7 Debunked Autism Myths Experts Urge Everyone to Stop Believing

Since child psychiatrist Leo Kanner documented the first case of autism in 1943, this neurodevelopmental condition has evoked both fascination and fear, potentially more than any other. This intense scrutiny has unfortunately perpetuated decades of misunderstandings.

In Kanner’s early work, he proposed the discredited “refrigerator mother” theory, suggesting that emotionally distant parenting causes autism. This myth has been thoroughly debunked, yet it contributed to a lasting stigma that persists today.

Fast forward to 2026, and scientific advancements such as gene sequencing, sophisticated AI, and lab-engineered “mini-brains” offer unprecedented insights into the development of autistic traits. Yet, as research progresses, misinformation continues to proliferate, aided by flawed studies and social media influencers misinforming parents seeking clarity.

Let’s debunk some of the most common misconceptions surrounding autism.

Myth 1: Autism is an epidemic

In spring 2025, the CDC released a report that many incorrectly interpret as evidence of an autism “epidemic.” This interpretation is misleading. David Mandell, a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, explains that much of the rise reflects significant changes in how autism is diagnosed and identified.

Since the 1990s, the diagnostic criteria have expanded, allowing more individuals who once exhibited “mild” characteristics, such as subtle social communication differences or strict routines, to receive formal diagnoses.

“There’s been a substantial shift in the definition of autism, leading to an increase in diagnosed cases,” says Mandel.

Myth 2: Vaccines increase the risk of autism

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the unfounded belief linking childhood vaccinations to autism persists. This misconception gained renewed attention when U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reiterated such claims.

Extensive research confirms no connection between vaccines and autism, despite ongoing claims circulating online and in public discourse. – Image courtesy of Getty Images

Concerns primarily focus on thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, and the cumulative effect of multiple vaccinations. However, numerous studies have found no evidence supporting these claims. “More than a dozen rigorous studies indicate no connection between thimerosal and autism,” Mandel emphasizes.

Myth 3: All autistic people are geniuses

As noted by Fred Volkmar, Professor of Child Psychiatry at Yale, the stereotype that all autistic individuals possess extraordinary abilities is both misleading and frustrating.

Films often reinforce the “autistic genius” stereotype, overshadowing the rich diversity of autistic abilities. – Image courtesy of Getty Images

Current research shows that around 30% of autistic individuals have an intellectual disability, while 40-70% experience language impairments. “Only about one in ten autistic individuals possesses isolated skills, and this doesn’t denote genius,” Volkmar remarks.

Myth 4: Taking paracetamol increases the risk of autism

In September 2025, claims emerged from President Donald Trump suggesting that paracetamol could lead to autism, a statement that alarmed researchers. This idea stemmed from recent research linking medication use to neurodevelopmental conditions.

Links between pain medication and autism risk often stem from underlying medical conditions rather than the medications themselves. – Image courtesy of Getty Images

Many pregnant women use paracetamol to manage fevers caused by infections, which are significant autism risk factors. “The reasons women take Tylenol often contribute to developmental delays in children,” explains Mandel.

Myth 5: Autism can be treated by removing heavy metals

Worries about autism as an “epidemic” have led to increased interest in environmental toxins, notably heavy metals. Some doctors now offer “chelation therapy” as a supposed remedy.

Chelation therapy aims to eliminate heavy metals from the bloodstream but can have deadly consequences. – Image credit: Getty Images

However, Lucia Peixoto, an Associate Professor at Washington State University, cautions that not only is there no evidence supporting the efficacy of chelation therapy, but it can also pose serious risks. “These treatments often profit from unproven methods,” she states.

Myth 6: Autistic people don’t feel emotions

Misunderstandings arise from the difficulty some autistic individuals have in reading social cues, which can mask their emotional depth. – Image courtesy: Getty Images

For decades, autistic individuals have been depicted as logical but devoid of emotion, even by their families. While some may struggle with emotional identification, this does not negate their emotional capacity; many actually possess intense emotional experiences.

Just because they struggle with reading social cues doesn’t mean they lack empathy. As Daniel Geschwind, a professor of neuroscience and genetics at UCLA, notes, “Autistic children can form strong emotional bonds.”

Myth 7: A gluten-free diet can reverse autism

In summer 2024, a controversial study claimed that adopting a gluten-free and dairy-free diet could “cure” autism, which quickly gained traction online.

While gluten-free diets may provide comfort-related benefits, they do not change the nature of autism, a fact often overstated. – Image credit: Getty Images

Claims of dietary changes preventing autism have been disproven multiple times. Though autistic children have a higher incidence of gastrointestinal issues and dietary adjustments can ease discomfort, it doesn’t cure autism. “They are still autistic; improved comfort should not be mistaken for neurodevelopmental change,” explains Geschwind.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

The Risks of Believing in Self-Proclaimed AI Experts

Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google DeepMind and a Nobel Prize Winner for his work in developing the AlphafoldAI algorithm that predicts protein structures, appeared on 60 Minutes in April. He asserted that, with the assistance of AI like Alphafold, we might reach the end of all diseases within the next decade.

This assertion is met with skepticism by those involved in drug development and disease treatment. For instance, Derek Lowe, an experienced drug chemist, reacted to Hassabis’ remarks by stating, “I want to quietly stare out the window and express words I don’t understand.” It’s not necessary to be an expert to see the hyperbole; the notion of entirely eliminating diseases in a decade is far-fetched.

Some speculate that Hassabis’ claim is yet another instance of tech leaders overstating their achievements to attract investors. Isn’t this reminiscent of Elon Musk’s outrageous predictions about Mars settlements or Sam Altman’s assertions regarding the impending arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI)? While this cynical perspective has some merit, such experts may downplay the underlying complexities.

It seems like authorities occasionally make bold statements outside their expertise (consider Stephen Hawking on AI, aliens, and space travel). However, Hassabis appears to recognize his boundaries, as his Nobel comments highlight the potential for new drug development stemming from Alphafold’s predictions, which generated buzz about groundbreaking discoveries.

Similarly, another 2024 Nobel laureate, Jeffrey Hinton, previously an AI advisor at Google, emphasized that large-scale language models (LLMs) are similar to human learning. So, don’t worry about crying protests from cognitive scientists—or in some instances, AI too much.

These examples suggest that, oddly, some AI experts may mirror their creations—producing remarkable outcomes while acknowledging their limitations.

Another case is Daniel Kokotajiro, a researcher who departed from OpenAI over concerns regarding AGI and is now the executive director of the AI Futures project in California. He stated, “We’ve caught AIs lying, and I’m sure they knew what they were saying was wrong.” His knowledge, intentions, and anthropomorphic language reveal that Kokotajiro may be overlooking the true nature of LLMs.

The danger of assuming these experts are always right is highlighted by Hinton’s 2016 comment suggesting that, due to AI, “We should stop training radiologists now.” Fortunately, radiology experts dismissed this claim; there are doubts about a connection between his comments and growing concerns among medical students regarding the future of radiology jobs. Hinton has since revised that statement—but imagine the impact it could have had if he had already received a Nobel. The same applies to Hassabis’ comments about illnesses. The notion that AI could handle everything fosters overconfidence when it requires a far more nuanced, scientifically and politically-informed approach.

These “expert” predictions often go unchallenged in the media. I can personally attest that even some intelligent scientists are persuaded by them. Many governmental leaders seem to have bought into the hype generated by high-tech CEOs and Silicon Valley titans. We need to start scrutinizing their proclamations with the same skepticism we apply to the statements made by LLMs.

Philip Ball is a science writer based in London. His latest book is How Life Works.

Topics:

  • artificial intelligence/
  • technology

Source: www.newscientist.com

Podcast reveals how reality show deceived women into believing fake Prince Harry was real

A new retrospective podcast series has emerged, delving into the gritty and boundary-pushing world of early 2000s reality TV.

One shocking example featured on the podcast is “There’s Something About Miriam,” where six men unknowingly went on a date with a transgender woman, sparking controversy and discussion. This series gained renewed attention following the tragic death of star Miriam Rivera a decade after filming.

Pandora Sykes and Shirin Kale’s investigative series “Unreal” sheds light on the ethics and exploitation behind era-defining reality shows like Big Brother, The X Factor, The Swan, and Love Island. Similarly, Jack Peretti’s exploration of shows like “The Bachelor” and “Married at First Sight” delves into the questionable practices within the genre.

Another standout from the early 2000s, “I Want to Marry Harry,” featured single American women vying for the affection of a man they believed to be Prince Harry, but turned out to be an imposter named Matt with dyed ginger hair.

In “The Bachelor at Buckingham Palace,” TV expert Scott Bryan interviews former contestants to reveal how easily they were deceived by the absurd concept of the show.

The podcast also features insights into the competitive world of educational scholarships and a scripted drama about AI and grief from Idris and Sabrina Elba.

Holly Richardson
Television Editor Assistant

This week’s picks

Sir Lenny Henry, star of Halfway. Photo: David Bintiner/Guardian

Competition
All episodes available on Wondery+ starting Monday
Sima Oriei’s journey for a high-paying scholarship in Mobile, Alabama, is revisited, showcasing a grueling competition where one girl is crowned America’s Outstanding Young Woman and wins a $40,000 education.

Letter: Ripple Effect
Weekly episodes available
Amy Donaldson’s true crime podcast explores the mysterious murder of a young father in Utah in 1982, delving into the impact on loved ones and the quest for answers.

Incomplete
Audible, all episodes now available
Idris and Sabrina Elba’s scripted podcast raises ethical questions about AI and grief, featuring a stellar cast led by Lenny Henry.

The Long Shadow: In the Guns We Trust
Weekly episodes available
Garrett Graf’s exploration of the right to bear arms in the US, 25 years after the Columbine shooting, sheds light on the voices of gun violence survivors.

Bachelor of Buckingham Palace
Wondery+, all episodes now available
Scott Bryan’s in-depth interviews with former contestants from “I Want to Marry Harry” reveal the surprising reality behind the show’s deceptive premise.

There’s a podcast for that

Dua Lipa, host of “At Your Service.” Photo: JMEternational/Getty Images

Hannah Verdier We’ve curated the 5 best podcasts hosted by pop stars, from Tim Burgess’ listening party to Sam Smith’s poignant exploration of HIV history.

Source: www.theguardian.com