Stumpy: The First Bloom of Washington, D.C.’s Beloved Cherry Tree Clone

Stumpy Lives Again: A Cherry Blossom Revival

A clone of the beloved craggy Yoshino cherry tree, famously cut down in Washington, D.C. two years ago, has bloomed for the first time this spring, marking what federal officials call a “crowning achievement” in horticulture.

The National Arboretum reported that the plant material used to propagate these Yoshino cherry tree clones was collected during the summer of 2024. This iconic tree was one of the many lining the shores of the Tidal Basin, situated between the Thomas Jefferson Memorial and the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial.

Stumpy clones bloom for the first time this spring.
National Arboretum

The new clone is thriving, having established its own root system and been significantly nurtured. Currently, it remains in a designated research area until the National Park Service plans to replant it, which could be as early as next spring.

Richard Olsen, director of the arboretum, expressed hope: “We anticipate that the legacy and spirit of these iconic cherries will inspire future generations of cherry blossom enthusiasts worldwide and strengthen our cultural connections for years to come.”

A cherry tree stump in Washington’s Tidal Basin, set to be cut in 2024.
Mandel Gunn/AFP via Getty Images

Stumpy gained fame while standing at the Tidal Basin near the National Mall. It became a social media sensation in 2020 when a Reddit post humorously compared its condition to “the user’s love life,” yet conveyed a heartfelt appreciation.

This distinctive tree, known for its hollow trunk, was among 158 trees removed in 2024 as part of an initiative to reinforce the sea wall bordering the National Mall.

The night prior to its removal, a tourist relayed to NBC News that Stumpy embodied the characteristics of an “ugly duckling,” capturing attention for its uniqueness.

“It stands independently and truly stands out,” she remarked.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

European Ants Successfully Clone Another Species: Insights from Sciworthy

When discussing evolutionary biology, we often assume that the offspring of organisms belong to the same species. However, the European ant Messol Iberix challenges this notion. Recent studies in evolutionary ecology have uncovered that certain ants in the genus Messer are likely descended from two different species, leading to the term hybrids.

A groundbreaking study conducted by researchers at the University of Montpellier in France revealed that European ant queens are capable of producing worker ants through cloning hybrids from other ant species. This remarkable finding positions the European ant as the first known animal to spontaneously generate offspring from a different species, a process termed Heterogeneous parity, challenging preconceived notions in reproductive biology.

By investigating the population genetics of Messer ants and analyzing single DNA nucleotides at specific genomic locations, scientists discovered that all worker ants within the European ant species are hybrids. Genetic sequencing has confirmed that these worker ants inherit maternal genes from European ants and paternal genes from their closely related harvester ants, identified as messerstructor. The ecological implications of this hybridization are significant, especially since these two species typically do not coexist in Europe, raising questions about the origins of these hybrids.

To investigate further, researchers analyzed samples from wild European ant colonies. From 132 males across 26 colonies, they observed that 44% exhibited hairiness—a trait indicative of European ants—while the remaining 56% appeared hairless, typical of harvester ants. Through DNA and protein sequence analyses, they confirmed these physical differences stemmed from a mix of both European and harvester ant species, which diverged over 5 million years ago.

Interestingly, European ant queens engage in polygamy, mating with both European and harvester ant males. This dynamic means that to produce worker ants, European ant queens rely on sperm from harvester males, as sperm from European males produces only queens. Consequently, all worker ants are hybrids, meaning the survival of these colonies is dependent on the presence of male harvesters.

To solidify their hypotheses, researchers sequenced the mitochondrial genome, which is exclusively inherited from mother ants. Analyzing 286 eggs from five laboratory colonies, they discovered that 9% of the eggs laid by queens solely contained harvester ant DNA, supporting the idea that European ant queens can produce offspring without their own genetic material. This unique phenomenon, where males serve as the sole source of genetic inheritance, is termed androclonality or androgen.

Researchers believe that millions of years ago, when both species thrived in close proximity, European ant queens acquired sperm from wild harvester ant colonies to produce workers. As harvester ant populations declined in Europe, these queens adapted by storing sperm and began directly cloning males through their eggs, establishing a unique clonal lineage of male harvester ants that persists today.

The study indicated that a majority of hybrid workers within the colonies observed were fathered by male clones, although a small fraction came from male harvester ants. The genetic diversity among cloned males was notably lower than that found in wild males. Researchers noted distinct physical differences, akin to the contrast between domesticated cats and their wild counterparts, with cloned harvesters exhibiting reduced body hair compared to their wild relatives. This led the researchers to propose that these male clones should be classified as a domesticated variant of the harvester ant species.

While artificial cloning is generally recognized in scientific circles, the natural cloning adaptation observed in European ant queens highlights a fascinating survival strategy. Although their ability to clone males from another species has been established, the cellular and genetic mechanisms underlying this process remain poorly understood. Unraveling the evolutionary origins of this behavior and its implications for other species presents an intriguing challenge for the research team in France.

For more insights on this topic, check out the article: here.


Post views: 194

Source: sciworthy.com

AI Can Clone Faces Instantly: Is There Cause for Concern?

Advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) has simplified the process of creating digital doppelgangers.

For decades, AI tools have been programmed to generate faces. The face was chosen as a primary focus for testing capabilities due to multiple factors.

Firstly, the structure and layout of human faces are relatively consistent, making them ideal for early AI learning. There is also an abundance of facial images available online, providing more data for AI to train on.

Importantly, the choice to focus on facial recognition stemmed from its familiarity. Humans are highly skilled at recognizing and interpreting faces, while assessing the accuracy of AI-generated images of landscapes or buildings can pose challenges.

This is why studies showcasing AI’s ability to create hyper-realistic synthetic faces have continually garnered significant attention.

Consequently, AI has evolved into a facial recognition expert. Today, it can analyze live video footage, precisely identify facial features, and transition seamlessly between different pre-learned faces, including those of celebrities and public figures.

Moreover, users can adjust lighting and create exaggerated facial expressions. The “Deepfake” technology successfully mimics these effects.

Additionally, with a collection of images showing faces from various angles, AI has the capability to generate double the number of faces, enabling overlays on existing images. With such doppelgänger technology, anyone can effectively become you.

Best of all, this technology is freely accessible to anyone who knows how to install and operate it on a standard computer.

While creating a digital doppelgänger may require a certain skill level, it’s not difficult to find user-friendly software. However, these advancements raise significant concerns for privacy and verification.


This article addresses the inquiry (submitted by Julian Fisher via email) “How can I easily create my digital doppelganger?”

Please email us with your questions at Question @sciencefocus.com or reach out via Facebook, Twitter or Instagram Page (please include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate Fun fact and discover more fascinating science content.


read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Disappointing AI PAC-MAN clone receives negative reviews

tThere’s a lot happening in the world of video games and AI generators right now. Both Microsoft and Google have developed models that allow you to imagine a virtual world, albeit with some limitations. People are also using Grok, the Gen-AI chatbot from Elon Musk’s Xai, to create basic clones of old arcade games.

All you have to do is type “write.” On February 21st, Xai employee Taylor Silveira claimed to have created an exact replica of the 1980 Coinop Pac-Man using Grok 3. This version of Pac-Man includes dots, power pills, fruit, and all ghosts moving around the maze.

The key takeaway is that as long as the AI has the right commands in its software, it can generate a version within seconds. But how accurate are these Pac-Man clones really? Can just anyone create them? To answer these questions, I randomly approached some individuals in X who had posted their own Grok Pac-Man clones and asked them about their process.

I’ll give it a shot


John Hester’s Pacman. Illustration: Generated by AI

Author: John Hester, @hesterjohn
Time spent: 2 hours

First up, we have John Hester, a retired corporate software developer from California. When asked about Grok, Hester describes it as a large-scale language model (LLM) that competes with other models like ChatGpt and Llama. According to him, Grok 3 is the most advanced and continuously learns new things.

Hester’s experience with creating a Pac-Man clone using Grok was positive. He was able to give basic instructions to the AI and received a version of Pac-Man in seconds. Despite a few tweaks needed, Hester was impressed with Grok’s capabilities. He rates his experience 3 out of 5 stars.

Hester also mentions Elon Musk’s plans to use Grok for game development and emphasizes the cautious optimism surrounding AI advancements.

Score: 3 stars

Source: www.theguardian.com