UK Criminalizes Pornographic Content Involving Strangulation

The act of choking in pornography, often referred to as ‘choking,’ will be criminalized, with legal obligations imposed on technology platforms to prevent users in the UK from accessing such content.

Proposed amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill introduced in Parliament on Monday will make it illegal to possess or distribute pornography that features choking.

An additional amendment aims to extend the timeframe for victims of intimate image abuse to come forward, increasing the prosecution limit from six months to three years.

The government stated that these changes would eliminate unnecessary obstacles for victims reporting crimes, thus “enhancing access to justice for those in need.”

The choking ban follows a government review that suggested pornography was fostering the normalization of strangulation as a “sexual norm.”

The Independent Pornography Review, initiated by former chancellor Rishi Sunak and conducted by Baroness Gabby Bertin, published its findings in February, recommending a prohibition on pornography featuring strangulation.

Despite the common belief that strangulation can be performed safely, studies indicate that it poses significant risks. While there may be no visible injuries, oxygen deprivation—even for brief moments—can cause detrimental changes to the brain’s delicate structures.

Research has revealed specific alterations in the brains of women who have been subjected to choking during sexual activities, showing indicators of brain damage; Hemisphere disruption associated with depression and anxiety.

Given these dangers, non-fatal strangulation and non-fatal asphyxiation were categorized as criminal offenses in the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, amid concerns that offenders often escape punishment due to the absence of visible injuries.

The new amendments will mandate platforms to take proactive measures to block users’ access to illegal content involving strangulation and suffocation.

Choking-related offenses will be prioritized, imposing a legal responsibility on pornographic sites and tech platforms to ensure UK users cannot view such material.

The Ministry of Justice indicated that this might involve the use of automated systems for the detection and removal of images, moderation tools, or stricter content policies to hinder the spread of abusive material.

Failure to comply could result in fines of up to £18 million imposed by Ofcom.

Barney Ryan, CEO of the Strangulation Research Institute, expressed support for the ban, stating, “While consenting adults should have the freedom to safely explore their sexuality, we must recognize the severe risks posed by unregulated online content, particularly to children and young people.

“Strangulation represents a severe form of violence, often employed in domestic violence for control, silence, or to induce fear. Its portrayal in pornography, especially without context, can impart confusing and harmful messages to youth regarding what is normal and acceptable in intimate relationships. Our research confirms that there is no safe way to strangle.”

Alex Davis-Jones, Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls, emphasized that online misogyny “has devastating real-world impacts on all of us.” Daily, women and girls have their lives disrupted by cowards who abuse and exploit them from behind screens.

“This government will not remain passive while women face online violations and become victims of normalized and violent pornography.

“We are delivering a strong message that dangerous and sexist behavior will not be tolerated.”

This initiative comes on the heels of a government-commissioned inquiry in 2020 that revealed “significant evidence.” The link between pornography use and harmful sexual attitudes and behaviors toward women.

Additionally, a study conducted that year found that many children had encountered violent or offensive pornography, which left them feeling upset or anxious; some even mimicked the behaviors observed online. Children who engaged with pornography were three to six times more likely to participate in “potentially risky behavior” concerning consent, according to a study by the British Board of Film Classification. .

Source: www.theguardian.com

Meta permitted pornographic advertisements that breach content moderation standards

Meta owns social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram

JRdes / Shutterstock

In 2024, Meta allowed more than 3,300 pornographic ads, many featuring AI-generated content, to run on social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram.

The survey results are available below. report by AI forensics a European non-profit organization focused on researching technology platform algorithms. Researchers also found inconsistencies in Meta’s content moderation policies by reuploading many of the same explicit images as standard Instagram and Facebook posts. Unlike ads, these posts violated Meta’s terms and were quickly removed. community standards.

“I am disappointed and not surprised by this report, as my research has already revealed double standards in content moderation, particularly in the area of sexual content,” he said. carolina are At the Center for Digital Citizenship at Northumbria University, UK.

The AI Forensics report focuses on a small sample of ads targeting the European Union. As a result, the explicit meta-authorized ads primarily target middle-aged and older men promoting “shady sexual enhancement products” and “dating sites,” with a total reach of 8.2 million impressions. It turned out that it was exceeded.

This permissiveness reflects a widespread double standard in content moderation, Allais said. She says tech platforms often block content by “women, femme presentations, and LGBTQIA+ users.” That double standard extends to the sexual health of men and women. “Examples include lingerie and period-related advertising. [removed] Ads from Meta are approved, but ads for Viagra are approved,” she says.

In addition to discovering AI-generated images within ads, the AI Forensics team also discovered audio deepfakes. For example, some ads for sex-enhancing drugs featured the digitally manipulated voice of actor Vincent Cassel superimposed over pornographic visuals.

“Meta prohibits the display of nudity or sexual activity in ads or organic posts on our platform, and we remove violating content shared with us,” a Meta spokesperson said. “Bad actors are constantly evolving their tactics to evade law enforcement, which is why we continue to invest in the best tools and technology to identify and remove violating content.”

The report comes at the same time that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced he would be eliminating the fact-checking team in favor of crowd-sourced community notes.

“If you really want to sound dystopian, which I think there’s reason to do so at this point given Zuckerberg’s latest decision to eliminate fact checkers, Meta You could even say that they’re quickly stripping agencies of their users by taking money from questionable ads,” Allais said.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com