Alabama woman undergoes surgery to remove rejected porcine kidney

Health officials at Nyu Langone said on Friday that the surgeon had removed genetically modified pig kidneys from an Alabama woman after experiencing acute organ rejection.

Towana Rooney, 53, lived with her kidneys for 130 days. This tolerate organs from genetically modified animals for longer than anyone else. She has resumed dialysis, hospital officials said.

Rooney’s surgeon and director of the NYU Langon Transplantation Institute, Dr. Robert Montgomery, said so-called explantation is not a setback in the field of xenografting.

“This was the longest of these organs,” he said in an interview, adding that Rooney had other medical conditions that could have complicated her prognosis.

“This all takes time,” he said. “This game is won by progressive improvements, singles and doubles rather than swinging for the fence and trying to score a home run.”

Rooney’s further treatment could have saved the organ, but she and her medical team opposed it, Dr. Montgomery said.

“No. 1 is safe. I had to be sure she was fine,” he said.

Another patient, Tim Andrews of Concord, New Hampshire, has been living with the kidneys of a genetically modified pig since January 25th, according to a doctor at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. He has been hospitalized twice for a biopsy.

Just as two patients fed genetically modified pig hearts, two other patients who received similar kidneys in recent years have died.

Rooney, who returned to her Alabama home after coming to New York for treatment, said in a statement that she was grateful for the opportunity to take part in the groundbreaking procedure.

“For the first time since 2016, I enjoyed my time with friends and family without planning dialysis treatments,” Rooney said in a statement provided by Nyu Langone.

“The outcome is not something nobody wanted, but I know I learned a lot from 130 days with pig kidneys. I know this can help and stimulate many others on my journey to overcome kidney disease,” she said.

Hospital officials said Rooney’s kidney function had decreased after experiencing organ rejection. The cause was being investigated, Dr. Montgomery said.

However, the response follows a decrease in immunosuppressive drugs that have been put into treatment of unrelated infections, he added.

The first indication of the trouble was a blood test done in Alabama, showing that Rooney had increased levels of creatinine, a waste product that is removed from the blood through her kidneys. Level elevation signal may be a problem with kidney function.

Rooney was admitted to the hospital, but when creatinine levels continued to rise, she flew to New York. There, the doctor biopsied the kidneys and found clear signs of rejection, Dr. Montgomery said.

Hospital officials said the kidneys were removed last Friday.

“The decision was made by Rooney and her doctors that the safest intervention would be to remove the kidneys and return to dialysis, rather than adding them,” Dr. Montgomery said in a statement.

United Therapeutics Corporation, a biotechnology company that produced the pigs that donated Rooney’s kidneys, thanked her for her courage and said the organs appear to work well to their rejection.

The company plans to start clinical trials for a Butakidney transplant this year, starting with six patients and eventually growing to 50 patients.

Pig organs are considered a potential solution to a lack of donated organs, particularly kidneys. Over 550,000 Americans suffer from kidney failure and need dialysis, of which around 100,000 are on the waiting list to receive their kidneys.

However, there is a sharp need for human organs, with fewer than 25,000 transplants being performed in 2023. Many patients die while waiting.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Apple’s global supply chain undergoes strain with Trump’s new tariffs

In 2018, when President Trump initially implemented tariffs on China, Apple shifted production of iPads and Airpods to India and Vietnam from China. However, with Trump’s return to the White House, this strategy may have backfired for the tech giant.

Trump recently announced tariffs of 46% on Vietnam and 26% on India, which could significantly impact Apple’s business. This is in addition to the existing 20% tariffs on products imported from China, which is where around 90% of iPhones are manufactured.

The proposed tariffs could increase Apple’s costs by $8.5 billion annually, affecting the company’s profits and potentially leading to a 7% decrease in earnings next year.

Apple’s shares dropped 5.7% after Trump’s tariff announcements, signaling concerns for the company’s financial outlook.

Other high-tech companies like Google and Microsoft may also be impacted by these tariffs, affecting businesses beyond Apple. Trump’s broader trade strategy includes imposing tariffs on all countries that tax US exports, further complicating the global trade landscape.

Despite previous efforts by Apple’s CEO Tim Cook to forge a relationship with Trump and avoid tariffs on Apple products, the company now faces significant challenges due to the new tax policies.

After Trump took office, Apple made promises to invest in the United States, but the new tariffs could impact these plans. The company has diversified production beyond China, with moves to India and Vietnam.

Apple’s efforts to expand production in India and Vietnam may face challenges, especially with the recent tariff implications. Despite previous success in avoiding tariffs on certain products, Apple now faces a more complex trade environment.

Apple’s shift in manufacturing to India and Vietnam was aimed at diversifying production and tapping into new markets. However, challenges like skilled labor and supply chain issues have hindered these efforts.

Despite the hurdles faced in US manufacturing, Apple continues to explore opportunities in different countries. The tech giant remains focused on innovation and growth, navigating the ever-changing global trade landscape.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Google Play undergoes changes following US settlement

Google today announced that it will pay $700 million as part of a settlement with the U.S. Attorney General’s Office in a lawsuit over the Google Play Store. In addition, the company also agreed to take certain actions related to Google Play billing, sideloading, and how sideloaded apps are updated.

Here is the list of changes that Google has agreed to implement: All of these provisions will apply from the effective date of the Settlement.

Third-party app stores and sideloading

  • Google will support installing apps on Android outside of Google Play through a variety of methods, including third-party app stores, for at least seven years.
  • Google will not force developers to release apps on Google Play at the same time or sooner for at least four years. This includes not entering into agreements with developers to provide versions with more features on Google Play.
  • For four years, Google has announced that third-party companies can use APIs to automatically update apps, use “split features” to download portions of apps on demand, and allow third-party companies to Support a consent mechanism to stop updates.
  • Google should also allow pre-installed apps or third-party app stores to maintain “exclusive” rights to update apps unless users choose to update from another source. However, developers can opt out of the ability to allow users to update their apps from another source.
  • Currently, Google displays a warning screen when you try to install apps from alternative sources. Next, the user must tap the settings button to allow installing apps from other sources. For at least 5 years, Google should merge these two screens into one and display the following message: “Your phone is not currently configured to install apps from this source.” Giving this source permission to install apps could put your phone and data at risk . “

alternative billing

  • Google must allow developers to offer alternative billing mechanisms for in-app purchases for at least five years. Additionally, we can’t force developers to offer the lowest prices through Google Play billing.
  • If a consumer chooses a different billing option, Google may only collect the minimum amount of data necessary from developers. Additionally, the company cannot use this data to compete with apps.
  • Google will allow developers to contact users outside of their apps with their consent for promotions related to pricing and billing using information collected from outside or inside their apps for at least six years. There is a need.
  • Developers can offer discounts and display them within the app to promote other billing systems. Additionally, Google can’t stop you from displaying prices linked to Google Play or Google Play’s billing system.
  • For six years, Google will allow developers to display information about other purchasing options, such as “Available for purchase on our website for $9.99,” without a link.

OEM clause

  • Google cannot enter into a deal with a phone manufacturer to put Google Play on the device’s home screen as a dedicated app store for at least five years.
  • During the same period, device manufacturers will no longer need to ask Google for “consent” to preload third-party app stores.
  • For at least four years, Google will be required to grant OEM installer rights to preloaded apps.

These changes may seem like a lot, but they may be small changes for Google. As we found out during the Epic vs. Google trial, Google is offering his 4% discount on user-selected charges May not be enough for developers to switch If the cost exceeds the savings, transfer to another payment processor. Additionally, other app stores should provide enough incentives and large numbers of users so that developers can earn more revenue through these app stores.

Source: techcrunch.com