Meta Prevails in AI Copyright Lawsuits as US Ruling Favors Company Over Authors

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has secured judicial backing in a copyright lawsuit initiated by a collective of authors this week, marking a second legal triumph for the American Artificial Intelligence Industry.

Prominent authors, including Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, claimed that the owners of Facebook utilized their books without authorization to train AI systems, thereby violating copyright laws.

This ruling comes on the heels of a decision affirming that another major AI player, Humanity, did not infringe upon the authors’ copyrights.

In his ruling on the Meta case, US District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco stated that the authors failed to present adequate evidence that the AI developed by tech companies would harm the market to establish an illegal infringement under US copyright law.

However, the judgment offered some encouragement to American creators who contended that training AI models without consent was unlawful.

Chhabria noted that using copyrighted material without permission for AI training is illegal in “many situations,” contrasting with another federal judge in San Francisco who recently concluded in a separate case that Humanity’s AI training constituted “fair use” of copyrighted works.

The fair use doctrine permits the utilization of copyrighted works under certain conditions without the copyright holder’s permission, which serves as a vital defense for high-tech firms.

“This ruling does not imply that Meta employs copyrighted content to train language models,” Chhabria remarked. “It merely indicates that these plaintiffs presented an incorrect argument and failed to establish a supportive record for their case.”

Humanity is also set to face further legal scrutiny this year after a judge determined that it had illegally utilized over 7 million books from the Central Library, infringing on the authors’ copyrights without fair use.

A representative for Boys Schiller Flexner, the law firm representing the authors against Meta, expressed disagreement with the judge’s ruling to favor Meta despite the “uncontroversial record” of the company’s “historically unprecedented copyright infringement.”

A spokesperson for Meta stated that the company valued the decision and characterized fair use as a “critical legal framework” for developing “transformative” AI technology.

In 2023, the authors filed a lawsuit against Meta, asserting that the company exploited unauthorized versions of their books to train the AI systems known as Llamas without consent or remuneration.

Copyright disputes are placing AI firms in opposition to publishers and creative sectors on both sides of the Atlantic. This tension arises because generative AI models, which form the foundation of powerful tools like ChatGPT chatbots, require extensive datasets to be trained, much of which is comprised of copyrighted material.

Skip past newsletter promotions

This lawsuit is part of a series of copyright cases filed by authors, media organizations, and other copyright holders against OpenAI, Microsoft, and companies like Humanity regarding AI training.

AI enterprises claim they are fairly using copyrighted materials to develop systems that create new and innovative content, while asserting that imposing copyright fees on them could threaten the burgeoning AI sector.

Copyright holders maintain that AI firms are unlawfully replicating their works and generating rival content that jeopardizes their livelihoods. Chhabria conveyed empathy toward this argument during the May hearing, reiterating it on Wednesday.

The judge remarked that generative AI could inundate the market with endless images, songs, articles, and books, requiring only a fraction of the time and creativity involved in traditional creation.

“Consequently, by training generative AI models with copyrighted works, companies frequently produce outputs that significantly undermine the market for those original works, thereby greatly diminishing the incentives for humans to create in the conventional manner,” stated Chhabria.

Source: www.theguardian.com

“Dirty Money Prevails: Older Generation Crypto Investors Cash in on ‘Trump Pump'”

MIles, a 37-year-old NHS doctor from London, has been trying to convince friends to buy cryptocurrencies for years. In recent weeks, the “Trump pump” on crypto prices has made them envious. “They watched in frustration as my gamble paid off,” he says.

Despite cashing out around £600,000 to buy a house earlier this year, Miles’ crypto portfolio is now worth £2.3 million. Miles, who invested £4,000 in Bitcoin in 2012, said: ‘It’s defined my life. My pot fluctuates by hundreds of thousands every day and I’ve been through periods of volatility over the years.” he says.

A number of Miles told the Guardian why they became private investors in cryptocurrencies (regular people who buy digital blockchain currencies) and how their investments have paid off over time. I was one of ten people.


Investors see Donald Trump’s return to the White House as a harbinger of a crypto-friendly climate. Photo: Mark Humphrey/AP

Bitcoin’s price has fallen to $97,000 (76,500 sterling) and hit a new all-time high. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has revealed that 12% of UK adults own cryptocurrencies.

The majority of respondents said they entered the crypto market within the past four years, with some using the extra funds they saved during the coronavirus lockdown to jumpstart their previous blockchain currency acquisition process. Some people also purchased coins via user-friendly apps and platforms.

The responses also reflect a growing trend of interest in professions such as education, banking, nursing, and IT investment. “Tech Brothers” are historically associated with the world of cryptocurrencies. argued that such investments were the best or only option for building meaningful personal wealth.

A large number of middle-class respondents lost faith in the existing system and turned to cryptocurrencies in the hope that it would help them achieve life goals such as having children, buying a home, and traveling. He said that he aimed at

Julian, a 57-year-old draftsman, homeowner, and father of four from Nottingham, was one of several respondents who said they bought Bitcoin in anticipation of a spike in inflation.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Remaining Accountable: Understanding the Extended Range of Plug-in Hybrids

Despite the growing number of electric and hybrid vehicles on the roads, some individuals remain apprehensive about range and access to charging points, particularly if they rely on their vehicles for work. These concerns persist.

Fleet managers and business owners, with myriad responsibilities, may find the transition away from gasoline daunting. Nevertheless, advancements in battery technology and substantial investments in charging infrastructure have made the switch to electric or hybrid more feasible and potentially cost-effective for businesses than ever before. So, what factors should you consider to extend your battery-powered driving range?

Have you thought about a plug-in hybrid?
It’s advisable to explore plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) first. These vehicles feature rechargeable batteries and gasoline engines, with only a few running on diesel. They can be charged at both domestic and public charging points and now offer impressive pure electric ranges.

On the other hand, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) rely on the car’s movement to generate electricity and use battery power to reduce gasoline consumption and emissions. They cannot be charged by plugging into a power outlet.

Modern plug-in hybrids like the Škoda Superb offer impressive range

The latest plug-in models showcase the significant technological advancements, with fast charging capabilities, remarkable range, and battery capacity. “For instance, the Škoda Superb Estate can travel up to 84 miles on pure electricity,” says Alan Barrowman, Skoda’s national contract employment and leasing manager. He also noted that this mileage qualifies for the 5% benefit-in-kind (BiK) tax for company car drivers.

Changes in charging
Charging networks are crucial for PHEV drivers looking to minimize their petrol (or diesel) usage. Fortunately, the number of public charging points is constantly increasing. In October 2023, approximately 50,000 points were installed at various service stations, with the installation rate continuing to rise. According to Zapmap, a data firm, there were 68,273 electric vehicle charging points across the UK by the end of August this year, representing a 41% year-on-year increase. Additionally, there are an estimated 700,000+ home and workplace charging points.

Charging points supply either alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) power. Electric car batteries can only store DC power, so connecting to an AC charger involves converting the current, which can be time-consuming. Vehicles that support both AC and DC charging points, such as the all-new Škoda Superb, can charge even faster. The Skoda www.theguardian.com

Transatlantic Speed Record Remains Unbroken for 50 Years: Darkness Prevails in the Skies | Air Transportation

ohOn September 1, 1974, two men made the fastest trip ever between New York and London. Traveling three times the speed of sound and taking less than two hours, this incredible journey set a record that still stands 50 years later.

Even the mighty Concorde, which set the record for the fastest commercial transatlantic flight in 1996, was almost an hour late.

The US Air Force Lockheed Blackbird SR-71 jet, with a crew of two – pilot James Sullivan and reconnaissance systems operator Noel Widdifield – completed the flight between the two cities in one hour, 54 minutes and 56 seconds, before landing in triumph to a great welcome at the Farnborough Air Show in Hampshire.

Widdifield, now 83, divides his time between Virginia and Florida in the US. “In some ways it was a normal flight for us,” he said, reflecting on that momentous day. “There was nothing unusual about the flight or the way we flew the plane, but in July 1974 we were told we were going to attempt the world record for flying from New York to London, which had previously been held by a Royal Navy pilot. There was a lot of media interest.”

It wasn’t just the Air Force’s prestige that was at stake. America was facing an international public relations crisis. Just three weeks earlier, disgraced President Richard Nixon had resigned after the Watergate scandal and Gerald Ford had taken over the White House. The country was still reeling from its disastrous involvement in the Vietnam War. The country needed something to cheer about.

There were other schemes as well. Widdifield observer“Although I didn’t know anything about it at the time, behind the scenes, negotiations were taking place between the US and the UK to deploy Blackbird SR-71s on British soil.




Widdifield flew B-52 bombers before joining the Blackbird SR-71 program. Photo: Noel Widdifield

“There were fears in the UK that this move might cause a lot of backlash, especially in the Middle East. But after we broke the record and flew into the Farnborough Air Show, that seemed to be the clincher and the UK allowed the SR-71 to be parked.”

Widdifield was 33 when he made this historic flight. He originally wanted to be a train driver, but after seeing U.S. Air Force jets flying low over his house at age 12, he decided to become a pilot.

After training and flying B-52 bombers, Widdifield served in the Blackbird SR-71 program at Beale Air Force Base in California from 1971 to 1975, after which he retired from flying to serve in the U.S. space program until 1982.

Piloting a Blackbird was akin to being an astronaut: The crew wore space suits and flew at an altitude of 80,000 feet (most commercial airliners top out at 42,000 feet). “It was pitch black up there,” Widdifield said. “You could see the stars and, depending on the time of day, the moon or the sun.”

Their plane took off from Beale and had to fly along the coast to New York to avoid creating a sonic boom over populated areas and causing significant damage to buildings. High above the city was an invisible “gate” where the journey would begin. Reaching a speed of Mach 3.2 (three times the speed of sound, about 2,455 miles per hour), the Blackbird crashed through the gate and the record attempt began.

The plane had to refuel twice: once upon takeoff, once when it docked with a tanker over California to top off, and once en route to near Greenland.

In one incident that looked terrifying from the outside but was handled with cool by the crew, the Blackbird suddenly began to “yaw,” or move quickly from side to side, after losing thrust.

Because the Blackbird took in air from the front to provide thrust for the engines, the air intake mechanisms would often become misaligned, causing a momentary, significant loss of power in one engine.

Skip Newsletter Promotions



Widdifield and Sullivan stand in front of a Blackbird SR-71. Photo: Noel Widdifield

“The automatic restart system was activated, the misaligned cones were corrected and the engine was restarted,” Widdifield said. “We had no real concerns other than what this would do to our record speed run.”


The plane then flew through the London “gates” without incident, and the Blackbird landed at Farnborough, where a large crowd waited and a press conference was held, during which Widdifield and Sullivan were on the phone with the new president. “It got huge international coverage for the next year,” says Widdifield, who has six scrapbooks of the clippings. “But what Jim and I always tried to emphasize was that although it was just the two of us who got the glory, there was a huge team behind every flight.

“When you take into account the support staff, the administrative staff and all the people who work to get us flying, that’s 1,000 people. They deserve as much credit as Jim and I do.”

Widdifield, who has been married to his wife Ann for 63 years and has two children, five grandchildren, and two great-grandchildren, is mourning the loss of his co-pilot, Jim Sullivan, who died in 2021, and the Blackbird SR-71 itself, which was officially retired in 1998.

He said: “Jim and I kept in touch but then lived far apart so we only saw each other a few times at SR-71 reunions.

“Obviously I was sad when the SR-71 program ended. So am I surprised that no one has beaten our record in 50 years? No, because no aircraft has been built since then that could break that record.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Epic Games Prevails in Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google Over Fortnite

On Monday, a jury sided with Epic Games over Google in an antitrust case that could change the way app marketplaces like Google Play operate.
The unanimous ruling ended a three-year legal battle between the two companies. Epic, the developer of the popular online multiplayer game Fortnite, first filed a lawsuit against Google in 2020, alleging that the company’s app store practices violated federal law and California antitrust law. He claimed that there was.
The lawsuit against Google was just part of Epic’s splashy effort to rally app developers large and small against the entrenched gatekeepers of mobile software. Epic’s war against Apple and Google revolves around the hit game Fortnite, which is free to play and available on almost every software platform imaginable, despite the current App Store and Google Play drama.
Epic alleges that both tech giants violate antitrust laws by forcing app users to pay through their systems, drastically reducing in-app revenue in the process. When defending themselves, Apple and Google typically point to security concerns and justify a shared desire to direct app users to central software authorities.
Apple and Google treat third-party apps differently. iOS doesn’t allow third-party apps, but Android allows “sideloading” of apps. This fact changed the shape of the battle between Epic and Google. Still, Google warns customers against installing external apps, and the process isn’t as simple as just downloading something on Google Play.
Faced with these facts, it wasn’t clear whether Epic would prevail in its lawsuit against Google Play’s relatively unrestricted ecosystem, but it did.
“Today’s ruling is a victory for all app developers and consumers around the world,” Epic Games said in a statement about the ruling. “This proves that Google’s app store practices are illegal and abuse its monopoly to charge exorbitant fees, stifle competition, and reduce innovation.”
Epic points to the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill and the EU Internal Digital Markets Act as examples of regulations on the way that could impose further restrictions on Apple and Google’s dominant software practices. I admired it.
In a statement provided to TechCrunch, Wilson White, Google’s vice president of government affairs and public policy, confirmed the company’s plans to appeal.
“We intend to appeal the ruling. Android and Google Play offer more choice and openness than any other major mobile platform,” White said. “…We remain committed to the Android business model and remain deeply committed to our users, partners, and the broader Android ecosystem.”
If any of these look familiar, it’s probably because Epic fought the same battle against Apple. The highly publicized campaign began with a parody of Apple’s iconic “1984” ad and culminated in a mixed verdict two years ago.
The court’s ruling largely favored Apple, but called on the iPhone maker to open up its software market by allowing developers to direct customers to alternative payment options. In September, the companies asked the Supreme Court to reconsider the ruling and take the case, so essentially everything is still up in the air.
Epic started directing Fortnite players to download it in 2018, moving it away from Google’s Play Store. In 2020, Epic released Fortnite through Google’s official app marketplace, but it still accused the company of preventing users from downloading third-party apps. The popular game is no longer available on Google Play or installed on iOS devices through Apple’s App Store.
This isn’t the last we hear about Epic’s multi-pronged battle. Google should appeal soon. Still, between a somewhat unexpected victory in court and last week’s massive Lego Fortnite launch that attracted more than 2.4 million concurrent players, Epic has everything going for it right now.

Source: techcrunch.com