Don’t Be Deceived: The Realities of AI Regulation in the US

aAt first glance, the current landscape of artificial intelligence policy indicates a strategic step back from regulation. Recently, AI leaders in the United States and beyond have echoed this sentiment. J.D. Vance describes AI policy as “Deregulation flavor.” Congress seems poised for a 10-year suspension. This is especially true regarding state AI laws. On cue, the Trump administration’s AI action plan warns against obscuring the technology “through bureaucracy at this early stage.”

However, the emphasis on deregulation is a significant misunderstanding. Although the U.S. federal government adopts a hands-off stance toward applications like chatbots and image generators, it is deeply engaged in the fundamental aspects of AI. For instance, both the Trump and Biden administrations have actively dealt with AI chips, crucial components of advanced AI systems. The Biden administration restricts access to these chips to safeguard against competitive nations such as China. The Trump administration sought a deal with countries like the UAE for AI sales.

Both administrations have significantly influenced AI systems in their respective manners. The United States is not deregulating AI; rather, it is regulating where many are not looking. Beneath the rhetoric of a free market, Washington is stepping in to shape the components of AI systems.


Embracing the comprehensive nature of the AI technology stack—analyzing the contributions of hardware, data centers, and software operating in the background of applications like ChatGPT—reveals that nations are targeting different components of AI systems. Early frameworks, such as the EU’s AI law, prioritized prominent applications, banning high-risk uses in sectors like health, employment, and law enforcement to mitigate social harm. However, nations are now focusing on the fundamental building blocks of AI. China restricts certain models to combat deepfakes and misinformation. Citing national security concerns, the U.S. has limited exports of advanced chips, and under the Biden administration, model weights—the “secret sauce” that converts user inputs into results. These AI regulations are embedded within dense administrative terminologies like “implementation of additional export controls” and “end uses of supercomputers and semiconductors,” obscuring their foundational rationale. Nevertheless, clear trends emerge behind this complex vernacular, indicating a shift from regulating AI applications to regulating their foundational elements.

The initial wave of regulations targeted applications within jurisdictions like the EU, emphasizing issues such as discrimination, surveillance, and environmental damage. Subsequently, rival nations like the United States and China adopted a national security approach, aiming to retain military dominance and thwart malicious entities from leveraging AI for obtaining nuclear weapons or disseminating disinformation. A third wave of AI regulation is emerging as countries tackle parallel social and security challenges. Our research indicates that this hybrid approach is more effective as it breaks down silos and minimizes redundancy.

Overcoming the allure of laissez-faire rhetoric necessitates a more thorough analysis. Viewed through the lens of the AI stack, U.S. AI policy resembles a redefinition of regulatory focus rather than an abdication of responsibility. This translates to a facade of leniency while maintaining a firm grip on core elements.

No global framework can be effective if the United States—the host of the world’s largest AI research institution—continues to project an image of complete deregulation. The country’s proactive stance on AI chips undermines this narrative. U.S. AI policy is anything but laissez-faire. Decisions regarding intervention reflect a strategic inclination. While politically convenient, the myth of deregulation is largely a fabrication.

The public demands enhanced transparency concerning the rationale and framework of government regulations on AI. It is difficult to rationalize the ease with which the U.S. government intervenes in chip regulation for national security while remaining muted on social implications. Awareness of all regulatory aspects—ranging from export controls to trade policies—is the first step toward fostering effective global cooperation. Without such clarity, discussions surrounding global AI governance will remain superficial.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Deceived and Defeated: The Struggles of African Job Seekers Exploited by Asian Cyber Scammers

WAfter arriving in Bangkok from Nairobi last December, Duncan Okindo sensed something was amiss as he began his job as a customer service agent. The 26-year-old had previously sold cattle, borrowed funds from a friend, and used his savings to pay the recruitment agency 200,000 Kenyan Shillings (£1,150).

“I thought it was a positive step to leave [the country] and seek opportunities to support my family,” Okindo recalls.

Unfortunately, when a van collected Okindo and six other Kenyans at the airport, the driver took their passports and falsely informed Thai officials that they were tourists. After several hours of travel, they were taken to a boat to cross a river, confused and exhausted.

They were then taken to Myanmar. Walled compounds guarded by rebel militias awaited them.

For the next three months, he was forced to send thousands of messages from fake social media accounts, posing as a wealthy American investor to defraud U.S. real estate agents through cryptocurrency scams.

When he failed to hit his daily targets, he faced beatings, confinement in a freezing room, and sometimes went without food for up to two days. He prayed for the safety of others who suffered at the hands of the Chinese gangsters operating the center, wishing they could avoid the electrocution and sexual torture he witnessed.

“It was hell on Earth,” says Okindo. “I felt completely shattered.”

Eventually, he was released from Myanmar’s KK Park, a compound reflecting the rising number of Kenyans, Ugandans, and Ethiopians trafficked to Southeast Asia as criminal organizations look to expand the East African labor pool.




KK Park is a rapidly growing fraud center located in Myawadi, along Myanmar’s border with Thailand. Photo: Jittrapon Kaicome/The Guardian

Since the 2021 coup in Myanmar, there’s been a surge in cyber slavery compounds, taking advantage of the country’s weakened governance and fostering illegal activities. The number of such centers along the Thai border has escalated from 11 to 26 in just four years.

The United Nations estimates that at least 120,000 individuals are trapped in cyberscam compounds, and human trafficking experts and rescue organizations in Myanmar have noted that crackdowns have yielded minimal results. These centers are often run by Chinese criminal gangs, with some colluding with Myanmar’s military along the borders.

Map of the Myanmar-Thai border along the Moei River, showing locations of the fraud centre

Okindo considers himself fortunate. The mission to find and free trafficked individuals involves coordination among multiple governments, militias, and police forces. Thai officials have successfully promoted the release of thousands of trafficking victims, while East African governments are increasingly collaborating with Thai authorities willing to engage with Myanmar’s junta and militia forces at the border.

Victims can only be released into Thai custody if their home country agrees to take responsibility for their repatriation and the associated costs.

Since 2020, the Southeast Asian cyberslavery industry has ensnared hundreds of thousands, forcing individuals into what is colloquially termed “slaughtering the pigs,” a brutal way to build trust with scam targets before executing fraud. Initially aimed at Chinese and Taiwanese victims, the industry has expanded to Southeast Asians, Indians, and now, Africans.




“Sometimes I’m afraid to talk about it,” Okindo reflects. Photo: Provided by Duncan Okindo

The criminal syndicate is shifting focus to fraudulent victims in the U.S. and Europe, with China working to prevent citizens from becoming targets, an expert informed The Guardian.

This has led various human trafficking networks to search for recruits with English and technical skills, including East Africans. Estimates now suggest thousands are trapped in Southeast Asian compounds, according to Benedict Hoffman, a representative of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime in Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

As awareness grows among citizens in various countries, recruitment becomes increasingly challenging. “It’s much harder these days to enlist large numbers of individuals from India,” Hoffmann notes. “This is why we’re observing a rise in victims from Africa.”

Between January and April, the Kenyan government successfully repatriated 175 citizens from Myanmar; Roseline Njogu, the Director of the Diaspora Issues Department in Kenya’s State Department, noted that a substantial group of Kenyans, about 150 individuals trafficked from across Southeast Asia, was rescued between 2022 and 2024. This issue also extends to Ethiopia and Uganda.

In Kenya, approximately 80% of the population is under 35, and the unemployment rate is alarmingly high. The government under President William Ruto has actively promoted labor exports. Investigations indicate that four in ten young Kenyans are considering moving abroad.

Recruiters exploiting modern slavery are capitalizing on government migration promotion, targeting Kenya through online job advertisements, social media, texts, and in-person visits to rural areas, states Mutuk Nguri, CEO of the Counter Human Traffic Trust.

Skip past newsletter promotions



Chinese, Vietnamese, and Ethiopians rescued in Misawadi, Myanmar. They are recognized as victims of human trafficking at fraud centers. Photo: Thanaphon Wuttison/AP

The government acknowledges its precarious position, according to Nguri. The Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Diaspora Issues did not respond to requests for comments.

Thailand has aided thousands, but repatriation presents its own challenges and costs. Thai officials must establish that workers are indeed victims of human trafficking before releasing them to their home countries.


When Susan Wahura* was rescued from a Myanmar romance scam operation in 2022, she spent a month moving between four Thai detention centers before realizing she was trafficked and initiating legal steps to obtain freedom.

“I spent time in a solitary cell before accepting my status as a trafficking victim which ultimately led to my freedom,” shares 32-year-old Wahura.

Neither Uganda nor Ethiopia maintain embassies in Thailand, complicating their ability to identify victims in Myanmar, currently engulfed in civil conflict. Earlier this year, several Ugandans and Ethiopians found themselves stranded at the Myanmar-Thai border as repatriation efforts stalled.




Duncan Okindo has created a TikTok video detailing his trafficking experiences in Myanmar, aiming to raise awareness about predatory agencies and bogus job offers. Photo: Carlos Mureithi/The Guardian

The fraud syndicate is exploiting vulnerabilities in East Africa’s diplomatic representation to deter victims from seeking help, asserts Jason Tower, a global initiative against transnational organized crime.

“Ultimately, that’s the objective of the scam syndicate—to transform individuals into profit-generating machines, acting as high-capacity con artists,” states Tower.


Nevertheless, despite repatriation efforts by East African nations, deceptive recruitment agencies keep advertising fake job opportunities. Both Okindo and Wahura continue to share guardian messages with Kenyans contemplating moves to Southeast Asia.

In May, Okindo, who holds a mass communication diploma, filed a lawsuit against the recruitment agency and its staff, accusing them of conscription into slavery and human trafficking. A Nairobi court has issued a temporary injunction preventing the overseas employment of labor.

Since his return, Okindo has spoken publicly about his experiences through television, TikTok, and other social media outlets, connecting stranded victims with legal support, aid organizations, and ambassadors for their recovery.

His aim is to raise awareness about malicious institutions and false job opportunities while encouraging victims to seek justice.

“I’ve enlightened many individuals,” he asserts. “Though I sometimes feel scared discussing it, I share my story, knowing that speaking out could help save others.”

*Name changed to protect identity

Source: www.theguardian.com

BBC Presenter Deceived into Using AI-Generated Voice for Advertisement: A Portrait of the Incident

Her voice seemed off, not quite right, and it meandered in unexpected ways.

Viewers familiar with science presenter Liz Bonnin’s Irish accent were puzzled when they received an audio message seemingly from her endorsing a product from a distant location.

It turned out the message was a fake, created by artificial intelligence to mimic Bonnin’s voice. After spotting her image in an online advertisement, Bonnin’s team investigated and found out it was a scam.

Bonin, known for her work on TV shows like Bang Goes The Theory, expressed her discomfort with the imitated voice, which she described as shifting from Irish to Australian to British.

The person behind the failed campaign, Incognito CEO Howard Carter, claimed he had received convincing audio messages from someone posing as Bonin, leading him to believe it was the real presenter.

The fake Bonin provided contact details and even posed as a representative from the Wildlife Trust charity, negotiating a deal for the advertisement campaign. Carter eventually realized he had been scammed after transferring money and receiving the image for the campaign.

AI experts confirmed that the voice memos were likely artificially generated due to inconsistencies in accent and recitation speed. Bonin warned about the dangers of AI misuse and stressed the importance of caution.

Incognito reported the incident to authorities and issued a statement cautioning others about sophisticated scams involving AI. They apologized to Bonin for any unintended harm caused by the deception.

Neither the BBC nor the Wildlife Trust responded to requests for comments on the incident.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Podcast reveals how reality show deceived women into believing fake Prince Harry was real

A new retrospective podcast series has emerged, delving into the gritty and boundary-pushing world of early 2000s reality TV.

One shocking example featured on the podcast is “There’s Something About Miriam,” where six men unknowingly went on a date with a transgender woman, sparking controversy and discussion. This series gained renewed attention following the tragic death of star Miriam Rivera a decade after filming.

Pandora Sykes and Shirin Kale’s investigative series “Unreal” sheds light on the ethics and exploitation behind era-defining reality shows like Big Brother, The X Factor, The Swan, and Love Island. Similarly, Jack Peretti’s exploration of shows like “The Bachelor” and “Married at First Sight” delves into the questionable practices within the genre.

Another standout from the early 2000s, “I Want to Marry Harry,” featured single American women vying for the affection of a man they believed to be Prince Harry, but turned out to be an imposter named Matt with dyed ginger hair.

In “The Bachelor at Buckingham Palace,” TV expert Scott Bryan interviews former contestants to reveal how easily they were deceived by the absurd concept of the show.

The podcast also features insights into the competitive world of educational scholarships and a scripted drama about AI and grief from Idris and Sabrina Elba.

Holly Richardson
Television Editor Assistant

This week’s picks

Sir Lenny Henry, star of Halfway. Photo: David Bintiner/Guardian

Competition
All episodes available on Wondery+ starting Monday
Sima Oriei’s journey for a high-paying scholarship in Mobile, Alabama, is revisited, showcasing a grueling competition where one girl is crowned America’s Outstanding Young Woman and wins a $40,000 education.

Letter: Ripple Effect
Weekly episodes available
Amy Donaldson’s true crime podcast explores the mysterious murder of a young father in Utah in 1982, delving into the impact on loved ones and the quest for answers.

Incomplete
Audible, all episodes now available
Idris and Sabrina Elba’s scripted podcast raises ethical questions about AI and grief, featuring a stellar cast led by Lenny Henry.

The Long Shadow: In the Guns We Trust
Weekly episodes available
Garrett Graf’s exploration of the right to bear arms in the US, 25 years after the Columbine shooting, sheds light on the voices of gun violence survivors.

Bachelor of Buckingham Palace
Wondery+, all episodes now available
Scott Bryan’s in-depth interviews with former contestants from “I Want to Marry Harry” reveal the surprising reality behind the show’s deceptive premise.

There’s a podcast for that

Dua Lipa, host of “At Your Service.” Photo: JMEternational/Getty Images

Hannah Verdier We’ve curated the 5 best podcasts hosted by pop stars, from Tim Burgess’ listening party to Sam Smith’s poignant exploration of HIV history.

Source: www.theguardian.com