Hobble Office’s Doge Cuts Funding for NASA and SpaceX Mars Missions

The office situated on the ambiguous corner of the federal government, where NASA relies on to safely land astronauts on the moon, is facing pressure to cut at least 20% of the close team of experts for Mars’ robotic probes, according to two individuals familiar with the directive.

Staff reductions have reportedly already commenced at the Astro Geography Science Center in Flagstaff, Arizona, with more employees expected to be terminated following a recent call for early retirement and resignations on April 4th. The office, which is part of the US Geological Survey under the Department of the Home Office, is the target of cost-cutting efforts initiated in January with a substantial email sent to the federal government by Musk’s team.

Representatives from the Department of Home Affairs, USGS, and the Astro Geography Center did not respond to requests for comment regarding the staff reductions or potential impacts.

The cuts could potentially impact the mission of sending a crew to Mars in the future, a significant objective for Musk, who is the founder of SpaceX. He envisions a company that can make human life multiplanetary.

Matthew Golombek, a geophysicist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, has been involved in selecting multiple probe landing sites on Mars and described the precise mapping at the Astro Geographic Science Center as the “gold standard used by essentially everyone in the community.”

At the beginning of this year, the office had 53 employees, with eight already set to depart and more encouraged to consider the latest offers.

Dr. Golombek emphasized the importance of the center’s experts for mapping excellence and site selection for almost every landing. He expressed concern about losing the highly experienced and knowledgeable executives from the center.

The repercussions of reducing the team of interplanetary mapmakers in the office are significant, as Jared Isaacman, the NASA-backed presidential candidate under President Trump, proposed a “parallel” effort to send astronauts to Mars during a Senate committee meeting.

One researcher at the Flagstaff Office voiced concerns that amid shifting budget priorities, personnel cuts could be detrimental to mapping and critical projects in planetary science, crucial for human exploration.

“I can’t fathom randomly cutting 40% of the remaining staff without canceling the entire project,” the researcher stated.

The researchers added that even the departure of just five workers could significantly impact the office, depending on seniority and field of expertise.

Two employees, who requested anonymity to protect their government careers, were aware of the recent call for volunteers for the “deferred resignation/retirement program” at a recent staff meeting. Essential layoffs known in the federal government if insufficient employees volunteer.

The field of astronomy is interdisciplinary, with experts in terrestrial fields like mineralogy, volcanology, and geography that are valuable for space exploration. The USGS Astrogeology Center, though part of an internal division, closely collaborates with NASA and is largely funded by the agency.

For decades, the Center’s experts have been pivotal in creating detailed topographic maps of various celestial bodies, strategic planning, and scientific goals for NASA missions.

The scientist also provided lunar geology crash courses to Apollo astronauts like Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, which enhanced their knowledge of rock sample collection. This training has been revived for NASA’s Artemis program, aiming to return astronauts to the moon’s surface in 2027.

Office geology experts played a crucial role in finding new landing sites for historic Viking Mars landers after the original site was deemed unsafe in 1976. In 2021, a rover safely landed on Mars and was guided autonomously using maps and software from the Center.

Companies in the commercial space sector also rely on the expertise of the Astro Geographic Science Center.

“SpaceX has consulted the USGS in the past, and the USGS team was enthusiastic,” said David SF Portree, a former archivist and public relations manager at the Astrology Science Center, a semi-self-historist and science writer in Arizona.

SpaceX did not respond to requests for comments regarding their work at the Astrogeology Center or the impact on their Mars program.

Mr. Porterie expressed concerns about the long-term effects of NASA’s 50-year plan for the crew’s mission to Mars and the executive order for a government-wide employment freeze, which affected student contractors at the office.

Dr. Edwards from Northern Arizona raised concerns about the mass recruitment of probationary workers, stating that it could lead to the dismissal of subject experts.

He emphasized the importance of maintaining experienced staff to ensure the continuity of specialized expertise in the field.

“That’s concerning to me,” he added.

Source: www.nytimes.com

British government offices attempting to prolong legal battle with Apple under wraps

The UK’s attempt to make details of its legal battle with Apple public has been unsuccessful.

The Investigatory Powers Court, responsible for investigating potential illegal actions by the national intelligence agency, rejected a request from the Home Office to keep “details” of the case confidential on Monday.

Presidents of the Investigatory Court, Judges Singh and Johnson, initially disclosed some aspects of the case on Monday.

They confirmed that the case involves Apple challenging the Home Office regarding a technical capability notice under the Investigatory Powers Act.

The Home Office argued that revealing the existence of the claim and the identities involved would jeopardize national security.

The judge stated, “We do not believe that disclosing specific details of the case would harm public interest or endanger national security.”

Reports from The Guardian and other media outlets claimed that the Home Office issued a Technical Capability Notice to Apple, seeking access to Apple’s advanced data protection services.

Apple has stated it will not comply with the notice, refusing to create a “backdoor” in its products or services.

Judges Singh and Johnson noted that neither Apple nor the Home Office confirmed or denied the accuracy of the Technical Capability Notice and media reports on its contents.

The judge added, “This ruling should not be taken as confirmation of the accuracy or inaccuracy of media reports. Details about the Technical Capability Notice remain undisclosed.”

A journalist was denied access to a hearing last month related to the incident.

Various media organizations requested the court to confirm the participants and the public nature of the hearing on March 14th.

Neither journalists nor legal representatives were allowed at the hearing, with the identities of the involved parties remaining anonymous beforehand.

The judges mentioned the potential for future hearings to have public elements without restrictions, but the current stage of the process does not allow it.

Recipients of Technical Capability Notices cannot reveal the order unless authorized by the Home Secretary, and hearings should only be private if absolutely necessary, as per the rule on the court’s website.

Ross McKenzie, a data protection partner at Addleshaw Goddard law firm, stated that despite the ruling, it is unlikely that detailed information regarding the Home Office’s case for accessing Apple user data will be disclosed.

An Interior Ministry spokesperson declined to comment on the legal proceedings but emphasized the importance of investigative powers in preventing serious threats against the UK.

Apple chose not to provide a comment on the matter.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Artificial intelligence tools employed to combat child abuse imagery in home offices

The United Kingdom has become the first country to implement laws regarding the use of AI tools, as highlighted by a remarkable enforcement organization overseeing the use of this technology.

It is now illegal to possess, create, or distribute AI tools specifically designed to generate sexual abuse materials involving children, addressing a significant legal loophole that has been a major concern for law enforcement and online safety advocates. Violators can face up to five years in prison.

There is also a ban on providing manuals that instruct potential criminals on how to produce abusive images using AI tools. The distribution of such material can result in a prison sentence of up to three years for offenders.

Additionally, a new law is being introduced to prevent the sharing of abusive images and advice among criminals or on illicit websites. Border units will be granted expanded powers to compel suspected individuals to unlock and submit digital devices for inspection, particularly in cases involving sexual risks.

The use of AI tools in creating images of child sexual abuse has increased significantly, with a reported four-fold increase over the previous year. According to the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), there were 245 instances of AI-generated child sexual abuse images in 2024, compared to just 51 the year before.

These AI tools are being utilized in various ways by perpetrators seeking to exploit children, such as modifying a real child’s image to appear nude or superimposing a child’s face onto existing abusive images. Victim voices are also incorporated into these manipulated images.

The newly generated images are often used to threaten children and coerce them into more abusive situations, including live-streamed abuse. These AI tools also serve to conceal perpetrators’ identities, groom victims, and facilitate further abuse.

Secretary of Technology, Peter Kyle, expressed concerns that the UK must stay ahead of the AI Revolution. Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty Images

Senior police officials have noted that individuals viewing such AI-generated images are more likely to engage in direct abuse of children, raising fears that the normalization of child sexual abuse may be accelerated by the use of these images.

A new law, part of upcoming crime and policing legislation, is being proposed to address these concerns.

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle emphasized that the country cannot afford to lag behind in addressing the potential misuse of AI technology.

He stated in an Observer article that while the UK aims to be a global leader in AI, the safety of children must take precedence.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Concerns have been raised about the impact of AI-generated content, with calls for stronger regulations to prevent the creation and distribution of harmful images.


Experts are urging for enhanced measures to tackle the misuse of AI technology, while acknowledging its potential benefits. Deleclehill, the CEO of IWF, highlighted the need for balancing innovation with safeguarding against abuse.

Rani Govender, a policy manager at NSPCC’s Child Safety Online, emphasized the importance of preventing the creation of harmful AI-generated images to protect children from exploitation.

In order to achieve this goal, stringent regulations and thorough risk assessments by tech companies are essential to ensure children’s safety and prevent the proliferation of abusive content.

In the UK, NSPCC offers support for children at 0800 1111, with concerns for children available at 0808 800 5000. Adult survivors can seek assistance from Napac at 0808 801 0331. In the United States, contact Childhelp at 800-422-4453 for abuse hotline services. For support in Australia, children, parents, and teachers can reach out to Kids Helpline at 1800 55 1800, or contact Bravehearts at 1800 272 831 for adult survivors. Additional resources can be found through Blue Knot Foundation at 1300 657 380 or through the Child Helpline International network.

Source: www.theguardian.com