Do Smartphones Diminish the Experience of Watching Soccer?

In November 1980, at the age of 13, I journeyed alone to Farhill from East Kill Bride and arrived to find an empty dugout without a manager. It felt quite odd, and my shyness prevented me from reaching out to anyone while I was there; the next day, Bertie Auld resigned and moved to Hibs, as reported by Sunday Mail.

The news hit hard. Bertie was my first manager, and as a devoted supporter, I felt responsible for the team’s presence in the Premier League year after year. Now he was gone, and no one informed me.

I skipped the next match, but soon after, I noticed Peter Cormack in the dugout. No one had mentioned it to me. At 13, I was an avid reader of newspapers but lacked a radio—just a single ear headphone connected to it, not convenient for carrying around.

This memory resurfaced after a recent Thistle home game I watched on TV. In front of me, a young couple was intently focused on their smartphones, engaged with the match. Admittedly, the game was quite dull, yet they followed the action closely and commented on the referee’s decisions. “It’s definitely offside.” “That was a clear penalty.” “He should have received a red card.”


Meanwhile, the crowd around me buzzed as we collectively pondered: “What a bizarre situation.” Why pay to attend a game only to ignore the live action unfolding mere meters away?

Yet it made some sense. As the young couple focused on their screens, more necks craned forward, and soon everyone nearby was chiming in to affirm the referee’s calls. Many of us who lament the changes in football secretly yearn for a return to the 1970s. Thank you. Yes, it did prompt a question.

For that couple, utilizing technology during the match was completely normal. This reflects how we have been conditioned to perceive sports. VAR is now standard for viewers of top leagues, whether we like it or not. Social media informs fans about clubs and their products. The differences between my 13-year-old self and kids today are vast.

Our access to football has transformed dramatically. This isn’t about whether “it was better back then.” Such discussions are tedious. I’m not keen on debating how technology has altered the game. Rather, I’m intrigued by how it has changed us. How have our brains adapted? How has our capacity for patience diminished? Our perception of football has evolved.




Tottenham fans have seen their team play Juventus in the Champions League via phone screens. Photo: Dylan Martinez/Reuters

In her recent book, “Extinction of Experience,” Christine Rosen posits that technology has personalized our life experiences to the point where we no longer tolerate waiting, unpleasant encounters, or situations that don’t align with our expectations.

As football fans, we anticipate news immediately. We expect access to games without hassle, including digital tickets. However, Rosen highlights that these conveniences come with hidden costs. As we become less accustomed to patience, our understanding of its importance dwindles, leading to frustration and anxiety.

Transportation, phones, appliances—like all new technologies that have enriched our everyday lives, including the Internet and, notably, smartphones—transform our relationship with time. In the past, attending away games required considerable patience. Long journeys were a test of endurance. Now, improved roads, trains, and buses make it easier for fans to travel across the nation to venues like Ibrox and Parkhead rather than supporting local teams. It’s now quicker and better in many ways.

Back in the day, when travel was rare and arduous, teams like East Fife, Cowdenbeath, and Queen of the South attracted crowds of over 20,000. With travel being challenging, it was easy to support local clubs—there were no alternatives.


However, when we are denied immediate access to what we desire, we often respond with frustration and seek distractions. Our impulsive reactions during football matches reveal that we frequently overlook the value of perseverance. This impatience extends to transfer windows: “January 3, still no signings? Typical.”

Following a loss, even during matches, we might see discussions regarding the manager’s future pop up on social media. “How is he still in charge?” Such reactions reflect poorly on us and neither solve the issue nor enhance the situation. Wanting someone to lose their job is an anomaly in a sport often labeled as a working-class game.

Like many aspects of our lives, we resist waiting for what we want. Nowadays, if you have the money, you can buy your way out of any queue. Why should football be any different? We’ve been conditioned to seek immediate gratification.

I no longer find the changing football experience bothersome. Discussing it feels fruitless. What truly matters is what we might be losing in the process.

The convenience of purchasing tickets via apps is undeniably delightful. I hold season tickets on my mobile, allowing me to buy last-minute tickets effortlessly. However, in this digital age, I miss the excitement of the turnstiles, the familiar banter, and the social interactions that kickstart the matchday experience. Those daily exchanges remind us of our humanity—the need to connect and inquire about one another’s day. But now, many of those interactions feel unnecessary, which is a bit disheartening.

For many, football serves as a sanctuary where they feel part of something larger. It offers comfort, camaraderie, and hope. While technology facilitates ticket purchases and program access, it risks undermining our shared human experience.

Our smartphones provide real-time updates from various matches, creating an immediacy that can feel surreal. Tweets about goals at Cappielow spread faster than moments unfold. Young couples verifying offside calls from their devices may confuse older fans like me, but they often provide information that isn’t readily available. What’s inherently wrong with that? I sometimes forget that I’m at the match, immersed in social media clips of “young teams” reveling in last season’s playoffs. My own enjoyment seems to fade into the background.




Stamford Bridge fans engaged with their mobile devices. Photo: Richard Heathcote/Getty Images

We often grow complacent with this mediated version of “being there” while not actually experiencing it. Engaging with distractions in the crowd often reflects our overexposure to social media. Football may involve long stretches of monotony, and our minds sometimes struggle to cope with that. Anxiety arises when we gravitate towards mediated experiences rather than fully embracing the present.

I previously mentioned in Nutmeg that 90% of all live sports events tend to fade from memory. It’s those remaining 10% that we come back to, reminiscing and cherishing. Perhaps boredom is a necessary component of the experience. Why should it be avoided? Football is a game that demands patience. We must concentrate on tactics and await the right moment. Only then can we appreciate the unforgettable, often breathtaking experiences that make it all worthwhile.

As the season begins, we hope for the best but remain open to various outcomes, allowing things to unfold naturally. A poor start may improve by October; thus, I’m willing to be patient. Or perhaps the season will see a slow burn, and we learn that much remains beyond our control.




New Issues of Nutmeg are now available.

Even if we face defeat and feel disheartened, we rally ourselves and anticipate the next match. The events of last Saturday will soon blend into history. In that spirit, we allow managers to make mistakes, grant players time to rediscover their form, and accept it all as part of a long season—a natural facet of the process.

We must embrace technology, though it doesn’t mean we should forgo our options. A little extra effort, whether it’s engaging more with our surroundings, initiating conversations, or fostering connections, can be rewarding. Only then can we uncover something extraordinary and unforgettable. That’s when we truly become real fans.

This is an article by Kenny Peeper for Nutmeg Magazine

Source: www.theguardian.com

Silicon Valley Lures Researchers Just Like Soccer Teams

The technology sector is engaged in an intense competition to lure artificial intelligence experts with increasingly lucrative salaries and hefty signing bonuses. Researchers holding doctoral degrees in computer science are at the forefront of this battle, often dubbed “talent.” The Washington Post recently referred to them as Olympians in a headline that asks, “Why are AI superathletes commanding $100 million bonuses in Silicon Valley?” These individuals are the most sought-after professionals globally.

High-tech firms are investing heavily in AI team star players who can create technologies surpassing human capabilities. These innovations aim to yield AI models known as “artificial general intelligence” or “super intelligence,” which outperform human intellect in every task.

In the pursuit of these coveted advancements, Silicon Valley is pouring money that could potentially establish a legacy. The race for talent is so intense that stories about the poaching of individual researchers are making headlines, as seen in Wired: “Another well-known OpenAI researcher joins Meta,” and Bloomberg: “Meta recruits two prominent Apple AI experts after hiring their boss.” The Information also reported, “Humanity has hired two leading coding AI experts from the cursor developer Anysphere.” All these stories emerged just last week.

The tech press’s fixation on these researchers resembles the sports media’s coverage of star player trades. Analysis of their salaries, speculation about upcoming moves Meta’s roster, discussions about team composition or overall strategy, and scrutiny of individual players echo the basketball trade phenomena from the Dallas Mavericks to the Los Angeles Lakers.

The term “another” in the Wired headline hints that one company is driving this frenzy—Meta. Mark Zuckerberg has made headlines recently by stating his company would invest “hundreds of billions” in AI initiatives. In April, Meta adjusted its capital expenditure plans for this year from $640 billion to $75 billion, an increase from the previous estimate of between $600 billion and $65 billion. In 2023, Meta only allocated $28 billion for maintenance, as noted by Fortune.

Zuckerberg is backing his commitment with cash. In early July, Meta hired Ruoming Pang, the head of Apple’s AI modeling team, for a staggering pay package amounting to around $200 million. Pang is set to join Meta’s super intelligence team, which may be the most expensive engineering group since the Manhattan Project.

The current trade frenzy is encapsulated in Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s remarks about half of the world’s leading AI researchers last week. He made these comments while in Beijing, during a meeting celebrating Donald Trump’s recent allowance for Huang’s extremely profitable company and a new permit to sell advanced semiconductors to China. Previously, the export of Nvidia chips faced tight restrictions. Huang’s remarks highlight the fact that American companies are investing in a pool of English-speaking talent, which still stands out in competition across the Pacific, regardless of the substantial salaries offered by high-tech giants.

Alternatives to iPhones and Samsungs vie for your attention

Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

In recent years, several companies have launched mobile phones aimed at providing alternatives to the industry’s biggest players. Some of these companies are capitalizing on a rising unease regarding smartphones’ grip on our daily lives or simply seeking to challenge the prevailing dominance.

One intriguing option is a recently released device in the UK by Sage Mobile. This iPhone 16 variant comes with customized software that prohibits internet searches, gaming downloads, and social media apps like Instagram. British technology editor Robert Booth notes that these bespoke phones are sold at over twice the price of standard UK iPhone contracts, targeting children with the promise of “reconnecting with real life.”

This device includes a curated app store, enabling users to access apps for banking, public transport, school calendars, and weather updates.

Based on experiences with similar devices in the US, usage among children aged 8 to 14 averaged just 15 minutes to an hour per day—significantly less than the average screen time of 3 hours. Kaspar remarked, “It’s not magic and isn’t that fun,” leading to disinterest among kids and resulting in many devices ending up in landfills.

A 16-year-old anonymous reviewer shared their experience with the Guardian, highlighting how using Sage underscored their dependency on various apps and social media platforms. Although they felt more productive and engaged with family, creating a clean division between online and offline life proved to be more complex than merely blocking apps.

Sage’s representatives mentioned that it can take about a month to adapt to these limitations. However, teens may feel isolated from their friends and society, which is perceived as unjust. Having TikTok and Instagram is the norm today, and stepping back from these platforms can make it challenging to stay connected.

Should I continue using this phone, I would likely feel excluded when discussing how many of our jokes and cultural references originate from those platforms.

The London-based company Nothing also aims for a different approach with its Phone 3. This device features a quirky design, including a small LED screen on the back of a translucent case, rather than being a stripped-down version of an iPhone or Android.

Constructed on a Nothing version of the Android operating system, the Phone 3 incorporates many interesting features while striving to differentiate itself from the ubiquitous offerings of Apple and Samsung. Consumer Technology editor Samuel Gibbs provided a four-star review, stressing the importance of its unique attributes for justifying its value.

While the Phone 3 is impressive for Nothing, it may not outperform standard Android devices. It stands out from competitors but requires a desire for something distinctive to appreciate its offerings, given that more affordable devices provide comparable or superior performance.

Photo: AP

In his commitment to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in AI, Zuckerberg disclosed plans for a data center comparable in size to Manhattan. Meta’s sprawling complex, fueled by similarly vast financial outlays, has been named Hyperion, after the Greek Titan symbolizing the sun. Zuckerberg’s second smaller data center is named Prometheus, after the Titan punished for bringing fire and sacred knowledge to humanity. Is this data center a boon for us? Or, as the creators of AI, are we destined to face consequences? The emotions evoked by these names reflect Zuckerberg’s grand ambitions. The famous novel Frankenstein has another notable title that seems relevant: Modern Prometheus.

Google is also expanding its undertakings, planning to invest $3 billion in hydropower and $25 billion in data centers across Pennsylvania and neighboring states within the next two years. Apple is making its mark with a $500 million deal for rare earth minerals, investments that have drawn scrutiny from US mining companies.

The Broader Technology Landscape

Source: www.theguardian.com

Despelote Review: A Stunning Dive into Soccer Fandom | Games

vIDEO games have been portraying soccer since the 1970s, yet they seldom dive into the realm of fandom simulation. While players can engage in the whole international tournament through the FIFA series, the games rarely depict how competition seeps into the daily lives of supporters, how entire communities become engulfed in World Cup mania, and how it transforms into a national obsession. The quintessential experience of a major match for most is encapsulated in those glorious moments of shared excitement, along with the sounds and sights of real life, whether on television or massive pub screens in the company of friends and family.

This is where Despelote steps in, a beautifully crafted game that transports players back to childhood and memory, all set against the backdrop of Ecuador’s historic 2002 World Cup qualifying campaign. Julian, an 8-year-old football enthusiast—essentially a semi-autobiographical character based on the game’s co-designer Julian Cordello—witnesses his team’s thrilling win over Peru. However, four more matches stand between Ecuador and the World Cup finals in Japan and Korea. The game unfolds as a series of intimate, immersive scenes, allowing Julian to navigate through life, balancing his responsibilities and daydreams during various life moments such as shopping trips, car rides, and school lessons.

What was it like to be a child… Despelote. Photo: Panic Game

A critical scene unfolds in a town square or during a family gathering, where Julian finds himself in a space of freedom and agency. He listens intently to adult conversations, observes an elderly man feeding pigeons, greets the shopkeeper, and enjoys moments of play with friends. The world is rendered in a single-color photograph that evokes nostalgia and simplicity.

As the gameplay evolves, Julian’s childhood experiences transition into reflections on teenage gatherings and newfound responsibilities. The socio-political context of the World Cup campaign is woven into the narrative; Ecuador was grappling with a financial crisis, causing rampant inflation and the collapse of businesses. Discussions about the tournament permeate everyday life, impacting everything from street conversations to weddings.

Additionally, other facets of Ecuadorian culture and life are beautifully integrated into the experience. Explore music, cuisine, and the resurgence of the local film industry through *Leyteros*, directed by Sebastián Cordero, creator of the 1999 crime films *Latus*, *Latones*, and *Julianne Cordero*. In this way, real life interweaves seamlessly with the gaming world, reminiscent of a poetic and self-referential Agnès Varda film. One endearing sequence even features Julian captivated by a hooky simulation on the family console.

Despelote evokes some of the remarkable works in independent narrative game design, such as *Unfinished Swan*, *Gravityborn*, and *Virginia*, yielding a thrilling experience. Though centered around one young boy in a uniquely crafted Ecuador, it captures the almost universal influence of football as a unifying social narrative. The Dutch 1974 team, Maradona’s genius in 1986, Gascoigne’s legendary goal against Scotland in Euro 96—all these moments contribute to a collective spirit. As the final qualifying match approaches, a palpable excitement and tension emerge, prompting reflections on the creative process itself, beyond the confines of traditional gameplay. This experience is both engaging and formally innovative, packing significant depth into two hours of gameplay, posing more profound questions about memory, simulation, and identity than many expansive 100-hour epics.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Despelote is currently available for £12

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elite players’ psychological profiles revealed using AI by analysts in the soccer world

“This players didn’t show enough fights. “When you hear Pandit’s post-match reaction, you can hear a variation in the sound bite.

In an age where soccer is increasingly leaning towards data to demonstrate physical attributes, it is difficult to provide statistics that accurately show players’ psychological qualities, such as emotional control and leadership. However, Premier League clubs, including Brighton, use techniques aimed at helping them choose and recruit.

Thomas Tuchel made headlines by telling England players to communicate more after assessing their interactions in the Euro 2024 final, but counting the players and talking to each other on the pitch, showing that only a portion of the mental battles are featured.

Former Norway and Denmark top flight defender Yo Amankwa is at the heart of the push for a better psychological evaluation of players. “When you take your eyes off the ball, it’s a treasure trove of information,” says Amankwa, who also works as a critic. “You can’t just ignore the tactics and look at the psychological parts of the game and the player through this lens, and you can’t see it. It’s a subtle, nonverbal message to show whether the player is very confident, aggressive, or a bubble of his own.”




“It’s impossible to just ignore tactics and look at the psychological parts of the game,” says Yo Amanka. Photo: Shipa/Aramie

Amankwah uses the example of a player who blew a 20-yard shot into the stands, and after 45 seconds he receives a comforting putt behind him from his passing teammate. It’s a fleeting moment that may be overlooked or overlooked by fans, the media, and even the coaching team, but for a former expert, it shows a quiet sense of leadership. “I know the clues and small actions you need to learn to function effectively on the football pitch,” says Amankwa.

Over the past six years he has worked with psychology professor Geir Jordet to analyze thousands of hours of match footage from around the world, including videos of all players from the Premier League and Women’s Super League. As a result, we have a dataset containing over 100,000 unique observations. This allowed the duo to create proxy rankings for players across different types of behavior via Duo (Inside Out Analytics).

This information can show whether the defender’s emotional control is in the top 5% of the league compared to opponents and teammates in the same position. As Jordette puts it, “It’s a new world. This map gives clubs a benchmark. You can see certain behaviors and count the number of times that occur in certain situations, but most can blind you to what it means.

“It’s hard to understand the exact meaning of them, but we’re no longer blind because, for this type of behavior, in this situation, if you compare all the players of this player in this Premier League, this player is in the 90th or 10th percentile.”

Bayern Munich is one of several major clubs trying out the platform, adopting technology in his time as head coach of Julian Nagelsmann. “All departments [in a club] You put numbers on the table, but psychology isn’t,” says Max Perka, a former Bavarian psychologist. [what is happening] On the pitch. ”




Max Perka (left) and Julian Nagelsmann worked together at RB Leipzig before moving to Bayern Munich. Photo: DPA/Aramie

Following Nagelsmann from RB Leipzig to Bayern, Perka worked with Jordet and Amankwa to analyze roughly 25 Bayern games in the second half of the 2022-23 season.

After each match, Pelka blocks detailed observations of each player’s posture, head movements, and hand gestures, leaving some elements of the body language monitored by Amankwah’s analytics team to a one-page summary of the side’s psychological performance. The data was one of several information sets that Nagelsmann and his assistants should consider before choosing a side.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“It was another variable that added to my idea of ​​choice,” Pelka says. “They could think if they really wanted a leader on their back four or if they wanted something else. [personality] option. ”


Players can also access an analysis of what Yoldett calls “the character of the game.” Perca said: [to play]. It doesn’t happen overnight, but if you have a starting point on how things look on the pitch, it’s much easier to work on. ”

Perca uses some of the techniques he employed in Munich to analyze Brighton’s players’ on-field behavior. He does not frequently monitor Fabian Hürzeler’s team, but the key board of the process is the same, with Brighton’s head coach reviewing a summary of key psychological “actions” on his part.

Jordet and Amnankwah are increasingly using artificial intelligence over manual coding, which consumed most of the pair’s time. “Soon there’s little limit to the number of teams you can analyze at any time, and we’ll actually start notifying the club about new signings in the future. “Yes, this seems like a good signature” or: “From our perspective, given these metrics, there’s a big red flag here and that’s what you might want to see.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Rematch delivers heart-pounding five-a-side soccer action with intense excitement

IIn the early 00’s, off-beat sports games were king. From the slam dunking shenanigans on NBA Street to the absurdity that stops the Mario Striker show, once serious competition has been rethought as a surprising, stupid grim match. But with the arrival of the era of live services, Sports Sims was not about playing pulse pumps, but about collecting more and more expensive virtual trading cards.

Please enter a rematch. This is a refreshing action-packed rethink of a beautiful game. Channel the crude thrills of five sides of the Power League and rematch tactics focused on FIFA teams and put you in a single player studded boot. With third-person action game-like controls, developer Sloclap has guided the channel to create heavy, skill-driven soccer, with martial arts-heavy experiences in previous titles SIFU and Absolver. It’s wonderfully agile, fast, and ferocious. The pass is delivered manually, the shot is curled in the heat of the moment, and the goalkeeper sprints down the half-hearted line, as Oliver Kahn owns. Free slide tackles and bike kicks are the order of the day, and I can’t stop grinning as I win my teammates and each half-line screamer.

“FIFA is a football simulation, and the rematch is a football player simulation,” says Pierre Tarno’s creative director. “In the game, there is no more kick action to pass to this type of pass, so “Let’s make it happen!”




Reflex test… a rematch. Photo: Sloclap

Sifu has also recursively tested the gameplay of the recursive test to kickabout, where you knocked out 7 shades from many martial arts masters. Thanks to high levels of player control, the match is surprisingly quick. Without the other 10 controllable players, the rematch is a game of constant movement. Sprints take valuable stamina and keeping the “Do” button at all times is always a quick way to FIFA. Thankfully there is a hidden trick underneath the knee pads. The tap on the bumper allows for a sudden, fast-speed explosion. Tied to another meter, this emergency boost is perfect for chasing a striker in a box or for throwing away a defender snapping on his heel. Immediately, I balance my midfield and defensive play and charge my goalmouse scramble in a true, crude way.

Sport the art style, a Breath of the Wild, some French Impressionism, and animated speed lines, and sprint through each rendered pitch. Scoring the goal will distort the virtual environment around you, change the Smash Bros style that has changed the background of the stage, and align the main team’s home stadium as the ball hits the back of the net with an explosion of color.

According to Tarno, Rematch’s visuals were an attempt to recreate the soft, dreamy look of paintings inside an immersive 3D stadium. But despite its charming cartoonish look, there is a welcome lack of feats against the super’s movements and gravity that fills the screen. “We once built up running the wall into the game,” he says.




A game of constant movement… a rematch. Photo: Sloclap

This is a world with a bright aesthetic and outlook. Instead of taking place within the normal Grimm Dark Dystopia of video games set in 2065, Sloclap offers a refreshing optimistic view of the future. The environment focuses on renewable energy and natural landscapes. One stadium is wrapped in a dam that generates hydraulic power, while another sees a match unfolding under the hillside with rotating wind turbines.

“We wanted to dream of a world where humanity made the right choice. It’s worth sharing cooperation and resilience on and off the pitch,” Tarno says. “It’s really about the joy of playing with friends.”

When the control finally clicks, you’ll be fully invested in the Ramshackle team. Just like Sloclap’s previous output, the rematch is about mastery. This is a game where the avatar begins with high power. In the world of Rematch, offsides, fouls, and merciless, Var is a thing of the past, and futuristic footies can’t slow the action. “I think players who are not soccer fans will be surprised that they can still enjoy football games because it’s so intense and dynamic,” Tarno says.

Since rematches are only online, the ball call system allows players to raise their hands as they scream and ask for the ball. Rematch’s futuristic footy has more to do than the touch of an Overwatch. I find the squad-driven approach and accurate manual aim as satisfying as setting goals as it scores. The rematch also shares the sense of Rocket League and Arcade relatives, but the rematch delivers a more reasonable approximation of the game, as Psyonix’s unstoppable hit watch players launch Hot Wheels-like vehicles into comical, big football.

The rematch is full of fun player customizations and you can design everything from choosing avatar earrings from your home or away kit. There are even vitiligo selectors and options for customizable prostheses for players to match a more comprehensive vision of the future. The rematch is a paid release, with additional items being sold in in-game currency, which is said to result in roughly half of the cosmetic items being unlocked through play.

Regardless of price range, Tarno is keenly aware that only one is really important. “There is no secret formula in game development,” he says. “The only way to achieve commercial success is to make a very good game. It’s more true about gaming than any other entertainment industry… Gamers are very discerning viewers. They are often very analytical, and the mechanisms and what works and what doesn’t work… If the game isn’t good enough, it simply doesn’t succeed.”

This month’s open beta is essential for a tweak rematch. That was promising in the first half, at least so far. I went into the demo, hoping for disposable fun like a Mario striker, leaving me with sweaty hands. Sloclap’s mission is to bring the pleasant sensation back to virtual football, and based on what he’s banded about this colorful pitch so far, the rematch has the depth to reach the big leagues.

The rematch will be released on PC, PS5 and Xbox in the summer of 2025.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why VAR Is Infuriating Soccer Fans and What Can Be Done About It

Liverpool fans crowd to watch the on-field VAR screen at Anfield Stadium

Alex Dodd – CameraSport via Getty Images

If you’ve watched any football, or even soccer, in the past few years, you know that the game has been embroiled in controversy surrounding new officiating technology. The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system was introduced in the English Premier League in 2019 to reduce referee errors and get more correct calls. Instead, it created a new kind of uncertainty and undermined our understanding of basic rules such as offside and handball. It has also infuriated fans, who can often be heard shouting “this isn’t football anymore” after lengthy VAR checks.

It’s safe to say that soccer fans love to get furious, especially when a referee’s decision goes against their team. But as I argue in my new book, I can’t stop thinking about VAR, there’s more to this than meets the eye. As someone involved in developing new ways to measure educational attainment, I’ve thought long and hard about why VAR is so frustrating. I think the problem has to do with the challenge of pinpointing objective reality, the difficulty of accurate measurement, and human nature’s aversion to uncertainty.

But what I realized is that VAR exemplifies the limits of rationality in many fields far beyond the field of football. So let’s briefly explore the broader history of measurement, from attempts to determine the boiling point of water in the 18th century to the struggle to accurately assess boiling point.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Tim Walz and AOC team up for epic soccer showdown on Twitch to win over young male voters

Vice presidential candidates Tim Walz and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced on Sunday that they will be playing American football as part of their efforts to secure votes from young people, just nine days before the White House election. The game was streamed live on Twitch.

Ocasio-Cortez and Walz will compete in the latest Madden game series as Democrats aim to regain control of the House of Representatives, maintain a Senate majority, and challenge Donald Trump in the upcoming presidential election. They also emphasized the importance of Kamala Harris’s victory.

“While we may not all share the same beliefs, defeating Trump this year is our main priority,” said Ocasio-Cortez.

Ocasio-Cortez criticized President Trump as an authoritarian ruler and a facist supported by special interests who are exacerbating the ongoing climate crisis. She also condemned the billionaire owners of the Los Angeles Times and Washington Post for not allowing their editorial teams to endorse Harris over Trump.

During the broadcast, Ocasio-Cortez also called out comedian Tony Hinchcliffe for making derogatory comments about Puerto Rico at a Trump rally.

Ocasio-Cortez and Walz decided to play Madden together a few weeks ago, as Walz had previous experience with the game and had worked as a football coach.

Following a recent NBC news investigation, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris is leading Donald Trump among young male registered voters.

Despite their lead, Democrats have historically struggled with public opinion during past election cycles. The Trump campaign recently criticized the former president during a three-hour appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast, which primarily attracts young male viewers.

Sunday’s event with Ocasio-Cortez followed her initial appearance on Twitch, which was one of the platform’s most-watched events at the time.

Harris’s campaign strategy also focuses on targeting young people, with ads on sports gambling platforms such as DraftKings and Yahoo Sports.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Liverpool FC and DeepMind collaborate to create artificial intelligence for soccer strategy consultation

Corner kicks like this one taken by Liverpool's Trent Alexander-Arnold can lead to goal-scoring opportunities.

Robbie Jay Barratt/AMA/Getty

Artificial intelligence models predict the outcome of corner kicks in soccer matches and help coaches design tactics that increase or decrease the probability of a player taking a shot on goal.

petar veličković Google's DeepMind and colleagues have developed a tool called TacticAI as part of a three-year research collaboration with Liverpool Football Club.

A corner kick is awarded when the ball crosses the goal line and goes out of play, creating a good scoring opportunity for the attacking team. For this reason, football coaches make detailed plans for different scenarios, which players study before the game.

TacticAI was trained on data from 7176 corner kicks from England's 2020-2021 Premier League season. This includes each player's position over time as well as their height and weight. You learned to predict which player will touch the ball first after a corner kick has been taken. In testing, Ball's receiver ranked him among TacticAI's top three candidates 78% of the time.

Coaches can use AI to generate tactics for attacking or defending corners that maximize or minimize the chances of a particular player receiving the ball or a team getting a shot on goal. This is done by mining real-life examples of corner kicks with similar patterns and providing suggestions on how to change tactics to achieve the desired result.

Liverpool FC's soccer experts were unable to distinguish between AI-generated tactics and human-designed tactics in a blind test, favoring AI-generated tactics 90% of the time.

But despite its capabilities, Veličković says TacticAI was never intended to put human coaches out of work. “We are strong supporters of AI systems, not systems that replace AI, but augment human capabilities and allow people to spend more time on the creative parts of their jobs,” he says.

Velicković said the research has a wide range of applications beyond sports. “If you can model a football game, you can better model some aspects of human psychology,” he says. “As AI becomes more capable, it needs to understand the world better, especially under uncertainty. Our systems can make decisions and make recommendations even under uncertainty. It’s a good testing ground because it’s a skill that we believe can be applied to future AI systems.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Neuroscientists analyze brain scans of soccer fans to research passionate devotion

Football is a great model of social belonging, promoting inclusivity, teamwork, community spirit, social change, and individual achievement. Still, collective factors may be the reason behind acts of violence and vandalism. In a new study, neuroscientists at the University of San Sebastian investigate the brain mechanisms underlying positive and negative social stimuli in soccer fans in positive and negative social scenarios.



Mendieta other. fMRI was used to measure the brain activity of fans of rival soccer teams during a match. This image shows the contrast between winning and losing in the “good fanatic’s brain.” Activities related to important victories are shown in warm colors. The blue scale represents activations associated with significant losses. This pattern is consistent with a mentalization network suggesting a pain rationalization process triggered by a losing scenario. Image credit: Mendieta other.

“Our study aims to uncover the behaviors and dynamics associated with extreme competitiveness, aggression, and social belonging within and between fans’ groups,” said the first author. Dr. Francisco Zamorano Mendietaa researcher at the University of San Sebastian.

Rivalries are deeply rooted in the history of sports, and fans can be very protective of their “home” team and favorite players.

These same fans run through a range of emotions as they watch their team succeed or fail during a game, cheering when they score or being furious at a bad call.

Soccer fans are known for their loyalty and enthusiasm for their team, especially in Europe and South America.

To gain insight into the brain mechanisms behind fan behavior, Dr. Zamorano and his colleagues recruited 43 healthy male volunteers for a functional MRI (fMRI) study.

Participants are fans of Chile’s two most popular soccer teams, which are considered arch-rivals.

They were divided into two groups: 22 supporters of one team and 21 supporters of the rival team.

They completed a survey to determine their Soccer Enthusiasm Score and underwent a psychological evaluation.

All participants received an edited version of the match containing 63 goals.

While participants watched a compilation of matches, their brain activity was measured using fMRI, a non-invasive imaging technique that detects changes in blood flow in the brain.

The fMRI results showed that fans’ brain activity changed depending on whether their team was successful or unsuccessful.

“When your team wins, the reward system in your brain is activated,” Dr. Zamorano says.

“Losing activates the mentalization network, putting fans into a reflective state, which may alleviate some of the pain of the loss.”

“We also observed that the brain hub connecting the limbic system and frontal cortex was disrupted, disrupting mechanisms that regulate cognitive control and increasing the likelihood of destructive or violent behavior. .”

The research team’s findings could shed light on social dynamics at all levels.

“People inherently crave social connection, whether it’s membership in a running club, participation in a book discussion group, or participation in a virtual forum,” Dr. Zamorano said.

“These social bonds are often formed around shared beliefs, values ​​and interests, but there can also be elements of persuasive proselytism, or ‘groupthink’; That can lead to irrational beliefs and social discord.”

“The enthusiasm we see among some sports fans can serve as a convincing example of intense emotional investment, occasional aggressive behavior, and a decline in rationality.”

“Understanding the psychology of group identification and competition sheds light on decision-making processes and social dynamics, allowing us to more fully understand how societies operate.”

Authors present their work findings this month, Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Annual Meeting.

_____

Francisco Zamorano Mendieta other. Brain mechanisms underlying emotional responses in social pain. Football as a surrogate for studying fanaticism: an fMRI study. RSNA 2023

Source: www.sci.news