Palantir Claims UK Physicians Prioritize “Ideology Over Patients’ Interests” in NHS Data Legislation

Palantir, a U.S. data firm collaborating with the Israeli Defense Department, criticized British doctors for prioritizing “ideology over patient interests” following backlash against its contract to manage NHS data.

Louis Mosley, executive vice president of Palantir, recently addressed the British Medical Association, which labeled the £330 million agreement to create a unified platform for NHS data—covering everything from patient information to bed availability—as a potential threat to public trust in the NHS data system.

In a formal resolution, the association expressed concerns over the unclear processing of sensitive data by Palantir, a company co-founded by Trump donor Peter Thiel. They highlighted the firm’s “study on discriminatory policing software in the U.S.” and its “close ties with the U.S. government, which often overlooks international law.”

However, Mosley dismissed these critiques during his testimony to lawmakers on the Commons Science and Technology Committee on Tuesday. Palantir has also secured contracts for processing large-scale data for the Ministry of Defense, police, and local governments.


Libertarian Thiel, who named the company after “Seeing Stones” from the Lord of the Rings series, previously remarked that British citizens’ admiration for the NHS reflects “Stockholm syndrome.” However, Mosley claimed he was not speaking on behalf of Palantir.

Palantir also develops AI-driven military targeting systems and software that consolidates and analyzes data across multiple systems, including healthcare.

“It’s incorrect to accuse us of lacking transparency or that we operate in secrecy,” claimed Mosley. “I believe the BMA has chosen ideology over the interests of patients. Our software aims to enhance patient care by streamlining treatment, making it more effective, and ultimately improving the efficiency of the healthcare system.”

In 2023, the government awarded Palantir a contract to establish a new NHS “Federated Data Platform,” though some local NHS trusts have raised concerns that the system might not only be subpar compared to existing technologies but could also diminish functionality, as reported. Palantir is also among the tech companies reported by the Guardian last week, which recently led to a discussion with Attorney General Shabana Mahmood about solutions for the prison and probation crisis, including robotic support for prisoners and tracking devices.

During the session, Senator Chi Onwurah questioned the appropriateness of involving the company in the NHS while also working with the Israeli Defense Forces in military applications in Gaza.

Mosley did not disclose operational specifics regarding Palantir’s role with Israeli authorities. Their offerings include a system labeled “supporting soldiers with AI-driven kill chains and responsibly integrating target identification.”

Onwurah remarked on the necessity for cultural change within the NHS to foster acceptance of new data systems, posing the question to Mosley: “What about a unified patient record in the future?”

“Trust should depend more on our capabilities than anything else,” Mosley responded. “Are we delivering on our promises? Are we improving patient experiences by making them quicker and more efficient? If so, we should be trusted.”

Liberal Democrat Martin Wrigley expressed serious concerns about the interoperability of the data systems provided by Palantir for both health and defense, while Conservative MP Kit Malthouse inquired about the military’s potential use of Palantir’s capacity to process large datasets to target individuals based on specific characteristics. Mosley reassured: “Our software enables that type of functionality and provides extensive governance and control to organizations managing those risks.”

Malthouse remarked, “It sounds like a Savior.”

The hearing also revealed that Palantir continues to engage Global Counsel, a lobbying firm co-founded by the current U.S. ambassador. Mosley denied any claims that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited Palantir’s Washington, D.C. office “through appropriate channels,” clarifying that Mandelson resigned as a global advisor “in early 2025.” According to the consultant’s website.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Critics accuse Ofcom of putting high-tech companies’ interests ahead of online child safety

The Communication Watchdog is accused of endorsing major technology for the safety of under-18s after England’s children’s commissioners criticized new measures to address online harm. Rachel de Souza warned Offcom last year that the proposals to protect children under online safety laws are inadequate. She expressed disappointment that the new code of practice published by WatchDog ignored her concerns, prioritizing the business interests of technology companies over child safety.

De Souza, who advocates for children’s rights, highlighted that over a million young people shared their concerns about the online world being a significant worry. She emphasized the need for stronger protection measures and criticized the lack of enhancements in the current code of practice.

Some of the measures proposed by Ofcom include implementing effective age checks for social media platforms, filtering harmful content through algorithms, swiftly removing dangerous material, and providing children with an easy way to report inappropriate content. Sites and apps covered by the code must adhere to these changes by July 25th or face fines for non-compliance.

Critics, including the Molly Rose Foundation and online safety campaigner Beavan Kidron, argue that the measures are too cautious and lack specific harm reduction targets. However, Ofcom defended its stance, stating that the rules aim to create a safer online environment for children in the UK.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have also advocated for stricter online protections for children, calling for measures to reduce harmful content on social media platforms. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle is considering implementing a social media curfew for children to address the negative impacts of excessive screen time.

Overall, the new code of practice aims to protect children from harmful online content, with stringent measures in place for platforms to ensure a safer online experience. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in significant fines or even legal action against high-tech companies and their executives.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk’s Acquisition Causes X’s UK Interests to Collapse the Following Year

The company acknowledges that X’s revenue and profits plummeted in the UK when Elon Musk took over the social media platform.

A decrease in ad spending due to concerns about “brand safety and/or content moderation” was cited as a key reason, according to recent accounts submitted.

Twitter UK Ltd also faced significant scrutiny for missing its account filing deadline last month, as noted in recent company filings. It finally filed its complete account in 2023, the year it was rebranded as X after Musk’s acquisition.

“The company continues to develop brand safety tools, invest in platform safety and content moderation, and implement corrective measures to educate advertisers on these initiatives,” stated the company.

Overall revenue amounted to £69.1 million, down 66.3% year-on-year from £205.3 million in 2022. Profit for 2023 dropped to £1.2 million from £5.6 million the previous year, with pre-tax profit decreasing by 74% to £2.25 million. This was described as a “significant decline in the company’s performance.”

The acquisition of masks also led to layoffs, with Musk revealing that only 1,500 of the approximately 8,000 Twitter employees were retained that year.

In the UK, the number of employees at the company decreased from 399 in the previous year to 114, including 173 cuts in the “research and development” sector.

Despite these challenges, X’s value was recently estimated at $44 billion by Musk, and his X.AI artificial intelligence company acquired the business for $33 billion last month.

Farhad Divecha, CEO of Accuracast and founder of unyte.ai, an expert in digital advertising, expressed that the revealed numbers did not come as a surprise.

“The warning signs were evident all along,” he remarked. “If anything, there may now be an opportunity for X to recuperate advertiser revenues, particularly if Musk and his team collaborate to support advertisers and implement brand safety protocols, initially focusing on the UK and Europe.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

X was contacted for comments, with KinFaiCheung listed as the director who approved the accounts. Cheung and Adeeb Sahar are listed as company directors, while Musk is identified as having a “key management” role at Company House.

Musk established a new company in the UK late last year amid speculation that he intends to make a substantial donation to Nigel Farage’s Reform British Party.

The new company, X.ai London, was founded on December 12th and is involved in “business and domestic software development,” operating from the same London office as X.

Source: www.theguardian.com