EPA Leaders Pledge “Complete Transparency” on Geoengineering Amidst Ongoing Weather Conspiracy Theories

The individual in green is R-Tenn. He mentioned that Sen. Tim Burchett is a co-sponsor of the initiative. The barchet is spreading equally perplexing assertions regarding severe weather.

A spokesman for Greene stated that lawmakers have been “discussing this matter for quite some time” and asserted that the bill is unrelated to the floods in Texas.

In a follow-up email, Greene communicated with Zeldin and expressed encouragement over his actions.

“This is an uncontrolled experiment conducted in the atmosphere without consent. It’s reckless, dangerous, and must be halted,” she stated in an email.

Burchett’s office did not immediately respond to inquiries for comment.

Following Milton and Helen, NOAA issued a factsheet in October 2024, aiming to debunk “weather modification claims” that emerged after two storms impacted Florida and North Carolina. The agency declared it would not “fund or engage in cloud seeding or any weather modification projects.”

Zeldin’s reference to more fringe theories regarding extreme weather coincides with the Trump administration’s reduction in climate change research funding and the removal of a website hosting the government’s climate assessment. President Donald Trump referred to climate change as a hoax, despite scientists uncovering stronger evidence linking the intensity and frequency of extreme weather to global warming.

Decades of research on weather modification have often fueled conspiracy theories.

From 1962 to 1982, NOAA participated in a project called Storm Fury, which aimed to investigate whether hurricane intensity could be altered. This study did not achieve its goals and was ultimately discontinued. NOAA has not undertaken similar research since. According to the factsheet.

Cloud seeding is a weather modification technology currently utilized. This practice has existed since the 1950s and typically involves dispersing silver iodide into clouds to extract moisture from the atmosphere, resulting in additional precipitation. Presently, cloud seeding programs are mainly focused on enhancing water supplies in western states. Companies are required to notify authorities before implementing such measures.

“Cloud seeding doesn’t generate water; it aids surrounding clouds in releasing 5-15% of their moisture. However, Texas was already experiencing 100% humidity, extreme moisture, and storms. The clouds didn’t require assistance,” Cappucci stated.

The proliferation of these claims coincides with escalating threats directed at meteorologists.

Geoengineering is a legitimate scientific field; however, assertions regarding its capability to control significant weather patterns and generate adverse weather are unfounded. Most geoengineering techniques remain theoretical and untested, with federal researchers making only tentative steps to evaluate their viability. Atmospheric scientists report no evidence of any large-scale programs.

Last year, in Alameda, California, a small test project in geoengineering, referred to as Marine Cloud Brightening, was disrupted by community protestors, despite researchers demonstrating its safety.

Psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert described how conspiracy theories tend to surge, particularly during moments of weather events that leave individuals feeling powerless.

“Conspiracy theories offer emotionally gratifying narratives. They restore a sense of control by framing phenomena as intentional actions by powerful entities rather than unpredictable chaotic events,” Alpert told NBC News. “In this context, believing ‘someone is doing this to us’ is more bearable than facing the idea that ‘no one is in charge.'”

While some interpret the EPA’s actions as a sign of transparency, others view it merely as a recent political maneuver to sidestep critical environmental issues.

“Some individuals question whether the bird is real or not. Will that become your next focus?” Congressman Don Beyer D-Va remarked in response to Zeldin’s comments on Thursday morning. He went on to comment on X regarding the EPA guidelines, “How much taxpayer money will be expended on this?”

Source: www.nbcnews.com

TikTok Breached EU Advertising Transparency Laws, Says Committee

The European Commission has determined that TikTok is breaching EU digital regulations, which mandate transparency from those who pay for advertising.

The committee has reached a preliminary conclusion regarding the advertising practices of the Chinese-owned short video platform, following an investigation that commenced in February 2024. Should the committee uphold this assessment, the company could incur a penalty of 6% of its global annual revenue.

Moreover, an ongoing EU investigation into TikTok, which raised concerns about the integrity of the Romanian election, is a priority for the committee. This inquiry began last December.

The committee’s finding of TikTok’s lack of advertising transparency comes just four days ahead of “Super Sunday,” when voters will head to the polls in Poland, Portugal, and Romania.

According to the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), large internet platforms are required to maintain advertising libraries, detailing ad content and identifying target users who pay for advertisements. The committee noted that TikTok has failed to provide this information, inhibiting public access to search it. This repository is vital for EU officials to detect fraudulent ads and coordinated campaigns aimed at election disruption.

Romania experienced political upheaval last year when the first round of the presidential election was nullified, citing a Russian online campaign promoting far-right candidates who skewed voting outcomes.

On Sunday, Romanian voters will select between two candidates in the second round of the rescheduled presidential election.

The European Commission initiated an investigation last December to assess whether TikTok adequately managed the risks to the integrity of Romania’s presidential election. Ursula von der Leyen, the committee’s president, stated, “There are substantial indications that foreign entities have utilized TikTok to meddle in Romanian presidential elections.”

The alleged non-compliance with TikTok’s advertising library complicates efforts for EU officials and researchers to ascertain if misleading ads were utilized in election campaigns, including in Romania. However, the committee cautioned against concluding that TikTok has violated the DSA’s electoral integrity requirements.

Commission spokesperson Thomas Leisure indicated that there is no direct correlation between the December investigation and the preliminary findings regarding advertising transparency violations.

“Naturally, the malfunctioning ad repository is an issue since it hampers the ability to assess whether fake or deceptive ads are being employed in elections,” explained Regnier. Nevertheless, he added, “The fact that the advertising repository is malfunctioning in the context of this February investigation does not impact the findings of the December inquiry.”

As part of the December investigation, EU officials stated that Mr. TikTok is evaluating necessary measures to avert electoral interference in Romania.

A TikTok spokesperson mentioned that the company is reviewing the committee’s preliminary findings regarding the advertising repository. “While we support the regulatory aims of the DSA, we are also continuously enhancing our advertising transparency tools. We contest some of the committee’s interpretations and highlight that guidance is being provided through preliminary findings rather than explicit public directives,” the company stated.

The company currently has the right to examine the committee’s investigative files and establish a defense. If the committee confirms its findings, TikTok could be fined up to 6% of its annual global revenue and will be required to take corrective measures.

The committee also noted that TikTok’s algorithm continues to face scrutiny for other suspicious activities under EU law, including whether users engage with content that leads to addictive behaviors. Investigations into TikTok’s age verification and child safety protocols also commenced in February last year alongside the inquiry into the advertising repository, but those efforts remain unresolved.

TikTok has previously indicated that it is collaborating with relevant authorities regarding the elections.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Activists advocate for public transparency of ride-hailing app data to tackle exploitation and reduce emissions | Gig Economy

Activists are urging Uber and other ride-hailing apps to disclose data on their drivers’ workload to combat exploitation and reduce carbon emissions.

Analysis by Worker Info Exchange suggests that drivers for Uber and its competitors may have missed out on over £1.2 billion in earnings and expenses last year due to payment structures.

The report argues that these platforms are built on an oversupply of vehicles and the exploitation of workers, leading to financial struggles and debt.

Uber collects anonymized trip data in several North American cities and claims this covers around 40% of drivers’ miles before picking up passengers.

Despite Uber’s response that drivers earn money on other platforms during idle times, Worker Info Exchange maintains that better compensation and expense coverage could have resulted in an additional £1.29 billion industry-wide in 2023.

The report also highlights issues with monitoring drivers’ mileage, leading to potential exhaustion and safety hazards.

Similar concerns are raised about food delivery apps, with calls for more transparency in journey data.

Efforts in New York to limit vehicle licenses to support taxi drivers and reduce congestion have been noted, although recent changes exempt electric vehicles.

Uber’s carbon emissions in the UK are projected to surpass those of Transport for London, prompting calls for stricter control and transparency from regulators.

The ongoing debate around worker classification and rights in the gig economy is also highlighted, with promises from lawmakers to address issues of “false self-employment”.

Worker Info Exchange, founded by a key figure in the Uber Supreme Court case, aims to empower gig workers by providing more control over their data and decision-making processes.

Source: www.theguardian.com