Why Long-Term Exercise Recommendations During COVID-19 May Be Detrimental

Resistance Training: An Emerging Therapy for Long COVID Symptoms

Bailey Cooper Photography/Alamy

With millions of individuals suffering from long-term symptoms of coronavirus, researchers are exploring effective strategies to alleviate these conditions. Resistance training presents a promising, drug-free, and affordable option that could potentially expedite recovery from long COVID infections. Despite its potential benefits, skepticism remains, with some experts claiming existing studies lack robustness, reminiscent of past debates on exercise for conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome.

Dr. Caroline Dalton from Sheffield Hallam University, UK, emphasizes the necessity for precision in defining exercise efficacy, warning against generalizing results to all long COVID patients.

One notable study led by Dr. Colin Berry at the University of Glasgow sought to investigate lifestyle interventions as long COVID emerged as a significant post-infection complication. Berry’s hypothesis was that exercise might serve as a viable alternative to lengthy drug development processes.

Berry’s team conducted a three-month resistance training program for participants with long COVID, assessing their performance improvements, including a notable increase of 83 meters on a timed walking test for those who completed the program compared to just 47 meters for the control group. The findings suggested resistance training could be a feasible treatment for persistent COVID-19 symptoms like fatigue and mobility issues.

Despite the enthusiasm surrounding the study, critical voices raised concerns about its findings. The difference in distance walked by both groups fell short of clinical significance, according to David Tuller from the University of California, Berkeley. Berry acknowledged that individual benefits need consideration beyond aggregated group data.

Another major criticism of the study relates to its diverse participant group. The inclusion of individuals with varying severity of COVID-19 infections meant the results could reflect broad averages rather than specific insights. According to Todd Davenport from the University of the Pacific, this diversity risks obscuring individual outcomes.

Understanding Post-Exercise Fatigue

Crucially, the study’s approach to assessing post-exertional fatigue—a debilitating symptom of chronic COVID-was limited. This condition causes severe fatigue after exertion, which often disproportionate to the activity level. Danny Altman at Imperial College London notes that effective evaluation of post-excretion fatigue can be challenging.

Unfortunately, fatigue assessment only occurred after the study, losing sight of early responses to exercise protocols. Alarmingly, at a three-month evaluation, 67% of participants reported inadequate recovery post-activity compared to 49% in the control group, potentially indicating greater setbacks for the intervention group, as shared by Leonard Jason from DePaul University.

Emerging research has also suggested that exercise may exacerbate certain symptoms, with a 2024 study highlighting potential muscle damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in individuals suffering from long COVID-related fatigue.

While Berry’s research sparked widespread debate, other studies support the notion that exercise can yield benefits for long COVID patients. A comprehensive review of 33 randomized controlled trials asserted that exercise significantly enhances the quality of life for affected individuals; however, it did not specifically address the prevalence of post-exercise fatigue, noted by over 80% of those surveyed.

The negative impact of post-exercise fatigue on quality of life was echoed by Margaret O’Hara, who highlighted the inadequacies of studies failing to consider this critical symptom.

Similarities to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

This ongoing discussion echoes sentiments from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) studies, where post-exertional fatigue plays a central role. Landmark research suggested graded exercise therapy provided some benefit but has faced scrutiny since, per critiques regarding the modified definitions of improvement throughout the trial period.

As outlined in subsequent analyses, the recovery rates reported in these trials have come under fire for failing to capture realistic improvements, reiterating the complexity and varying responses in exercise interventions for exercise-related fatigue.

As national health organizations pivot away from generally endorsing graded exercise therapy for CFS, acknowledging the necessity for tailored management strategies, experts argue a similar consideration is warranted for long COVID cases. Such insights advocate for a subtyping strategy in research, honing in on individual symptoms to gather nuanced perspectives on exercise impacts.

Assessing Risks and Benefits

Acknowledging that current guidelines do not endorse graded exercise therapy for long COVID, further inquiries into varied forms of exercise interventions remain essential. “Long COVID” encompasses a range of conditions, prompting the need to discern effective exercise practices for different patient profiles.

Factors like persistent viral presence in specific individuals or immune system overreactions post-COVID necessitate individualized investigation.

Mike Ormerod, a long COVID volunteer, stresses the importance of advocating for informed medical advice and managing the narrative surrounding exercise recommendations. “Most doctors encourage physical activity under the belief that it’s universally beneficial, yet this can lead to detrimental outcomes for those with specific fatigue profiles,” cautions Dalton.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Evolution of Vaccine Recommendations in the United States

Nurse administering a flu shot

Tess Crowley/Chicago Tribune/Getty Images

On June 26, the Advisory Committee on U.S. Vaccination Practices (ACIP) announced new recommendations regarding flu vaccinations that utilize controversial preservatives often misattributed to autism. While this change is unlikely to restrict access to vaccines, it reflects a broader U.S. governmental effort to uphold the integrity of the vaccination recommendation process.

What Changes Have Occurred with ACIP?

ACIP is an advisory body that provides expert recommendations to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccinations. Established in 1964, its members are appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, currently Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Kennedy recently dismissed all 17 members of ACIP, claiming it was necessary to eliminate conflicts of interest. “A complete overhaul is essential to restore public trust in vaccine science,” Kennedy stated in a press release.

This action faced pushback from many public health experts. “Prior to Kennedy’s actions, I had confidence in ACIP. Now, I have none,” remarked Amesh Adalja from Johns Hopkins University. “It’s reckless and dangerous to unilaterally dismantle an entire panel of experts,” added Tinatan, president of the American Infectious Diseases Association, in a statement.

Kennedy appointed eight new members, though one resigned before the inaugural meeting. Several of the new members have raised concerns regarding various vaccines. For instance, Robert Malone, a pioneer in mRNA vaccine technology, discussed on Joe Rogan’s Experience podcast in 2021 the potential links between Covid-19 vaccines and heart-related issues. A 2024 study found that while there was a lower heart attack and stroke rate post-vaccination among approximately 46 million adults, there was an increase in rare side effects such as myocarditis and pericarditis.

A CDC spokesperson stated, “Dr. Malone is a seasoned physician who advocates for rigorous, evidence-based evaluations rather than uncritical acceptance. He does not oppose vaccines based on flawed data or policies—noting the necessity for better information.”

Adalja expressed concerns that some new members lack significant expertise in vaccines, infectious diseases, and epidemiology, suggesting that trust in ACIP under Kennedy’s leadership is dwindling. “In reality, he effectively made ACIP an independent entity,” he stated.

What Changes Have Been Made to Vaccine Recommendations?

In May, Kennedy stated in a video on social media platform X that the CDC would halt Covid-19 vaccine recommendations for most children and pregnant individuals. This decision was taken without ACIP’s input, breaking longstanding precedent.

Subsequently, the CDC revised its Vaccination Guidelines for Children and Adolescents, indicating that decisions regarding Covid-19 vaccinations will be made in consultation with healthcare providers, based on personal preferences.

The new ACIP also voted to discontinue recommendations for flu vaccines containing Thimerosal, a preservative used in several vaccines, during its first meeting. Additionally, the panel advocated for seasonal flu vaccinations for all individuals older than six months.

What is Thimerosal? Is it Safe?

Thimerosal is a preservative used in various vaccines to prevent bacterial contamination and contains trace amounts of mercury, which the body metabolizes into a byproduct known as ethyl mercury.

Ethyl mercury is distinct from the more harmful methylmercury found in certain environmental sources, such as fish. Methylmercury is highly toxic and can accumulate in the body, while numerous studies have shown that low doses of ethyl mercury are safe. Additionally, it is typically cleared from the bloodstream within 30 days, even in infants.

Despite claims from anti-vaccine proponents, no studies have substantiated a link between thimerosal and autism. A 2014 survey of nearly 1.3 million children found no association between vaccines, including thimerosal-containing vaccines, and the development of autism.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration conducted a thorough review of thimerosal use in pediatric vaccines in 1999, identifying no side effects aside from minor allergic reactions at the injection site.

Which Vaccines Contain Thimerosal?

The utilization of thimerosal in vaccines has decreased as formulations have evolved, with a shift toward single-dose vials minimizing the risk of bacterial contamination.

Thimerosal is not included in routine childhood vaccinations except for certain flu shots, which are used infrequently. For instance, only 3% of children over the age of 65 and about 2% of adults received the flu vaccine containing thimerosal during the 2024-2025 influenza season.

How Will New U.S. Vaccine Policies Compare to Other Countries?

Other nations have continued to recommend thimerosal-containing vaccines. For instance, the UK removed thimerosal from routine vaccinations between 2003 and 2005 to mitigate mercury exposure but later found no evidence of harm. They employed several vaccinations, including those with thimerosal, during specific flu seasons targeting H1N1.

In 1999, the European Medicines Agency endorsed the use of vaccines without thimerosal even in light of no evidence of harm. In 2004, after new data re-affirmed the safety of preservatives, the agency noted that “the benefits of vaccination significantly outweigh any exposure concerns, including thimerosal.” A further review of their guidelines in 2016 reaffirmed their relevance.

Can I Get the Vaccine for Myself or My Child?

Since most seasonal flu vaccinations do not contain thimerosal, it is unlikely that the ACIP’s recommendations will hinder vaccine access. Additionally, the CDC’s updated guidelines regarding Covid-19 vaccines for children and pregnancies should not affect the availability of vaccines.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Is customized nutrition more effective than generic dietary recommendations?

Even if you eat the same bread, everyone's metabolic reaction will be different.

Matthew Ashmore/Alamy

Consider two slices of bread. One is an artisanal sourdough boule and the other is an inexpensive mass-produced white bread. Which do you think is healthier?

The correct answer is “You won't know until you try.” Some people have unhealthy reactions to cheap foods, such as spikes in blood sugar levels. However, this is not the case for some people and their blood sugar levels spike after eating sourdough. Some people will see a spike in both, while others will not see much of a rise.

This article is part of a series on nutrition that delves into today's hottest trends. Click here for details.

The same goes for other foods and other nutrients, especially fats, which can dangerously spike in your bloodstream after eating. How our metabolisms react to food is highly specific, a shocking discovery that overturns decades of nutritional orthodoxy and explains what we should eat to stay healthy. It is hoped that this will finally answer the surprisingly vexing question of whether.

A rise in blood sugar and lipids after a meal is quite normal, but if they rise too quickly (called a spike) they can cause problems. Frequent spikes in glucose and a type of fat called triglycerides are associated with the risk of developing diabetes, obesity, and heart disease. For decades, nutrition researchers assumed that all humans responded roughly the same way to certain foods, leading to uniform increases in blood sugar and fat levels.

glycemic index

Under that premise, dietary advice was simple and uniform. Reduce your intake of foods that cause spikes. Unsurprisingly, most of them…

Source: www.newscientist.com