MetaExpose Authors Risk Bankruptcy Following Company Criticism Ban | Meta

The former Meta executive, who authored a provocative book highlighting social media companies’ interactions with China and their treatment of teenagers, is reportedly facing bankruptcy after its release.

Lawmakers in Congress have contended that Mark Zuckerberg’s company is trying to “silence and punish” Sarah Wynn Williams, the former director of global public policy at Facebook, Meta’s predecessor.

Former Labor Transport Secretary Louise Hayes stated that Wynn Williams may incur a fine of $50,000 (£37,000) for each breach of an order obtained by Meta.


In her book, Eardaling People, published this year, Wynn-Williams made several claims regarding the conduct and culture of social media firms, including allegations of sexual harassment that the company denied. She asserts that her dismissal was due to “poor performance and toxic behavior.”

Nevertheless, the former diplomat has been prohibited from publishing memoirs after Meta secured a ruling against her. She later testified before the US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, claiming Meta collaborated “with gloves” with Beijing regarding censorship tools.

Pan Macmillan, which published the memoir, reported over 150,000 copies sold across all formats. The book was also recognized as a Sunday Times bestseller in Hardback for 2025, with a paperback edition due for release early next year.

Haigh pointed out Wynn-Williams’ situation during a House of Representatives debate on employment rights on Monday, asserting that her decision has led to significant financial jeopardy.

“Despite previous official statements indicating that Meta had ceased using NDAs [non-disclosure agreements] in cases of sexual harassment,” she noted, “Sarah is being pushed towards financial ruin within the UK arbitration system.

“Meta has given Sarah a disturbing order and is gearing up to impose a $50,000 fine for any violations. She is on the brink of bankruptcy, and I am confident that the home and government will push this legislation to protect individuals with moral courage.”

It’s understood that the $50,000 figure pertains to damages Wynn-Williams must pay for violating a separation agreement she signed when leaving Meta in 2017, with Meta asserting that she voluntarily agreed to the terms.

Mehta indicated that, as of now, Wynn-Williams has not been compelled to adhere to the contract.

The company refrained from commenting on Hayes’ intervention. Senate testimony from Wynn-Williams previously asserted that the company has been “disconnected from reality” and is plagued by false claims.

Meta characterized the book as “an outdated, previously reported compilation of company claims and unfounded allegations against executives.” She claimed she was dismissed for “poor performance and toxic behavior,” with investigations concluding that she made misleading harassment allegations.

The ruling that barred her memoir’s publication affirmed that “the false narrative should never have seen the light of day.”

The order dictated that Wynn-Williams must halt promotion of the book and minimize any further publications, though no actions were mandated against Pan Macmillan.

Since her Senate hearing in April, Wynn-Williams has remained publicly silent. In a statement this month, she expressed gratitude for the continued investigation into Meta’s actions by the US Senate.

“I wish I could elaborate,” she stated. “I urge other tech employees and potential whistleblowers to share their insights before more harm comes to children.”

Her attorney mentioned that Wynn-Williams “will remain silent regarding the matters currently under Congressional investigation.”

Source: www.theguardian.com