2020 Artificial Intelligence (AI): British novelist slams government for AI “theft”

Kate Mosse and Richard Osman have criticized Labor’s proposal to grant wide-ranging freedom to artificial intelligence companies to data mine artwork, warning that it could stifle growth in the creative sector and amount to theft.

Best-selling authors have joined Keir Starmer in opposing the national initiative to establish Britain as an “AI superpower,” endorsing a 50-point action plan that includes changes to how technology companies utilize copyrighted content and data for training models.

There is ongoing debate among ministers regarding whether to permit major technology companies to gather substantial amounts of books, music, and other creative works unless copyright owners actively opt out.

This move is aimed at accelerating growth for AI companies in the UK, as training AI models necessitates substantial amounts of data. Technology companies argue that existing copyright laws create uncertainty and pose a risk to development speed.

However, creators advocate for AI companies to pay for the use of their work, expressing disappointment when the Prime Minister endorsed the proposal. The EU is also pushing for a similar system requiring copyright holders to opt out of data mining processes.

The AI Creative Rights Alliance, comprising various trade bodies, criticized Starmer’s stance as “deeply troubling” and called for the preservation of the current copyright system. They urged ministers to consider their concerns.

Renowned artists like Paul McCartney, Kate Bush, Stephen Fry, and Hugh Bonneville have raised concerns about AI potentially threatening their livelihoods. A petition warns against the unauthorized use of creative works for AI training.

Mosse emphasized the importance of using AI responsibly without compromising the creative industries’ growth potential, while Osman stressed the necessity of seeking permission and paying fees for using copyrighted works to prevent theft.

The government’s AI action plan, formulated by venture capitalist Matt Clifford, calls for reforming the UK’s text and data mining regulations to align with the EU’s standards, highlighting the need for competitive policies.

The government’s response to the action plan emphasizes the goal of creating a competitive copyright regime supportive of both the AI sector and creative industries. Starmer expressed his support for the recommendations.

Various industry representatives, including Joe Twist from the British Recording Industry, advocate for a balanced approach that fosters growth in both the creative and AI sectors without undermining Britain’s creative prowess.

Critics argue that AI companies should not be allowed to exploit creative works for profit without permission or compensation. The ongoing consultation on copyright policies aims to establish a framework benefiting both sectors.

Source: www.theguardian.com

UK Data Regulator Slams Google for ‘Irresponsible’ Ad Tracking Changes

The UK’s data protection regulator has condemned Google for enabling advertisers to track customers’ digital “fingerprints,” expressing concerns about the difficulty of blocking online surveillance technology even for privacy-conscious users, calling it “irresponsible.”

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in the UK stated that this practice undermines consumer control and choice regarding data collection and usage. Google’s decision to introduce this method creates expectations for a privacy-focused internet, deviating from current standards.

Fingerprinting involves gathering unique signals from a device’s software or hardware to identify a user or device, similar to an advanced form of cookies.

Data watchdogs note that fingerprinting is challenging to detect and block, making consent more difficult compared to cookie notifications often encountered while browsing the web.

Google recently announced its entry into the rapidly expanding Connected TV (CTV) advertising space, emphasizing the need for brands to effectively target desired audiences while also improving customer privacy.

In a statement in 2019, Google acknowledged the lack of control users have over their fingerprint data compared to cookies, labeling this practice as user-choice infringing and wrong.

Stephen Almond, Executive Director of Regulatory Risk at the ICO, emphasized that companies must adhere to legal and transparent deployment of advertising technology, warning of potential action from the ICO if guidelines are not followed.

The ICO asserts that fingerprinting is an unfair method of online tracking which compromises user choice and control over data collection.

Google indicated it will engage in further discussions with the ICO regarding its policy change.

Skip past newsletter promotions

A Google spokesperson mentioned that privacy-enhancing technology enables partners to succeed on emerging platforms such as CTV without compromising user privacy. They reaffirmed the commitment to providing users with the choice of personalized ads and promoting responsible data use across the industry.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Terrorism watchdog slams WhatsApp for allowing UK users as young as 13

Criticism has been directed at Mark Zuckerberg’s meta by Britain’s terror watchdog for reducing the minimum age for WhatsApp users from 16 to 13. This move is seen as “unprecedented” and is expected to expose more teenagers to extremist content.

Jonathan Hall KC expressed concerns about the increased access to unregulated content, such as terrorism and sexual exploitation, that meta may not be able to monitor.


Jonathan Hall described the decision as “unusual”.

According to Mr. Hall, the use of end-to-end encryption by WhatsApp has made it difficult for meta to remove harmful content, contributing to the exposure of younger users to unregulated materials.

He highlighted the vulnerability of children to terrorist content, especially following a spike in arrests among minors. This exposure may lead vulnerable children to adopt extremist ideologies.

WhatsApp implemented the age adjustment in the UK and EU in February, aligning with global standards and implementing additional safeguards.

Despite the platform’s intentions, child safety advocates criticized the move, citing a growing need for tech companies to prioritize child protection.

The debate over end-to-end encryption and illegal content on messaging platforms has sparked discussions on online safety regulations, with authorities like Ofcom exploring ways to address these challenges.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The government has clarified that any intervention by Ofcom regarding content scanning must meet privacy and accuracy standards and be technically feasible.

In a related development, Meta announced plans to introduce end-to-end encryption to Messenger and is expected to extend this feature to Instagram.

Source: www.theguardian.com