Astronomers conduct simulations of undetected asteroids within our galaxy

Astronomers discover large planets around other stars more often than small planets.whether to measure The gravitational pull of an exoplanet on its host starobserve How much starlight do exoplanets block?or Take a photo of the exoplanet itselfObservation methods for exoplanets are biased toward planets with masses twice the mass of Earth, or 12 septillion kilograms or more. But astronomers know that small planets exist. It's just harder to find because the smaller the planet, the more accurate equipment is needed.

Astronomers call planets smaller than Earth: sub-earth or asteroid. Current telescopes are bad at finding these tiny planets, so astronomers rely on simulations to determine how they behave. A team of astronomers studied the conditions of a hypothetical planetary system containing only asteroids. They argued that understanding where asteroids are likely to appear in large numbers will allow scientists to better understand how common these types of planets are.

To obtain a representative sample of the right conditions for planetary systems to form, astronomers simulation codeGenerate models of exoplanets similar to actual observations. Using this code, the team ran 33 sets of 1,000 simulations, each set with different starting parameters. Most stars in the Milky Way are in that size range, so they simulated a system containing stars ranging from 1/2 to 5 times the mass of the Sun. They ran all but the last two sets of simulations over a billion years of simulation time.

The first set was their point of comparison. This demonstrated that the code would produce a system containing asteroids given the same conditions as a solar system in which planets smaller than Earth are known to exist. In the next set of eight, they varied the mass of the host star, the spread of mass within the disk of matter's starting point, and the ratio of gas to dust in the system. The astronomers then ran four sets of experiments varying the period during which the asteroid could accumulate new material, ranging from 320,000 to 32 million years. The researchers ran 16 more sets, varying the amount of dust the system needed to start with, from exactly the same mass of Earth to 10,000 times the mass of Earth.

The astronomers' last four sets of simulations varied depending on the host star's mass, which ranges from 1.5 to 5 times the mass of the Sun. They ran their two largest sets on shorter timescales than the rest because large stars burn out their fuel faster and have shorter lifetimes than smaller stars. At the end of a star's life, it expands, sometimes quite dramatically. Scientists used these sets to find scenarios in which the star swallows the asteroid as it expands, and scenarios in which the star survives.

The researchers noted that computing power limits the scope of the simulation, as certain systems cannot perform calculations on more than 1,000 objects at once. Also, ice and rock were not allowed to accumulate at the edges of the system, as they do in real star systems. They said these factors limit the accuracy of models of planet formation processes and long-term system dynamics, respectively.

Overall, the research team found that asteroids should be extremely abundant in the universe. They found that under the parameters they studied, systems consisting of only planets between 1 and 110 million times the mass of Earth could “easily form.” They suggested that estimates of how often planets form around stars may significantly underestimate the actual frequency of planets.

Astronomers have found that the most important factor determining how large an asteroid becomes is the amount of dust it can initially form. But they also found that systems containing only small planets stop forming when the initial available dust exceeds 100 times the mass of Earth. Their final conclusions dealt with the outermost asteroids of certain systems, which are more than 10 times the distance from Earth to the Sun. They found that although these planets rarely grow larger than small moons, they can survive the star's inevitable expansion and persist for billions of years after the star's expansion.


Post views: 197

Source: sciworthy.com

Researchers find approximately 250,000 undetected nanoplastic particles in each liter of bottled water

The average bottle of water contains nearly 250,000 tiny, invisible particles of nanoplastic that were detected and classified for the first time using a dual-laser microscope.

Scientists have long suspected that there are a lot of these tiny pieces of plastic, but until researchers at Columbia University and Rutgers University made calculations, they had no idea how many or what types they were. Researchers examined five samples of each of three common bottled water brands and found particle levels ranging from 110,000 to 400,000 per liter, with an average of about 240,000, according to Monday’s findings.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

These are particles less than 1 micron in size. One inch is 25,400 microns (also called a micrometer because it is one millionth of a meter).
The width of a human hair is approximately 83 microns.

Previous research looked at slightly larger microplastics, ranging from visible 5 millimeters (less than a quarter of an inch) to 1 micron. The study found that about 10 to 100 times more nanoplastics than microplastics were found in bottled water.

Nisin Kian, the study’s lead author and a physical chemist from Colombia, said much of the plastic appears to come from the bottles themselves and the reverse osmosis filters used to keep out other contaminants. She did not reveal her three brands because the researchers need more samples and would like to study more brands before singling out one. Still, she said they were common and she bought them at Walmart.

Researchers still can’t answer the big question: Are these nanoplastic pieces harmful to health?

“That’s under consideration right now. We don’t know if it’s dangerous or how dangerous it is,” said study co-author Phoebe Stapleton, a toxicologist at Rutgers University. “We know they invade tissues (of mammals, including humans)…and current research is investigating what they do inside cells.”

The International Bottled Water Association said in a statement: “Currently, there is a lack of standardized (measurement) methods and no scientific consensus on the potential health effects of nano- and microplastic particles. Reports will only unnecessarily scare consumers.”

The American Chemistry Council, which represents plastics manufacturers, had no immediate comment.

The world is “driving under the weight of plastic pollution, with more than 430 million tonnes of plastic produced annually” and microplastics are being found all over the planet.
world ocean,
food and
drinking water
Some of it comes from clothing and cigarette filters, according to
United Nations Environment Programme. Initiatives towards
global plastic treaty It will continue even after negotiations stalled in November.

All four co-authors interviewed said they had reduced their use of bottled water after conducting the study.

Wei Ming, a Colombian physical chemist who pioneered dual-laser microscopy technology, said he has cut his use of bottled water in half. Stapleton said he is now using more filtered water at his home in New Jersey.

But Bayzan Yan, a co-author of the study and a Colombian environmental chemist who has increased tap water usage, said the introduction of plastic could cause problems with the filters themselves.

“There’s no chance of winning,” Stapleton said.

Naixin Qian, a physical chemist at Columbia University, zooms in on an image of microscopic pieces of plastic that appeared as bright red dots in New York on Monday.
Mary Conlon/Associated Press

Outside experts who praised the study agreed there were general concerns about the dangers of plastic particles, but it was too early to say for sure.

“The dangers of plastic itself are an unanswered question. To me, the additives are the most concerning,” said Jason Somarelli, professor and director of the Comparative Oncology Group at Duke University School of Medicine. . He did not participate in this study. “We and other researchers have shown that these nanoplastics can be taken up into cells, and that nanoplastics have the potential to cause cellular stress and DNA damage, altering metabolism and cell function. We know that it contains all kinds of chemical additives that are harmful.”

Somarelli said his unpublished research found more than 100 “known carcinogenic chemicals in these plastics.”

Zoe Diana, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Toronto, said: “The concern is that small particles are showing up in various organs and can cross membranes that they’re not supposed to cross, such as the blood-brain barrier.'' ” he said.

Diana, who was not involved in the study, said this was an exciting development in the study of plastics in the environment and in the body, thanks to the new tools researchers used.

About 15 years ago, Min invented a dual-laser microscopy technique that identifies specific compounds by their chemical properties and how they resonate when exposed to a laser. Yang and Qian approached him about using the technology to find and identify plastics that are too small for researchers using established methods.

“This study could be an important advance in the detection of nanoplastics,” said Kara Lavender-Law, an oceanographer at the Marine Education Association, adding that other analytical chemists will not be able to replicate the technique and results. He said he would like to see it done.

Dennis Hardesty, an Australian government oceanographer who studies plastic waste, said context was needed. The total weight of the nanoplastics found is “approximately the weight of one penny, which is the volume of two Olympic-sized swimming pools.”

Mr. Hardesty is less concerned about nanoplastics in bottled water than others, saying, “I am privileged to live in an area with access to ‘clean’ tap water, and I don’t have access to drinking water in single-use containers. There’s no need to buy one.”

Yang said other municipalities, including Boston, St. Louis and Los Angeles, are starting to look at how much plastic is in their tap water.
Previous research We’re looking for microplastics, and some early tests show tap water may have less nanoplastics than bottled water.

Despite the unknowns about human health, Yang said he has one recommendation for those concerned. It’s about using reusable bottles instead of single-use plastics.

Source: www.nbcnews.com