Prohibiting Phones in Schools Might Negatively Impact Certain Students’ Mental Well-Being

Some schools mandate that students store their cell phones in lockers throughout the school day.

Robin Utrecht/Shutterstock

Concerns about the adverse effects of excessive screen time are growing. Specifically, phone usage in educational settings can detract from learning experiences. However, some studies indicate that outright banning smartphones from schools can lead to feelings of loneliness among students, at least initially.

“When a school opts to completely prohibit smartphones, several factors should be considered,” explains Sanyogita Kare from Radboud University in the Netherlands. “Socially vulnerable youth may face additional challenges, leading to a possible sense of estrangement from peers.”

Mobile phones and similar devices have been linked to various issues, ranging from declining academic performance to worsening mental health among adolescents. However, there is a lack of concrete evidence supporting these claims. As of January 1, 2024, the Netherlands has instituted a ban on the use of smartphones and other smart devices in classrooms. Many schools enforce strict rules, prohibiting students from using such devices at all during class and often requiring that they be stored in lockers.

Seeking to unravel this impact, Carré and colleagues conducted a study with students from two middle schools in the Netherlands, both of which disallow smartphone usage during class. Surveys were administered initially in December 2023, prior to the nationwide ban, and repeated in March or April 2024.

The researchers aimed to analyze two types of loneliness: social loneliness and emotional loneliness. “Social loneliness pertains to your overall network and feelings of group belonging,” states Carre. “Emotional loneliness speaks to the depth of connection in close friendships.”

Upon comparing loneliness rates before and after the ban, findings were mixed. “Though we did not observe a significant change in social loneliness, there was a slight uptick in psychological loneliness,” Carre mentions. This surge may occur if some classmates are absent, thereby limiting students’ ability to connect with close friends during the school day.

The research also revealed that while the general sense of social loneliness didn’t rise among children, those who found social interactions more challenging were likely to feel increased loneliness. Carre notes that these impacts might not be long-lasting as students adjust to the ban over time.

A limitation of the study is that there was no comparison made with other Dutch schools where regulations are more lenient, such as allowing phones during breaks. Jonathan Canter from RAND, a U.S. nonprofit research organization, states, “To draw meaningful comparisons, we need data from similar students in schools without prohibition. Without that, we can’t ascertain whether our findings reflect broader patterns.”

Both Carre and Cantor express that there’s a gap in fundamental data regarding the effects of phone bans in schools. Canter and his team have recently attempted to address this issue by looking into voluntary bans on phones in U.S. schools.

They discovered significant variability in policies; certain schools enforce total bans on phones, while others permit their use at the discretion of teachers. In the UK, government guidelines suggest the use of phones in schools but leave the final decision to the discretion of school leaders regarding whether these devices should be banned.

“The pressing issue is the need for rigorous evaluations to assess the effectiveness of these policies at the school level. This requires detailed data on the types and timing of policies implemented,” Kanter states. “This is the focal point of current analysis efforts.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Florida Senate approves bill prohibiting local regulations protecting workers from heat-related hazards

The Florida Senate has passed a bill that would prevent cities and counties from enforcing mandatory water breaks or other workplace safety measures for extreme heat.

With a 28-11 vote along party lines, the Republican-controlled Senate approved Senate Bill 1492, which would prohibit local governments from setting workplace heat standards higher than federal requirements. This means that cities and counties would no longer have the authority to mandate water breaks or shade breaks for workers during the day.

The legislation was introduced in response to the record-breaking heat in 2023, which resulted in prolonged heat waves and high temperatures in the southern United States. Climate experts attributed the extreme heat to global warming.

Proponents of Senate Bill 1492 argue that uniform regulations are necessary to avoid inconsistent rules across the state.

However, labor organizations argue that workplace heat standards are vital for protecting workers, particularly those in industries like construction and agriculture that require outdoor work.

Similar to a law in Texas, the bill in Florida would prevent local governments from implementing ordinances that mandate outdoor workers to take breaks for water or shade.

According to the National Weather Service, heat-related incidents cause more deaths in the U.S. than any other weather event, with outdoor workers at higher risk. The bill would also prohibit local heat protection measures such as training programs and record-keeping related to heat exposure.

While companies must adhere to OSHA’s general workplace safety regulations, there are currently no specific federal guidelines addressing extreme heat hazards.

The bill is pending final approval in the House of Representatives before reaching Governor Ron DeSantis. If signed, it will take effect on July 1st.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Prohibiting social media use for children does not address the root issues.

When considering the most effective way to protect children’s mental health, the idea of banning social media often comes up. Recent events in the UK, such as the tragic murder of Brianna Gee, have reignited discussions on the dangers of social media for children. However, scientific evidence does not strongly support the notion that social media directly causes mental health issues in children.

Social media has been around for quite some time and has brought many positive aspects to the lives of young people. It allows them to connect with others, pursue their interests, and show support in times of tragedy. Studies have shown that increased social media use does not necessarily decrease life satisfaction for most children.

While it may seem that social media is linked to a decrease in life satisfaction for some adolescents, the opposite is not always true. Evidence supporting the idea of social media addiction in children is limited. Without a clear causal relationship between social media use and mental health issues, banning social media for children may not be the solution.

Are most children addicted to social media and smartphones?

Using the term “addiction” in reference to social media and smartphone use may be misleading. While some children may develop bad habits related to their use, it does not necessarily constitute a true addiction. Weaning children off social media is often easier than addressing addictive behaviors related to substances.

Is it possible that a social media ban will actually be enforced?

Enforcing a ban on social media for children poses many challenges, both legally and morally. Children have rights to access and enjoy social media, and restricting their access may infringe on these rights. Past attempts to ban social media use, such as South Korea’s “Cinderella Law,” have shown limited effectiveness in improving children’s well-being.

How can children develop a healthy relationship with screens?

As parents, it is important to guide children in developing a healthy relationship with screens, including social media. Teaching them to self-regulate their behavior and manage their screen time can prepare them for adulthood. Simply banning social media may not address the underlying issues of human behavior and the attention economy.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com