Why Long-Term Exercise Recommendations During COVID-19 May Be Detrimental

Resistance Training: An Emerging Therapy for Long COVID Symptoms

Bailey Cooper Photography/Alamy

With millions of individuals suffering from long-term symptoms of coronavirus, researchers are exploring effective strategies to alleviate these conditions. Resistance training presents a promising, drug-free, and affordable option that could potentially expedite recovery from long COVID infections. Despite its potential benefits, skepticism remains, with some experts claiming existing studies lack robustness, reminiscent of past debates on exercise for conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome.

Dr. Caroline Dalton from Sheffield Hallam University, UK, emphasizes the necessity for precision in defining exercise efficacy, warning against generalizing results to all long COVID patients.

One notable study led by Dr. Colin Berry at the University of Glasgow sought to investigate lifestyle interventions as long COVID emerged as a significant post-infection complication. Berry’s hypothesis was that exercise might serve as a viable alternative to lengthy drug development processes.

Berry’s team conducted a three-month resistance training program for participants with long COVID, assessing their performance improvements, including a notable increase of 83 meters on a timed walking test for those who completed the program compared to just 47 meters for the control group. The findings suggested resistance training could be a feasible treatment for persistent COVID-19 symptoms like fatigue and mobility issues.

Despite the enthusiasm surrounding the study, critical voices raised concerns about its findings. The difference in distance walked by both groups fell short of clinical significance, according to David Tuller from the University of California, Berkeley. Berry acknowledged that individual benefits need consideration beyond aggregated group data.

Another major criticism of the study relates to its diverse participant group. The inclusion of individuals with varying severity of COVID-19 infections meant the results could reflect broad averages rather than specific insights. According to Todd Davenport from the University of the Pacific, this diversity risks obscuring individual outcomes.

Understanding Post-Exercise Fatigue

Crucially, the study’s approach to assessing post-exertional fatigue—a debilitating symptom of chronic COVID-was limited. This condition causes severe fatigue after exertion, which often disproportionate to the activity level. Danny Altman at Imperial College London notes that effective evaluation of post-excretion fatigue can be challenging.

Unfortunately, fatigue assessment only occurred after the study, losing sight of early responses to exercise protocols. Alarmingly, at a three-month evaluation, 67% of participants reported inadequate recovery post-activity compared to 49% in the control group, potentially indicating greater setbacks for the intervention group, as shared by Leonard Jason from DePaul University.

Emerging research has also suggested that exercise may exacerbate certain symptoms, with a 2024 study highlighting potential muscle damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in individuals suffering from long COVID-related fatigue.

While Berry’s research sparked widespread debate, other studies support the notion that exercise can yield benefits for long COVID patients. A comprehensive review of 33 randomized controlled trials asserted that exercise significantly enhances the quality of life for affected individuals; however, it did not specifically address the prevalence of post-exercise fatigue, noted by over 80% of those surveyed.

The negative impact of post-exercise fatigue on quality of life was echoed by Margaret O’Hara, who highlighted the inadequacies of studies failing to consider this critical symptom.

Similarities to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

This ongoing discussion echoes sentiments from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) studies, where post-exertional fatigue plays a central role. Landmark research suggested graded exercise therapy provided some benefit but has faced scrutiny since, per critiques regarding the modified definitions of improvement throughout the trial period.

As outlined in subsequent analyses, the recovery rates reported in these trials have come under fire for failing to capture realistic improvements, reiterating the complexity and varying responses in exercise interventions for exercise-related fatigue.

As national health organizations pivot away from generally endorsing graded exercise therapy for CFS, acknowledging the necessity for tailored management strategies, experts argue a similar consideration is warranted for long COVID cases. Such insights advocate for a subtyping strategy in research, honing in on individual symptoms to gather nuanced perspectives on exercise impacts.

Assessing Risks and Benefits

Acknowledging that current guidelines do not endorse graded exercise therapy for long COVID, further inquiries into varied forms of exercise interventions remain essential. “Long COVID” encompasses a range of conditions, prompting the need to discern effective exercise practices for different patient profiles.

Factors like persistent viral presence in specific individuals or immune system overreactions post-COVID necessitate individualized investigation.

Mike Ormerod, a long COVID volunteer, stresses the importance of advocating for informed medical advice and managing the narrative surrounding exercise recommendations. “Most doctors encourage physical activity under the belief that it’s universally beneficial, yet this can lead to detrimental outcomes for those with specific fatigue profiles,” cautions Dalton.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Study: Flavanol-Rich Foods Shield Men’s Vascular Health Against the Detrimental Effects of Prolonged Sitting

Prolonged sitting can lead to a temporary decline in blood vessel function and blood pressure. Implementing specific eating strategies while in a sitting position may either alleviate or exacerbate these effects on vascular health. Recent research indicates that dietary cocoa flavanols, consumed prior to two hours of uninterrupted sitting, effectively counteract the deterioration in vascular function seen in young, healthy men. The beneficial effects of flavanols were consistent across individuals with varying levels of cardiorespiratory fitness, suggesting that even those with high fitness do not escape the decline in vascular function or blood pressure associated with sitting.



Consuming flavanol-rich foods during sedentary periods can be an effective method, used alone or alongside other strategies (such as reducing sedentary time), to mitigate the adverse effects of inactivity on the vascular system. Image credit: Daniele et al., doi: 10.1113/JP289038.

Sedentary behavior has become exceedingly common in contemporary society.

Over the past two decades, it has been reported that the time spent sitting among young Americans has escalated from an average of 5.5 to 6.5 hours per day (an increase of 18.2%).

Sitting encompasses not only professional or commuting scenarios but also leisure activities like watching television or playing video games.

Previous studies indicate that a 1% decrease in vascular function (measured via brachial flow-mediated dilatation, which reflects arterial elasticity) correlates to a 13% rise in the risk for cardiovascular diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and heart attack.

Researchers, including Catarina Rendeiro and her team at the University of Birmingham, sought to determine if diet—as specifically influenced by flavanol-rich foods—could mitigate the vascular risks associated with extended sitting.

Flavanols are polyphenolic compounds naturally found in certain fruits, teas, nuts, and cocoa beans.

Research has shown they provide cardiovascular benefits, notably in protecting vascular health during mental stress.

“We spend significant amounts of time seated, whether at a desk, driving, traveling, or relaxing on the couch,” Dr. Rendeiro notes.

“Even while inactive, our bodies can experience stress.”

“Identifying methods to alleviate the impacts of prolonged sitting on vascular function might significantly lower cardiovascular disease risk.”

To investigate this, researchers assessed whether ingesting flavanols shortly before two hours of sitting could preserve blood vessel function in the arms and legs.

A total of forty healthy young men (20 with high fitness and 20 with low fitness) were given either a high-flavanol (695 mg total flavanols per beverage) or low-flavanol cocoa beverage (5.6 mg total flavanols per beverage) before undergoing a two-hour sitting test.

This study focused solely on men due to potential fluctuations of estrogen during women’s menstrual cycles, which might impact how flavanols affect vascular health while sitting. Future trials will address this aspect.

The research team conducted various vascular measurements pre- and post-sitting, including (i) superficial femoral and brachial artery FMD, (ii) arterial resting shear rate and blood flow, (iii) systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and (iv) leg muscle oxygenation.

For both groups that consumed low-flavanol cocoa before sitting, there was a decrease in FMD in arm and leg arteries.

This indicates that even high fitness levels do not shield individuals from the effects of seated inactivity.

Both groups also exhibited a significant rise in diastolic blood pressure, reduced shear rate and blood flow in both arteries, and lower muscle oxygenation.

However, participants who consumed the high-flavanol cocoa drink retained their FMD levels in both the arm and leg arteries, demonstrating the protective effects of flavanols across various fitness levels.

This is the first instance where flavanols have been recognized for their ability to prevent vascular dysfunction linked to prolonged sitting in healthy young men.

Professor Sam Lucas remarked: “Our findings reveal that even those with high fitness levels are not immune to the temporary vascular impairments caused by sitting and consuming only low-flavanol cocoa.”

“Remarkably, after consuming the high-flavanol beverage, both fit and unfit participants maintained their FMD levels, unaffected by two hours of sitting.”

This study also uniquely demonstrated that pre-existing cardiorespiratory fitness levels do not influence how flavanol intake affects vascular function.

This means everyone, irrespective of fitness levels, can reap the rewards of flavanol consumption.

“Integrating flavanol-rich foods into your diet is quite simple,” asserts Alessio Daniele, a PhD candidate at the University of Birmingham.

“Cacao products that retain flavanol levels are readily found in supermarkets and health stores.”

“If cocoa isn’t your preference, consider incorporating apples, plums, berries, nuts, or black and green teas, which are common in kitchens.”

“Our findings suggest that consuming flavanol-rich foods and beverages during sedentary periods is an effective strategy to mitigate the impacts of inactivity on vascular health,” Dr. Rendeiro indicates.

“Given the upward trend in sedentary lifestyles and the associated risks to vascular health, integrating flavanol-rich foods and beverages with short breaks for walking or standing can promote long-term well-being, regardless of physical fitness levels.”

The study was published in October 2025 in the Journal of Physiology.

_____

Alessio Daniele et al.. Dietary flavanols maintain endothelial function in the upper and lower extremities during sitting in healthy men with high or low physical fitness. Journal of Physiology published online October 29, 2025. doi: 10.1113/JP289038

Source: www.sci.news

The detrimental effects of banning frightening concepts may outweigh the sense of security it provides

Yuichiro Chino/Getty Images

In 1818, Mary Shelley invented a technology that has been used for both good and bad in the centuries since. It's called science fiction.

Although you might not think that literary genres count as technology, science fiction has long been a tool for predicting and critiquing science. Shelley’s Frankenstein Considered by many to be the first serious science fiction novel, it was so powerful that South Africa banned it in 1955. This story set the formula with a story that still serves today as a warning against unintended consequences.

As far as we know, the exact science that the eponymous Victor Frankenstein used to create is impossible. But today researchers can restore dead human brains to something resembling life. Experiments are underway to restart cell activity (but importantly not consciousness) after death to test its effectiveness in treating conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (see “Fundamental treatments that bring people back from the brink of death”).

It reminds me of many science fiction stories that feature similar scenarios and I can’t help but imagine what will happen next. The same is true for the study reported in “1000 people’s AI simulation accurately reproduces their behavior.” In this study, researchers used the technology behind ChatGPT to recreate the thoughts and actions of specific individuals with surprising success.

The team behind this work blurs the lines between fact, fiction, and what it means to be human.

In both cases, the teams behind this research are blurring the lines between fact, fiction, and what it means to be human, and their research is being conducted under strong ethical oversight. We are deeply aware that there are ethical concerns in the details. It was announced early on. But now that the technology is proven, there is nothing to stop more violent groups from attempting the same thing without oversight, potentially causing significant damage.

Does that mean the research should be banned for fear of it falling into the wrong hands, as Shelley’s book was? Far from it. Concerns about technology are best addressed through appropriate evidence-based regulation and swift punishment of violators. When regulators go too far, they miss out on not only the technology but also the opportunity to criticize and debate it.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com