How Taylor Swift Elevates Botany to Celebrity Status

Feedback is New Scientist Popular Sideways covers the latest in science and technology. You can reach out to Feedback@newscientist.com to share items you believe will captivate our readers.

Quick Botany Lessons

We’re on top of our game, thanks to our assistant news editor and Swiftie Alexandra Thompson. The upcoming release titled The Anniversary of Botany is set for August. It’s named “Dance with Plants: Taylor Swift’s music video as a Catalyst for Engaging Botany Learning.”.

The study reveals that high school students exhibit a “generally low interest in plants,” leading to “plant blindness.” Teachers, frustrated by the challenge of igniting interest in botany, often find themselves repeating tired lessons. Plants are deemed an afterthought, making visits to the garden seem less inviting. It’s disheartening; interest in botany should be more pronounced.

However, as autumn leaves begin to fall, researchers have proposed a novel solution: showing a Taylor Swift music video.

This might appear off-track. Swift wouldn’t typically be seen as a conventional instructional tool. Yet, her videos prominently feature numerous plants. “Out of the 61 official music videos on Swift’s YouTube channel, 53 (87%) contain elements related to plants,” the authors note.

By incorporating videos like green cardigan into the curriculum, educators can introduce concepts such as “photosynthesis, light competition, forest waste, nutrient cycling, seasonal changes, canopy structure, plant growth habits, and morphology.”

Botany is a captivating field, filled with beauty and challenges, and students show enthusiasm for learning about plants, echoing, “You look like my next mistake.”

Botany Communicator: This is a game-changer. Embrace it! Stop denying your inner Swiftie and start incorporating her videos as teaching tools. Soon, you’ll have your students engaged.

Feedback eagerly awaits updates from researchers who find inspiration in Showgirl’s Life, as I slowly drift towards my favorite city.

Acronyms Galore

Feedback continues its mission to uncover the most imaginative scientific acronyms. Readers have highlighted two noteworthy examples. Credit where it’s due for discovering them!

Firstly, Eric Foxcroft points out that Graham Lawton’s discussion of chronic sinus infections included a “number of pages in columns” which mentioned mid-nasal results or runny noses. This was literally beneath our noses! While our feedback addressed the concept of “runny noses” way back in 2001, it seems we had forgotten, so it’s time to bring it back.

Meanwhile, Johann Gottalt Olsen highlighted a recent September Nature paper detailing unique rock formations discovered by the Mars rover, which may indicate ancient life on Mars. This was mentioned in New Scientist and notably included an acronym Olsen found that we missed.

One instrument is called Rimfax, a nod to the Norse mythical horse Hrímfaxi. The acronym cleverly stands for “radar imager for underground Mars experiments.”

But it gets better! “We also encountered Shelllock and Watson,” Olsen writes, representing “scanning habitable environments with Raman and organic matter emission” and “wide-angle terrain sensors for operation and engineering.” Olsen continued:

Feedback is curious as to why “patience” didn’t also lead to Raman rainbow colors and radiation tomography monitors. It’s essential to keep up with the feedback in New Scientist from time to time!

Creatures, Gremlins, and More

Exciting news from the Wall Street Journal reveals that OpenAI is producing its first film. Well, kind of. OpenAI is “lending tools and computational resources” to Vertigo Films, which will create films based on concepts from OpenAI’s “creative specialist” Chad Nelson.

The film is titled Cricktails, likely due to its clever spelling. A previous title, Creatures, belongs to a Science Fiction Comedy Horror film from 1986. The plot centers on “a forest creature embarking on an adventure following the destruction of its village by an outsider.”

This feature expands on the 2023 short film, Cricktails, which you can watch for free on YouTube. The short is noted as the first animated film crafted entirely using DALL-E’s generative AI, creating all visuals, characters, and backgrounds—the entirety of Crikterz’s world.

Only DALL-E could generate such unique designs as seen in Critterz. Where are the Wild Ones? Despite the desire for more animation, one YouTube commenter quipped, “I enjoy watching the whole movie with a character standing still, staring at me.”

Feedback has gathered ample content, so you can expect that the best joke is the film is narrated by “David Attenborough’s neighbor Dennis.” I’m eager to see how this unfolds as a full-length feature. Mark your calendars for its anticipated debut at Cannes next year!

Have you shared your feedback yet?

You can send your stories to feedback via email at feedback@newscientist.com. Don’t forget to include your home address. This week’s and past editions of feedback can be found on our website.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Rescuers in Landslide Efforts to Utilize Swift Earthquake Data Analysis

Community members investigating a landslide in Yangbari, Papua New Guinea, in 2024

Xinhua Newsletter/Aramie

In the event of a landslide, pinpointing the location can be crucial for rescue teams. Recent advancements in earthquake data analysis have made it possible to identify the source of such disasters within just a few kilometers in a matter of seconds.

Current methods can generally limit the area of interest to tens of kilometers, as noted by Stefania Ursica from the Helmholtz Geoscience Centre in Germany. This limitation can result in significant delays if rescuers are directed to an incorrect site. “The time lost is critical,” Ursica stated during a press briefing at the European Geoscience Union Conference in Vienna last week.

Numerous countries maintain seismic monitoring networks to track earthquakes and volcanic activity. This data can also aid in detecting landslides, especially as the risks associated with climate change intensify. However, analyzing data from landslides is considerably more complex than that from earthquakes, according to Ursica.

Her team’s innovative approach involves two key components. First, they assess five distinct facets of the seismic waveform and filter out noise when an event occurs.

This information is processed by numerous mathematical agents that seek the origin of the initial rock-like event that leads to a landslide. They accomplish this by estimating which waveforms would have been generated at various possible locations and comparing those estimations with the data captured. If the waveforms do not align, they will explore other options.

Each agent “travels” following patterns inspired by animal behavior, such as the spiral of falcons or the migration paths of elephants, until they converge back to the most plausible site of the event. This whole procedure takes approximately 10 seconds, providing far greater accuracy than previous methods. “It’s a few digits of improvement,” Ursica adds.

Aside from enhancing rescue operations, this new technique will assist researchers in locating events in remote regions where satellite data may be limited or unavailable.

The team plans to release their findings and make the underlying code accessible to the public.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

What was the reason behind Donald Trump sharing an AI-generated fake video of Taylor Swift?

circleWhen Donald Trump posted a series of AI-generated images that falsely portrayed Taylor Swift and her fans as supporters of his presidential campaign, he inadvertently endorsed the efforts of an opaque non-profit organization aiming to fund prominent right-wing media figures and with a track record of disseminating misinformation.

Among the modified images shared by Trump on Truth Social were digitally altered pictures of young women sporting “Swifties for Trump” shirts, created by the John Milton Freedom Foundation. This Texas-based non-profit, established last year, claims to advocate for press freedom while also seeking to “empower independent journalists” and “fortify the pillars of our democracy.”




President Trump posts AI imitation of Taylor Swift and her fans Photo: Nick Robbins Early/Truth Social



Screenshot of @amuse’s “Swifties for Trump” tweet. Photo: Nick Robbins Early/Truth Social/X

The foundation’s operations seem to involve sharing clickbait content on X and collecting substantial donations, with plans for a “fellowship program” chaired by a high school student that intends to grant $100,000 to prominent Twitter figures like Glenn Greenwald, Andy Ngo, and Lara Logan. Despite inquiries into the foundation’s activities and fellowship program through tax records, investor documents, and social media posts, the John Milton Freedom Foundation did not offer any comment.

Having spent months endorsing conservative media figures and echoing Elon Musk’s allegations of free speech suppression from the political left, one of the foundation’s messages eventually reached President Trump and his massive following.

Experts caution about the potential dangers of generative AI in creating deceptive content that could impact election integrity. The proliferation of AI-generated content, including portrayals of Trump, Kamala Harris, and other politicians, has increased since Musk’s xAI introduced the unregulated Grok image generator. The John Milton Freedom Foundation is just one among many groups flooding social media with AI-generated content.


Niche nonprofit’s AI junk reaches President Trump

Amid the spread of AI images on X, the conservative @amuse account shared an AI-generated tweet from Swift fans with its over 300,000 followers. The post was tagged as “Satire,” marked with “Sponsored by the John Milton Freedom Foundation.” Trump then reposted screenshots of these tweets on Truth Social.

The @amuse account, managed by Alexander Muse, enjoys a broad reach with approximately 390,000 followers and frequent daily postings. Muse, indicated as a consultant in the Milton Foundation’s investor prospectus and a writer of right-wing commentary on Substack, has numerous ties to the @amuse account. The AI content includes depictions like Trump vs. Darth Vader and sexualized images of Harris, with the prominent watermark “Sponsored by: John Milton Freedom Foundation.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Research: Extinction of dinosaurs led to swift evolution of bird genomes

About 66 million years ago, at the end of the Cretaceous period, a 10 km-wide asteroid struck Earth near what is now the town of Chicxulub in Mexico. The impact wiped out about 75% of Earth's animal and plant species, including groups such as non-avian dinosaurs and ammonites. A new study identifies key changes in bird genomes caused by the end-Cretaceous mass extinction that ultimately contributed to the remarkable diversity of modern birds.

This painting depicts an asteroid impact in the shallow tropical ocean of the sulfur-rich Yucatan Peninsula in what is now southeastern Mexico. The impact of this massive asteroid, which occurred about 65 million years ago, is believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs and many other species on Earth. The painting shows a Pterodactylus, a flying reptile with a wingspan of up to 50 feet, gliding above low tropical clouds. Image by Donald E. Davis/NASA.

“By studying the DNA of modern birds, we can detect patterns in gene sequences that changed shortly after one of the most significant events in Earth's history,” said Dr Jake Barb, from the University of Michigan.

“The signatures of these events appear to be imprinted in the genomes of survivors in ways that are detectable tens of millions of years later.”

An organism's genome is made up of four nucleotide molecules designated by the letters A, T, G, and C. The order of these nucleotides in the genome defines the blueprint of life.

The DNA code can evolve in ways that change the overall composition of DNA nucleotides across the genome.

These changes in composition are important in determining what genetic variations are possible and contribute to an organism's evolutionary potential, or ability to evolve.

Dr. Belf and his colleagues found that the mass extinction caused a change in nucleotide composition.

The researchers also found that these changes appear to be related to the birds' development as young birds, their adult size, and their metabolism.

For example, in the approximately 3 to 5 million years following the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period, surviving bird lineages tended to decrease in body size.

The development of hatchlings has also changed, with more species becoming 'altricial'.

“This means that when they hatch they are still in a fetal state and need to be fed by their parents, and it may take several weeks for them to fledge,” Dr Barb said.

“Birds that are ready to fend for themselves immediately after hatching, like chickens and turkeys, are called 'precocious.'”

“We found that adult body size and pre-hatching developmental patterns are two important traits of bird biology that we can link to the genetic changes we are detecting.”

“One of the most important challenges in evolutionary biology and ornithology is unraveling the relationships between the major bird groups. The structure of the extant bird phylogenetic tree is difficult to determine.”

Over the past 15 years, researchers have been trying to solve this problem by applying increasingly large genomic datasets.

So far, they have used genomic data to study the evolution of bird genomes using statistical models based on strong assumptions.

These traditional models allow researchers to reconstruct the history of genetic change, but they typically assume that the makeup of DNA, i.e. the proportions of A, T, G and C nucleotides, remains constant throughout evolutionary history.

The study authors developed software tools to more closely track DNA composition over time and across different branches of the tree of life.

This tool allowed us to relax the assumption that DNA's composition is constant.

“This allows us to vary our models of DNA evolution across the evolutionary tree and identify places where there may have been changes in DNA makeup,” said Professor Steven Smith, from the University of Michigan.

“In this new study, these changes were clustered within about five million years of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction,” Dr Belff added.

This approach also allowed the team to estimate which bird traits are most closely associated with changes in DNA composition.

“This is an important type of genetic change that we think is associated with mass extinctions,” Dr Barb said.

“To our knowledge, changes in DNA composition have never before been so clearly linked to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.”

“We know that mass extinctions can have dramatic effects on biodiversity, ecosystems and the forms of life,” said Professor Daniel Field, from the University of Cambridge.

“Our study highlights that these extinction events can have even larger effects on organismal biology by altering key aspects of genome evolution.”

“This study improves our understanding of the dramatic biological impact of mass extinction events and highlights that the mass extinction that wiped out the giant dinosaurs was one of the most biologically consequential events in the entire history of the Earth.”

By relaxing typical assumptions used in evolutionary biology, the researchers are developing more nuanced insights into the sequence of events in birds' early history.

“We haven't typically thought of changes in DNA configurations and models across the tree of life as changes that indicate something interesting happened at a particular time and place,” Prof Smith said.

“This study shows that we've probably missed something.”

of study Published in the journal Scientific advances.

_____

Jacob S. Belf others2024. Genomic and life-history evolution link bird diversification and the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Scientific advances 10(31); doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp0114

This article is a version of a press release provided by the University of Michigan.

Source: www.sci.news

Is it possible for AI to replace all recorded music with Taylor Swift covers?

Taylor Swift performed in Melbourne earlier this year.

Graham Denholm/TAS24/TAS Copyright Management Getty Images

A rogue artificial intelligence obsessed with Taylor Swift could replace all recorded music with artificially generated cover versions of her, researchers say. History tells us that this American singer-songwriter for elise to paperback authorThere is no evidence left that Ludwig van Beethoven or the Beatles ever existed.

nick collins at Durham University, UK. mick grierson Professors at the University of the Arts London have issued an unusual warning in a paper that says humans should think about ways to resist “now, rather than when it is too late.”

Thankfully, the risk of AI Swiftpocalypse is low. Collins said the idea is a thought experiment aimed at encouraging researchers to develop ways to protect all types of data, including music, literature, scientific research, and historical records, from being corrupted by AI. I am.

The pair lay out a future scenario in which we rely on a few centralized data stores, such as Spotify and Apple for music. AI could infiltrate these stores and corrupt, delete, or alter the data inside. This can be dramatic and obvious, or it can be gradual and unnoticeable. “It's very likely that within a few thousand years there will be at least some corruption and some conflict over the truth of music in audio recordings,” Collins says.

To make their point clear and show how AI can already manipulate the data it has access to, researchers used current AI models to create Taylor Swift songs, including Queen songs. did. bohemian rhapsodyFrank Sinatra's I've Got You Under My Skin and the beach boys Isn't it wonderful?. They calculate that producing these “Taylor's versions” of all recorded music currently requires 1.67 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, costing him more than $266 million. However, this is an amount that Swift herself can afford.

Collins says that while digital and physical backups can leave us complacent about the safety and permanence of our data, AI with the right incentives and capabilities can access everything we record. It states that it may be damaged. “No matter how much we try to preserve human culture, unpredictable threats may emerge in the future,” he says.

However, not all experts are convinced that AI is such a serious threat. sandra wachter Oxford University researchers have shown that AI can cause great harm by replicating sexist and racist biases in humans, but Collins and Grierson said He said that such a feat would never be possible.

“I don't think there's a serious problem with AI waking up and setting its own goals, having its own motivations, and taking actions to achieve those goals,” she says. “I think that's a nonsense argument, and I don't think it's realistic. It's like asking me what I would do if aliens landed on this planet tomorrow. I think it's unlikely. I think so.”

Carissa VelisResearchers, also at the University of Oxford, said that decisive action against AI is needed, but not a dramatic “kill switch” to stop malicious models from progressing. Instead, it should be a careful system of checks and balances to ensure the safety of AI models.

“This argument seems to assume that there is a malicious AI that somehow has its own desires and becomes so powerful that we want to stop it,” she says. . “And that seems so implausible and so ridiculous to me.”

The real problem is that we will integrate AI into many aspects of our lives and become completely dependent on it, even though it is likely not apocalyptic in nature. , which she believes raises issues such as racism and sexist prejudice that are still very harmful. Or they are simply making up facts that sound plausible.

“The more you leave it [AI] The more embedded it is in a product, the harder it is to turn it off. Not because this malicious thing has become powerful enough to take over, but because we've become dependent on it and it's very costly to stop it even when it's not working well,” Bellis said. says Mr.

Taylor Swift did not respond to a request for comment.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com