MG Requests Over £500 to Repair Your Fraudulent Electric Car.

Our MG5 electric vehicles have spiraled out of control, and MG seems unresponsive to the situation.

After utilizing a charger at one site, the vehicle experienced a power system failure at a highway service station.

The car became unresponsive to all controls, including the off button. Consequently, we called the AA. The patrolman was able to start the engine and opted to take a test drive with my family onboard as it was pouring rain.

When the patrolman shifted the car into reverse, it surged forward and wouldn’t stop, even when he pressed the brakes. The vehicle collided with an AA van, and as it attempted to accelerate, its wheels spun and began smoking.

We all exited the vehicle safely, and eventually, a patrolman managed to switch the car off from outside. I was informed it wasn’t safe to drive.

The AA arranged for a tow truck to bring it to the dealership, covering the repairs (£2,500). A police vehicle was also damaged in the incident.

The dealership is scrutinizing the defect, and there will be a charge of £500 in costs. No issues were identified. MG insists the matter has been resolved and intends to pursue further investigation at their own cost.

Six weeks on, the vehicle remains with the dealership. I am reluctant to drive until I know it’s safe, yet I can’t afford continued investigations.

AB, East Lothian

You are not the sole MG owner facing issues. One individual was forced to ram his car into a police van due to brake failure.

I requested a technical report from the AA, confirming that the vehicle “jumped forward” when shifted to reverse.

It’s understandable to hesitate before getting behind the wheel until the issue is identified, and since the vehicle is still under warranty, it’s reasonable to avoid spending personal funds on the repairs.

MG Motor UK appears surprisingly indifferent, given the potential dangers posed by malfunctioning EVs. The dealership recommended that MG’s technical department investigate the issue and provide guidance, but MG let it go.

MG merely issued an apology for the “inconvenience” following your complaint.

My inquiries regarding whether the dealer-requested investigation was conducted prior to resolving the incident and how many similar cases they’ve acknowledged concerning power failures were side-stepped.

However, the company promptly initiated a more comprehensive assessment of the vehicle and conducted a 45-mile test drive, using various public charging stations. There will be no charges for this test or any previous evaluations.

“MG considers all reported issues related to malfunctions a priority. No associated faults with onboard equipment or the vehicle’s charging capabilities were discovered.”

“MG and our authorized dealer have meticulously examined the vehicle and concluded that an error occurred that isn’t linked to the vehicle itself. We will continue to provide support to our customers with relevant information and advice.”

This places you in a challenging position. Your car is deemed healthy, yet your trust in it has waned. Consequently, you’ve decided that selling it is the best course of action.

We encourage letters, though we cannot respond individually. Email us at Consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime contact number. The following conditions apply to all letter submissions and publications: Our Terms of Use.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Amazon Requests Corporate Employees to ‘Volunteer’ for Grocery Deliveries as Prime Day Approaches

On Monday, Amazon’s corporate staff were encouraged to volunteer at the company’s warehouse to assist in delivering groceries for the upcoming Prime Day sale.

According to a Slack message obtained by the Guardian that was sent to numerous white-collar employees in the New York City region, from engineers to marketers, an area manager urged team members to “help with Prime Day to connect with our customers on this significant day.” The response to this request remains unclear.

The appeal came just a day before Prime Day was set to start. The manager indicated that volunteers were “needed” for two-hour shifts from 10 AM to 6 PM in Red Hook, Brooklyn, running from Tuesday to Friday. Employees from partner companies at the warehouse will be responsible for selecting products, preparing grocery carts and bags for delivery, packing boxes upon cart arrival, and “boosting morale by distributing snacks.” Volunteers were also encouraged to attend a meeting room for further engagement. The manager emphasized that these efforts would help enhance the connection between the warehouse and corporate teams.

Amazon typically employs thousands of additional warehouse workers in anticipation of its annual Prime Day sale, leading to a surge in demand for orders and deliveries as large online retailers offer substantial discounts on various items. While Amazon Fresh is a service available to Prime members, it operates independently from Amazon’s Whole Foods subsidiary, which is providing discounts this week in celebration of Prime Day. For instance, there is a $30 discount on current member delivery while maintaining a 90-day free trial of delivery services, which includes same-day or next-day options. New York is recognized as one of the busiest areas in the United States.

Amazon spokesperson Griffin Buch stated that this is not the first occasion employees from “grocery” sectors have been “invited to volunteer.”

“This initiative is entirely voluntary and allows company employees to engage more closely with customers while enabling store teams to concentrate on the most essential tasks,” said Buch.

Amazon Fresh has encountered challenges in recent years. As part of cost-cutting measures and issues with profitability in the grocery delivery sector in 2023, CEO Andy Jassy has closed multiple physical Amazon Fresh locations and laid off hundreds of employees in this segment. Overall, Amazon has reduced its workforce by over 27,000 employees since initiating cost-cutting efforts in 2022.

Just a week ago, an Amazon CEO spoke on CNBC about the future, highlighting the use of drones and robots for delivering goods to customers.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“As we progress and increase the application of robotics at fulfillment centers, we will be relying on robots for fulfillment and transportation,” he added.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Facebook requests U.S. Supreme Court to drop fraud lawsuit regarding Cambridge Analytica scandal

The U.S. Supreme Court discussed Meta’s Facebook’s attempt to dismiss a federal securities fraud lawsuit brought by shareholders. The lawsuit accuses the social media platform of deceiving users about its misuse of user data.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in Facebook’s appeal against a lower court’s decision allowing a 2018 class action lawsuit by Amalgamated Bank to move forward. The lawsuit aims to recover lost value of investors’ Facebook stock. Another lawsuit filed this month involves Nvidia, where litigants accuse the company of securities fraud, potentially making accountability more challenging.

The key issue is whether Facebook broke the law by not disclosing previous data breaches in its risk disclosures, portraying the risks as hypothetical.

Facebook argued in its brief to the Supreme Court that reasonable investors would see risk disclosures as forward-looking statements, eliminating the need to disclose previous risks that materialized.

Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Samuel Alito raised questions during the hearing, asserting that risk assessment is always forward-looking.

The plaintiffs accused Facebook of violating the Securities Exchange Act by misleading investors about a 2015 data breach involving Cambridge Analytica. The case was initially dismissed, but the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated it.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal led to various investigations and legal actions against Facebook. The Supreme Court is expected to reach a decision by June.

Despite the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, there are differing views on how investors interpret forward-looking risk disclosures.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Facebook’s stock price dropped after reports in 2018 regarding the misuse of user data by Cambridge Analytica in connection with President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Sam Bankman, former CEO of FTX, to be sentenced; Family requests mercy – Blockchain News, Opinion, TV, Jobs

Written by Enoch Muthembei

As former FTX CEO Sam Bankman Fried's sentencing date approaches, an unexpected source has emerged: a plea for clemency from his own family. In a recent filing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, SBF's attorneys submitted 29 letters of support, including heartfelt nominations from his mother, father, and siblings.

Barbara Freed, Joseph Bankman, and Gabriel Bankman Freed, the 31-year-old former CEO's mother, father, and brother, all wrote a letter to Judge Lewis Kaplan, expressing SBF's background, personality, and Shedding light on contributions to society. FTX. SBF was convicted of seven felonies, but his family has fervently asked for a lenient sentence, stressing that his life behind bars could have been wasted.

In the letter, Gabriel Bankman Freed said, “Sam made a mistake, but his life will be wasted if he goes to prison. He has a great gift to offer the world.” The family's petition is based on the belief that SBF's talents and abilities could be better utilized outside of prison.

Unlike a trial, the sentencing stage allows personal appeals by friends and family. Judge Lewis Kaplan is scheduled to decide Bankman-Fried's prison term on March 28. Speculation about the possible sentence varies, with experts suggesting a range of 15 to 25 years. However, unless there are special circumstances, it is unlikely that he will be sentenced to a maximum of around 110 years in prison.

SBF's father, Joseph Bankman, expressed concern about the physical danger his son could face in prison and warned of a “draconian sentence”. He highlighted the difficulty of SBF in responding to societal demands and urged courts to consider alternative sentencing options. Joseph Bankman said SBF prioritized repaying investors and minimizing allegations of lavish spending before his arrest.

In a comprehensive letter, Barbara Freed detailed SBF's desire to help others from her childhood to her time in prison. She highlighted his commitment to coaching his fellow inmates for the GED exam. Fried urged Judge Kaplan to consider his son's poor response to social cues and expressed that his son has been “stricken with remorse” since the incident. The collapse of FTX In November 2022.

Reactions regarding Bankman Freed's family seeking pardon

The letter written by Bankman's family downplays the impact of FTX's collapse on investors and Bankman Freed's role in the fraud. Reaction on social media was mixed, with some users criticizing the plea for leniency and comparing it to other lawsuits, including: billy mcfarland A scene from the fire festival.

One user, Kyle Gibson, said: “Those who are writing letters asking for leniency in the SBF sentence are wondering what Fyre Festival's Billy McFarland is doing now and how he is in prison. You should look at how much rehabilitation he has undergone.” Mr Gibson expressed skepticism about SBF's rehabilitation potential and suggested he would return to his previous activities upon release.

Bankman Fried's defense team has recommended a sentence of 63 to 78 months, and prosecutors are scheduled to present their recommendation on March 15. Bankman Freed will celebrate his 32nd birthday on March 6, which will be his first birthday in prison since he was released on bail. The impending sentencing remains a pivotal moment for the former FTX CEO and those following the case closely.

Source: the-blockchain.com

Tesla requests a break in federal racial discrimination lawsuit to focus on finalizing other legal matters

Tesla wants to suspend a federal lawsuit against it for racial bias against black workers at its Fremont assembly plant.

The electric car maker said in a filing Monday in San Francisco federal court that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit against Tesla in September as part of “harmful interagency competition” with the California civil rights agency. accused of rushing. The company sued the automaker last year on similar grounds.

The EEOC’s lawsuit alleges that Tesla violated federal law by condoning widespread and ongoing racial harassment of Black employees and retaliating against some employees who opposed the harassment. EEOC filings state that Black workers were accused of using slurs and epithets such as the N-word, variations such as “monkey,” “boy,” and “black bitch,” as well as racist graffiti that called for violence against Black people. There are detailed reports that it has withstood casual use. Other forms of abuse.

The California Civil Rights Division’s complaint against Tesla also includes similar examples of harassment from black workers.

Both lawsuits are pending in state court and allege that Tesla violated California anti-discrimination laws. The EEOC’s lawsuit also includes allegations that Tesla violated federal laws prohibiting racial discrimination and harassment in the workplace.

Tesla also faces a proposed class action lawsuit filed by workers in 2017 alleging racial harassment.

The EEOC did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment.

Tesla’s Monday filing says a federal court should refuse to file a third lawsuit until the existing lawsuit is resolved. Lawyers for the automakers argued that prosecuting the three cases simultaneously would involve a “substantial duplication of effort,” risk “inconsistent court decisions,” and waste judicial resources.

Tesla is calling for something called the Colorado River Abstention Principle here. This is a legal principle that allows a federal court to recuse itself from hearing a case if there is a parallel case in a state court dealing with the same issue. The goal behind this principle is to avoid duplicative litigation and promote more efficient justice.

The turf battle Tesla refers to in its filing is between the EEOC and the California Civil Rights Department (CRD), formerly the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. The filing argues that historically the EEOC and CRD have worked together to protect entities from being subject to the same lawsuits from both agencies.

“That historic coordination and cooperation has disintegrated as agencies have become increasingly eager to file headline-grabbing complaints and report multi-million dollar settlements,” the filing said. It is stated in

Tesla has repeatedly denied wrongdoing in multiple racial discrimination incidents. Monday’s filing called the allegations “false” and accused the EEOC of “hastily covering them up.”[ping] Launching a bogus pre-litigation investigation. ”

The company is also appealing a $3.2 million award in a separate racial bias lawsuit to a black former contractor at the Fremont plant.

Source: techcrunch.com

Apple requests court order to disclose customer information to law enforcement officers

WASHINGTON, Dec. 12 (Reuters) – Apple (AAPL.O) says it is seeking a judge’s order to turn over information about its customers’ push notifications to law enforcement, bringing the iPhone maker’s policy in line with rival Google’s and allowing authorities to obtain app data about users. The hurdles that must be cleared have been raised.

The new policy was not officially announced, but was announced in the past few days. Law enforcement guidelines published by Apple. This follows revelations by Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden that officials had requested such data not only from Apple but also from Alphabet Inc.’s Google. (GOOGL.O) Create an operating system for Android phones.

Apps of all kinds rely on push notifications to notify smartphone users of incoming messages, breaking news, and other updates. These are the audible “sounds” or visual indicators that users receive when they receive an email or when a sports team wins a game. What users often do not realize is that almost all such notifications are sent through Google and his Apple servers.

In the letter, first revealed by Reuters last week, Wyden said the practice gives the companies unique insight into the traffic flowing to users from these apps, and that the two companies can “see how users use specific apps.” “We are in a unique position to facilitate government oversight of what is happening.”


Although Apple did not officially announce this new policy, it was included in Apple’s published law enforcement guidelines within the past few days. Getty Images

Apple and Google both acknowledged receiving such requests. Apple added a section to its guidelines stating that such data can be obtained “via subpoena or larger legal process.” This text has now been updated to refer to more stringent warrant requirements.

Apple has not released an official statement. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wyden said in a statement that Apple is “doing the right thing by aligning with Google in seeking a court order to turn over data related to push notifications.”

Source: nypost.com