PMOS Explains the Need for Renaming Scientific Terms: A Path to Clarity and Understanding

CT42A4 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Cavallini James/BSIP/Alamy

What do research fields like artificial intelligence (AI), medicine, and climate change share? They could all benefit from an understanding akin to the story of Rumpelstiltskin. As fairy tales suggest, knowing the “true name” of a concept—an age-old idea in folklore—grants us power over it.

While it might not seem scientific, psychologists reveal that a person’s name can significantly influence perceptions. The same may hold true for scientific terminology. Take “artificial intelligence” as an example: despite its groundbreaking potential, a simpler label like “machine learning” might have mitigated much of the controversy surrounding it.

There’s no definitive “real name” in the folklore sense, but some labels undoubtedly resonate better than others. Recent years have seen a shift away from stigmatizing disease names, exemplified by the World Health Organization (WHO) quickly rebranding the Wuhan coronavirus to COVID-19 and renaming monkeypox to mpox in 2022.


‘Net Zero’ is a term that has drifted from its original definition.

Some renamings correct inaccuracies, such as the recent shift from polycystic ovary syndrome to polyendocrine metabolic ovary syndrome. However, renaming isn’t always effective. For instance, earlier references to “greenhouse effect” or “global warming” have evolved into “climate change,” a broader term that now reflects various effects beyond just rising temperatures. Meanwhile, the technical phrase “net zero” has lost clarity and is often misappropriated by those opposing environmental policies.

What factors contribute to successful renaming? Terms like “artificial intelligence” generate vivid associations compared to “machine learning.” A directive approach from reputable institutions like the WHO can also facilitate this process. Ultimately, some names simply stick better due to being more memorable; even if it’s a tongue twister, I won’t forget Rumpelstiltskin anytime soon.

Source: www.newscientist.com

PCOS Rebranded as PMOS: A Major Update in Women’s Health

Misidentified ‘Cysts’ in PCOS are Not True Cysts

Steve Gschmeisner/Science Photo Library

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) has undergone a significant rebranding. At the recent European Endocrine Society congress in Prague, renowned endocrinologist Helena Teed announced that it will now be referred to as polyendocrine metabolic ovary syndrome (PMOS).

This new terminology is more than just semantics; it corrects prevalent misconceptions about the condition. It highlights the crucial metabolic and hormonal features of PMOS that extend beyond the ovaries.

Reflecting on my diagnosis of PCOS over 20 years ago, I recall suffering from severe acne and irregular periods—common symptoms that prompted a distressing ultrasound. I was shocked to see what were labeled “cysts” on my ovaries. The fear of infertility and potential emergency surgeries left me feeling confused and devastated.

My journey led me to explore recent PCOS/PMOS research through New Scientist, unveiling the extensive misinformation surrounding the condition. After publishing an article on my findings in 2018, I discovered my story resonated with many others seeking clarity.

The major revelation is that the “cysts” associated with PCOS are misidentified; they are not cysts but rather underdeveloped eggs that remain trapped due to an excess of immature follicles in the ovaries. This shift in understanding allows for a more accurate perspective on ovarian health.

This overabundance can disrupt normal ovulation and menstrual cycles, potentially delaying pregnancy due to infrequent egg release. However, studies show that women with this condition are still likely to achieve their desired family size: 80% conceive without medication or IVF. Despite my challenges, including five miscarriages, I eventually had the three children I had always wanted.

Moreover, researchers now recognize that PMOS impacts the entire body, characterized by elevated male hormone levels like testosterone. This can lead to symptoms such as acne, excessive body hair, and thinning scalp hair. Insulin resistance is also prevalent, increasing the risk of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular issues. Mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression, are also common.

On a positive note, recent findings suggest that individuals with PMOS may have enhanced egg reserves, potentially delaying the onset of perimenopause and menopause, which could enhance reproductive options even in later years.

According to Tehi Piltonen, president of the International Society for Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and professor at Oulu University Hospital in Finland, the prevalence of this condition—affecting one in eight women—might have been advantageous for our ancestors, allowing them to store energy during times of food scarcity, thus prolonging pregnancy and reproductive viability.

While today’s environment of plentiful high-calorie foods presents challenges for those with PMOS, effective symptom management is available. Historically, attention was only given to ovarian health, particularly fertility concerns, but this new classification aims to broaden the approach.

Teed, who has campaigned for over a decade to reclassify PCOS, collaborated with 56 patient and professional organizations to establish a name that accurately reflects the science. If this change alleviates confusion and anxiety linked to former diagnoses, then the effort will have been well worth it.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com