The Behavior of Two Different Particles Linked by Quantum Entanglement
Science Photo Library / Alamy
We have a groundbreaking method to measure quantum entanglement in solids, paving the way for significant advancements in quantum technology and fundamental physics.
Researchers face limitations in quantifying quantum entanglement—the phenomenon that correlates the behavior of distant quantum particles. The Bell test is one technique that assesses whether two particles are entangled or facilitates the intentional creation of entanglements in quantum computing setups.
However, detecting entangled particles within a material is far more complex. This capability is critical in developing advanced quantum computing and communication devices that rely on entanglement.
Allen Scheie from Los Alamos National Laboratory, along with his team, has dedicated over 50 years to refining this technology, and they have now confirmed its effectiveness.
“We have verified that it works flawlessly, and we’re taking steps to extend its application across various materials,” Scheie stated.
The innovative technique involves bombarding a sample material with neutrons and capturing them with a detector. Since the 1950s, studying the properties of these neutrons has allowed researchers to unveil the arrangement and behavior of quantum particles within substances. Scheie and his colleagues utilized this approach to calculate quantum Fisher information (QFI), a metric that indicates the minimum number of entangled quantum particles necessary to influence a neutron in a detected manner.
The research team applied their method to various magnetic materials, including well-documented crystals of potassium, copper, and fluorine. Team member Pontus Laurel emphasized that their findings closely aligned with computer simulations of the quantum architectures of these crystals, affirming the reliability of their new approach. “The experimental and theoretical predictions matched surprisingly well,” he stated.
Laurel added that while previous studies explored QFI and similar metrics as potential “witnesses to entanglement,” their group has established a clear, dependable, and broadly applicable measurement technique. Much of their effort focused on perfecting the nuances, enabling experiments with diverse materials, including those suitable for future device development.
Notably, their method remains effective irrespective of whether a robust mathematical model exists for the material, even when the samples are incomplete. “That’s the remarkable aspect: you can measure quantum Fisher information under any circumstances,” Scheie remarked. The research was presented at the American Physical Society Global Physics Summit on March 17th in Denver.
Within the next month, the researchers aim to enhance their methodology by measuring QFI (quantum equivalent at the transition point from water to ice) in materials approaching a phase transition. At this juncture, theoretical models often falter or predict skyrocketing entanglement, creating a prime opportunity for groundbreaking quantum discoveries, according to Scheie.
NASA officials have announced that future heat shields will be optimized with a more transparent outer material to enhance performance. However, for the Artemis II mission, the heat shield design will remain unchanged.
To mitigate risks to astronauts, mission managers are altering the Orion spacecraft’s reentry trajectory. Instead of the usual atmospheric reentry that simulates a “bouncing stone” effect to reduce thermal stress, this mission will feature a faster, steeper descent to minimize exposure to extreme temperatures.
NASA has confirmed that this revised plan is the result of extensive testing. Isaacman expressed his “complete confidence” in the heat shield during a January update.
During a media event in July, Wiseman echoed this sentiment, stating: “If we adhere to NASA’s new atmospheric entry path, this heat shield will be safe for flight.”
Countdown to the Moon Landing: Two Years Remaining
A significant critique of the Artemis program focuses on its timeline. Nearly four years have passed since Artemis I took flight, and until recently, the next launch, Artemis II, was slated for another two-year wait.
Critics argue that compared to agile private companies like SpaceX, NASA’s slower improvement cycles lead to longer wait times, jeopardizing program security.
Dryer emphasized that “the infrequent launches of space systems pose major structural and safety risks that have been acknowledged for years,” asserting, “We have a limited window to identify potential failure modes.”
NASA’s Space Launch System rolls out from the Vehicle Assembly Building at Kennedy Space Center on January 17. Joe Radle/Getty Images
To address these challenges, Isaacman has initiated vital improvements to the Artemis program, including the addition of more missions and an accelerated launch schedule.
The Artemis III mission, which was originally set to land astronauts on the moon in 2028, is now scheduled to launch into low Earth orbit in mid-2027 for essential technology tests and demonstrations. NASA’s detailed strategy for landing on the lunar surface also includes a second spacecraft—a lander developed by SpaceX or Blue Origin. This lander will rendezvous with Orion in lunar orbit to transport astronauts to the moon. Artemis III is positioned to conduct these critical maneuvers. However, challenges persist in the commercial sector, as reported in a recent report, revealing that SpaceX’s Starship lander is “at least two years behind schedule, with expectations for additional delays.”
Under the revamped strategy, NASA aims to achieve a lunar landing by the Artemis IV mission in 2028.
Key changes include the target of launching Space Launch System rockets approximately every 10 months, compared to the previous three-year intervals, according to Isaacman.
The overall progress hinges on the success of the Artemis II mission, which could provide a much-needed boost for NASA and the American public.
“Whenever the White House seeks positive news, they turn to NASA,” Melroy remarked.
Ultra is Samsung’s biggest and largest mobile phone, packed gills with the latest technology. This means more artificial intelligence than ever before.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra leads the new wave of Android phones that promise to do it all. Combining Google’s advanced AI support with various Samsung tools for writing, drawing, photography, and chat.
However, at £1,249 (€1,449/$1,299.99/$2,149), the reality is slightly less futuristic than expected. While some AI tools can be impressive, others may falter.
The S25 Ultra is a modern glass slab enclosed in a titanium band. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian
The Ultra boasts a slimmer design, 14g lighter than its predecessor, with sharp flat sides and minimal bezels on a large, breathtaking screen. It is nearly a glass slab with a vibrant display.
It features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Chip, outpacing even the recent OnePlus 13 in performance tests. The chip’s performance is remarkable, enabling users to accomplish tasks smoothly on the phone. With a battery life lasting two full days of moderate use and 7.5 hours of active usage on tasks like photography and media, the Ultra stands out as one of the longest-lasting devices on the market.
specification
Main screen: 6.9 inch QHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X (500PPI) 120Hz
Connectivity: 5G, USB-C, WiFi 7, NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, UWB, GNSS
water resistance: IP68 (1.5m in 30 minutes)
size: 162.8 x 77.6 x 8.2mm
Weight: 218g
Sustainability
Samsung claims that the S25 Ultra is The most durable ever, although a case is still recommended for drops. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian
Samsung does not specify the expected battery lifespan, but it is designed to retain at least 80% of its original capacity after 500 full charge cycles.
Phone repairs are possible, with screen replacements costing £204 at authorized service centers, including battery replacement. Samsung also offers a self-healing program. The phone scored 5 out of 10 for repairability by experts at iFixit.
The device contains recycled materials such as aluminum, cobalt, copper, glass, gold, plastic, rare earth elements, and steel. Samsung provides a trade-in recycling scheme for old devices. The company also releases annual sustainability reports and impact assessments for some specific products.
More AI in more places
Some new AI tools are useful, while others are a bit gimmicky or unreliable. The Drawing Assist tool turns rough sketches into art (left). Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian
Samsung has integrated numerous “Galaxy AI” tools, including new drawing features and AI selection tools introduced last year. These tools allow users to interact with images, text, icons, and more on the screen, offering options like drawing, editing, searching, and more.
The “Now” bar on the lock screen displays various widgets like Google’s Live Sports Score, current music, timers, flight reminders, and more. It resembles Google’s At a Glance feature and Apple’s dynamic widgets, providing convenient access to timely information. Live notifications, such as sports scores, can also be shown in the status bar.
The AI-curated snapshots feature local weather, calendar events, photos, reminders, health information, Spotify playlists, and more. It even warns users about using the phone while walking. However, some may find these features less useful.
The S-pen stylus remains for drawing on the screen, but one of the important selling points since the Galaxy Note series era – the magic wand and the remote feature have been removed. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian
Introducing the Next Generation of Google’s Gemini Assistant, promising to perform multiple tasks efficiently. While the capabilities are impressive when they work, they can sometimes falter, leading to frustration with inaccuracies. Trusting the AI tools completely can be a challenge.
The overall software experience with One UI 7 is smooth, resembling Apple’s iOS in some aspects but offering enough customization options to personalize the phone’s look and functionality. Samsung’s commitment to providing software and security updates for the S25 Ultra for seven years after release rivals the best support from Google and Apple.
camera
The camera app is fairly easy to operate despite its functionality. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian
The S25 Ultra features a revamped camera system similar to its predecessor, offering a range of options from the main 200mp camera to various telephoto lenses. The new and improved 50MP Ultra Wide Camera provides better low-light performance compared to previous models, producing sharper images in dimly lit environments.
Equipped with numerous modes and tools, including portrait modes and manual controls, the camera app allows users to capture unique and high-quality photos. The standout feature remains the adaptability to use multiple lenses for different scenarios, offering versatility in photography.
price
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra starts at £1,249 (€1,449/$1,299.99/A$2,149) with 256GB of storage.
Comparatively, the Galaxy S25 is priced at £799, the S25+ at £999, the Z-fold 6 at £1,519, and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL at £1,099. The iPhone 16 Pro Max is priced at £1,199.
verdict
The Galaxy S25 Ultra sets a high standard for Android phones with its powerful features and versatility.
Boasting multiple lens options in the camera system, top-of-the-line Android chip, long battery life, expansive storage, a large screen, and a stylus, the Ultra offers a complete package for users.
However, while it excels in many areas, the design and lack of significant innovation may leave some users wanting more. The AI features, while impressive at times, can also be hit or miss, affecting the overall user experience.
The Ultra stands out as a top-tier mobile phone, but buyers should temper their expectations regarding exaggerated AI capabilities.
Strong Points: A massive 120Hz screen, a highly capable camera with 3x optical zoom, excellent software with 7 years of support, top android chip, long battery life, access to the latest AI features.
Cons: The huge and extremely expensive S-Pen doesn’t have the small magic of the previous version, and does not significantly improve the formula of its predecessor.
THsinchu Science Park on Taiwan’s west coast is so lush, with well-planned and clearly signed roads and modern, well-maintained buildings that from the outside, most visitors would not even realise they were visiting one of the world’s most important factories.
Once known for its fish ball street food, Hsinchu is now known as Taiwan’s Silicon Valley, a tech-centric microcosm that channels workers from schools to universities and into the world’s leading semiconductor industry that’s crucial to global supply chains.
Chips, or semiconductors, are the tiny technological components that power almost everything: your computers, your mobile phones, your cars, etc. A single chip contains tens of billions of transistors needed to make electronic devices work, and the most advanced chips (mainly made in Taiwan) contain even more.
Taiwanese semiconductors were thrust into the spotlight this week after Donald Trump rehashed old accusations that Taiwan has stolen U.S. business, using the allegation to question whether the U.S. would continue its longstanding support for Taiwan if he is re-elected president in November.
“They took over almost 100% of our semiconductor industry,” he argued in an interview with Bloomberg. “We should never have allowed that to happen.”
In some parts of Taiwan, Trump’s comments were like a gangster asking for protection money, given that the United States is Taiwan’s most important security partner in countering the threat of Chinese annexation.
There is little evidence to support Trump’s claim that Taiwan has stolen U.S. property, but there is no denying that Taiwan controls nearly 100% of the cutting edge of the global semiconductor industry.
Taiwan produces about 90% of the world’s most advanced semiconductors, most of which are produced through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), the world’s largest producer and a major supplier to Apple and Nvidia.
“Taiwan was simply more competitive than other countries,” said Raymond Kuo, a political scientist at the RAND Corporation.
People walk in front of the TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) logo at the Taiwanese semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company’s building in Hsinchu. Photo: SOPA Images Limited/Alamy
Manufacturers like TSMC rose to prominence by focusing on research and development and relentless efficiency, allowing them to pack more transistors onto a smaller chip than their competitors. Taiwanese workers are highly educated, and in a society where salaries are low compared to the cost of living, semiconductor jobs are well-paying but highly demanding. Taiwan’s labor protection laws are much weaker than those in the United States and other countries. For Taiwanese people, working for TSMC or a similar company is seen as a prestigious job with a bright future.
“[Companies] Masters or PhD holders can run the factory in three shifts. [fabrication plants] “Every day, new chipmakers are coming in,” Kuo said. “There’s also a whole secondary industry ecosystem built to support them.”
Taiwan’s vice minister for science and technology said on Thursday that Taiwan has spent 30 to 40 years developing its industries so “it is impossible to simply replace and difficult to imitate.”
While other countries are trying to catch up, some reports suggest the gap is widening. Taiwan’s monopoly on the components that literally power the world raises concerns about the vulnerability of global supply chains, especially if China’s leaders were to one day order an invasion or attack.
“It’s not hard to imagine Beijing using its control of these production facilities to coerce other countries into submitting to its subjugation,” Kuo said. “Semiconductors will become another tool Beijing can use to coerce other countries economically and politically.”
During the pandemic, the world got a firsthand look at how a supply chain crisis and chip shortage can affect global trade, as factory closures snowballed into a global chip shortage, delaying manufacturing and sending prices of autos and other products soaring.
In response to the crisis, other countries have tried to diversify their supply sources, mainly through Taiwanese companies setting up new manufacturing plants overseas, but with limited success.
Thanks to U.S. incentives, some of Taiwan’s production has shifted to the U.S., and TSMC is spending billions to build new factories overseas, including a $65 billion investment in three factories in Arizona. In Arizona The facility revealed challenges in replicating the Taiwanese model for a variety of reasons, including differences in approaches to labor rights and worker demands.
TSMC founder and former chairman Morris Chang previously said the cost of the U.S. project would be much higher, describing it as a “wasteful, expensive and wasteful endeavor.”
For Taiwan, this advantage is a good thing from a national security perspective: Geopolitical observers call Taiwan’s semiconductor industry a “silicon shield,” serving as an incentive for the international community to keep Taiwan away from Beijing’s control.
In response to Trump’s remarks, Taiwanese officials emphasized the strength of U.S.-Taiwan relations and extensive international cooperation in the semiconductor sector (Taiwan is home to several foreign semiconductor companies), but also indicated their intention to keep Taiwan’s research and development domestic and maintain its industrial dominance.
“Diversification means countries have less reason to defend Taiwan,” Kuo said. “Why should they defend it when they can easily switch to another supplier?”
Noland Arbor can play chess using Neuralink implant
Neuralink
Neuralink, the brain-computer interface company founded by Elon Musk, has revealed the identity of its first patient who says its implant “changed his life.” But experts say it’s not yet clear whether Neuralink has done more than replicate existing research efforts.
Who was Neuralink’s first patient?
Musk announced in January that the first human patient had received a Neuralink implant, but few details were released at the time. We now know from something. Live stream video by company – Who is that person and how will the test be done?
Noland Arbaugh explains in the video that an accident eight years ago dislocated his fourth and fifth vertebrae, leaving him a quadriplegic. He previously controlled the computer with a mouth interface, and is shown moving the cursor with just his thoughts, apparently using a Neuralink implant.
“Once I started imagining the cursor moving, it became intuitive,” Arbaugh says in the video. “Basically, it was like using ‘force’ on the cursor, and I was able to move the cursor anywhere I wanted. I could just look anywhere on the screen and the cursor would move where I wanted it. It was a very wild experience.”
He uses the device for reading, language learning, and computer games such as chess, and claims he uses it for up to eight hours at a time, at which point he needs to charge the device. “It’s not perfect, I’ve run into some problems. But it’s already changed my life,” he says.
What does the implant contain?
Neuralink did not respond to requests for an interview, but its website says the current generation coin-sized implant, called N1, generates neural activity through 1,024 electrodes distributed across 64 threads that extend into the user’s brain. It is said that it records. These are so fine that they must be placed by a surgical robot.
In a livestream video, Arbaugh said he was discharged from the hospital the day after his implant surgery, and that from his perspective the surgery was a relatively simple process.
The implant uses a small battery that is charged through the skin by an inductance charger and communicates wirelessly with an app on your smartphone.
Does this mean the first human trials were successful?
Reinhold Scherrer Researchers at the University of Essex in the UK will decide whether Neuralink’s first human trial was a success because the company “has not released enough information to form an informed opinion” He said it was too early.
“While the video is impressive and there is no doubt that it took a lot of research and development work to get to this stage, it is unclear whether what is being shown is new or groundbreaking,” he said. Masu. “Although control appears to be stable, most of the studies and experiments presented so far are primarily replications of past studies. Replication is good, but major challenges still remain. ”
Who else is working on brain implants?
Neuralink isn’t the only group exploring this idea. A number of academic organizations and commercial startups have already conducted human experiments that have successfully interpreted brain signals and produced some sort of output.
A team at Stanford University in California placed two small sensors just below the surface of the brain of a man who was paralyzed from the neck down. Researchers may be able to interpret the brain signals when a man decides to put pen to paper and translate them into text that can be read on a computer.
When will Neuralink be available and how much will it cost?
It’s too early to tell, as this has a long way to go before it becomes a commercial product, with much testing and certification to come. But Musk has made it clear that he intends to commercialize the technology.of The first product planned was named Telepathy.allows users to take control of their mobile phones and computers.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.