A notable decline in megafauna populations approximately 200,000 years ago prompted ancient humans to pivot from robust stone tools to lighter, more versatile hunting kits for capturing smaller animals, according to a groundbreaking study. This research bolsters the theory that the shift to hunting smaller prey played a pivotal role in enhancing the cognitive abilities of early humans.

For over a million years, diverse early human species relied on heavy stone toolkits, including axes, kitchen knives, scrapers, and stone balls. Evidence indicates these tools specifiably targeted large herbivores, such as now-extinct relatives of elephants, hippos, and rhinos.

Between 400,000 and 200,000 years ago, the emergence of smaller, advanced tools coincided with the disappearance of heavier implements. Our species, Homo sapiens, emerged during this transformational period.

About 200,000 years ago, heavy tools vanished from archaeological records across the Levant, while the quantity of sophisticated, lightweight stone toolkits—such as blades and precision scrapers—increased significantly.

Research led by Vlad Litov, a professor at Tel Aviv University, establishes a compelling connection between these technological advancements and the dramatic decline of large herbivorous mammals, likely caused by overhunting.

Researchers meticulously cataloged archaeological evidence from 47 Paleolithic sites—covering 3.3 million to 12,000 years ago. Cross-referencing stone artifacts with animal remains revealed a distinct pattern.

The findings show a marked decline in large herbivores exceeding 1,000 kilograms, coinciding with the disappearance of fundamental stone tools 200,000 years ago. Conversely, the presence of smaller prey and innovative small tools rose significantly.

Supporting the correlation between tool types and prey availability, previous research indicates durable stone tools persisted in areas like southern China—where large game remained abundant—until about 50,000 years ago.

Previously, it was posited that technological advancements were driven by an inherent rise in intelligence among humans, potentially influenced by unknown evolutionary pressures. However, Litov and his colleagues suggest that the reliance on smaller prey may have been a significant factor in the brain’s evolution across modern humans.

“As megaherbivores dwindled, humans increasingly turned to smaller prey, demanding novel hunting methods, enhanced planning capabilities, and the use of more intricate, lighter toolkits,” states Litov. “This cognitive evolution was thus a response to new adaptive needs, rather than its initial driver.”

“It’s essential to consider more than just prey size,” states Seri Shipton from University College London. He mentions evidence suggesting mass hunts of medium-sized ungulates like horses and bison, indicating that cognitive developments and advanced planning were already occurring during the Middle Paleolithic period.

Nicolas Tessandier from the French National Center for Scientific Research adds a critical perspective. “Human adaptations to new fauna reflect resourcefulness rather than sheer intelligence,” he explains. “The development of effective technologies for hunting large herbivores was equally strategic.”

Litov acknowledges that earlier studies demonstrate cognitive abilities in ancient hominins, particularly Homo erectus specimens dating back around 2 million years. However, he contends that the transition from large to small prey had far-reaching implications for human development. An ancient elephant carcass could have sustained about 35 hunter-gatherers for an extended period. With this high-calorie resource’s disappearance, relying solely on smaller prey could drastically reduce caloric returns.

“To match the energy yield of one elephant carcass, we had to acquire numerous smaller ungulates, like fallow deer,” Litov explains. This necessity may have spurred cognitive and behavioral transformations, such as enhanced cooperative hunting strategies and better planning, laying the groundwork for increased brain sizes in later hominins like Neanderthals and Homo sapiens.

“In my view, the decline of large prey likely escalated inter-group competition,” notes Shipton. “It’s possible this dynamic created a feedback loop where diminishing large prey spurred cognitive advancements, allowing access to diversified smaller prey.”

Explore the Fascinating World of Archaeology and Human Origins

New Scientist extensively covers remarkable archaeological sites that have reshaped our understanding of early civilizations and species evolution. Come discover these insights with us!