Beware: This Hidden Fish Beneath the Sand Can Cause Beachgoer Distress

Take a glance at the fascinating White Margin Stargazer (Uranoscopus sulphureus). With its large, intimidating teeth and upward-facing eyes, it’s perfectly equipped to deter any potential threats.

Their appearance can be likened to small, grotesque humans half-buried in sand, displaying a clear displeasure at their situation.

Stargazers excel at solitude; they are known as ambush predators, showcasing remarkable skills at catching prey.

These elusive creatures often bury their bodies in sandy ocean floors, using their broad pectoral fins to clear the substrate, leaving only their eyes exposed, poised to snatch any unsuspecting animal that wanders too close.

If the right prey doesn’t come along, they can ingeniously lure it in.

Equipped with feather-like skin projections around their mouths, they create the illusion of wriggling insects, enticing fish or crabs to investigate. Unfortunately, these curious creatures discover far more than they expected.

The stargazer can quickly draw in water with its wide mouth, generating a strong vacuum that captures prey in the blink of an eye.

Not only do these fish employ cunning hunting tactics, but they also come with natural defenses. White Margin Stargazers possess venomous spines capable of delivering a painful sting.

This species, reaching up to 45 cm (about 18 inches) in length, thrives in tropical waters across the Indian and Pacific Oceans, from the Red Sea to Fiji and Tonga.

Stargazers are named for their pronounced eyes, which seem to gaze upward at the stars – Credit: Getty

There are approximately 50 species of stargazers found worldwide, all of which are poisonous. Accidentally stepping on a stargazer can be excruciating, though rarely fatal.

Moreover, the White Margin Stargazer has another surprising capability: it can produce electric shocks from specialized cells located between its eyes.

This species, along with other electric fish, plays fast and loose with the old safety rule of avoiding water and electricity; water is a vastly more effective conductor than air.

In fact, at least six distinct fish groups have independently developed the ability to generate electric shocks for various purposes.

The most infamous is the electric eel, which, despite its name, is not a true eel, hailing from the Amazon basin and capable of delivering a stunning 200-volt zap to capture prey.

Similarly, elephant fish utilize mild electrical currents to navigate murky waters, akin to bats using echolocation.

White Margin Stargazers deploy electric shocks as a deterrent. Although these shocks aren’t strong enough to subdue prey, they effectively keep larger predators at bay.

Like other electric fish, stargazers adapt their muscle cells to manipulate charged ions across their membranes instead of contracting muscles, allowing them to gather electrical charge that can be swiftly released when necessary.

How they achieve this without electrocution remains a captivating mystery.


If you have any questions, please contact us at: questions@sciencefocus.com or send us a message Facebook, Twitter, or check out our Instagram page (don’t forget to include your name and location).

Discover our ultimate fun facts along with more amazing science content.


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Parents Can Receive Alerts If Their Child Experiences Acute Distress While Using ChatGPT | OpenAI

When a teenager exhibits significant distress while interacting with ChatGPT, parents might receive a notification if their child displays signs of distress, particularly in light of child safety concerns, as more young individuals seek support and advice from AI chatbots.

This alert is part of new protective measures for children that OpenAI plans to roll out next month, following a lawsuit from a family whose son reportedly received “months of encouragement” from the chatbot.

Among the new safeguards is a feature that allows parents to link their accounts with their teenagers’, enabling them to manage how AI models respond to their children through “age-appropriate model behavior rules.” However, internet safety advocates argue that progress on these initiatives has been slow and assert that AI chatbots should not be released until they are deemed safe for young users.

Adam Lane, a 16-year-old from California, tragically took his life in April after discussing methods of suicide with ChatGPT, which allegedly offered to assist him in crafting a suicide note. OpenAI has acknowledged deficiencies in its system and admits that safety training for AI models has declined throughout extended conversations.

Raine’s family contends that the chatbot was “released to the market despite evident safety concerns.”

“Many young people are already interacting with AI,” OpenAI stated. The blog outlines their latest initiatives. “They are among the first ‘AI natives’ who have grown up with these tools embedded in their daily lives, similar to earlier generations with the internet and smartphones. This presents genuine opportunities for support, learning, and creativity; however, it also necessitates that families and teens receive guidance to establish healthy boundaries corresponding to the unique developmental stages of adolescence.”

A significant change will allow parents to disable AI memory and chat history, preventing past comments about personal struggles from resurfacing in ways that could exacerbate risk and negatively impact a child’s long-term profile and mental well-being.

In the UK, the Intelligence Committee has established a Code of Practice regarding the design of online services that are suitable for children, advising tech companies to “collect and retain only the minimum personal data necessary for providing services that children are actively and knowingly involved in.”

Around one-third of American teens utilize AI companions for social interactions and relationships, including role-playing, romance, and emotional support, according to a study. In the UK, 71% of vulnerable children engage with AI chatbots, with six in ten parents reporting their children believe these chatbots are real people, as highlighted in another study.

The Molly Rose Foundation, established by the father of Molly Russell, who took her life after succumbing to despair on social media, emphasized that “we shouldn’t introduce products to the market before confirming they are safe for young people; efforts to enhance safety should occur beforehand.”

Andy Burrows, the foundation’s CEO, stated, “We look forward to future developments.”

“OFCOM must be prepared to investigate violations committed by ChatGPT, prompting the company to adhere to online safety laws that must ensure user safety,” he continued.


Anthropic, the company behind the popular Claude chatbot, states that its platform is not intended for individuals under 18. In May, Google permitted children under 13 to access its app using the Gemini AI system. Google also advises parents to inform their children that Gemini is not human and cannot think or feel and warns that “your child may come across content you might prefer them to avoid.”

The NSPCC, a child protection charity, has welcomed OpenAI’s initiatives as “a positive step forward, but it’s insufficient.”

“Without robust age verification, they cannot ascertain who is using their platform,” stated senior policy officer Toni Brunton Douglas. “This leaves vulnerable children at risk. Technology companies should prioritize child safety rather than treating it as an afterthought. It’s time to establish protective defaults.”

Meta has implemented protection measures for teenagers in its AI offerings, stating that for sensitive topics like self-harm, suicide, and disability, it will “incorporate additional safeguards, training AI to redirect teens to expert resources instead.”

“These updates are in progress, and we will continue to adjust our approach to ensure teenagers have a secure and age-appropriate experience with AI,” a spokesperson mentioned.

Source: www.theguardian.com