New Research Reveals Ancient Americans as Specialized Hunters of Large Animals

A recent study reveals that the earliest human cultures in the Americas were not simply opportunistic foragers. Instead, they were specialized big game hunters who dedicated their lives to hunting large animals like mammoths, elephant-like gomphotheres, and giant ground sloths—true Ice Age giants.



Paleoindians hunting glyptodonts, relatives of armadillos from the Pleistocene. Illustrated by Heinrich Harder, 1920.

For decades, archaeologists have debated whether Paleoindians focused on hunting megafauna or adopted a generalist lifestyle, consuming a diverse diet that included small game, fish, plants, and shellfish based on their environment.

In recent years, many scientists have leaned toward a generalist perspective. However, a new study led by the University of Alaska Fairbanks contradicts this notion.

Ben Potter, a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, stated, “One of the competing theories is dietary generalization, which advocates for utilizing a wide variety of resources varying by region.”

“The other theory posits megafauna specialization, concentrating on a select few large-bodied prey.”

In this groundbreaking study, researchers analyzed 50 sites across three regions: Eastern Beringia (ancient Alaska, circa 14,000 to 13,300 years ago), the Clovis Culture of North America (approximately 13,400 to 12,800 years ago), and the Fishtail Projectile Point Culture of South America (roughly 12,900 to 11,600 years ago).

Together, these cultures represent the oldest known human societies extending across the Western Hemisphere.

By assessing factors such as species richness, minimum population size, and edible biomass, scientists discovered that megafauna constituted 83% to 88% of the meat and fat consumed by these groups.

Woolly mammoths dominated Beringia diets, while Columbian mammoths were prevalent in North America, and giant ground sloths along with gomphotheres were staples in South America.

While small animals were present in many locales, they provided minimal nutritional value.

“Evaluating culinary expertise involves more than identifying the number of specific animals at ancient campsites,” notes Professor Potter.

“If early humans were dietary generalists, the most common animals would be reflected more frequently in their campsites.”

“Mammoths and ground sloths were relatively rare in the environment, yet they dominate the archaeological record.”

“Conversely, rabbits and rats, despite being numerous, are seldom found in the record.”

The authors also cite independent evidence: chemical analysis of the Clovis-era child, Anzick-1, showed that about 96% of the mother’s proteins were derived from megafauna, primarily mammoths.

In addition to their diets, these early groups exhibited traits characteristic of professional hunters. They led highly mobile lifestyles rather than establishing fixed homesteads, and there was scant evidence of plant-processing tools such as grindstones.



Maps and dietary analysis illustrating how three Paleoindian cultures, East Beringian, Clovis, and Fishtail Projectile Point, specialized in hunting megaherbivores across the Western Hemisphere from about 14,000 to 11,600 years ago. Image credit: Ben Potter.

Professor Potter elaborated: “The focus on large edible herbivores explains the remarkable similarity in early toolkits found from California to Maine and across South America.”

“Hunters targeting the same type of animals across vastly different landscapes did not need to modify their methods to adapt to local conditions.”

“Archaeological findings included tools specifically designed for hunting large game, such as large fluted projectiles and specialized equipment for slaughtering.”

There was a significant absence of fishing tools and implements for processing plants.

This emphasis on large prey facilitated the rapid human expansion from Alaska to South America.

Typically, when hunter-gatherers venture into unfamiliar regions, it can take many generations to fully understand the local terrain, hunt smaller game, and identify edible plants. However, relying on large mammals alters this dynamic.

“Mammoths, for instance, were widespread, traversing vast territories,” stated Matt Uhler, a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

“In effect, expert hunter-gatherers utilized their knowledge of megaherbivores like mammoths to expand across continents faster than they would have if they had to learn about every local ecosystem.”

The researchers hypothesize that this specialization in hunting large herbivores may have significantly impacted ecological networks, contributing to the mass extinction of Ice Age megafauna as these cultures migrated southward.

Mammoths and horses vanished from Alaska around 13,300 years ago, coinciding with the earliest known human occupations.

In North America, Clovis-era megafauna disappeared by 12,800 years, while gomphotheres and giant ground sloths lingered in South America until approximately 11,600 years ago.

“This pattern of arrival, proliferation, and extinction may have repeated itself, each time progressing further south, making a compelling case for human hunting as the primary catalyst for megafauna extinctions, with climate change possibly exacerbating the situation,” Professor Potter concluded.

“Megaherbivores reproduce slowly, occupy expansive territories, and lack natural predators as adults.”

“They likely did not possess the learned wariness that technologically advanced hunter-gatherers exhibited.”

For more information, see the study published in the Journal on July 1, 2026, in Scientific Progress.

_____

Ben A. Potter et al. 2026. Hemispheric-scale evidence for early Paleoindian megaherbivore specialization. Scientific Progress 12(27); doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aef9628

Source: www.sci.news

The specialized adaptation of fox skulls for diving into snow

Red fox diving into the snow to catch prey

Maxime Riendau/Getty Images

Some foxes can dive headfirst into snow without causing harm, and we now know how the shape of their skulls is adapted to this technique.

In colder climates, where small rodents live deep beneath the snow, red foxes (Vulpes Vulpes Vulpes) and arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) has a special hunting technique known as mouse. They use their strong sense of hearing to pinpoint the location of their prey, then jump into the air and dive face-first into large piles of snow at speeds of up to 4 meters per second, catching their prey by surprise.

“This is a very interesting and unique behavior,” he says. Jung Sung-hwan At Cornell University in New York. “Not all foxes do that.”

To learn more about why red and arctic foxes are so adept at snow diving, Jung et al. scanned.

Their analysis found that felines tend to have broader and shorter snouts compared to foxes. This creates a stronger bite, which is more beneficial for felines, which typically hunt alone, Jung said.

Foxes, on the other hand, which hunt in packs, had much longer and more pointed skulls. This leads to a weak bite. The red fox and the arctic fox have similarly narrow muzzles that are slightly longer than other foxes.

The researchers dropped a 3D-printed model of a regular arctic fox skull and a flattened version of the skull into snow from a height of 50 centimeters.

“What we found is that a sharper nose compresses the snow less, reducing the impact,” Jung says. This reduces the risk of injury. Its longer, pointier snout gently pushes the snow aside, as if it were liquid, he said. “Such an elongated shape helps foxes dive safely into the snow so they can focus on hunting.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

The specialized larynx of humpback whales allows them to sing underwater

Humpback whales use songs to communicate with each other across oceans

Karim Ilya

Biologists have discovered how baleen whales produce their unique songs. It involves the uniquely shaped larynx.

Baleen whales, including humpback whales, communicate through complex songs that can be heard over great distances. “People recorded the first whale sounds in his 1970s, but only recently have we started to recognize the different sounds these animals actually make,” he says. Cohen Elemans At the University of Southern Denmark. “Now the question is, how do they do this?”

To learn more, Elemans and his team extracted the larynxes of three recently deceased baleen whales.Balaenoptera borealis), humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and the northern minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata).

The larynx, commonly known as the voice box, is an organ located in the upper neck of mammals. As air flows through the organ, the tissue folds vibrate, creating sound.

But that's not the case with baleen whales, Ellemans says. When the researchers examined the whale's larynx, they discovered that the organ had an unexpected shape, with a cushion of fat on one side.

When these whales breathe, air is forced against the fatty material, which vibrates and makes sound. “I've never seen this in any other animal,” Ellemans says. “This is unique to baleen whales.”

Whales can also recycle air from their lungs, which is useful when they are underwater for long periods of time. When you exhale through the trachea and larynx, air enters a sac with walls that contract, returning air to the lungs.

Using a computer model of its larynx, the researchers found that baleen whales can generate frequencies of up to 300 hertz at depths up to 100 meters below the ocean's surface. This is within the frequency range of noise emitted by ships, raising concerns that ship noise could drown out their songs.

“These whales can't escape this situation,” Elemans said. “Therefore, we need to take steps to reduce noise.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com