Rapture Talk Highlights: TikTok’s First ‘The World Ends’ Moment

I have faith in a group of evangelical Christian influencers on social media. On Tuesday, September 23rd, or perhaps Wednesday, September 24th—consider the state of society. For the first time, joy blossoms on TikTok.

Followers are flocking to the app, revealing that they are ready for their impending destiny. I sold their car or asked for an “Eternal vacation” from their jobs and expressed their concerns. The family dog is also expected to join them in heaven. One woman advised her followers to remove password protection on their devices, making personal information accessible to anyone left behind. Another purchased Bibles from a myriad of Dollar Trees, intending to leave personalized notes in hopes of saving last-minute converts.

Evangelical Christians who believe in the rapture view it as a pivotal doctrine. The concept suggests that one day, true believers will ascend to heaven, marking an end to life as we know it, while the rest must endure seven years of suffering under the Antichrist.

The theory gained traction in the early 1800s through an English cleric named John Nelson Darby, who sparked numerous false alarms. In 1844, a farmer from New York named William Miller attracted a massive following with predictions that ultimately led to widespread disappointment. When Halley’s Comet appeared in 1910, con artists sold “anti-comet drugs” intended to save souls, and in 1997, the Hale-Bopp comet was linked to the tragic suicides of 39 members of the Heaven’s Gate cult.

This time, the message comes from South African preacher Joshua Murakera. He said on a podcast in June, “Spread the word—Rejoy is upon us, ready or not.” This theory quickly made its way to TikTok, where over 320,000 posts have been tagged with #Rapture.

Tyler Huckabee, the managing editor at Sojo.net, a progressive Christian publication, remarked that the “Joker of the Day” in the newsroom is that deadlines have become obsolete. “This isn’t my first rodeo dealing with a particular sect of Christian theology that ignites rumors about the world’s end,” Huckabee noted. “Facebook and Twitter had their moments, but this is TikTok’s inaugural end of the world.”

The Rapture narrative thrives during tumultuous times, according to Matthew Gabriele, a professor at Virginia Tech studying apocalyptic movements. “Christians don’t know when it will happen, but they look for signs,” Gabriele elaborated. “Typically, when conditions worsen, that’s when the electors are saved, which isn’t surprising given the current backdrop of political violence, economic worries, and illness.”

The phrase “end time” frequently circulates on social media to describe our fractured reality—one marked by a pandemic akin to a plague, natural disasters of biblical proportions, and widespread violence. Recently, followers linked the assassination of Charlie Kirk to Rapture Theory. Some TikToks have become platforms for Christian nationalist narratives, suggesting Kirk is embarking on a religious revival. Revival is in the air.




Content creator Jess Lauren on TikTok. Photo: Tiktok/@Jesslauuren

Jess Lauren, a 27-year-old content creator who also runs a clothing startup, was raised in a “deeply involved” Christian household where both her parents were pastors. While studying at the University of California, Davis, Lauren began to question her conservative beliefs and gravitated towards the “deconstruction” movement.

As a child, she was a firm believer. In particular, after reading “Left Behind,” the blockbuster apocalyptic book series co-written by the controversial minister Tim LaHaye, she bought into concepts like the Illuminati and supported views from Christian author Jerry B. Jenkins. (The series has been adapted into several films, including the 2014 version starring Nicolas Cage.) Growing up as the youngest of four, Lauren once roamed the streets checking if fewer cars were on the road, questioning if she had indeed been left behind.

Ibid. April Ajoy, a podcaster and author of the memoir “Star Spangled Jesus: Leave Christian Nationalism and Find True Faith,” recounted a traumatic moment from her childhood. “At 13, chatting on AOL Instant Messenger, I thought I had been left behind. I began to search for my family, who had simply gone for a walk.”

“It was incredibly traumatic,” Ajoy shared. She now prays that “God will turn off his phone” until she grows older, allowing her to graduate high school, marry, and experience intimacy for the first time. While simultaneously feeling excitement about the rapture, Ajoy acknowledged, “We were taught that it’s like a get-out-of-death-free card. You go straight to heaven, avoid dying, and bypass horrors on Earth.”

Rumors about the Rapture tend to spike in September, Ajoy mentioned, coinciding with Rosh Hashanah, a Jewish holiday referenced in the Bible. “People often turn to talk about the rapture when they feel particularly out of control and frightened,” she noted.

On TikTok, fear isn’t always overt. Many #RaptureTok clips adopt a lighthearted tone, aligning well with the platform’s algorithms. Sarah Raines, a doctoral student at the University of Pennsylvania who studies religion and social media, has observed moms giving practical advice for the final hour while preparing for those left behind.

“They adopt a self-help language, common on social media, and attach it to the discourse around the rapture,” she explained. “Some might not genuinely believe it’s the moment of the rapture, yet they feel an essential awakening call to pay attention. They’re hedging their bets.”


It’s not just devoted followers lighting up #RaptureTok. Outside religious contexts, social media users are pushing for a systematic approach to hoarding supplies. One amusing video suggests left-behind individuals stockpile VHS copies of Shrek, implying it’s the new currency. Moreover, one X user remarked that September 23rd is also the day dedicated to bisexual visibility, highlighting that Jesus’ “second coming” would coincide with the public’s opportunity to come out.

So, on Thursday morning, what had changed? Sojo.net’s Huckabee remarked that if previous false alarms are any indication, there’s not much to worry about. Those who predicted the rapture and were proven wrong rarely take it as a cue to reevaluate their beliefs.

“There’s a very human fear of admitting, ‘I was wrong,'” Huckabee said. “I’ve seen people resign from jobs, believing Jesus was returning.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Don Lemon files lawsuit against Elon Musk and X for breach of talk show contract termination

Don Lemon, former CNN anchor, has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk and Company X for breaching a contract with the now-formerly known Twitter social media platform.

The lawsuit, filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco, alleges fraud, negligent misrepresentation, misappropriation of name and likeness, and breach of contract.

Shortly after filming an interview with Musk, Lemon received a text ending their partnership which led to the abrupt termination.

Don Lemon’s lawyer, Carney Shegerian, stated the executives at Company X used Lemon for their advantage and then tarnished his name.

When contacted for comment, Company X responded with an automated message of being busy.

Lemon, once a prominent CNN figure, was let go due to conflicts and poor reviews as a morning show host. He was fired in April 2023.

Linda Yaccarino, CEO of Company X, initially reached out to Lemon’s agent to propose a new show after his CNN departure. The platform aimed to become a video-centric platform.

Lemon’s first scheduled episode on the platform, an interview with Musk, turned tense as Lemon questioned Musk on various topics, leading to the show’s cancellation over creative differences.

Skip Newsletter Promotions

Musk’s increasing conservatism and Lemon’s conflict with the platform’s content direction resulted in the show’s cancellation. Musk’s efforts to attract talent ended with limited success.

The platform’s shift to video content and creator outreach faced challenges with extremism and content moderation issues leading to advertisers pulling out.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Is Apple’s iPhone dominating talk time in the US? | Technology

aApple’s issues span beyond the Atlantic. The company is facing challenges with the EU regarding the Digital Markets Act and is closely monitoring the UK’s progress with the Digital Markets, Competition, and Consumers Bill. However, the looming antitrust lawsuit from the US government poses a significant risk for the company. The primary battleground now shifts back to its home turf.

From our narrative:

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in New Jersey, accuses Apple of having a monopoly in the smartphone market and engaging in “pervasive, persistent, and unlawful conduct” by leveraging its control over the iPhone. The lawsuit seeks to break Apple’s stronghold on the smartphone market and alleges that the company has stifled innovation to maintain its dominance.

At a press conference, US Attorney General Merrick Garland stated, “Apple has maintained power not through dominance, but through illegal anti-competitive behavior.” He emphasized that monopolistic practices like Apple’s pose a threat to the economy’s free and fair markets.

The lawsuit amalgamates a plethora of allegations from the expansive market Apple controls, focusing primarily on substantiating the key claim in US antitrust law: harm to consumers. While competing against Apple can be exasperating, the lawsuit’s success hinges on demonstrating consumer harm.

The lawsuit argues that Apple’s policies restricting the integration of third-party smartwatches with iPhones, while facilitating easy Apple Watch compatibility, and the differentiation between SMS messages from Android users and iMessages from other iPhones have contributed to the decline in market competition. It also touches on Apple’s CarPlay system’s driver-centric approach being all-encompassing.

This preemptively addresses Apple’s stance that restrictions are imperative for safeguarding user privacy and security. The filing contends that Apple justifies its anti-competitive behavior under the guise of privacy, security, and consumer preferences to further its financial and business interests. Deals like offering a “more private and secure app store” for certain entities and the multi-billion-dollar deal with Google to make it the default search engine underscore Apple’s willingness to compromise. The government insists this reveals Apple’s true intentions.

What Kind of Monopoly?

One fundamental question remains ambiguous: what exactly does Apple monopolize? Government filings assert that the company dominates the “high-performance smartphone market” at the expense of cheaper, entry-level devices. Eliminating these affordable phones would secure Apple’s 70% revenue market share, a substantial figure. Apple’s own documentation suggests they don’t view their entry-level smartphones as competitors to the iPhone and high-performance smartphones, further complicating the matter.

While the scenario might seem implausible, denying Apple’s market-shaping influence, which the Justice Department aims to dismantle, is challenging. However, does Apple truly wield market influence by dominating “high-performance” smartphones? International comparisons reveal that high-end Android smartphones excel outside the US, but Apple’s dominance remains largely unaffected. The minimal adoption of iMessage in a market dominated by WhatsApp, Line, and WeChat showcases a noticeable difference, but it hasn’t significantly impacted Apple’s overall position.

Another Game

For those in Europe, the prospect of government action against Apple for abusing its monopoly might seem unsurprising. However, US antitrust enforcement varies from the European model, necessitating litigating the case in court and prevailing based on merit.

One advantage of this system is its fairness in proving Apple’s monopoly abuse within a judicial framework, curbing regulator overreach. However, enforcement poses challenges, with cases potentially enduring for years and incurring hefty legal expenses for Apple, if either won or lost.

In contrast, the EU exemplifies a contrasting approach, swiftly enforcing regulations that are binding. The investigation into Meta, Google, and Apple underscores the regulatory landscape’s swift and decisive nature in the EU.

Source: www.theguardian.com