Horror Game Horses Banned: Is the Controversy Bigger Than You Think?


On November 25th, Santa Ragione, the celebrated Italian developer known for acclaimed titles like MirrorMoon EP and Saturnalia, will
unveil their latest project “Horses”, which faced a ban from Steam, the largest digital marketplace for PC games. Shortly after, Epic Games Store also pulled the game just days before its intended release on December 2. Additionally, Horses was briefly removed from the Humble Store, though it was reinstated the following day.

This stirred-up controversy thrust the game into the spotlight on various digital platforms.
Teeth sells it on itch.io and GOG. Nevertheless, the pivotal question lingers—why was it banned? Horses tackles various highly sensitive subjects (the introduction notably warns of “physical violence, psychological abuse, graphic brutality, depictions of slavery, physical and psychological torture, domestic abuse, sexual assault, suicide, misogyny”), making it both disturbing and unsettling.




Controversial…horses. Photo: Santa Ragione

The storyline is straightforward but soon takes a dark turn. You step into the shoes of Anselmo, a 20-year-old Italian man who is sent to spend his summer on a farm for personal development. It rapidly becomes clear (so much so that I let out a startled “ha!”) that this is no ordinary farm. The “horses” present there are not real horses but naked humans with horse heads seemingly affixed to them.

Your task is to tend to the garden, the “horses,” and the “dog” (a human with a dog’s head). Throughout Horses’ three-hour duration, Anselmo engages in tedious and painfully slow daily chores, such as chopping wood and gathering vegetables. However, these mundane activities are peppered with disturbing tasks. On the first day, you stumble upon the corpse of a “horse” hanging from a tree and must assist the farmer in burying it.

While undeniably unsettling, Horses provides little in terms of horror nuance, and when it does, the severity is lessened by basic, crude graphics (when a farmer lashes a human horse and subsequently applies hydrogen peroxide to its back, the resulting marks on its skin appear blurred and unrealistic).




Anxiety…horses. Photo: Santa Ragione

The genitals and udders of the “horses” are obscured. Slaves are prohibited from fornicating, yet we observe they still partake in such acts (depicted in a simplistic and animalistic manner). You are compelled to “tame” them by returning them to their pen, but your interactions with them are limited to button presses, leaving what you’ve done to them ambiguous.

Valve, the owner of Steam,
informed PC Gamer that Horses underwent content review in 2023. “After our team played the build and reviewed the content, we provided feedback to the developer regarding why the game cannot be published on Steam in accordance with our onboarding rules and guidelines,” reads their statement. “After some time, the developer requested we reassess the review, leading our internal content review team to discuss it thoroughly and communicate our final decision to the developer not to publish the game on Steam.”

According to IGN, the Epic Games Store told Santa Ragione, “Upon investigation, we found violations of the Epic Games Store Content Guidelines, specifically in our ‘Inappropriate Content’ and ‘Hateful or Abusive Content’ policies, and as a result, the game cannot be published on the Epic Games Store.” Santa Ragione asserts that “the specifics of the contested content have not been clarified.”

The gameplay in Horses is grotesque but not without purpose. The horror is psychological, rooted in the unsettling sensation of performing mundane tasks in a hellish environment without understanding the reasons behind such bizarre occurrences. There’s minimal sound beyond the constant whir of a film camera (the game presents itself akin to a nearly silent Italian arthouse film), with sporadic cuts to ultra-close shots of mouths talking and chewing, disconcerting character models, and real-world visuals of water being poured into glasses or slop filling a dog’s bowl.

While there’s no explicit gore or overt violence, the discomfort, annoyance, and unease pervade throughout, exposing primal human fears without severely disturbing your lunch. Though this serves as an intriguing reflection on violence and power dynamics, it does not embody a shocking or excessive experience. The discussions it has sparked about video games as an art form and the censorship of art ultimately seem more profound than the game’s actual content.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Instagram Users Claim They Were Banned Without an Appeal Process | Consumer Concerns

I am a young black entrepreneur and RM leader. His personal and business social media profiles have been deleted by Meta, the parent company of Instagram. There was no notice, no option to appeal, and no explanation given to my understanding. He had successfully established two businesses in clothing design and music events.

Just six days prior to the ban, he sold 1,500 tickets for an electronic dance event in London. Instagram, rather than his website, serves as the main platform for his work. Yet, he was abruptly informed that his content violated Meta’s community guidelines regarding violence and incitement.

His business account boasted 5,700 followers, while his personal account had nearly 4,000 contacts. All were erased without alternative means of contact, leaving him without his entire social and professional network. Retrieving this data is not allowed. IP address His device is inaccessible due to restrictions New account.

In following his work, I’ve yet to see anything violent in his promotional videos, save for toy weapons. His life is being upended by what seems to be an unyielding algorithm.

RP, London

The pivotal role of social media in the lives of young people often confuses older generations who rely on websites and direct contacts.

When I spoke with RM, 21, he shared that the abrupt account closure by Meta, due to vaguely defined infractions, also affected fellow students, resulting in a loss for their burgeoning businesses.

“For my generation, my Instagram profile is not just my sole source of income; it’s part of my identity, making recovery challenging,” he explains. “I wasn’t notified about violating any guidelines. This decision has cost me thousands of pounds in lost sales, which is especially devastating for single parents in the city center.”

RM firmly denies posting any content that could be perceived as violent or inciting harm. His account has been deleted, leaving him unable to clarify.

Instead, I came across an interview with RM on a music website that offered insights into the cyberpunk rave scene he participates in. Some band and song titles might trigger the algorithms.

Terms like drug, sex, and kill are prevalent in various musical genres. It remains unclear which specific lines resulted in RM’s discharge, as Meta has provided no communication to RM or myself, citing “confidentiality.”

While they declined to comment further, a spokesperson indicated that they would not restore RM’s account or provide him with contact details due to a “violation” of the guidelines. There is no avenue for appeal.

Meta, as a commercial entity, has the right to decide its clientele and eliminate harmful content, yet its role as judge, jury, and executioner is concerning given the repercussions of such decisions.

RM can file a Subject Access Request to discover what information Meta holds about him. While this won’t restore his account, it might help him comprehend the basis of the actions taken against him. Should Meta refuse to comply, he can reach out to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

He has created a new account and purchased a laptop to begin the process of rebuilding. I advise him (and others) to regularly back up contacts and not solely rely on companies that offer opaque administrative practices.

Meta currently faces scrutiny for enforcing widespread bans on users via algorithms on Facebook and Instagram. A petition has garnered over 25,000 signatures, advocating for human intervention.

Locked out of Facebook

em West Sussex hit a digital dead end after being locked out of her Facebook account when hackers changed her password, email address, and phone number. She states that Facebook’s automated system provided a lengthy set of instructions when she sought guidance to regain access from the hackers. Subsequently, the hackers switched her account from private to public, exposing her sensitive personal information.

Upon seeking help from Facebook, her newly established account was permanently closed. “It’s impossible to find someone to communicate with via email, chat, or phone,” she laments. “On a positive note, I enjoy the absence of Facebook noise in my life, though it felt like having my arm amputated!”

Meta did not respond to requests for comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

WhatsApp Banned on All US House of Representatives Devices

All U.S. House representatives have banned the use of WhatsApp messaging services, as detailed in a memo distributed to House staff on Monday.

The notification to House staff indicated that “the Cybersecurity office deems WhatsApp problematic due to a lack of transparency regarding user data protection, insufficient data encryption at rest, and the potential security risks associated with its use.”

The Chief Admin Note suggested alternative messaging applications, including Microsoft’s Teams, Wickr, Amazon’s Signal, Apple’s iMessage, and FaceTime.

A spokesperson for META, the parent company of WhatsApp, stated: “We strongly oppose the stance taken by the highest administrative officers of the House of Representatives and recognize that members and their staff frequently rely on WhatsApp.

“WhatsApp offers end-to-end encryption by default, ensuring that messages can only be accessed by recipients and not even WhatsApp itself. This level of security surpasses that of most apps on the CAO’s approved list.

Signal, which employs end-to-end encrypted messaging similar to WhatsApp, has recently been involved in a controversy after Defense Secretary Pete Hegges shared sensitive information about a planned Yemen attack within at least two private Signal group chats.

One of these chats was initiated by national security adviser Mike Waltz and included senior U.S. security officials, along with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg from Atlantic. Other chats were organized by Hegges himself, involving his family and approximately 12 others.

The Pentagon previously cautioned employees against using Signal due to its technical vulnerabilities, as reported by NPR. A “OPSEC special bulletin” shared on March 18 warned that Russian hacking groups could exploit Signal’s vulnerabilities to surveil encrypted organizations and target “individuals of interest.”

Pentagon-wide communications permit the use of “third-party messaging apps” for sharing unclassified information, but prohibit their use for sending “private” unclassified details.

Reuters contributed to this report

Quick Guide

Please contact us about this story

show

The best public interest journalism relies on direct accounts from knowledgeable individuals.

If you have anything to share regarding this topic, please reach out to us securely via the following methods:

Secure Messaging in the Guardian App

The Guardian app includes a tool for submitting tips about stories. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and hidden within the usual operations of the Guardian mobile app, preventing an observer from realizing you are communicating with us.

If you haven’t downloaded the Guardian app yet, you can get it (iOS/Android) and access the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.

SecureDrop, Instant Messaging Apps, Email, Phone, and Mail

For alternatives and the pros and cons of each, please check our guide at guardian.com/tips.

Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Dolphins on the brink of death from banned toxic chemicals since the 1980s

Common dolphins tied to a beach in the UK

Waves & Wellies Photography

Sea dolphins around the UK are almost dying from a combination of water temperature and toxic chemicals that the UK banned in the 1980s.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are long-lasting chemical contaminants that were once widely used in industrial manufacturing. They interfere with the breeding and immune response of animals and cause them cancer With humanity.

In a new study, researchers showed that higher levels of PCBs in the body and increased sea surface temperatures are at a higher risk of death from a common shunting dolphin infection (Delphines Delphis), the first of marine mammals.

The ocean is facing a “triple planetary crisis” – the “climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss,” but we often see the threat alone, says, Rosie Williams At the Zoological Society in London.

Williams and her colleagues analyzed postmortem data from 836 common dolphins marginalized in the UK between 1990 and 2020 and assessed the impact of these interlinked threats.

They found that a rise in PCB of 1 milligram per kilogram of fat has become fatal, with a 1.6% increase in the likelihood of infections such as gastritis, enteritis, bacterial infections, encephalitis, and pneumonia. Every 1°C increase in sea surface temperature corresponded to a 14% increase in the risk of death.

According to this study, the threshold for PCB fat concentrations to significantly affect the risk of dolphin disease was 22 mg/kg, while the average sample concentration was high at 32.15 mg/kg.

Dolphins have a long lifespan, are widely distributed around the UK and are widely distributed in the food chain, making them a good indicator species that shows how threats affect other animals.

“The location at the top of the food web means that toxins from prey accumulate in the enlargement, providing an intensive snapshot of chemical contaminants at the expense of health,” says Thea Taylor. Sussex Dolphin Project.

It was banned in the UK in 1981 and internationally in 2001, but the PCB is still washed down into the ocean. “They are probably still entering the environment through stockpiling, and often are side products or by-products of other manufacturing processes,” Williams says.

Cleaning up your PCB is extremely difficult. “They are nightmares to get rid of because they are so permanent,” she says. “There’s definitely no easy fix.”

While some researchers have explored edging as a cleanup technique, others have focused on improving the effectiveness of water treatment plants in the removal of sustainable chemicals.

These findings show what happens if not taken to ban Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), another broad group of so-called eternal chemicals.

“We cannot reverse any already-occurring pollution, but it’s important to prevent further chemical input into the environment,” Taylor says.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com