Eighty Percent of the Global Population Now Resides in Urban Areas

Eixample district in Barcelona, Spain

Shutterstock/Bear Photo

Currently, over 80 percent of the global population resides in urban areas, a statistic that’s on the rise, emphasizing the necessity for cities to enhance both human health and environmental sustainability, as detailed in a significant United Nations report.

The latest Outlook for Global Urbanization report, published in 2018, indicated that 55 percent of the population lived in urban settings. However, these estimates vary internationally based on disparate definitions of urban and rural regions. For instance, Denmark considers an urban settlement to be one with a population of about 200, while Japan sets the threshold at 50,000, obscuring the understanding of global urbanization.

To clarify matters, Sarah Hertog, a researcher for the United Nations in New York, identified urban areas as those with at least 50,000 inhabitants and a density of 1,500 people per square kilometer, or cities with a minimum of 5,000 people and 300 people per square kilometer.2 “For the first time, we applied a consistent definition across all countries,” Hertog stated.

The researchers analyzed satellite and national survey data from 237 nations and territories to project global urbanization trends for 2025. Their findings indicated that 45 percent of the world’s population currently resides in cities, most within urban areas of fewer than 250,000 inhabitants, meaning a total of 81 percent of people are urban residents, with the last 19 percent in rural regions.

Statistical models incorporating factors like aging and migration patterns predict that by 2050, 83 percent of the global population will inhabit cities rather than rural settings. Although the overall number of city and town residents will rise until 2050, the rural population, mainly influenced by the Democratic Republic of the Congo, is expected to peak in the 2040s and subsequently decline until 2050.

These new estimates will assist the United Nations in tracking progress towards its goals. Hertog noted that the aim is to achieve the 11th Sustainable Development Goal, which aspires to make urban areas more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable by 2030. The outcomes will also be included in a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to help inform policies to mitigate climate change.

Factors driving urban population growth differ by region. In eastern and southern Asia, rural-to-urban migration is predominant. “People migrate not just for job opportunities and education, but also for social interactions,” according to Hertog. While international migration significantly influences Europe and North America, in sub-Saharan Africa, the rise is largely attributable to higher birth rates compared to death rates.

The increase in urbanization presents both challenges and opportunities for the environment. As urban populations expand city limits, improper public transport planning can lead to urban sprawl, increasing car dependency and carbon emissions. Conversely, thoughtful planning can yield more energy-efficient transit options than those offered in rural areas.

Urbanization also impacts health. For instance, residents in urban settings are typically more susceptible to air pollution and extreme heat, which correlate with issues like cardiovascular problems and a higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease, as stated by Andrea Mechelli from King’s College London. Moreover, the scarcity of green spaces in certain urban locales can lead to heightened anxiety and cases of depression, he emphasizes.

However, urbanization also offers health advantages. “Healthcare in urban settings tends to be more accessible and comprehensive compared to rural areas,” notes Mechelli. “Additionally, social connections are easier to establish in cities, where individuals can find like-minded people, unlike in rural regions where one might need to travel for hours to meet others with similar interests.”

This does not imply that urbanization should be halted or that city living is undesirable. Mechelli concluded, “This report underscores the urgency to enhance our urban environments, making them greener and more livable, which would yield numerous benefits.”

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Restricting eating times linked to 91 percent higher risk of cardiovascular death

A recent comprehensive study of 20,000 adults suggests that time-restricted eating, a form of intermittent fasting, may significantly increase the risk of death. Moreover, healthy eating habits could challenge the established scientific consensus on this topic.

The latest research, published by the American Heart Association, reveals that restricting eating to less than eight hours a day is associated with a staggering 91 percent increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular disease.

After analyzing participants’ dietary habits and health over a period of up to 17 years, the study found no evidence to support the idea that limiting meals to an eight-hour window reduces the risk of death from any cause.

Lead author Professor Victor Wenze Zhong expressed surprise at the results, stating to BBC Science Focus that they had anticipated a decrease in cardiovascular disease risk and overall mortality with long-term adoption of an eight-hour time-restricted diet.


He further stated, “Despite the popularity of this dietary approach for its short-term benefits, our study indicates that while the typical eating window ranges from 12 to 16 hours per day, shorter meal times do not correlate with longer life.”

Although the precise reason why time-restricted eating may increase the risk of cardiovascular death is still unknown, one possible explanation suggested by Zhong is that it could lead to a loss of muscle mass.

Recent interest in time-restricted eating has been fueled by its potential health benefits. Prior studies have indicated that it could aid weight loss and improve blood sugar and cholesterol levels.

Many practitioners follow a 16:8 schedule, whereby they consume all food within an eight-hour window and fast for the remaining 16 hours.

This eating pattern aligns more closely with natural circadian rhythms and is believed to support better sleep and metabolic function. However, the recent findings cast doubt on its long-term benefits.

Stanford University School of Medicine Professor Dr. Christopher Gardner cautioned that while time-restricted eating may offer short-term advantages, it could have adverse long-term effects, based on the study.

It is important to note that the study has not yet undergone peer review, and detailed dietary information of the participants is not available.

The research population, with an average age of 49, recorded 2797 deaths, of which 840 were due to cardiovascular disease.

As per Zhong, individuals, especially those with existing heart disease or cancer, should be cautious about adopting an eight-hour eating window due to its associated increased risk of cardiovascular death.

He emphasized the potential effectiveness of intermittent fasting for short periods, such as three to six months, for weight loss and cardiometabolic health improvement. However, long-term adherence to practices like eight-hour time-restricted eating warrants careful consideration.

Despite these cautionary findings, Zhong and Gardner noted that it is premature to draw definitive conclusions regarding time-restricted eating based on a single study.

Ultimately, the study suggests that the content of one’s diet may hold greater importance than the timing of meals for long-term health outcomes.

About our experts:

Dr. Victor Wenze Zhong is a professor and chair of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He holds leadership roles in the American Academy of Nutrition and the American Heart Association.

Dr. Christopher Gardner is a professor of medicine at Stanford University, known for his research on dietary components and patterns. He has served on the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee and the Lifestyle & Metabolic Health Council.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com