US Government Files Lawsuit Against Uber for Alleged Discrimination Against Disabled Passengers

On Thursday, the U.S. government filed a lawsuit against Uber, alleging that the ride-sharing service has breached federal laws by discriminating against passengers with disabilities.

The complaint, submitted in federal court in San Francisco, claims that Uber drivers frequently refuse to transport disabled riders, including those accompanied by service animals or using wheelchairs.

Additionally, the department stated that Uber and its drivers unlawfully impose cleaning fees for service animals on riders denied service and also charge cancellation fees.

Some drivers are reportedly dismissing legitimate requests, such as humiliating persons with disabilities or preventing passengers with mobility challenges from sitting in the front seats.

According to the Justice Department, “Uber’s discriminatory actions have inflicted significant financial, emotional, and physical harm on individuals with disabilities,” violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In response, Uber stated that it disputes the allegations and is dedicated to enhancing access and the overall experience for riders with disabilities.

Uber further asserts that riders utilizing guide dogs or requiring other assistance “deserve a safe, respectful, and welcoming experience with Uber. A complete stop.”

The complaint outlines 17 instances of alleged misconduct involving Uber.

One instance involves JE, a seven-year-old amputee from the Bronx, New York, who reportedly faced refusal from an Uber driver after attending his brother’s birthday party due to his wheelchair.

Another case highlights Jason Ludwig, a Gulf War veteran with a service dog, who was denied a ride to Norfolk Airport in Virginia, causing him to miss his flight and return to Yarmouth, Massachusetts, after 16 hours of travel.

Jeff Clark, a third rider from Mount Laurel, New Jersey, claims that four drivers canceled their ride in Philadelphia within 17 minutes.

The lawsuit aims for an injunction to prevent further violations of the ADA, along with demands for improvements in Uber’s practices and training, financial compensation, and civil penalties.

A spokesperson for the Department of Justice was not available for immediate comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The impact of historical discrimination on heat waves in minority and low-income communities

Today, the South Bronx has the least amount of green space per capita in the city and is crisscrossed by power plants, waste dumps and freeways, causing significant noise and air pollution. Residents face high rates of infant mortality, cognitive impairment, heart disease, and asthma, and Mott Haven is known as ‘ Asthma Alley.’ These conditions increase vulnerability to heat.

“Environmental racism in the South Bronx is clear,” said Arif Ullah, executive director of the environmental justice group South Bronx Unite.

Similar inequities have been identified across the country. Analysis of 115 metropolitan areas from San Jose, California, to Louisville, Kentucky, to Hartford, Connecticut, neighborhoods with larger numbers of residents who identify as black, African American, Hispanic, or Latino were found to be less likely to have air conditioning.

To combat rising temperatures, New York City Mayor Eric Adams has implemented heatstroke measures. For one week, starting June 18, hundreds of locations were designated as air-conditioned facilities where residents could stay cool during the day.

New York City Emergency Management Director Zach Iscol said the city is distributing “cool kits” and indoor thermometers. He said: There is a program to help low-income residents who need heating and cooling. This year, 21,000 applications have already been received.

Installing air conditioning for people with mobility impairments is actually essential as outdoor temperatures rise — or these individuals may never be able to reach a cooling center. In areas like Brownsville, the South Bronx, and East Harlem, residents also report being exposed to crime and drug dealing when they go outside to cool off.

Celine Olivarius, who has lived in the South Bronx for nine years, brought her two grandsons, ages 9 and 4, to cool off in the fountains at Willis Playground. She expresses concern about the opioid epidemic, as drug users are injecting in the bathroom, and she worries that children might pick up needles.

Environmentalists say one solution to beat the heat in sprawling cities is to plant more trees, create green spaces like parks and meadows, and cover rooftops with vegetation.

“We need to focus on low-income communities, people of color, and immigrant communities,” Uhlfelder said. Areas with a 33 percent reduction in tree canopy area are likely to experience a 13-degree increase (7 degrees Celsius) in temperature compared to predominantly white areas just two miles away.

The New York City Council passed laws last fall to add trees to the City Charter Sustainability Plan and mandate the development of urban forest plans to increase tree cover from 22 percent to 30 percent by 2035.

“I’ve never felt anything like it,” said Howard Shillingford, a 58-year-old janitor who grew up in the South Bronx, on a recent sweltering day. It’s especially bad when he’s cleaning school staircases, where the windows often don’t open.

“Oh my goodness, those stairs look like an oven,” Shillingford said as he read the news on a computer at Mott Haven Public Library, another cooling center.

Residents in heat-stricken areas are getting resourceful. Berrios holds a wet towel to the back of her neck. Olivarria squirts her grandchildren with a toy water gun. Jorge Morales, a 54-year-old graffiti artist from the South Bronx, showers twice a day and washes his Chihuahua, Bugsy, in the sink. Residents sometimes unscrew fire hydrants, allowing water to spill off the sidewalk and onto the street.

“I don’t like wasting water, but people here do it. It’s a way of survival,” Morales, who is half Puerto Rican and half Cuban, said as he charged his phone in the same library.

Experts say extreme heat will likely become the new normal and should not be underestimated. Heat waves have become more frequent since 1936.

“If we continue on this path, the heat wave in 2044 will be much worse than the one we’re experiencing now,” said Jones, the science historian. “This is not an unusual heat wave. It is a sign of things to come.”

For more information about NBC BLK, Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, argues that the US’s alleged discrimination against the popular app is unconstitutional

ByteDance, a Chinese tech company, has filed new legal documents challenging the US government’s “unconstitutional discrimination against TikTok.” These documents also reveal details about failed negotiations regarding a ban on the platform.

A legislation signed by President Joe Biden in April requires ByteDance to sell TikTok’s U.S. assets by Jan. 19 or face a ban. ByteDance argues in its filing that such a sale is “technically, commercially, and legally impossible.” The company accuses the US government of not taking settlement negotiations seriously after 2022.

TikTok, in a lawsuit, states, “Never before has Congress silenced so much speech with a single act.”

The proposed ban reflects long-standing national security concerns from US lawmakers who fear China could exploit the app to access Americans’ data or spy on them. While the Biden administration prefers ByteDance to sell TikTok instead of an outright ban, the company claims it’s not a viable option.

The bill would prevent app stores like Apple and Google from featuring the app unless ByteDance sells it. It would also prohibit internet hosting services from supporting TikTok without a sale, effectively banning its use in the US.

In its filing, ByteDance’s lawyers outline the company’s negotiations with the US government, which abruptly ended in August 2022. The company also shared a redacted draft national security agreement aimed at protecting TikTok’s US user data.


The proposed agreement includes a “kill switch” for the US government to halt TikTok’s use in the US if it doesn’t comply. The US has also requested TikTok to move its source code out of China.

TikTok’s lawyers criticized the administration for favoring shutting down TikTok in the US instead of working on a practical solution to protect US users. The Justice Department defended the law, saying it addresses national security concerns while respecting constitutional constraints.

TikTok and ByteDance filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Sept. 16. The outcome of the case could influence the government’s use of new powers against foreign-owned apps.

TikTok argues that separating businesses is not feasible and claims the law violates free speech rights. The platform’s content creators maintain that there is no imminent national security threat, as the law allows TikTok to operate for the remainder of the year.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla requests a break in federal racial discrimination lawsuit to focus on finalizing other legal matters

Tesla wants to suspend a federal lawsuit against it for racial bias against black workers at its Fremont assembly plant.

The electric car maker said in a filing Monday in San Francisco federal court that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit against Tesla in September as part of “harmful interagency competition” with the California civil rights agency. accused of rushing. The company sued the automaker last year on similar grounds.

The EEOC’s lawsuit alleges that Tesla violated federal law by condoning widespread and ongoing racial harassment of Black employees and retaliating against some employees who opposed the harassment. EEOC filings state that Black workers were accused of using slurs and epithets such as the N-word, variations such as “monkey,” “boy,” and “black bitch,” as well as racist graffiti that called for violence against Black people. There are detailed reports that it has withstood casual use. Other forms of abuse.

The California Civil Rights Division’s complaint against Tesla also includes similar examples of harassment from black workers.

Both lawsuits are pending in state court and allege that Tesla violated California anti-discrimination laws. The EEOC’s lawsuit also includes allegations that Tesla violated federal laws prohibiting racial discrimination and harassment in the workplace.

Tesla also faces a proposed class action lawsuit filed by workers in 2017 alleging racial harassment.

The EEOC did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment.

Tesla’s Monday filing says a federal court should refuse to file a third lawsuit until the existing lawsuit is resolved. Lawyers for the automakers argued that prosecuting the three cases simultaneously would involve a “substantial duplication of effort,” risk “inconsistent court decisions,” and waste judicial resources.

Tesla is calling for something called the Colorado River Abstention Principle here. This is a legal principle that allows a federal court to recuse itself from hearing a case if there is a parallel case in a state court dealing with the same issue. The goal behind this principle is to avoid duplicative litigation and promote more efficient justice.

The turf battle Tesla refers to in its filing is between the EEOC and the California Civil Rights Department (CRD), formerly the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. The filing argues that historically the EEOC and CRD have worked together to protect entities from being subject to the same lawsuits from both agencies.

“That historic coordination and cooperation has disintegrated as agencies have become increasingly eager to file headline-grabbing complaints and report multi-million dollar settlements,” the filing said. It is stated in

Tesla has repeatedly denied wrongdoing in multiple racial discrimination incidents. Monday’s filing called the allegations “false” and accused the EEOC of “hastily covering them up.”[ping] Launching a bogus pre-litigation investigation. ”

The company is also appealing a $3.2 million award in a separate racial bias lawsuit to a black former contractor at the Fremont plant.

Source: techcrunch.com

Activision Blizzard settles California workplace discrimination lawsuit for $54 million

California Department of Civil Rights settlement Activision released a joint statement with Blizzard late last week, two years after state regulators filed a lawsuit alleging sex discrimination, pay inequality and a culture of sexual harassment at the video game company.

Activision Blizzard, publisher of hit games such as the “Call of Duty” series and “World of Warcraft,” has agreed to pay $54 million and take steps to ensure fair pay and fair promotion. I promised. Approximately $46 million of the funding will be used to compensate employees, particularly women who were employees or contractors of the company from 2015 to 2020. Details of the settlement have been finalized but still require court approval.

“If approved by the court, this settlement agreement would be a significant step forward and provide direct relief to Activision Blizzard employees,” said California Department of Civil Rights Director Kevin Kish. The agency was previously known as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, but changed its name last year. Activision Blizzard operates from its headquarters in Santa Monica, California.

The agency filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2021, alleging the company violated rules set forth in the state’s Equal Pay Act and Fair Employment and Housing Act. The California Department of Civil Rights announced it was dropping the allegations as part of the settlement. agreement “Allegations of systematic or widespread sexual harassment at Activision Blizzard have not been substantiated by a court or independent investigation.”

The settlement also says an investigation by the California Department of Civil Rights found no evidence of wrongdoing by the company’s board, executives or CEO Bobby Kotick.

Activision Blizzard was cited in February for failing to “put in place the necessary controls to collect and review employee complaints of workplace misconduct,” ultimately preventing that information from being disclosed to investors. agreed to a $35 million settlement with the SEC.

The California lawsuit includes employee strikes, inflammatory statements from executives, stock price volatility, and ongoing concerns that the company fosters a toxic workplace culture to the detriment of employees. It ushered in a dramatic era for Activision Blizzard.

A series of events ultimately led to Microsoft’s move to acquire the company. Regulators finalized the $68.7 billion deal in October. Activision Blizzard’s longtime CEO Bobby Kotick has become deeply embroiled in years of controversy and plans to leave the company at the end of the year.

Source: techcrunch.com