Why Controversial Scientific Ideas Deserve Consideration

Maverick scientists often face skepticism from their more conventional peers. Science thrives on verifiable evidence and consensus, making it difficult for contrarians to gain traction.

Yet, some ideas merit critical examination. For instance, the ketogenic diet, widely known for rapid weight loss, is now being considered as a potential treatment for anorexia nervosa. This suggestion may seem paradoxical, given that anorexia is defined by an obsession with food restriction.

However, research indicates that the ketogenic diet may actually help alleviate symptoms of this condition. Our latest study highlighted that following a structured dietary regimen can significantly improve the well-being of those affected, albeit in a limited trial. It is thought that the keto diet may help restore energy balance in brain cells, leading to reduced anxiety and food-related obsessions. This possibility underscores the need for further investigation into the ketogenic diet as a potential treatment for anorexia. Currently, traditional treatments fail to help one-third of anorexia patients, a condition notorious for its high mortality rates.


It’s a mistake to think that an idea is bad just because the people who have it support it.

Endorsing the ketogenic diet for serious mental health issues may associate you with controversial figures, including former U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr., known for his unsubstantiated claims regarding vaccines and autism.

Nevertheless, dismissing an idea solely based on its advocates is misguided. An expanding body of research suggests potential mental health benefits from the ketogenic diet, including alleviation of symptoms linked to severe depression and schizophrenia. While this inquiry is still in its infancy, larger-scale trials must be conducted. Caution is essential, and any keto application for anorexia should be supervised by medical professionals. Ultimately, pursuing innovative solutions for challenging mental health conditions through rigorous scientific inquiry is crucial, even if it entails the risk of being labeled as unconventional or heretical.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Embracing Festive Pedantry: Why Snowflakes Deserve Our Attention

Beautiful snowflakes painted on a shop window - festive Christmas decoration. Horizontal color image.

This decoration will soon celebrate Katie’s convocation

Andriy Oleksienko/Shutterstock

During this festive season, it’s hard to miss seasonal designs like trees, holly, and joyful Santa figures. Among the most recognizable motifs are snowflakes. Although famously intricate, they can also be quite bothersome.

The snowflake’s unique structure is influenced by ice’s chemical makeup. While each snowflake is touted as one-of-a-kind, they exhibit intriguing mathematical patterns. Symmetry is a term we often use for shapes, where reflection symmetry means that one side mirrors the other when a line divides it.

Shapes can also showcase rotational symmetry, enabling partial rotations to maintain identical appearances. The count of distinct positions where the shape looks the same is known as the symmetry order. For instance, a square has a degree of 4 rotational symmetry, while an equilateral triangle exhibits a degree of 3.

Some shapes possess only rotational symmetry (like the Isle of Man’s emblem), while others exhibit only reflection symmetry (similar to a stick figure split down the middle).

Regular polygons combine both rotational and reflection symmetries, referred to as dihedral symmetries, allowing us to achieve additional symmetries. For example, reflecting a square vertically followed by horizontally results in a 180-degree rotation. Much like numerical addition, we can “add” symmetries, a concept rooted in group theory.

Snowflakes beautifully embody this concept. With a hexagonal formation, they reflect across six distinct lines through the center and can be rotated six times every 60 degrees. This symmetry arises from the chemical structure of water and ice, where hydrogen bonds form a rigid hexagonal lattice as water freezes.

This unique chemistry leads to the hexagonal foundation of most ice formations, including snowflakes. Variations in temperature, humidity, and pressure impact the specific shape of each snowflake, ensuring that while no two are alike, their basic form remains consistent.

As a mathematician, I am delighted to see such elegant shapes gracing winter, though I find the decorations (excluding the ones shown!) displaying snowflakes with 5 (ugh) or 8 (boo) branches incredibly irritating. Reader beware of seasonal snow fakes!

These articles will be published weekly at:
newscientist.com/maker

Katie Steckles is a mathematician, lecturer, YouTuber, and author based in Manchester, UK. She is also an advisor for New Scientist‘s puzzle column “BrainTwister”. Follow her on Twitter @stex

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com