Tag Archives: analyze

Exploring Eurovision: Scientists Analyze 1,763 Songs for Nostalgia and Emotional Impact

Posted on by
Reply

Feedback from New Scientist

Welcome to New Scientist, your trusted source for the latest in science and technology news. If you have feedback or items that may interest our readers, please reach out via email at feedback@newscientist.com.

Eurovision 2026: Are You Ready?

The highly anticipated 2026 Eurovision Song Contest is fast approaching, with the grand finale set for Saturday, May 16th. Whether you’re a fan or not, get ready for an entertaining spectacle!

Coinciding with this buzz, a comprehensive study published in Royal Society Open Science delves into the rich history of Eurovision. Researchers analyzed data from every contest between 1956 and 2024, totaling 1,763 songs. They categorized entries by various musical attributes, including language, themes, lyrics, and genre, utilizing AI tools for analysis. It’s hard to ignore the auditory implications of such a massive dataset!

The analysis unearthed intriguing insights, revealing that past research identified 12 major themes prevalent in popular songs, such as desire, heartbreak, and pain. However, only 11 themes are reflected in the Eurovision entries, as researchers excluded the theme ‘Jaded’ for being underrepresented.

The data also shows a significant decline in songs expressing nostalgia, while themes of pain, rebellion, despair, confusion, and escapism have become more prominent over the years. The 1970s marked a notable rise in songs depicting disorder and escapism, reflecting the societal crises of that era. However, the increase in ‘pain’ themes began not until the 2000s, post-Great Recession, suggesting a correlation.

Interestingly, songs have shifted from acoustic to electronic styles, with a growing prevalence of English lyrics over national languages. This trend indicates that Eurovision participants are deliberately aligning their entries with the winning formula established by past champions.

There are notable exceptions, as countries like France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain continue to champion their native languages, suggesting a deeper cultural rationale beyond mere competition.

The researchers conclude by emphasizing the notion of “organizational learning” among Eurovision participants, reflecting an ongoing adaptation to the competition landscape. Feedback sees this as a testament to the enduring allure of the contest.

Moss Appeal: A Niche Attraction

In a previous article, we discussed a park filled with intricate foraminiferal carvings and pondered the existence of niche science-themed attractions. This inspired reader John Wilson to share information about the Serenity Moss Garden in North Carolina.

Spanning about 900 square meters, this moss-covered mountainside offers visitors a unique experience, though John humorously described it as “more like a climate-controlled box” rather than a traditional museum.

Feedback realizes that our quest for niche appeal may have been too limited. Are there any other unique attractions, such as a museum dedicated to Plecopteran (stoneflies) or specialized exhibits featuring beach pebbles?

New Math? A Logical Dilemma

Regardless of our professional backgrounds, math can sometimes overwhelm us. Navigating concepts like converting square kilometers to square meters can be perplexing.

Recently, U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced scrutiny for claiming a 600% decrease in drug prices, an assertion deemed mathematically implausible by rival politicians.

Feedback believes RFK Jr. has been misled. A 100% drop suggests prices have plummeted to zero, a mathematical limit. In theory, this could even lead to negative pricing, but the complexities of rate changes should ideally be left to mathematicians.

In a curious twist, RFK Jr. stated, “If that drug goes from $100 to $600, that’s a 600% price increase.” This form of reasoning feels like a new, perplexing brand of logic—while the premises hold, the conclusion is unmistakably flawed.

Contribute Your Story

If you have a story or feedback, share it with us! Email your article to Feedback and include your home address. You can also find this week’s and past feedback on our website.

Source: www.newscientist.com

How Large-Scale Language Models Analyze and Judge Human Behavior

Posted on by
Reply

Recent findings from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem reveal that large-scale language models (LLMs) establish structured “trust” ratings akin to humans. However, they tend to apply these ratings more mechanically, often exhibiting stronger and more consistent demographic biases.

Research indicates that large-scale language models exhibit a rigid and sometimes biased approach to interpersonal trust that only partially aligns with human judgment.

As LLMs and AI agents increasingly interact with humans in decision-making contexts, understanding the dynamics of trust between humans and AI is paramount.

While human trust in AI has been extensively researched, the mechanisms through which LLMs foster trust in humans remain largely unexplored.

In an innovative study conducted by scientists Valeria Rahman and Yaniv Dover from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, five LLMs were compared to human participants across five scenarios and 43,200 simulations.

“We placed both humans and AI in familiar contexts—such as assessing loan amounts for a small business owner, evaluating a babysitter’s trustworthiness, rating a boss, and deciding on donations to a nonprofit,” they stated.

“A striking pattern emerged: both humans and AI favored individuals who demonstrated competence, honesty, and goodwill.”

“In essence, machines appear to recognize the core components of trust—competence, honesty, and benevolence—similar to humans.”

“AI evaluates individuals based on these components, much like scoring in a spreadsheet, resulting in a more rigid, systematic, yet impersonal judgment style.”

“In contrast, humans often make more subjective and chaotic judgments,” notes Dr. Rahman.

“AI’s approach is cleaner and more organized, which can lead to notably different results.”

“However, a concerning trend of amplified bias was identified. In financial contexts, such as loan or donation decisions, AI systems displayed consistent, and sometimes pronounced, discrepancies based solely on demographic factors.”

“For instance, (i) older adults frequently enjoyed more favorable outcomes, although the contrary pattern also emerged; (ii) religious affiliation significantly influenced results, particularly in financial matters; and (iii) gender also played a role in certain models and scenarios.”

“Such discrepancies appeared even when all other aspects of the individual were identical.”

“Humans inherently possess biases, yet we were surprised to find that biases in AI could be more structured, predictable, and occasionally stronger,” Professor Dover remarked.

Another key insight is the variability in AI judgment.

Different LLMs often provide varying assessments of the same individual. In some cases, one system may reward traits that another may penalize, indicating that your choice of LLM could subtly influence real-world outcomes.

“Selecting which LLM to use is crucial,” asserts Dr. Rahman.

“While these systems might appear similar superficially, their decision-making processes about individuals can be vastly different.”

“AI is increasingly being deployed to screen job applications, evaluate creditworthiness, recommend medical treatments, and guide organizational strategies.”

As these LLMs transition from mere assistants to decision-makers, comprehending their reasoning processes becomes essential.

This study underscores that while LLMs can emulate the structure of human judgment, they do so in a more rigid and less nuanced fashion, with biases that could be elusive.

The researchers emphasize that their findings are not an indictment of AI, but rather a call for heightened awareness.

“These systems wield substantial power,” concludes Professor Dover.

“They can model human reasoning aspects in a consistent manner.”

“However, they lack humanity, so we should not presume they perceive individuals as we do.”

“As AI becomes more embedded in daily life, the pressing question shifts from whether we trust machines to whether we comprehend how machines trust us.”

For further details, see the findings published in this month’s Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

_____

Valeria Rahman and Yaniv Dover. 2026. A closer look at how large-scale language models “trust” humans: Patterns and biases. Procedure A 482 (2335): 20251113; doi: 10.1098/rspa.2025.1113

Source: www.sci.news

Scientists induce Yellowstone seismic activity to analyze the volcano’s depth

Posted on by
Reply

Researchers from the University of Utah and the University of New Mexico used artificial “earthquakes” to investigate the magma beneath Yellowstone, a closely monitored hypervolcano. The team deployed truck-mounted bibroseis, large mechanical vibrators, to generate seismic waves throughout the national park. By recording these waves with 650 ground sensors, scientists were able to examine the underground volcanic structures.

Dr. Jamie Farrell, a geologist at the University of Utah and study co-author, explained, “In a way, we’re causing our own earthquakes and recording all that data on seismometers. With so many sensors, we can obtain a clear image of what’s happening below the surface.” This investigation revealed that the top of the magma chamber is approximately 3.8 km below the surface, with 86% consisting of solid rock and 14% containing molten rock, gas, and liquid pockets.

Scientists deployed a portable seismometer called Geophone to measure vibrations from artificial earthquakes – Credit: Jamie Farrell, University of Utah

Professor Bill McGuire, an expert in Geophysical and Climate Hazards, noted that using artificial seismic waves to study underground geology is not new but has not been applied in Yellowstone for determining magma depth before. Despite the proximity of the magma to the surface, the study confirmed that an eruption is not imminent.

Mike Poland, the chief scientist at the US Geological Survey and Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, remarked, “Yellowstone provides valuable insights into volcano behavior worldwide. While another super eruption is possible elsewhere, Yellowstone is not currently at risk.”

For more information:

About our experts:

Professor Bill McGuire: Professor Emeritus of Geophysics and Climate Hazards at University College, London. McGuire is a science writer and broadcaster with a forthcoming book on how past events shape our future.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Astronomers Analyze Gas Flow in Uncommonly Bright Infrared Galaxy

Posted on by
Reply

Ultraluminous infrared galaxies are the rarest and most extreme star-forming systems and are found only in the distant universe.

Radiative distribution of stars, cold gas, and ionized gas in the unusual HyLIRG Einstein ring PJ0116-24. Image courtesy of Liu others., doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02296-7.

“Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (HyLIRGs) are incredibly luminous galaxies illuminated by extremely rapid star formation within their interiors,” said Dr Daizhong Liu from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics and his colleagues.

“Previous studies had suggested that such extreme galaxies must have arisen through galactic mergers.”

“The collisions of these galaxies are thought to create regions of dense gas that trigger rapid star formation.”

“However, isolated galaxies could also become HyLIRGs through internal processes alone if star-forming gas flows rapidly toward the galaxy's center.”

In the new study, the astronomers focused on a gravitationally lensed HyLIRG galaxy known as PJ0116-24.

“PJ0116-24 is so distant that it took its light about 10 billion years to reach Earth,” the researchers said.

“By chance, the foreground galaxy acts as a gravitational lens, bending and magnifying the light from the background galaxy, PJ0116-24, and directing it towards the Einstein ring.”

“This precise configuration of space allows us to magnify very distant objects and see them with a level of detail that is very difficult to achieve any other way.

The researchers used ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) to study the motion of gas within PJ0116-24.

“ALMA tracks the cold gas which appears blue here, while the VLT with its new High Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (ERIS) tracks the warm gas which appears red,” the researchers say.

“Thanks to these detailed observations, we now know that the gas in this extreme galaxy rotates in an organized manner, rather than the chaotic state expected after a galaxy collision. A stunning result!”

“This convincingly shows that a merger is not necessarily required for a galaxy to become a HyLIRG.”

Team paper Published in the journal Natural Astronomy.

_____

D. Liu othersA detailed study of a rare, ultra-luminous rotating disk in a 10 billion year old Einstein ring. Nat AstronPublished online July 15, 2024; doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02296-7

Source: www.sci.news

Neuroscientists analyze brain scans of soccer fans to research passionate devotion

Posted on by
Reply

Football is a great model of social belonging, promoting inclusivity, teamwork, community spirit, social change, and individual achievement. Still, collective factors may be the reason behind acts of violence and vandalism. In a new study, neuroscientists at the University of San Sebastian investigate the brain mechanisms underlying positive and negative social stimuli in soccer fans in positive and negative social scenarios.

Mendieta other. fMRI was used to measure the brain activity of fans of rival soccer teams during a match. This image shows the contrast between winning and losing in the “good fanatic’s brain.” Activities related to important victories are shown in warm colors. The blue scale represents activations associated with significant losses. This pattern is consistent with a mentalization network suggesting a pain rationalization process triggered by a losing scenario. Image credit: Mendieta other.

“Our study aims to uncover the behaviors and dynamics associated with extreme competitiveness, aggression, and social belonging within and between fans’ groups,” said the first author. Dr. Francisco Zamorano Mendietaa researcher at the University of San Sebastian.

Rivalries are deeply rooted in the history of sports, and fans can be very protective of their “home” team and favorite players.

These same fans run through a range of emotions as they watch their team succeed or fail during a game, cheering when they score or being furious at a bad call.

Soccer fans are known for their loyalty and enthusiasm for their team, especially in Europe and South America.

To gain insight into the brain mechanisms behind fan behavior, Dr. Zamorano and his colleagues recruited 43 healthy male volunteers for a functional MRI (fMRI) study.

Participants are fans of Chile’s two most popular soccer teams, which are considered arch-rivals.

They were divided into two groups: 22 supporters of one team and 21 supporters of the rival team.

They completed a survey to determine their Soccer Enthusiasm Score and underwent a psychological evaluation.

All participants received an edited version of the match containing 63 goals.

While participants watched a compilation of matches, their brain activity was measured using fMRI, a non-invasive imaging technique that detects changes in blood flow in the brain.

The fMRI results showed that fans’ brain activity changed depending on whether their team was successful or unsuccessful.

“When your team wins, the reward system in your brain is activated,” Dr. Zamorano says.

“Losing activates the mentalization network, putting fans into a reflective state, which may alleviate some of the pain of the loss.”

“We also observed that the brain hub connecting the limbic system and frontal cortex was disrupted, disrupting mechanisms that regulate cognitive control and increasing the likelihood of destructive or violent behavior. .”

The research team’s findings could shed light on social dynamics at all levels.

“People inherently crave social connection, whether it’s membership in a running club, participation in a book discussion group, or participation in a virtual forum,” Dr. Zamorano said.

“These social bonds are often formed around shared beliefs, values ​​and interests, but there can also be elements of persuasive proselytism, or ‘groupthink’; That can lead to irrational beliefs and social discord.”

“The enthusiasm we see among some sports fans can serve as a convincing example of intense emotional investment, occasional aggressive behavior, and a decline in rationality.”

“Understanding the psychology of group identification and competition sheds light on decision-making processes and social dynamics, allowing us to more fully understand how societies operate.”

Authors present their work findings this month, Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Annual Meeting.

_____

Francisco Zamorano Mendieta other. Brain mechanisms underlying emotional responses in social pain. Football as a surrogate for studying fanaticism: an fMRI study. RSNA 2023

Source: www.sci.news