Extended Use of Melatonin Linked to Negative Health Outcomes

An analysis of five-year health data from over 130,000 adults suffering from insomnia who had been taking melatonin for at least a year indicated that these individuals were at an increased risk of being diagnosed with heart failure, needing hospitalization for the condition, or dying from any cause.



Long-term use of melatonin supplements, often utilized to enhance sleep and treat insomnia, was linked to a higher risk of heart failure diagnosis. Image credit: Gemini AI.

Melatonin is a hormone naturally generated by the pineal gland, aiding in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle.

Levels of melatonin rise in darkness and fall during daylight.

Synthetic hormones, chemically identical to natural melatonin, are frequently prescribed to address insomnia (difficulties in initiating or maintaining sleep) and jet lag.

This supplement is widely available over-the-counter in several countries, including the United States.

In the recent study, researchers identified individuals with long-term melatonin use (defined as over a year recorded in electronic health records) as part of the melatonin group.

Conversely, those without any recorded use of melatonin in their medical history were classified as the non-melatonin group.

“The perception that melatonin supplements are harmless may not be accurate,” asserts Dr. Ekenedirichukwu-Nnadi from the State University of New York Downstate/Kings County Primary Care.

“If validated, our findings could significantly impact how healthcare providers counsel patients regarding sleep aids.”

Although melatonin supplements are marketed as safe sleep aids, there is insufficient evidence regarding their long-term cardiovascular safety, prompting researchers to investigate whether melatonin use elevates the risk of heart failure, particularly in chronic insomnia patients.

Heart failure, which arises when the heart is unable to pump sufficient oxygenated blood for the body’s organs to operate effectively, affects 6.7 million adults in the United States, according to the American Heart Association’s 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics.

The researchers utilized a large international database to analyze five years of electronic health records of adults with chronic insomnia who had documented melatonin use exceeding one year.

They were compared with colleagues in the database who also suffered from insomnia but did not have melatonin recorded in their medical files.

Participants with a prior heart failure diagnosis or those prescribed other sleep medications were excluded from the study.

The analysis revealed that among insomnia sufferers, those whose records indicated long-term melatonin use (over 12 months) were roughly 90% more likely to develop heart failure over five years compared to non-users (4.6% vs. 2.7%, respectively).

Similar outcomes (an 82% higher incidence) were observed for individuals who received at least two melatonin prescriptions spaced 90 days or more apart.

In a further analysis, researchers noted that melatonin users were nearly 3.5 times more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure compared to non-users (19.0% vs. 6.6%, respectively).

Melatonin group participants were almost twice as likely to die from any cause over a five-year duration compared to those in the non-melatonin group (7.8% vs. 4.3%, respectively).

“Melatonin supplements are generally regarded as a safe, ‘natural’ solution for improving sleep quality, so the consistent and significant rise in serious health issues was unexpected,” stated Dr. Nadi.

“Since melatonin isn’t officially approved for treating insomnia in the U.S., it’s surprising that physicians would prescribe it for more than 365 days,” remarked Dr. Marie-Pierre St-Onge from Columbia University.

“While melatonin is available as an over-the-counter supplement in the U.S., individuals should be cautious about using it chronically without proper guidance.”

The research findings are expected to be presented at an upcoming conference this week at the American Heart Association 2025 Academic Session.

Source: www.sci.news

The Negative Impact of Excessive Fiber on Gut Health

You might have come across the term “fibremaxxing.” This recent health craze, popularized on platforms like TikTok, involves individuals significantly increasing their daily fiber intake. The recommended amount is 25-30g (0.9-1 oz) per day with the goal of enhancing gut health.

Influencers are now dubbing fiber as the “new protein,” promoting high-fiber foods such as beans, lentils, whole grains, fruits, and vegetables. Some even resort to fiber supplements to meet their daily targets.

This theory suggests that such increases have potential health benefits, including improved digestion, more regular bowel movements, increased gut bacteria, and relief from symptoms associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

This trend arises from the belief that modern diets often lack sufficient fiber, and there is certainly some truth to this.

Current data indicates that 91% of individuals in the UK, and likewise in the US, do not meet the recommended fiber intake. 95% of people lack adequate fiber.

So, ramping up fiber consumption must be beneficial, right? However, it’s not that straightforward, particularly in relation to diet and health.

Intestinal Reactions

Fiber plays a crucial role in gut health for several reasons.

Though it is a carbohydrate, fiber differs from other carbs like starch and sugar; it is not digested in the small intestine. Instead, it travels to the large intestine where gut bacteria utilize it. These bacteria offer various health benefits by producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that contribute positively to our health.

Non-decomposable fibers absorb liquid, increase stool bulk, and make elimination smoother. Thus, boosting fiber intake can help prevent constipation and regulate bowel movements.

Individuals with IBS often believe enhanced fiber intake soothes symptoms, particularly if they experience more constipation than diarrhea.

Vegetables offer a variety of fibers, both soluble and insoluble, beneficial for gut health.

Research suggests that adequate fiber intake can reduce the risk of colon cancer. One SCFA produced in the large intestine, butyrate, is believed to have anti-inflammatory and protective properties for colon cells.

By facilitating stool passage, fibers minimize the contact time colon cells have with harmful substances, potentially explaining the rising incidence of colon cancers worldwide. Particularly among young individuals who consume insufficient fiber-rich foods.

Nonetheless, while incorporating more fiber into your diet is generally beneficial, “fibremaxxing” requires a nuanced understanding of nutrition. It’s akin to running a marathon without proper training for your gut.

The Risks of Overconsumption

The gut is a complex ecosystem, finely tuned to maintain balance, and introducing excessive specific nutrients can lead to unintended consequences. Some proponents of “fibremaxxing” advocate for fiber intakes exceeding 50g (1.8oz) daily, possibly resulting in side effects such as bloating, cramps, and diarrhea.

There’s also a variety of fiber types to contemplate. Soluble fibers absorb water and slow digestion, while insoluble fibers pass through largely intact, hastening digestion. Moreover, fermentable fibers feed bacteria in the large intestine.

A healthy gut requires a balance among these fibers. Excessive insoluble fiber (found in wheat bran and some vegetables) may bulk up stool but irritate sensitive digestive organs. Certain fermentable fibers, like oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (known as FODMAPs), can complicate absorption and potentially aggravate IBS symptoms.

To effectively support gut health, a balance of different fiber types is essential. By aiming excessively high, such as 50g (1.8oz) daily, “fibremaxxers” might confine their diet to a limited array of fiber-rich foods.

For example, high-fiber breakfast cereals provide 12.4g of fiber per 100g (0.5 oz per half cup); to reach their lofty goals, individuals may feel compelled to consume multiple bowls throughout the day. However, cereal mainly offers insoluble fiber, lacking soluble and fermented fiber.

Consequently, excessive fiber can lead to increased digestive discomfort and disrupt the delicate equilibrium required for a healthy gut, particularly if individuals neglect to consider how to balance their nutrient intake.

Cleansing Trends

By prioritizing one nutrient for specific health benefits, fibremaxxing fits into a long tradition of cleansing and detox trends targeting digestive health.

While various gut cleansing rituals frequently trend on social media and appear enticing, they often cause more harm than good. For instance, juice cleanses can strip away vital nutrients, and “detox” teas and laxatives may result in dehydration and long-term harm to the intestinal lining.

Additionally, recent trends involving enemas can disrupt the natural rhythm of the intestines and eliminate beneficial bacteria.

Juice cleansing is neither a healthy nor a safe dieting approach.

Experts advise caution regarding trendy supplements and extreme elimination diets that exclude entire food groups without proper oversight, as these may reduce microbial diversity and impair digestion. Your gut won’t appreciate these drastic resets; what it truly needs is ongoing, careful, and balanced support.

Monitoring Your Fiber Intake

How can you determine if you’re consuming enough fiber in your diet and if you need to increase your intake?

Signs such as fatigue and weight gain are often early warnings. Soluble fiber slows digestion, contributing to prolonged feelings of fullness while gradually releasing sugar into the bloodstream.

In its absence, blood sugar levels can fluctuate unpredictably, leading to fatigue shortly after meals. Such energy dips can tempt you into snacking, resulting in weight gain.

While fibremaxxing may have begun as a sincere effort to boost well-being, like many health trends that go viral, it oversimplifies complex bodily processes and poses risks by overdoing things.

It’s evident that most individuals will benefit from increasing fiber consumption, especially from plant-based foods, which can aid digestion, lower disease risk, and help maintain healthy weight. However, this must be done cautiously; excessive, sudden, or unbalanced increases can be detrimental.

Your gut is a finely tuned ecosystem that flourishes through diversity, consistency, and balance—not through drastic changes or quick fixes.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Managing Negative Emotions May Help Alleviate Chronic Pain

Many individuals endure chronic pain for years or even decades

Asiavision/Getty Images

Understanding how to manage negative emotions like anxiety can help ease chronic pain. Research shows certain therapies that emphasize pain tolerance may be more effective than current treatments.

“Chronic pain is not just a physical sensation; it’s deeply emotional,” explains Nell Norman Knott from the University of New South Wales, Australia. “Around 80% of those with chronic pain experience heightened levels of anxiety and depression,” she adds, noting how existing pain exacerbates negative feelings, intensifying the pain experience.

To assess if this cycle could be disrupted, Norman Knott and her team implemented a program inspired by dialectical behavioral therapy, a variation of cognitive behavioral therapy catering to those with strong emotions. The program centered on mindfulness, emotional management, and pain tolerance.

Eighty-nine chronic pain sufferers, averaging 16 years of discomfort, were assigned to either an 8-week online therapy program with therapists or to receive their prior treatments, such as medications or physical therapy.

After nine weeks, the treatment group showed a roughly 5-point improvement in emotional regulation on a scale of 18-90 compared to the control group. Their pain intensity began to decrease by week 21, and after six months, participants in the control group reported significantly less pain.

“This is both intriguing and hopeful,” remarks Benedict Alter from the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He notes that it could particularly benefit individuals without easy access to in-person care. “The online format is significant, as a small number of providers offering treatment is a substantial challenge, often limited to urban settings.”

While the specific mechanisms behind pain reduction remain unclear, he asserts, “Better emotional regulation correlates with improved quality of life, resulting in less pain and decreased functional impairment. Future studies with larger sample sizes could elucidate these mechanisms.”

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Revitalize Your Metabolism with a Brief Negative News Detox

Researchers are able to analyze how the human brain and body respond to stimuli that may be perceived as painful. By subjecting participants to a series of images and words that are designed to provoke the nervous system, we simulate the same experience that people encounter when consuming news on a daily basis. Some of the most intense materials we use in our studies are actually sourced from news reports.

Over time, changes in brain activity patterns emerge, impacting the body’s regulatory systems. The brain regions associated with the “fight or flight” response undergo alterations, which are essential for maintaining the functionality of the nervous system, immune system, and metabolism.

As a result, we observe physiological responses in participants such as increased heart rate, sweating, and elevated cortisol levels, even though they are seated comfortably in a lab setting. Just the thought of distressing events can trigger significant electrochemical changes in the body.

For example, our research has investigated how individuals react to news coverage of events like the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. When news articles contain a high proportion of negative language, our participants reported heightened distress and displayed stronger physical reactions to the images associated with the bombing.

Unexpected or ambiguous news stories can also intensify feelings of distress, such as reports on government inaction towards rising infection rates and carbon emissions. When the brain processes information that is slightly more challenging than expected, it can strain the body’s metabolism and create discomfort.

Although a degree of discomfort may be a necessary aspect of being informed, constant exposure to negative news can lead to a cumulative burden, especially as news outlets tend to prioritize negative stories and language.

Negative news often spreads quickly through social media platforms, rewarding news outlets that emphasize negative content and perpetuating a cycle of negativity. Consuming excessive negative news may leave individuals feeling overwhelmed and drained, even if their personal experiences are relatively positive.

To counter the effects of negative news, it’s important to balance exposure with positive content. Engaging in activities that bring joy and relaxation can provide a respite for the nervous system and overall well-being.

For instance, focusing on stories of resilience, heroism, and kindness in challenging circumstances can help individuals cope with distressing news. Our research showed that participants reported lower levels of distress when presented with positive content related to the Boston Marathon bombing, and were less reactive to associated images.

Additionally, it’s advisable to avoid consuming negative news while eating, as stress can impact the body’s metabolism and lead to weight gain over time.

Explore more about psychology:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Tesla warns US government that Trump’s trade war could have negative impact on EV companies

Tesla, led by Elon Musk, is cautioning about the potential repercussions of Donald Trump’s trade war. They warned that retaliatory tariffs could harm not only electric car makers but also other American automakers.

In a letter to US trade representative Jamieson Greer, Tesla emphasized the importance of considering the broader impacts of trade actions on American businesses. They stressed the need for fair trade practices that do not inadvertently harm US companies.

Tesla urged the US Trade Representative (USTR) office to carefully evaluate the downstream effects of proposed actions to address unfair trade practices. They highlighted the disproportionate impact that US exporters often face when other countries respond to trade actions taken by the US.

The company, which has been a supporter of Trump, expressed concerns about potential tariffs on electric vehicles and parts imported to targeted countries. They cited past instances where trade disputes led to increased tariffs on vehicles and parts manufactured globally.

As Tesla continues to navigate the challenges of trade policies, they emphasized the importance of considering implementation timelines and taking a step-by-step approach to allow US companies to prepare and adapt accordingly.

Meanwhile, German automaker BMW reported a decline in net profit due to trade tariffs. They highlighted the impact of US trade actions on their business performance and reiterated the challenges posed by a competitive global environment.

BMW’s forecast takes into account various tariffs, including those on steel and aluminum. The company faces challenges in China, where local EV manufacturers are gaining market share, leading to a decline in BMW and Mini sales.

Despite these obstacles, BMW remains committed to navigating the complexities of trade and geopolitical developments to maintain business resilience and performance.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Disappointing AI PAC-MAN clone receives negative reviews

tThere’s a lot happening in the world of video games and AI generators right now. Both Microsoft and Google have developed models that allow you to imagine a virtual world, albeit with some limitations. People are also using Grok, the Gen-AI chatbot from Elon Musk’s Xai, to create basic clones of old arcade games.

All you have to do is type “write.” On February 21st, Xai employee Taylor Silveira claimed to have created an exact replica of the 1980 Coinop Pac-Man using Grok 3. This version of Pac-Man includes dots, power pills, fruit, and all ghosts moving around the maze.

The key takeaway is that as long as the AI has the right commands in its software, it can generate a version within seconds. But how accurate are these Pac-Man clones really? Can just anyone create them? To answer these questions, I randomly approached some individuals in X who had posted their own Grok Pac-Man clones and asked them about their process.

I’ll give it a shot


John Hester’s Pacman. Illustration: Generated by AI

Author: John Hester, @hesterjohn
Time spent: 2 hours

First up, we have John Hester, a retired corporate software developer from California. When asked about Grok, Hester describes it as a large-scale language model (LLM) that competes with other models like ChatGpt and Llama. According to him, Grok 3 is the most advanced and continuously learns new things.

Hester’s experience with creating a Pac-Man clone using Grok was positive. He was able to give basic instructions to the AI and received a version of Pac-Man in seconds. Despite a few tweaks needed, Hester was impressed with Grok’s capabilities. He rates his experience 3 out of 5 stars.

Hester also mentions Elon Musk’s plans to use Grok for game development and emphasizes the cautious optimism surrounding AI advancements.

Score: 3 stars

Source: www.theguardian.com

The negative impact of daylight saving time on health and how to mitigate it

It feels harsh. Being forced to sacrifice valuable sleep is tough. In the United States, Daylight Saving Time (DST) will begin on March 9, 2025. At 2am local time, the clock will spring forward an hour, skipping straight to 3am.

Not only does this make the following day feel a bit groggy, but experts are growing concerned about the potential negative impacts of the DST switch on our health.

“When the clock changes, there is a slight increase in stroke, heart attack, car accidents, and sleep loss,” says Vanderbilt’s Director of Sleep, Dr. Beth Malow to BBC Science Focus.

The effects of this time shift are felt not only by the youth but also by older individuals. A study published in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine in 2015 found that teenagers lose approximately 2 hours and 42 minutes of weekday sleep after the time change.

Mallow continues, “It has health repercussions for nearly eight months due to the shift in light exposure from the morning and evening times.”

“Morning light is essential for waking up, regulating our biological clock, and enhancing our mood. We use light therapy in the morning to treat seasonal affective disorders and improve sleep quality. Exposure to morning light supports nighttime sleep, while evening light disrupts it.”

However, all hope is not lost. Here are some simple strategies to alleviate the impact of losing that hour:

1. Back up your bedtime for a few days before the clock change

While it may be too late this time, keep this in mind for the future. Sleep experts recommend gradually shifting your bedtime 15-20 minutes earlier each night leading up to the time change.

According to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, sudden changes in sleep schedules, such as switching to daylight saving time, can lead to temporary insomnia symptoms affecting about 30-35% of adults.


By easing into it gradually, Malow suggests, “you can adjust to the new time and get a bit more sleep in the process.”

If you’re short on time and feeling drowsy, going to bed earlier on the night of the time change can also be helpful.

2. Expose yourself to bright light in the morning

Daylight Saving Time aims to provide an extra hour of sunlight in the evening. While this is ideal for post-work socializing, it may disrupt natural sleep-wake cycles and circadian rhythms.

To help you wake up in the morning and consequently sleep better at night, exposing yourself to bright light is crucial. Malow recommends natural light for this purpose, especially as the sun rises earlier during the summer months.

“Morning bright light exposure helps synchronize your biological clock,” she explains. “Aligning your clock will improve your nighttime sleep.”

3. Avoid lengthy naps and late-day caffeine. Opt for exercise instead

If you enjoy taking naps (who doesn’t?), this news may be disappointing. However, if you want to maintain good sleep, avoiding long naps is essential.

“Naps and caffeine impair our ‘sleep drive’,” Malow clarifies. Her solution? Engage in physical exercise instead.

“Physical activity in the afternoon energizes us during that afternoon slump, but comes bedtime, it promotes sleepiness. It enhances our sleep drive,” she adds.

But remember, avoid exercising just before bedtime, as it can stimulate endorphins and raise body temperature, both of which can interfere with sleep.

4. Put away your phone before bedtime

You’ve likely heard this advice before, but it remains just as relevant, particularly when the clock springs forward an hour. Bright light at night, especially from screens emitting blue light, can disrupt your sleep.

Blue light, found in LED screens, inhibits the natural release of melatonin in the brain, a hormone that regulates sleep. Additionally, content like news can trigger anxiety before bed.

Perhaps it’s time to eliminate daylight saving time

While the aforementioned strategies can minimize the impact of the time change, many experts are calling for the abolishment of this antiquated practice entirely.

So, should standard time become the new norm?

Alice Gregory, a psychology professor at Goldsmith’s, believes so. She argues that permanent standard time aligns better with our circadian rhythms compared to daylight saving time.

Mallow echoes this sentiment, stating, “Most individuals are quite fatigued by the interaction.”

About our experts:

Dr. Beth Malow is a neurology and pediatrics professor, Director of the Vanderbilt Sleep Division, Chair of Barry Donations for Cognitive Childhood Development, and Vice-Chair of Clinical Research at Vanderbilt University, USA. She is board-certified in Neurology and Sleep Medicine, conducting research on sleep and its medical and genetic implications.

Alice Gregory is a psychology professor at Goldsmith’s. She conducts research on the link between sleep and mental health, behavioral genetics, sleep paralysis, and nightmare disorder. She is also a prolific science communicator, publishing articles in various outlets like Guardian, GQ UK, and Slate fr.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Elon Musk’s Potential Ownership of OpenAI Could Have Negative Consequences, Despite Possibility of it Occurring

eLon Musk and Sam Altman are not exactly best friends. Altman’s pursuit of a for-profit approach for Openai, a company founded in 2015, seems to have irked Musk. Altman’s focus on making money rather than advancing humanity’s interests clashed with Musk’s vision for Openai.

As a result, Musk, who previously attempted to acquire Twitter, has now acquired ownership of an entity called X, which is linked to Openai’s growth.

Musk, characterized by the US government as lean, efficient, and globally influential, made a substantial bid of nearly $100 million for Openai’s nonprofit sector. Musk emphasized the need for Openai to return to its original open-source and safety-focused model. However, this bid was rejected by Altman, who jokingly mentioned that he would buy Twitter for $97.4 billion if necessary.

Musk’s bid was not about enriching investors or inflating corporate valuations, but about steering AI development towards societal benefits. Although the bid to reclaim control of Openai’s nonprofit was significant, the outcome remains uncertain.

The ongoing feud between Musk and Altman may escalate further, especially considering the history of their disagreements. Musk’s bid to take over Openai’s nonprofit could be seen as an attempt to thwart Altman’s for-profit ambitions for the company.

Elon Musk and Donald Trump, Washington, January 19, 2025. Photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters

Musk’s bid for Openai’s nonprofit could have multiple interpretations, ranging from a strategic move to a mere publicity stunt. Given Musk’s penchant for unconventional actions, the true motives behind his bid remain uncertain.

There are various theories regarding the significance of the bid, including references to literature and playful numbers. However, the bid’s seriousness cannot be discounted, especially in light of potential political implications.

The bid may also reflect Musk’s attempt to disrupt the status quo and reshape the future trajectory of AI development. The possibility of Musk and Openai merging in the future cannot be ruled out entirely, given the unpredictable nature of the current situation.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The negative impact of frenemies and love-hate relationships on your well-being

Mariana Castel/Millennium Images, UK

When I think about the members of my social network, I am almost filled with feelings of pure love and warmth. I can't wait to see them again, knowing we can bask in each other's love and support.

But for some, it evokes a completely different emotion: a mixture of enthusiasm and fear. In terms of conversation, encounters like Russian roulette are guaranteed. If I'm in a good mood, these guys will give me a fun night, but if I catch them at the wrong time, they can suck all my goodwill. I have no idea what will happen.

If this sounds familiar, it means you have a frenemy too. Psychologists call them “ambivalent relationships,” and not only can they ruin a good party, but they can also have surprising consequences for your happiness. A wealth of research shows that love-hate relationships like this are often more stressful than interacting with people who are constantly mean. It can harm your mental and physical health. They can also cause you to age prematurely.

Knowing this, the easy solution seems to be to cut ties with these people. However, our relationship with frenemies is not simple, and it is not always possible or desirable to abandon them. However, gaining deeper insight into your own ambiguous relationships can help you cope more effectively. You might even become better friends that way. Because if you know the signs to look out for, you may realize that the frenemy in some relationships is you.

Since the 1970s, huge amount of research We're looking at thousands of things…

Source: www.newscientist.com

“Bots” are now considered negative on social platforms

Analysis of millions of tweets shows the changing meaning of the word “bot”

Svet foto/Shutterstock

Calling someone a bot on social media once meant suspecting they were in fact software, but now the use of the word is evolving into an insult for known human users, researchers say.

Many efforts to detect social media bots use algorithms that attempt to identify behavioral patterns that are more typical of the traditional meaning of a bot: automated accounts controlled by a computer, but their accuracy remains questionable.

“Recent research has focused on detecting social bots, which is a problem in itself because of the ground truthing issues,” he said. Dennis Assenmacher The Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences in Cologne, Germany, said it was unclear whether the findings were accurate.

To investigate, Assenmacher and his colleagues looked at how users perceive bots: They looked at how the word “bot” was used on Twitter between 2007 and December 2022 (the social network was renamed X in 2023 after being acquired by Elon Musk), analyzing the words that appeared next to it in more than 22 million English-language tweets.

The researchers found that before 2017, the term was often used in conjunction with allegations of automated behavior, such as “software,” “scripts,” or “machines,” the kinds of things that traditionally fit the definition of a bot. Since that year, that usage has changed.

“The accusation has now become like an insult, it’s used to dehumanize people, it’s used to denigrate people’s intelligence, it’s used to deny them their right to participate in the conversation,” Assenmacher said.

The cause of this change is unclear, but Assenmacher said it may be political in nature. The researchers looked at the accounts of prominent people, such as politicians and journalists, that each Twitter user followed, and classified users as left- or right-leaning. They found that left-leaning users were more likely to accuse other users of being bots, and that those who were accused were more likely to be right-leaning.

“One possible explanation is that the media has reported that right-wing bot networks [2016] “The US elections,” Assenmacher said, “but this is just speculation and needs to be confirmed.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

NILS discovers negative ions present on the moon’s surface

of Negative Ion Laser Spectroscopy (NILS) Chinese Chang'e 6 Probe Negative ions have been detected on the surface of the moon. These ions are produced on the surface of the moon due to interactions with the solar wind.



The South Pole-Aitken Basin on the far side of the Moon is one of the largest and oldest impact features in the Solar System. It's easy to see in the elevation data: the low central area is dark blue and purple. The mountains on its edges, remnants of the outer ring, are red and yellow. Image credit: NASA/GSFC/University of Arizona.

The solar wind is a constant stream of radiation and particles emanating from the Sun. The Earth's magnetic field acts as a shield.

In contrast, the Moon has no magnetic field and a very thin atmosphere called the exosphere.

When the solar wind hits the Moon, it reacts with the surface, sending up secondary particles.

These particles may be positively or negatively charged, or may not be charged at all.

Positively charged particles have been measured from orbit before, but measuring negatively charged particles has been difficult.

Negative ions are short-lived and cannot reach orbit, which is why ESA scientists had to operate their instruments closer to the lunar surface.

“This is ESA's first operation on the lunar surface, a world first for science and our first lunar collaboration with China,” said Neil Melville, ESA's technical lead for the NILS experiment.

“We collected data in quantity and quality far beyond our expectations.”

“These observations on the Moon will help us to better understand the surface environment and serve as a precursor to exploring the distribution of negative ions on other atmosphere-less bodies in the Solar System, from planets to asteroids and other moons,” said NILS principal investigator Dr Martin Wieser.

Chang'e-6 is scheduled to successfully land in the South Pole-Aitken Basin on the far side of the moon on June 1, 2024.

NILS began collecting science data 280 minutes after landing. The first data collection period lasted 23 minutes, after which the instruments experienced a voltage drop. Several further data collection periods followed, during which communications were interrupted and restarted.

“The equipment was getting hot, so it was alternating between short periods of running at full power and longer periods of cooling down,” Melville said.

“The fact that we managed to stay within the thermal design limits and achieve a successful recovery in extremely hot conditions is testament to the quality of the research at the Swedish Institute of Astrophysics.”

Source: www.sci.news

Study shows workplace AI, robots, and trackers have a negative impact on overall well-being

A groundbreaking study by the Institute for Work think tank has revealed that exposure to new technologies like trackers, robots, and AI-based software in the workplace has a negative impact on people’s quality of life.

Conducted through a survey of over 6,000 individuals, the study focused on the health impacts of four categories of technologies that are increasingly prevalent in various industries.

The research found that increased exposure to technology in areas such as AI, machine learning-based software, surveillance devices like wearable trackers, and robotics had a detrimental effect on the health and well-being of workers.


On the other hand, the use of established information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as laptops, tablets, and instant messaging at work had a more positive impact on well-being.

The report highlighted that frequent interactions with ICT improved quality of life, while interactions with new technologies in the workplace had the opposite effect.

Economists at Goldman Sachs estimated that by 2030, 300 million jobs worldwide could be automated, with many roles being fundamentally transformed due to developments in generative AI.

Lead author Dr. Magdalena Sofia emphasized that the issue lies not in the technology itself, but in how it is implemented and utilized.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The report also raised concerns about the negative impact of tracking devices and surveillance technology on worker performance, echoing warnings from unions and activists.

Mary Towers, head of AI at TUC, cautioned that without proper regulation, AI could create an oppressive work environment for many individuals.

On the other hand, the Pissarides review on the future of work and happiness, in collaboration with Warwick Business School and Imperial College London, aims to shed light on the impact of new technologies on quality of life in the workplace.

Professor Christopher Pissarides emphasized the importance of understanding how interactions with new technologies influence the overall well-being of individuals in their working lives.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The potential negative impacts on privacy of refusing cookies compared to accepting them

When you open a new website, do you choose to either accept or reject all cookies? New research suggests that choosing to reject cookies may actually reveal more information about yourself than if you simply “accept all cookies.”

In this digital age, cookies, which are pieces of data, are stored on our devices for various purposes such as remembering login information. However, cookies can also be used to track online behavior and tailor ads to individuals. This has led many people to refuse cookies in order to keep their personal information private and to prevent companies from using their data for marketing purposes.

Surprisingly, recent research presented at NeurIPS 2023 has shown that certain demographics are more likely to reject cookies, which could have implications for advertisers. Contrary to popular belief, rejecting cookies does not necessarily mean hiding one’s identity.

Results from the study showed that acceptance of cookies varies depending on the country and age of the individual. For example, individuals in the US over the age of 34 were more likely to refuse cookies, inadvertently sharing more of their data.

Advertisers could access five pieces of information from a person who accepts cookies, but only two pieces from a person who rejects them. In other words, declining cookies may not necessarily protect your identity. This demographic, which includes older adults, has been found to have less trust in tech companies and is more likely to reject cookies as a result.

It is important to note that the privacy laws in the United States are not as stringent as those in the EU, meaning that user data may not be as protected, especially for individuals who reject cookies.

Privacy is important to some people, but not to everyone

Researchers have found that older Americans are less likely to accept cookies, with only 28% of them choosing to do so. This compares to 40% of younger Americans who typically accept cookies. This indicates that the decision to reject cookies has a greater impact for younger Americans in protecting their identity.

The authors of the research are hopeful that their findings will help shape regulations for new technologies such as AI and inform policymakers. They emphasize that the decision to accept or reject cookies is not as simple as it may seem and may not always produce the intended effect.

So… does it make sense to refuse cookies?

Ultimately, the impact of privacy decisions is more complex than users may realize, and there are no definitive answers. Some recommendations include using more privacy-friendly browsers and supporting stronger privacy laws and regulations.

About our experts

Dr. Elizabeth Daly is a computer research scientist leading the Interactive AI Group at IBM Research in Dublin. She has published research in journals such as Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence Research Journal.

Dr. Eric Mealing is a researcher at IBM Research with publications in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, American Control Conference (ACC), and International Conference on Decision Making and Game Theory for Security.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com