI products and acknowledged the need for thorough testing before implementing AI systems. However, concerns remain about transparency and the potential impact of AI on inequality and fairness in the welfare field.

The government spokesperson highlighted the short-term nature of concept demonstration projects and the importance of learning from these projects to inform future implementations. The government aims to follow a “Scan, Pilot, Scale” approach outlined in the AI opportunity action plan to harness the full potential of AI in transforming public services.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk’s Lawsuit Criticized by OpenAI as “Frivolous” and “Disjointed” in Legal Filings

OpenAI criticized Elon Musk’s lawsuit against the company in a legal response filed on Monday, calling the Tesla CEO’s claims “frivolous” and driven by “advancing commercial interests.”

The filing is a rebuttal to Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI earlier this month, accusing the company of reneging on its commitment to benefiting humanity. OpenAI refuted many of the key allegations in Musk’s lawsuit, denying the existence of what he referred to as an “establishment agreement.”

The filing highlighted the complexity and lack of factual basis for Musk’s claims, pointing out the absence of any actual agreement mentioned in the pleadings.


The conflict between OpenAI and Musk has been escalating since Musk’s lawsuit, intensifying the ongoing disagreement between Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Although they co-founded the nonprofit in 2015, disputes over company direction and control led to Musk’s departure three years later. The relationship between Musk and Altman has soured as OpenAI gained recognition for products like ChatGPT and DALL-E.

Musk’s lawsuit accuses OpenAI of straying from its original mission as a nonprofit organization focused on sharing technology for humanity’s benefit, alleging that Altman received significant investments from Microsoft. OpenAI denied these claims in a recent blog post, stating that Musk supported the shift to a for-profit entity but wanted sole control.

OpenAI’s response painted Musk as envious and resentful of the company since starting his own commercial AI venture. The filing dismissed the notion of a founding agreement between Musk and Altman, labeling it as a “fiction” created by Musk.

According to the response, Musk’s motivation for suing OpenAI is to bolster his competitive position in the industry, rather than genuine concerns for human progress.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The filing concluded that Musk’s actions stem from a desire to replicate OpenAI’s technological achievements for his own benefit.

Source: www.theguardian.com