The leading AI firm and the premier entertainment company have made an unexpected agreement, allowing AI-generated versions of beloved characters from movies, TV, and comics. This deal might indicate that major copyright holders realize they’re unable to control the influx of AI tools available today.

The Walt Disney Company has entered into a partnership with OpenAI, permitting the AI company’s Sora video generation and ChatGPT image creation technologies to utilize over 200 of Disney’s most renowned characters. In contrast, Disney is currently in a legal battle with another AI firm, Midjourney, concerning alleged copyright infringement, claiming Midjourney intends to “blatantly incorporate and copy famous characters from Disney and Universal” into its tools. This lawsuit suggested that copyright owners were starting to take steps to protect their rights against what AI companies might misuse, but some analysts now view the agreement as a sign that Disney has opted to collaborate with rather than combat AI firms.

As of now, characters like Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse, Simba and Mufasa from The Lion King, and characters from Moana, as well as notable figures from Marvel and Lucasfilm’s Star Wars, are permissible for OpenAI users. However, while users can create videos featuring these characters, many of the voice rights are held by celebrities, as is the case with Tom Hanks voicing Woody in the Toy Story films, which remains prohibited.

Content creation using these characters will be available from early 2026, under a license agreement lasting three years.

According to statements released by both parties, the agreement was reached after OpenAI pledged to implement age-appropriate policies and “reasonable controls” to prevent underage users from accessing its products, alongside “robust controls to avert the generation of illegal or harmful content and respect for the rights of content owners regarding model output, as well as individuals’ rights to manage the use of their voice and likeness.”

In tandem with this, Disney has committed to a $1 billion equity investment in OpenAI, with an option to purchase additional shares in the rapidly expanding AI firm. Many characters presently available in OpenAI’s tools coincide with those mentioned in Disney’s lawsuit against Midjourney.

“This presents an exciting chance for the company to let audiences engage with our characters through perhaps the most advanced technologies and media platforms available today,” said Disney CEO Bob Iger, as he informed CNBC. “OpenAI values and respects our creativity.” Iger further acknowledged the remarkable growth of AI. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman remarked, “People genuinely want to connect with Disney characters and express their creativity in novel ways.”

Despite the optimistic statements, the agreement took many by surprise. “I was astonished because Disney is recognized for fiercely safeguarding its brand,” noted Katherine Flick from Staffordshire University. The company has historically defended the intellectual property of its characters, including efforts to keep Mickey Mouse from falling into the public domain, according to Rebecca Williams of the University of South Wales.

Conversely, some observers were less surprised by the partnership. “It was clear that Disney didn’t want to confront major tech firms like Google, OpenAI, and Meta, as they’ve often perceived generative AI as beneficial,” remarked Andres Guadamuz from the University of Sussex.

Guadamuz hypothesizes that the OpenAI partnership could significantly benefit Disney, suggesting, “I suspect they will utilize their vast catalog to adapt their models,” which might even play a role in the animation process. Reports indicate that Disney is poised to become a “key customer” for OpenAI tools.

Williams expresses concern that this partnership may indicate the broader trajectory of AI and copyright disputes. “This suggests that companies like Disney consider it impossible to halt the AI tide,” she notes. “Their approach appears to involve collaborating with such enterprises to derive profit from the utilization of their intellectual property, rather than allowing it to be misappropriated.”

However, Ty Martin from the licensing company Copyrightish believes that other AI firms will start to negotiate licensing agreements moving forward. “This is the direction we’re heading in 2026,” he asserts. “Licensing is vital for quality. AI platforms equipped with strong, recognizable IP are likely to weather downturns, while unlicensed or generic content risks being overlooked.”

Whether this represents a proactive initiative or a defensive tactic due to animosity, the future of this initial three-year agreement is uncertain, and Frick believes it may soon be reevaluated. “There will be individuals who exploit their brand in ways that Disney may not typically endorse,” she stated.

Frick added, “This will serve as an evaluative case to see how this intellectual property is utilized. Personally, I suspect it will be a test to understand the limits of its usage, as [Disney] endures individuals engaging in potentially uncomfortable applications of your intellectual property.”