Warner Music Partners with AI Song Generator Suno Following Lawsuit Settlement

Warner Music has entered into a licensing deal with the AI song generator Suno, following the resolution of a copyright infringement lawsuit against the service from a year prior.

As the third-largest music label globally, representing artists like Coldplay, Charli XCX, and Ed Sheeran, Warner becomes the first major record label to officially collaborate with Suno.

Under the terms of the agreement, users can create AI-generated songs on Suno by using simple text prompts, which may include the voices, names, and likenesses of Warner artists who have opted into the service.

Robert Kinkle, CEO of Warner Music Group, emphasized that this partnership demonstrates how artificial intelligence can develop into “professional artists” while showcasing “the values of music.”

“This innovative agreement with Suno is a win for the creative community that will benefit everyone involved,” he declared. “As Suno’s user base and monetization rapidly grow, we recognized this opportunity to create a revenue model and enhance fan experiences.”


As part of the agreement, Suno, often dubbed the ChatGPT of music, committed to modifying its platform to introduce a new, more strictly licensed model next year, including download limitations for users.

Suno announced that only paying members will be permitted to download its AI music creations, and even these members will be subject to extra fees for downloads, as well as a cap on the number of creations they can produce.

This initiative aims to tackle the proliferation of AI tracks generated on Suno, moving toward discontinuing the current version and avoiding an oversupply on streaming platforms.

This agreement comes shortly after Warner Music reached a settlement and partnership agreement with rival AI music generation platform Udio.

Previously, the world’s largest record label sued both Suno and Woodo for copyright violations, asserting their technologies misappropriated music and churned out millions of AI-generated songs without artist consent.

Universal Music, the leading label worldwide, was the first to announce settlements with these companies when they concluded an agreement with Audio last month. While Universal continues to pursue legal action against Suno, Sony Music has filed lawsuits against both Suno and Woody.

Skip past newsletter promotions

In conjunction with the deal with Warner Music, Suno has also acquired live music and concert discovery platform Songkick for an undisclosed figure.

The UK government is currently consulting on a new intellectual property framework for AI, which was initially expected to enable AI firms to use the creative community’s work without approval for model training.

This issue has ignited significant backlash from creators, who advocate for an opt-in system that would enable companies to identify and license their work while ensuring creators receive compensation when their work is utilized.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall indicated last week her intention to “reset” the discussion, expressing support for artists’ appeals to prevent their work from being exploited by AI companies without remuneration.

Source: www.theguardian.com

3M to Pay Up to $450 Million for Water Contamination Settlement

3M is expected to pay New Jersey between $400 million and $450 million over the next 25 years. The company is implicated in the contamination of drinking water across the nation with harmful “forever chemicals,” known as PFAS.

The Minnesota-based chemical corporation has produced PFAS for decades at the Chambers Works site in Deepwater, New Jersey, situated along the Delaware River. This facility was previously owned by the competitor DuPont.

Officials have stated that this settlement marks the largest single clean water agreement in New Jersey history. In 2019, New Jersey launched a lawsuit against 3M, DuPont, and other PFAS manufacturers, citing contamination of the drinking water supply from the facility.

PFAS, or polyfluoroalkyl substances, are found in numerous everyday products, such as nonstick cookware, water-repellant clothing, and stain-resistant carpets. Exposure to these chemicals is associated with metabolic disorders, reduced birth rates in women, delayed child development, and higher risks of certain cancers, including prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers.

As part of the settlement announced on Tuesday, 3M will allocate between $400 million and $450 million to New Jersey over 25 years, aimed at damages and improving drinking water treatment.

New Jersey noted that DuPont and its spinoff, Kemoul, which operates the facility, are not included in the settlement. The remaining parties are anticipated to take the matter to trial. DuPont chose not to comment.

“Businesses that contaminate our water supply must be held accountable,” stated New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin. “For years, 3M was aware its PFAS chemicals were permanently polluting the New Jersey environment, yet they evaded responsibility. That time is over.”

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the Chambers Works facility historically produced gunpowder and materials for nuclear purposes, aiding in the development of the atomic bomb. Recently, the site has manufactured a range of chemicals, including PFAS.

New Jersey Environmental Protection Commissioner Sean M. Latourette remarked that the pollution issue extends far beyond drinking water. “PFAS are present throughout New Jersey, even reaching soil in forests distant from landfills,” he noted.

New Jersey is only the second state to settle with 3M regarding PFAS-related drinking water pollution claims, following Minnesota, which saw 3M agree to pay $850 million in 2018 for similar issues affecting natural resources.

In 2023, 3M also reached a nationwide settlement of up to $12.5 billion with public water suppliers to tackle PFAS contamination in drinking water.

3M characterized the agreement as a “crucial step toward mitigating risks and uncertainties” related to historical PFAS contamination. The company indicated that it had begun phasing out the production of two major PFAS substances in 2000 and aims to stop all PFAS production by 2025.

3M clarified that the settlement should not be seen as an admission of guilt and noted that it would incur a pre-tax charge of $285 million in the second quarter.

This week, the EPA was set to announce whether it will uphold the stringent PFAS drinking water standards established by the Biden administration last year.

Chemical companies and utilities have sued the agency over this decision. The Trump administration was due to inform the court on Monday whether it would continue to support these standards but instead requested a 21-day extension to determine its next steps.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Insightful New Research Reveals Life in the Neolithic Settlement of Trypillia

In new research Published in a magazine PLoS ONEArchaeologists have investigated exceptional human remains unearthed from the Middle Trypilian site (c. 3700-3600 BC) of Kosenivka in Ukraine.

Archaeological background of Kosenivka, Ukraine. Image credit: Fuchs others., doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289769.

The Trypilian culture was a Neolithic European culture that arose in Ukraine between the Seret and Bug rivers in the 5th millennium BC, extending south into modern-day Romania and Moldova and east as far as the Dnieper River.

Also known as the Cucuteni-Trypilian culture, this culture is characterized by advanced agriculture, advanced metallurgy, pottery making, sophisticated architecture, and social organization.

Trypian society was a matrilineal society in which women headed the household, engaged in agricultural work, and manufactured pottery, textiles, and clothing.

Hunting, raising livestock, and making tools were the responsibility of men.

“Despite the huge number of artifacts left behind by the Trypilians, archaeologists have discovered very few human remains,” said Dr Katharina Fuchs from Kiel University and her colleagues.

“Because of this absence, many aspects of the life of this ancient people remain to be discovered.”

Researchers investigated a Trypilian culture settlement near Kosenivka, Ukraine.

This site, which consists of several houses, is unique in the presence of human remains.

The 50 human bone fragments found in the remains of the house were taken from at least seven people, children, adults, men and women, who likely once lived in the house. The bodies of four of them were also badly burned.

Researchers analyzed the carbon and nitrogen content of bones, grains and animal carcasses found at the site and found that meat made up less than 10% of the residents' diet.

This matches teeth found at the scene, which show wear marks indicating chewing on grain or other plant fibers.

That the Trypilian diet consisted largely of plants supports the theory that cattle in these cultures were primarily used to fertilize fields and produce milk rather than for meat production.

“Human bones are a real biological archive,” Dr. Fuchs said.

“The study of Trypilian society and its living conditions in the oldest urban communities in Eastern Europe remains difficult, but our 'Cosembica case' clearly shows that even small bone fragments can be of great help. ”

“By combining new osteological, isotopic, archaeobotanical and archaeological information, we provide excellent insight into the lives, and possibly deaths, of these people.”

Scientists also investigated potential causes of the burns, including fire and unusual forms of burial.

Burnt bone fragments were mainly found in the center of the house, and previous research had assumed that the residents there died in a house fire.

The authors examined the bone fragments microscopically and concluded that the burn probably occurred shortly after death.

In the event of an accidental fire, the researchers suggest that some people could have died from carbon monoxide poisoning even if they had escaped their homes.

According to radiocarbon dating, one of them died in about 19 years. 100 years later. This person's death cannot be related to the fire, but is otherwise unknown.

Two others whose skull injuries have not healed have raised questions about whether violence may have played a similar role.

Examination of Trypilian human bone finds showed researchers that less than 1% of the dead were cremated, and even more rarely buried inside homes.

“Overall, our results point to enormous yet untapped explanatory potential in the rare and poorly preserved bioarchaeological archive of the Cucuteni Trypillia phenomenon,” the scientists concluded.

_____

K. Fuchs others. 2024. Life and death in the Trypilian period: an interdisciplinary analysis of unique human bones from the Kosenivka settlement, Ukraine (3700-3600 BC). PLoS ONE 19 (12): e0289769;doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289769

Source: www.sci.news

An ancient stone bridge dating back 5,600 years signals the early settlement of humans on the Spanish island of Mallorca

Archaeologists say Genovesa Cave Discovered in Mallorca, the main Balearic island and the Mediterranean's sixth largest, the find suggests that humans settled in the western Mediterranean much earlier than previously thought.

5,600-year-old underwater stone bridge in Genovesa Cave, Mallorca, Spain. Image courtesy of R. Landreth.

Limited archaeological evidence makes it difficult to reconstruct early human colonization of the Balearic Islands in the western Mediterranean.

By studying the 7.7-metre (25-foot) submerged bridge, Professor Bogdan Onak of the University of South Florida and his colleagues were able to provide compelling evidence of prior human activity within Genovesa Cave.

“The presence of this underwater bridge and other artefacts indicates a high level of activity and suggests that early settlers were aware of the cave's water resources and strategically built infrastructure to navigate through them,” Prof Onak said.

Genovesa Cave, located near the coast of Mallorca, has had parts of its passage flooded by rising sea levels and has clear calcite deposits when sea levels were higher.

These layers, along with the light-colored bands on the submerged bridge, act as markers to precisely track historical sea-level changes and pinpoint the date of the bridge's construction.

Previous studies had suggested a human presence at the site as far back as 9,000 years ago, but inconsistencies in nearby carbon-dated bones, pottery and other evidence, as well as poor preservation, had left the findings in doubt.

Recent studies have used charcoal, ash and bones found on the island to create a timeline of human settlement dating back about 4,400 years ago.

This allows the timeline of human presence to coincide with important environmental events, such as the extinction of the goat antelope. Myotragus balearix.

By analysing the bridge's mineral overgrowths and the height of the bridge's colour bands, the authors found that the bridge was built around 6,000 years ago – more than 2,000 years older than previous estimates, narrowing the gap in the timelines between eastern and western Mediterranean settlements.

“The history of the bridge's construction appears to be closely linked to the rapid Holocene sea-level rise just before 6,000 years ago and the brief period of sea-level stillness that caused parts of the upper part of the cave to be flooded,” the researchers said.

“Our chronology shows that sea-level rise stopped and stabilized for several hundred years, between 5,964 and 5,359 years ago. During this time, so-called phreatic expansions of speleothems (POS) formed in the cave lake and the characteristic 'bathtub ring' formed on the bridge.”

“Construction of the bridge probably began early in this period, as it was needed to cross the 0.25 metre deep lake, but it must have been completed before 5,600 years ago, when the upper part of the bridge was submerged.”

“Evidence suggests that humans constructed a cobblestone path and a sturdy bridge leading to the cave's water pool, facilitating access to the only dry part of the cave, located in the Sala d'Entrada across the lake.”

“The exact reason these structures in Genovesa Cave were built remains unclear.”

“However, the dating constraints imposed by the depth of the bridge, and the similar depths at which the POS and colour marks are found, support the idea that early humans were present on the island by 5,600 years ago, potentially extending the date back to 6,000 years ago.”

a paper A paper describing the findings was published in the journal Neurology today. Communication Earth and the Environment.

_____

BP Onac others2024. An underwater bridge built at least 5,600 years ago marks early human arrival on the Spanish island of Mallorca. Community Global Environment 5, 457; doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01584-4

Source: www.sci.news

Ancient settlement uncovered in Chile dates back 12,500 years

About 12,440 to 12,550 years ago, hunter-gatherers regularly returned to Chile’s Lake Taguatagua to hunt an ancient elephant relative called Gomphotherium and exploit other local resources, according to a team led by archaeologists from the Pontificia Catholic University of Chile.

Taguatagua 3 site, Chile: (A) Burning evidence spatially associated with Gomphothery cervical vertebrae and skull fragments. (B) Sacral and caudal vertebrae, intervertebral disks, and unfused hipbone segments. Note the distance between the first sacral vertebra and its disk. (C) End scraper from the site. (D) Core debitage from the site spatially associated with Gomphothery remains. Image courtesy of Labarca others., doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302465.

There are several known archaeological sites in the area. Lake Taguatagua Located in central Chile, it is one of the oldest known sites of human habitation in the Americas.

In a new study, Dr Rafael Labarca from the Pontificia Catholic University of Chile and his colleagues discovered an ancient hunter-gatherer camp dating back to the Late Pleistocene epoch, between 12,440 and 12,550 years ago.

The site, named Taguatagua 3, contains fossils of the Gomphosele, an extinct species closely related to the elephant.

Butchery marks on bones, stone tools and other evidence indicate that Taguatagua 3 was a temporary camp set up to process large carcasses.

During the camp’s short existence, other activities were also carried out, including the processing of other foods, as evidenced by the charred remains of plants and small animals such as frogs and birds.

Fossilized cactus seeds and bird egg shells suggest that the camp was inhabited, especially during the dry season.

Numerous archaeological sites from a similar period are now known to exist in the area, suggesting that Lake Tagua-Tagua was a recurring hunting and food-scavenging site for Late Pleistocene people thanks to abundant and predictable local resources.

“The area was an important location along the route of mobile groups at the time and the temporary camp may have hosted regular meetings between these groups,” the archaeologists said.

Further investigation of this archaeologically rich area will continue to provide insight into the migration and survival strategies of early humans in South America.

“Taguatagua 3 contributes to a greater understanding of how early humans adapted to the rapidly changing environment of central Chile during the Late Pleistocene,” the researchers said.

of Investigation result Published online in the journal PLoS One.

_____

R. Labarca others2024. Taguatagua 3: A new Late Pleistocene settlement in a highly suitable site for lacustrine habitat in central Chile (34°S). PLoS One 19(5): e0302465; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302465

Source: www.sci.news

Epic Games CEO Criticizes Google’s $700 Million Settlement with US States as Unjust to Android Users

Google agreed to pay $700 million and allow more competition within the Android app store as part of a settlement with all 50 states and millions of U.S. consumers, but Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney denounced the deal as “unfair to all Android users and developers.” ”

The exact terms of the settlement, first reached in September, were announced just days after Google was handed a major legal defeat in a related lawsuit with Epic Games, best known as the maker of Fortnite.

As part of the lawsuit, U.S. District Judge James Donato is expected to order sweeping changes that could upend Google’s lucrative app store.

In its settlement with states, Google targeted consumers who may have overpaid for apps as a result of Google’s practices, according to terms detailed in documents filed Monday in San Francisco federal court. It plans to contribute $630 million to the settlement fund.

This equates to just $6 per person when divided evenly among 102 eligible U.S. consumers.

All eligible consumers will receive a minimum of $2. The state said at least 70% of consumers should automatically receive their share of the settlement.

The remaining $70 million will be earmarked for the state to use to cover various fines and legal costs.

Google will pay $700 million as part of the settlement. SOPA Image/LightRocket (via Getty Images)

Google also agreed to a series of time-bound changes to its app store practices.

This includes allowing developers to use other in-app purchase systems for the next five years, dialing back the use of so-called “horror screens” when Android users try to use competing app stores (but This includes making it easier for users to use it. Download apps directly from developers.

A coalition of state attorneys general says Google’s dominance in the Android software market – taking up to 30% fees from big developers in the Play Store – has resulted in higher prices and fewer choices for consumers. He claimed to be inviting.

Epic used the same argument in its successful battle with the company.

In a series of scathing tweets, Sweeney criticized the states that accepted the deal.

“The settlement with the state attorney general is unfair to all Android users and developers,” he wrote, adding that the settlement was “intentionally designed by Google to disadvantage competing stores and direct downloads.” It supports a misleading, anti-competitive and scary screen.”

“Previous U.S. lawsuits have made a strong case for $10.5 billion in damages, as well as a 30% fee that Google wrongly collected,” Sweeney added. “I think they would have been satisfied if they had continued to fight for a few more weeks until they won a resounding victory in court. It was a disappointing outcome.”

Pictured is Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney. Getty Images

The terms of the settlement could not be disclosed until the end of the separate Google v. Epic case. Epic was particularly opposed to the settlement when it was first announced in September.

The settlement still needs formal approval from Donato, who presided over each state’s case, before it becomes effective.

During the trial, Donato accused Google of “disturbing” efforts to delete employee chat logs it was ordered to keep.

Luther Rowe, an antitrust watchdog and longtime Google adversary, said: described the settlement as a “scandal” That could derail another major antitrust battle, the Justice Department’s landmark case targeting Google’s online search business.

“Not only was the fine an order of magnitude larger than it should have been, but[RI AG]won a $250 million settlement in 2012 with Company G, which didn’t even split with anyone for not blinking. (remember), the fine was lowered in mid-2012. The US v. G case was designed to make it seem as though it was unreasonable for the Department of Justice and the state in the case to bring it to the finish line. It seems as if the

Elsewhere, Wilson White, Google’s vice president of government affairs and public policy, said he was “pleased” to resolve the dispute with the state and that efforts to challenge the Epic lawsuit verdict were still “not over.” ‘ he claimed.

Google suffered a huge loss in its recent battle with Epic Games. AP

“We are pleased to be able to reach an agreement on that basis and to advance Android and Google Play for the benefit of millions of developers and billions of people around the world. We look forward to making these improvements that will help.” White said in a blog post..

Washington, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb was among those touting the settlement as a victory for consumers.

“For too long, Google’s anticompetitive practices in app distribution have deprived Android users of choice and forced them to pay artificially high prices,” Schwalb said in a statement.

with post wire

Source: nypost.com

Possible Scrutiny Awaits FTC Candidate Melissa Holyoake in the Wake of Google Settlement

Sources tell On The Money that critics have blasted the terms of Google’s $700 million settlement over anti-competitive Android app store practices as weak, leaving the Republican vacant seat at the Federal Trade Commission open. Melissa Holyoake’s bid to become the world’s most successful bidder could face new hurdles.

Holyoak, Utah’s Republican attorney general, said U.S. states have argued that Google’s monopolistic tactics, including charging major developers up to 30% fees in the Play Store, have led to price gouging and lowering prices. As a result, he played a key role in negotiating this deal. Choice for consumers.

The settlement, which Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney decried as “unfair to all Android users and developers,” requires FTC candidates to be “appropriately skeptical of Big Tech.” This could anger some Republicans who want to see more, and even cause some to reconsider their support. An industry source who requested anonymity to discuss the situation told the Post.

“If she was the tip of the spear in an embarrassing reconciliation, that’s not a good thing,” the source added.

As the Post previously reported in June, some Washington insiders were concerned that Mr. Holyoak did not have the antitrust integrity they expected from a new commissioner, and that certain information Sources quipped that FTC Commissioner Lina Khan would “run circles” around the Republican candidate. Regarding antitrust laws.

Utah’s Republican attorney general, Melissa Holyoake, played a key role in negotiating the deal after U.S. states alleged Google’s monopolistic tactics. Paola Morongello

The Republican-backed litigators will need to be approved by the Senate Commerce Committee in October, followed by a floor vote.

Another person said she “will be confirmed” even if some Republicans complain about the odor, but the process may not be a smooth one.

“if [Sen. Josh Hawley] Or she could delay if someone on the Republican side wants it,” another person said. “I think a scenario where she’s delayed is possible, but it’s unlikely that she won’t be confirmed. But it’s safe to say that her nomination is either delayed or in jeopardy.”

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney called the settlement “unfair to all Android users and developers.” Getty Images

Mr. Hawley’s office did not respond to a request for comment about Mr. Holyoak’s confirmation.

On Wednesday, Hawley sent a letter stating that he plans to block the confirmation of another Republican FTC commissioner nominee, Andrew Ferguson, by the end of the year and asking him “additional questions about his philosophy on Big Tech.” I made it possible.

The Missouri senator also opposes expedited confirmation of Todd Inman to a post on the National Transportation Safety Board. Both Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Inman are former aides to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

Sen. Josh Hawley sent a letter indicating he plans to block efforts to confirm another Republican FTC candidate, Andrew Ferguson, by the end of the year. AP

Capitol Hill insiders blame Hawley’s move on a well-documented rift with McConnell. There was no mention of Holyoak in the letter.

Utah accounted for the highest amount of claims in the lawsuit targeting Google’s Android app store practices, and was one of the few states to spearhead the lawsuit, along with New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, and California.Holyoak name appears Court documents detailing settlement terms.

In remarks prepared for the Sept. 20 FTC nomination hearing, Holyoak emphasized his efforts on behalf of Utah and said of the high-profile legal battle, “Our office’s led the work,” he told the Senate committee. Her testimony came just days after the Google settlement was first announced.

“This is a huge benefit for consumers.” Holyoak said at the time:.

The Utah Attorney General’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The settlement with Google was first announced in September, but specific details were withheld pending the conclusion of Epic Games’ stunning legal victory against Google in a related case. Epic specifically rejected the possibility of a settlement.

In the U.S. state case, Google will pay consumers $630 million (just $6 per eligible U.S. user) to cover state fines and legal costs, according to court filings this week. agreed to pay an additional $70 million for

The company also agreed to a series of time-limited changes to its app store policies. This includes allowing developers to use other in-app purchases and dialing back the use of so-called “horror screens” when Android users try to use competing app stores. It will be.

Critics, including Mr. Sweeney, noted that the states’ previous lawsuits “made a strong case for $10.5 billion in damages.” Epic Games’ CEO called it a “disappointing result.”

Meanwhile, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes said the deal includes “many of the injunctive reliefs we sought that would change Google’s behavior,” adding that payments to consumers would be ” “It’s an added bonus.”

“Holyoak is still trying to understand what antitrust law is… She doesn’t have the ability to understand how to enforce the law,” said one longtime antitrust expert.

“What about her actually going after Big Tech?” added a source. “I’ll believe it when I see it.”

Source: nypost.com

Google Play undergoes changes following US settlement

Google today announced that it will pay $700 million as part of a settlement with the U.S. Attorney General’s Office in a lawsuit over the Google Play Store. In addition, the company also agreed to take certain actions related to Google Play billing, sideloading, and how sideloaded apps are updated.

Here is the list of changes that Google has agreed to implement: All of these provisions will apply from the effective date of the Settlement.

Third-party app stores and sideloading

  • Google will support installing apps on Android outside of Google Play through a variety of methods, including third-party app stores, for at least seven years.
  • Google will not force developers to release apps on Google Play at the same time or sooner for at least four years. This includes not entering into agreements with developers to provide versions with more features on Google Play.
  • For four years, Google has announced that third-party companies can use APIs to automatically update apps, use “split features” to download portions of apps on demand, and allow third-party companies to Support a consent mechanism to stop updates.
  • Google should also allow pre-installed apps or third-party app stores to maintain “exclusive” rights to update apps unless users choose to update from another source. However, developers can opt out of the ability to allow users to update their apps from another source.
  • Currently, Google displays a warning screen when you try to install apps from alternative sources. Next, the user must tap the settings button to allow installing apps from other sources. For at least 5 years, Google should merge these two screens into one and display the following message: “Your phone is not currently configured to install apps from this source.” Giving this source permission to install apps could put your phone and data at risk . “

alternative billing

  • Google must allow developers to offer alternative billing mechanisms for in-app purchases for at least five years. Additionally, we can’t force developers to offer the lowest prices through Google Play billing.
  • If a consumer chooses a different billing option, Google may only collect the minimum amount of data necessary from developers. Additionally, the company cannot use this data to compete with apps.
  • Google will allow developers to contact users outside of their apps with their consent for promotions related to pricing and billing using information collected from outside or inside their apps for at least six years. There is a need.
  • Developers can offer discounts and display them within the app to promote other billing systems. Additionally, Google can’t stop you from displaying prices linked to Google Play or Google Play’s billing system.
  • For six years, Google will allow developers to display information about other purchasing options, such as “Available for purchase on our website for $9.99,” without a link.

OEM clause

  • Google cannot enter into a deal with a phone manufacturer to put Google Play on the device’s home screen as a dedicated app store for at least five years.
  • During the same period, device manufacturers will no longer need to ask Google for “consent” to preload third-party app stores.
  • For at least four years, Google will be required to grant OEM installer rights to preloaded apps.

These changes may seem like a lot, but they may be small changes for Google. As we found out during the Epic vs. Google trial, Google is offering his 4% discount on user-selected charges May not be enough for developers to switch If the cost exceeds the savings, transfer to another payment processor. Additionally, other app stores should provide enough incentives and large numbers of users so that developers can earn more revenue through these app stores.

Source: techcrunch.com