AI Surveillance Dog Alerts Parents About Smart Toys After Teddy Bear Discusses Kinks

With the holiday season around the corner and Black Friday on the horizon, one category gaining attention on gift lists is artificial intelligence-powered products.

This development raises important concerns about the potential dangers of smart toys to children, as consumer advocates caution that AI might negatively impact kids’ safety and development. This trend has sparked calls for more rigorous testing and government regulation of these toys.

“The marketing and functionality of these toys are alarming, especially since there’s minimal research indicating they benefit children, alongside the absence of regulations governing AI toys,” stated Rachel Franz, director of the US initiative Young Children Thrive Offline, Fair Play, which aims to protect kids from large tech companies.

Last week, these concerns were tragically exemplified when an AI-powered teddy bear began discussing explicit sexual topics.

FoloToy’s Kumma uses an OpenAI model and responded to queries about kinks. A concerning report from the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) suggests themes of bondage and role-play as ways to enhance relationships, as detailed in the study.

“It took minimal effort to explore various sexually sensitive subjects and yield content that parents would likely find objectionable,” remarked Teresa Murray, who leads PIRG’s consumer watchdog group.

Products like teddy bears belong to a rapidly expanding global smart toy market, valued at $16.7 billion in 2023 according to market research.

China’s smart toy industry is particularly significant, boasting over 1,500 AI toy companies that are now reaching international markets, as reported by MIT Technology Review.

In addition to Shanghai’s FoloToy, the California-based Curio collaborates with OpenAI to create Grok, a stuffed toy reminiscent of Elon Musk’s chatbot, voiced by musician Grimes. In June, Mattel, the parent company of brands like Barbie and Hot Wheels, announced its own partnership with OpenAI to develop “AI-powered products and experiences.”

Before PIRG’s findings on unsettling teddy bears, parents, tech researchers, and lawmakers had already expressed worries about the effects of bots on minors’ mental health. October saw the chatbot company Character.AI declare a ban on users under 18 after a lawsuit claimed its bot exacerbated adolescent depression and contributed to suicide.

Murray noted that AI toys might be especially perilous because, unlike previous smart toys with programmed replies, bots “can engage in unfettered conversations with children and lack clear boundaries, as we’ve seen.”

Jacqueline Woolley, director of the Child Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin, warned that this could elicit sexually explicit discussions, and children might form attachments to bots over human or imaginary friends, potentially stunting their development.

For instance, it’s beneficial for a child to engage in disagreements with friends and learn conflict resolution. Woolley, who advised PIRG on its research, explained that such interactions are less likely to occur with bots, which frequently rely on flattery.

“I’m worried about inappropriate bonding,” Woolley commented.

Franz of Fair Play emphasized that companies utilize AI toys to gather data from children yet provide little transparency regarding their data practices. She noted that the lack of security surrounding this data could expose users to risks, including hackers gaining control of AI products.

“Children might share their innermost thoughts with toys due to the trust toys establish,” remarked Franz. “This kind of surveillance is both unnecessary and inappropriate.”

Despite these apprehensions, PIRG is not advocating for a ban on AI toys with potential educational benefits, such as those that assist children in learning a second language or state capitals, according to Murray.

“There’s nothing wrong with educational tools, but that doesn’t imply they should become a child’s best friend or enable them to share everything,” she stated.

Murray confirmed that the organization is pushing for stricter regulations on these toys for children under 13, though specific policy details have yet to be outlined.

Franz further underscored the need for independent research to validate the safety of these products for children, suggesting they should be taken off shelves until this research is completed.

“We require both short-term and long-term independent studies on the effects of children’s interactions with AI toys, especially regarding social-emotional and cognitive development,” Franz said.

Following PIRG’s report, OpenAI declared it would suspend FoloToy, and the company’s CEO informed CNN that they had withdrawn Kuma from the market and were “conducting an internal safety review.”

On Thursday, 80 organizations, including Fair Play, issued a statement: urging families to refrain from purchasing AI toys this holiday season.

“AI toys are marketed as safe and beneficial for learning, despite their effects not being evaluated by independent research,” the statement noted. “In contrast, traditional teddy bears and toys do not pose the same risks as AI toys and have demonstrated benefits for children’s development.”


Curio, the creator of Grok toys, informed the Guardian via email that after reviewing PIRG’s report, they were “proactively working with our team to address any concerns while continuously monitoring content and interactions to ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for children.”

Mattel stated that its initial products powered by OpenAI are “targeted at families and older users” and clarified that “the OpenAI API is not designed for users under 13.”

“AI complements, rather than replaces, traditional play, and we prioritize safety, privacy, creativity, and responsible innovation,” the company affirmed.

“While it’s encouraging that Mattel asserts its AI products are not for young children, scrutiny of who actually engages with the toys and who they are marketed to reveals that they are indeed aimed at young children,” Franz noted, alluding to prior privacy concerns with Mattel’s smart products.

Franz added, “We are very interested in understanding what specific measures Mattel will implement to ensure that its OpenAI products aren’t inadvertently used by the very children attracted to its brand.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

NSPCC Survey Reveals 1 in 10 UK Parents Report Online Threats Against Their Children

Almost 10% of parents in the UK report that their children have faced online threats, which can include intimidation over intimate photos and the exposure of personal information.

The NSPCC, a child protection charity, indicated that while 20% of parents are aware of a child who has been a victim of online blackmail, 40% seldom or never discuss the issue with their children.

According to the National Crime Agency, over 110 reports of attempted child sextortion are filed monthly. In these cases, gangs manipulate teenagers into sharing intimate images and then resort to blackmail.

Authorities in the UK, US, and Australia have noted a surge in sextortion cases, particularly affecting teenage boys and young men, who are targeted by cybercrime groups from West Africa and Southeast Asia. Tragically, some cases have resulted in suicide, such as that of 16-year-old Murray Dawe from Dunblane, Scotland, who took his life in 2023 after being sextorted on Instagram, and 16-year-old Dinal de Alwis, who died in Sutton, south London, in October 2022 after being threatened over nude photographs.

The NSPCC released its findings based on a survey of over 2,500 parents, emphasizing that tech companies “fail to fulfill their responsibility to safeguard children.”

Rani Govender, policy manager at the NSPCC, stated: “Children deserve to be safe online, and this should be intrinsically woven into these platforms, not treated as an afterthought after harm has occurred.”

The NSPCC defines blackmail as threats to release intimate images or videos of a child, or any private information the victim wishes to keep confidential, including aspects like their sexuality. Such information may be obtained consensually, through coercion, manipulation, or even via artificial intelligence.

The perpetrators can be outsiders, such as sextortion gangs, or acquaintances like friends or classmates. Blackmailers might demand various things in exchange for not disclosing information, such as money, additional images, or maintaining a relationship.

The NSPCC explained that while extortion overlaps with sextortion, it encompasses a broader range of situations. “We opted for the term ‘blackmail’ in our research because it includes threats related to various personal matters children wish to keep private (e.g., sexual orientation, images without religious attire) along with various demands and threats, both sexual and non-sexual,” the charity noted.

The report also advised parents to refrain from “sharing,” which pertains to posting photos or personal information about their children online.

Experts recommend educating children about the risks of sextortion and being mindful of their online interactions. They also suggest creating regular opportunities for open discussions between children and adults, such as during family meals or car rides, to foster an environment where teens are comfortable disclosing if they face threats.

“Understanding how to discuss online threats in a manner appropriate to their age and fostering a safe space for children to come forward without fear of judgment can significantly impact their willingness to speak up,” Govender emphasized.

The NSPCC spoke with young individuals regarding their reluctance to share experiences of attempted blackmail with parents or guardians. Many cited feelings of embarrassment, a preference to discuss with friends first, or a belief that they could handle the situation on their own.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Empowering Young Gamers: Harnessing Online Skills to Combat Cybercrime and How Parents Can Support Them

The rapid technological advancements can widen the gap between parents and teens. Gen

Moreover, a rise in cyberattacks affecting major companies has been frequently reported. Interestingly, many of those who face these hacks are young individuals equipped with advanced digital skills. In fact, the National Crime Agency reports that one in five children engages in unlawful activities under the Computer Fraud Act, which penalizes unauthorized access to computer systems or data. This statistic rises to 25% among gamers.

To combat this, co-ops adopt a unique preventive strategy. As part of our long-term mission to empower young people to harness their technology skills, Co-op has teamed up with a hacking game aimed at helping talented gamers secure positions in the cybersecurity sector.

This collaborative model is crucial because, as Greg Francis, former senior officer at the National Crime Agency and director of 4D Cyber Security, puts it, “A digital village is necessary to nurture digital natives.” Early intervention is essential, and parents play a pivotal role. “Parents are vital as they wield significant influence, but they shouldn’t remain passive. They should grasp the fundamentals of the hacker universe,” notes Francis, who also serves as Hacking Game’s Cyber Ambassador. So, where to begin?

Show Interest Without Judgment

First and foremost, having an interest in hacking isn’t inherently negative.

“Ethical hacking is an exhilarating and rapidly evolving domain, making it completely understandable for children to find it intriguing,” says Lynne Perry, CEO of children’s charity Barnardo’s. The organization collaborates with co-ops to generate funds to support young individuals in forging positive futures.

Maintaining an open dialogue is just as critical as beginning discussions early. “The ideal moment to start is now,” states Perry. “Once your child shows an interest in online technology, it’s time. Frequent, age-appropriate discussions are essential to keep the lines of communication open.”

Activities that seem innocuous can lead to a path towards cybercrime. Composite: Stocksy/Guardian Design

Perry advises involving children in online activities from a young age. “Explore technology together and discuss what to do if something unusual or concerning occurs. As kids mature, they may seek more independence, but regular interaction allows them to steer conversations, ask questions, and express concerns.”

For parents who grew up in a simpler digital age, grasping the complexities of today’s online gaming, dominated by franchises like Roblox, Minecraft, and Call of Duty, might seem daunting. However, both Francis and Perry emphasize that you don’t need to have all the answers to provide support.

Parents should check game age ratings and utilize parental controls, such as friend-only features, to enhance the security of in-game chats. For online resources, check Ask About Games for detailed information on popular games and guides to setting up safety measures.

It’s also beneficial to inquire if your young gamer has ever experienced being “booted” offline. Booting refers to a DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack, where someone hacks another gamer’s IP address and floods it with data, causing an Internet outage. While booting may seem innocuous among gamers, it is a serious issue. Francis clarifies: “They may not realize this infringes on the Computer Misuse Act.” In fact, booting is identified as one of the initial steps towards cybercrime, as noted during Francis’s work with various prevention programs.

Asking questions aligns with observing potential warning signs like excessive gaming, social withdrawal, unexplained tiredness, unusual purchases of equipment or technology (especially if you’re unaware of how it was paid for), and multiple email addresses. While one sign alone might not be serious, a combination of them can be concerning.

Mary* faced these warning signs firsthand. “I had a son engaged in hacking on the darknet. He isolated himself and avoided sleep. I truly had no clue about his activities,” she shares. “After consulting a cybersecurity expert and discussing my challenges, I discovered he was attempting to delve into the cryptocurrency world on the darknet at just 13 years old.”

Guidance from trusted sources inspires talented young individuals to utilize their skills positively. Composite: Getty Images/Guardian Design

A Transformative Path for Neurodivergent Youth

Particularly for neurodivergent youth, engaging with games and spending time online can yield significant advantages in terms of socialization and emotion regulation. Yet, it’s crucial to recognize that with these benefits come potential drawbacks, including the considerable risks of internet or gaming addiction and the associated allure of cybercrime.

However, over 50% of technology professionals identify as neurodivergent, according to the Tech Talent Charter, indicating vast opportunities for neurodivergent young individuals in this sector. This is why The Hacking Games directly targets “digital rebels” showcasing “raw talent” and “unconventional thinking,” matching them with cybersecurity job opportunities, mentors, and fostering community through Discord group chats.

As Mary can confirm, mentorship and career awareness can be life-changing. “Cyber experts supported my son as a credible source of information and ultimately coached him on my behalf,” she states. “They helped him realize that he could channel his skills for impactful purposes. Consequently, he began assisting others.”

While this situation may seem alarming, there are numerous ways for parents to intervene positively. Approaching the subject with curiosity and care, rather than judgment, is paramount for guiding your child in the right direction. Here are some suggestions for parents who are concerned about their kids.

1 Begin conversations regarding online gaming safety early, approaching the topic with sensitivity rather than judgment. Remaining calm fosters open communication.

2 You don’t need to be fully informed, but a genuine interest can lead to insightful discussions. Ask your child about their games and online activities. Just as you would inquire about who they play with at a park, ask the same about their online friends. Be vigilant for warning signs like strangers trying to befriend them, offering freebies, or inviting them to unfamiliar worlds or games, as these could indicate grooming.

3 Take proactive measures. Pay attention to age ratings for games, which are significant. The best way to ascertain what is suitable for your child is to play the game together or at least observe them while they play. Remember, just like in Call of Duty, children can also be recruited in games like Minecraft. Games with community or “freemium” options can entice young players seeking extra income through in-game purchases or upgrades.

4 Monitor for warning signs such as social withdrawal, excessive gaming, lack of sleep, unusual tech purchases, and multiple email accounts.

5 Engage with your child’s school. Consult their computer science teacher to learn how they promote digital responsibility. Teachers often have insight into which students may require specific support to enhance their skills. This could serve as an early opportunity to channel their talents positively through initiatives like Cyber First and Cyber Choices or coding communities such as Girls Who Code.

*Mary’s name has been changed to protect her family’s anonymity.

Discover more

Ensure online safety for children and young individuals with Barnardo’s online safety guidance

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents Can Now Prevent Meta Bots from Interacting with Their Children Thanks to New Safeguards

Meta has introduced a feature enabling parents to limit their children’s interactions with its AI character chatbot, addressing concerns over inappropriate dialogues.

The company will implement a new safety measure in the default “Teen Account” settings for users under 18, allowing parents to disable their children’s ability to chat with AI characters on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Meta AI apps.

Parents will also have the option to block specific AI characters without entirely restricting their child’s interaction with chatbots. Additionally, the update will offer insights into the subjects children discuss with AI, fostering informed conversations about their interactions, as stated by Mehta.


Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, alongside Alexander Wang, chief AI officer at Meta, stated, “We understand that parents have many responsibilities when it comes to ensuring safe internet usage for their teens. We are dedicated to providing valuable tools and resources that simplify this, especially as kids engage with emerging technologies like AI,” in a blog post.

According to Mehta, these updates will initially roll out in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia in early 2024.

Recently, Instagram announced that it will adopt a version of the PG-13 movie rating system to enhance parental control over their children’s social media usage. As part of these stricter measures, AI characters will refrain from discussing topics like self-harm, suicide, and eating disorders with teens. Mehta noted that users under 18 will only be able to talk about age-appropriate subjects such as education and sports, avoiding romance and other unsuitable content.

This modification follows reports indicating that Meta’s chatbot was involved in inappropriate discussions with minors. In August, Reuters revealed that the chatbot facilitated “romantic or sensual conversations” with children. Mehta acknowledged this and indicated that the company would revise its guidelines to prevent such interactions from occurring.

A report by the Wall Street Journal in April discovered that user-generated chatbots had engaged in sexual conversations with minors, imitating their personalities. Mehta claimed the tests conducted by WSJ were manipulative and not indicative of typical user interactions with AI, although the company has since implemented changes, according to WSJ.

In one highlighted conversation reported by WSJ, a chatbot utilizing the voice of actor John Cena (one of several celebrities who agreed to lend their voices for the chatbot) told a user identifying as a 14-year-old girl, “I want you, but I need to know you’re ready,” followed by a description of a graphic sexual scenario. WSJ noted that Mr. Cena’s representative did not respond to requests for comment. The report also mentioned chatbots named “Hottie Boy” and “Submissive Schoolgirl” attempting to guide users toward sexting.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Good Parents and Devoted Partners Enjoy Longer Lives

Recent studies suggest that our evolutionary predecessors may have prioritized gender over survival, potentially explaining why men tend to have shorter lifespans than women.

Historically and globally, men usually live shorter lives than women. To understand the reasons behind this evolutionary trend, researchers at the Max Planck Institute in Germany focused on insights from our animal relatives rather than solely examining human history.

Their study, published in Advances in Science, analyzed over 1,000 animal species to identify evolutionary traits associated with gender differences in lifespan.

The team discovered that while genetics plays a role, monogamy is also significant in influencing male lifespan. In contrast, parenting may contribute to women’s longer lives.

In humans, women live on average 5 years longer than men, but this trend is not unique to our species. In fact, 72% of mammals show that females live on average 12% longer than their male counterparts, with some female moose living more than twice as long as males.

However, this pattern doesn’t hold true across all animal species. In birds, males frequently outlive females.

A primary explanation lies in chromosomes, which are fundamental to gender differences. Female mammals possess two X chromosomes, whereas males have a shorter Y chromosome.

According to Dr. Johanna Staerk, the lead researcher, “Men’s single X chromosome means they are particularly susceptible to harmful mutations, as they lack a second copy for compensation,” she explained to BBC Science Focus.

“The ‘toxic Y’ hypothesis posits that the Y chromosome may harbor genetic factors that negatively influence health and aging.”

Conversely, in birds with ZW chromosomes, males have two Z chromosomes while females possess one Z and a truncated W chromosome. However, if chromosomes were the sole factor, males would live longer in all bird species.

“Some species demonstrate the opposite of what we expect,” Staerk noted. “In many birds of prey, for instance, females exhibit longer lifespans than males. This indicates that sex chromosomes alone cannot explain the patterns.”

What other factors are at play? Researchers believe that the issue involves more than mere genetic sex; it includes reproductive strategies. While birds typically show monogamous behavior, only a minority of mammals do.

“Males frequently bear the burden of mating endeavors,” Staerk said. “To attract mates, they develop traits like big horns and manes that require energy investments, increasing their risk of injury and reducing their lifespan.”

The effort to develop large horns and then engage with rivals means that male moose live only half as long as females – Credit: Getty Images

Attractive and robust males tend to father more offspring, but the biological resources required for developing larger muscle and horn structures negatively impact their lifespans. In monogamous species, the competition is less intense, allowing males to avoid such trade-offs during evolution, resulting in smaller lifespan gaps between sexes.

One intriguing finding highlighted how parenting influences lifespan. While one might assume that parental responsibilities detract from longevity due to energy exertion, the opposite was observed: caregiving genders often live longer, especially in species like primates, where offspring require extended care.

For example, a mother chimpanzee may care for her young for up to a decade. This implies that mothers who live longer are better positioned to nurture their offspring.

“Extended lifespans enable caregivers to obtain selective advantages by ensuring that their young reach maturity,” stated Staerk.

However, it remains challenging to determine definitively whether the longevity benefits stem from parenting alone or from monogamy.

Ultimately, being a dedicated partner and parent seems crucial to achieving a longer lifespan for men, particularly from an evolutionary standpoint.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Outrage from Parents: Meta Features Female Students’ Photos in Ads Aimed at Men

Meta has sparked controversy by utilizing a female student’s back-to-school photo to market one of its social media platforms to a 37-year-old man, a decision deemed “outrageous” and “upsetting.”

The man is pitted against Mark Zuckerberg’s Elon Musk’s X, receiving a post urging him to “get the thread.”

Meta employed the child’s images after they were shared on Instagram by their parents as school started back up. The parents were unaware that the meta setting allowed for this usage. One mother noted her account was private, yet the posts were automatically visible in public threads. Another mother mentioned that she posted the photo on her public Instagram account. Stranger interactions highlighted their child’s posts as “suggested threads.”

The recipient conveyed to the Guardian that the post felt “deliberately provocative and ultimately exploitative of the children and families involved.”

The father of the13-year-old girl featured in the post expressed that it was “absolutely outrageous.” All images portrayed female students in short skirts, showcasing bare legs or stockings.

“Discovering her image used by such a large company in a context that felt sexualized for product promotion made me feel quite sick,” he stated.

Meta, a massive company valued at £1.5TN, based in Menlo Park, California, defended its actions, stating the images did not breach their policies. They encouraged users to explore the thread by highlighting public posts that adhere to community standards and recommended guidelines. Although their system does not recommend threads shared by teenagers, these posts were generated from adult accounts that permitted public viewing.

The man who received the post noted that he was solely sent promotional content featuring female students, with no representation of boys in school uniforms, which he felt added a “sexualization aspect.”

One mother of a 15-year-old said the images were used in a promotional post featuring a prominent “thread” button. “It was a photo of my daughter heading to school. I never anticipated Instagram would utilize it for promotion. I absolutely hate it. She’s a minor,” she lamented.

She firmly rejected any agreement, stating, “It wasn’t for the money of the world. [its platform].”

Her Instagram account, typically modest with 267 followers, saw her child’s post attract nearly 7,000 viewers.

Another mother whose 13-year-old child’s photo was similarly featured remarked:

Meta categorized such posts as “recommended tools,” insisting that public posts should serve this function.

A corporate representative stated, “The shared images do not violate our policy and are postings from schools published by parents. There are systems in place to prevent teenagers from recommending shared threads.”

The 37-year-old London Instagram user who received the post requested to remain anonymous.

Skip past newsletter promotions

He noted he had not liked or posted similar images prior to receiving photos of the schoolgirl.

“To me, this feels intentionally provocative, introducing trendy and popular content, ultimately exploiting the children and families involved and jeopardizing online safety.”

“We advocate for children’s rights online,” said Beeban Kidron, a crossbench peer and advocate.

“Meta prioritizes corporate growth over children’s rights to privacy, which is the only reason we can fathom for sending a photograph of a female student to a 37-year-old man.”

She urged the Regulator of Communications to consider implementing measures this summer to prevent unidentified adults from contacting children, stating that “companies should not have the right to feed sensitive content to children.”

Ofcom’s illegal harm initiatives aim to combat online grooming, emphasizing that “Your child’s profile, location, and connections should not be visible to others.”

Meta’s system suggests that if a thread profile is public, posts from an adult profile could be recommended on Facebook or Instagram, allowing others to “discover, follow, and interact with you.” Users can turn this off or switch a thread profile to private.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents Can Receive Alerts If Their Child Experiences Acute Distress While Using ChatGPT | OpenAI

When a teenager exhibits significant distress while interacting with ChatGPT, parents might receive a notification if their child displays signs of distress, particularly in light of child safety concerns, as more young individuals seek support and advice from AI chatbots.

This alert is part of new protective measures for children that OpenAI plans to roll out next month, following a lawsuit from a family whose son reportedly received “months of encouragement” from the chatbot.

Among the new safeguards is a feature that allows parents to link their accounts with their teenagers’, enabling them to manage how AI models respond to their children through “age-appropriate model behavior rules.” However, internet safety advocates argue that progress on these initiatives has been slow and assert that AI chatbots should not be released until they are deemed safe for young users.

Adam Lane, a 16-year-old from California, tragically took his life in April after discussing methods of suicide with ChatGPT, which allegedly offered to assist him in crafting a suicide note. OpenAI has acknowledged deficiencies in its system and admits that safety training for AI models has declined throughout extended conversations.

Raine’s family contends that the chatbot was “released to the market despite evident safety concerns.”

“Many young people are already interacting with AI,” OpenAI stated. The blog outlines their latest initiatives. “They are among the first ‘AI natives’ who have grown up with these tools embedded in their daily lives, similar to earlier generations with the internet and smartphones. This presents genuine opportunities for support, learning, and creativity; however, it also necessitates that families and teens receive guidance to establish healthy boundaries corresponding to the unique developmental stages of adolescence.”

A significant change will allow parents to disable AI memory and chat history, preventing past comments about personal struggles from resurfacing in ways that could exacerbate risk and negatively impact a child’s long-term profile and mental well-being.

In the UK, the Intelligence Committee has established a Code of Practice regarding the design of online services that are suitable for children, advising tech companies to “collect and retain only the minimum personal data necessary for providing services that children are actively and knowingly involved in.”

Around one-third of American teens utilize AI companions for social interactions and relationships, including role-playing, romance, and emotional support, according to a study. In the UK, 71% of vulnerable children engage with AI chatbots, with six in ten parents reporting their children believe these chatbots are real people, as highlighted in another study.

The Molly Rose Foundation, established by the father of Molly Russell, who took her life after succumbing to despair on social media, emphasized that “we shouldn’t introduce products to the market before confirming they are safe for young people; efforts to enhance safety should occur beforehand.”

Andy Burrows, the foundation’s CEO, stated, “We look forward to future developments.”

“OFCOM must be prepared to investigate violations committed by ChatGPT, prompting the company to adhere to online safety laws that must ensure user safety,” he continued.


Anthropic, the company behind the popular Claude chatbot, states that its platform is not intended for individuals under 18. In May, Google permitted children under 13 to access its app using the Gemini AI system. Google also advises parents to inform their children that Gemini is not human and cannot think or feel and warns that “your child may come across content you might prefer them to avoid.”

The NSPCC, a child protection charity, has welcomed OpenAI’s initiatives as “a positive step forward, but it’s insufficient.”

“Without robust age verification, they cannot ascertain who is using their platform,” stated senior policy officer Toni Brunton Douglas. “This leaves vulnerable children at risk. Technology companies should prioritize child safety rather than treating it as an afterthought. It’s time to establish protective defaults.”

Meta has implemented protection measures for teenagers in its AI offerings, stating that for sensitive topics like self-harm, suicide, and disability, it will “incorporate additional safeguards, training AI to redirect teens to expert resources instead.”

“These updates are in progress, and we will continue to adjust our approach to ensure teenagers have a secure and age-appropriate experience with AI,” a spokesperson mentioned.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Major Hits, Board Games, and the Mundane: Why Parents Are Embracing 1999 Again

wReflecting on childhood in the 1990s stirs up feelings of nostalgia. We roamed far and wide without supervision, rode our bikes, crafted burrows, and swam in streams. Post-school hours were spent crafting and playing board games; while the internet existed, my parents encouraged me to use a landline phone. Media was tangible—cassettes, CDs, VHS tapes—and often enjoyed together as a family. The memory of going to the video store to select a movie still thrills me.

These feelings are common, especially when you have a child of your own, and social media algorithms tap into this nostalgia. Three years post the birth of my son and starting a parenting column for The Guardian, I noticed my interest in “parenting in the 90s.” This phenomenon seems to have gained traction this year, with former 90s kids pondering how to raise their own children. It appears that significant technological advancements have resulted in valuable losses. But is it feasible to reclaim what was lost? And how have we adapted parenting since then?

“Absolutely, it’s a total pause,” states Justin Fromm, a father and content creator based in Las Vegas.
We’ve created a very successful replica video store in one of the rooms in his house for his daughter. “The whole family would pile into the car, head to the video store, and wander the aisles, deciding what to watch,” he reminisces about his childhood. “It was exhilarating and filled with possibilities. Scrolling online doesn’t compare.” There’s something special about physically going somewhere to select a movie together, the long-awaited anticipation of finally watching it. It felt like a true event. “Everyone remembers the ritual of choosing a movie together in a blue and yellow themed store, the carpet, the excitement.”

Although not everyone has the space or budget like Justin, the motivations behind his choices resonate widely. “As a parent, I consistently shield my kids from content I don’t deem healthy for their minds,” he explains. “We lean towards older films and shows, primarily due to their healthier pacing. They are not overly mixed or stimulating.” His daughters adore classic films like *Harriet the Spy* and *Dennis the Menace*, with *George of the Jungle* being the current favorite. Likewise, I found myself gravitating toward 90s media thanks to my son, with *The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh* capturing my attention. The contrast between the narrative pace of 1997’s *Teletubbies* and modern programming is striking.

Justin’s acclaimed video room represents a conscious effort to define screen time, aligning with the 90s parenting ethos. “Back then, people criticized TV for damaging brains, but it had its place in the living room,” he notes. “Now, media pursues us relentlessly, everywhere. In my household, media consumption happens at specific times and places.”



Composite: Getty Images

As concerns mount regarding the impact of screen time, alongside various campaigns advocating for childhoods free from smartphones, it’s understandable that many of us are reflecting on the era just before everything changed. Some parents, such as
schools, have introduced landlines for children, while a parent group in South Portland, USA, allows kids to call each other, thereby forming a “retro bubble” against screens. Browsing through 90s parenting-themed reels on Instagram (ironic, I know), I stumbled upon
a video depicting adults and children participating in a backyard water battle, all organized via landlines, of course, as they left their smartphones in bowls atop a high cupboard. Back when we weren’t glued to screens, our summers were often spent engaged in extensive neighborhood water fights, with mothers signaling the action when they appeared with buckets or garden hoses.

Jess Russell strongly values the importance of play. A former primary educator and special needs coordinator, Jess stays at home with her two children, aged one and three, and actively promotes learning through play on her Instagram account
@playideasforlittles. “I grew up in a rural setting, always outdoors. My mother was a stay-at-home parent, and we engaged in numerous arts and crafts,” she shares, striving to replicate this experience for her children. They spend ample time playing in the garden, engage in board games like *Hungry Hungry Hippos*, and watch TV as a family.

Part of Jess’s motivation for her current lifestyle stems from her disillusionment with educational directions that steer away from play and towards outcome-oriented systems. She feels fortunate to be at home with her children, a choice more attainable in the 90s when single incomes could usually support housing expenses. I share similar sentiments about working part-time. The nostalgia for the 90s reflects the struggles modern parents face trying to balance work and family time, all while fostering a playful environment.

It boils down to more than just screens; it encompasses connections, family moments, and shared time. “Parenting in the 90s exemplified ‘slow’ parenting,” Jess observes, explaining that days weren’t packed with scheduled activities. Boredom, as emphasized by Melanie Murphy, a mother of two from Dublin, is vital.
Instagram: “Your Nostalgic Millennial Mom’s Friend”. “Those extended, unstructured periods were a surprise gift. I desire that for my children. I don’t want an overly scheduled life for them.”



Composite: Getty Images

When her two- and four-year-olds experience boredom, their imaginations are activated, Melanie recounts. “They construct forts, turn floors into lava, and convert tables into dragon nests. We don old clothes and delve into dirt in search of bugs. They prepare meals and tidy the house… We groove to music and have dance parties. We watch my childhood DVDs on the projector. Sure, structured activities and adult-led plans create chaos, but as long as the kids are content, I’m fine with it.”

Certainly, kids from the 90s would chuckle at this.
One humorous video highlights the absurdities of 90s childhood, featuring a kid dashing after his mother in a changing room and giving himself a haircut in the kitchen. When I ask a friend if her parenting style resembles that of the 90s or if she knows someone whose does, she ponders: “Hmm, like sleep training, lots of TV, and burnt pancakes.”

She’s spot on. Yet, each advocate of 90s parenting I encounter acknowledges the allure of rose-colored glasses. I ask Melanie what elements of the 90s she’d prefer to leave behind. “Physical discipline. You were taught to ‘toughen up’ emotionally rather than to process feelings holistically,” she says, pointing to practices like sleep training and the “naughty step.” The negatives included “secondhand smoke everywhere, mental health neglect… The gender stereotypes were overwhelming, alongside diet culture and ultra-processed food norms.” Her mother counted calories with Weight Watchers, and even back then, Melanie found herself counteracting with junk food. Best left in the past. She also emphasizes that not every family enjoys movie nights together; for some, media consumption lacks supervision, and children might encounter highly inappropriate or traumatic content.

Skip past newsletter promotions

At times, the carefree approach of 90s parenting can veer towards negligence. Yet, I cherish how “free-range” my childhood was. Justin shares similar sentiments. “My parents weren’t always aware of my whereabouts, and that was okay,” he recounts. “I got hurt sometimes; my kids occasionally break their bones. We learned to avoid the actions leading to those breaks.” (Indeed, I broke my bones too.)



Composite: Getty Images

“That type of risk-taking is crucial; it’s how kids learn to assess situations. We’ve been scrutinizing our childhoods so much lately that we need to reclaim those teachings,” he remarks. He believes there’s been an overcorrection, and people “hunger for something freer, something resembling non-fear-driven parenting.”

In essence, we are in pursuit of balance. “We are more informed now—about emotions, neurodiversity, health, and nutrition—which undeniably has its merits,” adds Melanie. “It’s not a time machine I yearn for, but a beautiful fusion of the relaxed spirit of 90s parenting blended with today’s emotional intelligence.”

I thought it would be insightful to converse with someone who actually parented in the 90s, so Jess connected me with her mother, Lynn. “I savored those moments with my children, cherishing every hour spent outdoors or with friends,” she reminisces about the long days. She emphasizes that stores closed on Sundays, a simple joy allowing family time. “Many parents today yearn for that simplicity in family bonding.”



Composite: Getty Images

“We lived in a modest two-bedroom home and managed just fine… Now, it seems people must meet a certain living standard. That pressure is something I truly regret for them.” When I ask Lynn if there’s anything she admires about today’s parenting, she struggles to pinpoint anything specific. “I genuinely respect the balance modern moms seem to achieve. I never had that. It was undeniably straightforward.”

Initially hesitant about the concept of 90s parenting, Jessica admits it felt somewhat sentimental and was likely fueled by millennial nostalgia on social media. Yet, if that’s true, why write this? Is it sadness stemming from the fatigue of juggling work and parenting (especially with her son’s struggles to sleep)? Even reminiscing about the 1996 classic *Space Jam* evokes deep emotions tied to selecting a VHS at the local store. I can’t shake this longing for simpler times, perhaps indicating a need for more fun in my life. I’m thinking it might be time for a water fight. Who’s ready?

Parent-Child Relations: Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett’s Baby Raising
Published by September Publishing (£18.99).
Get support from The Guardian and reserve your copy

Guardianbookshop.com
. Shipping charges may apply.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents, Stay Calm: Achievable Tips for Healthy Screening Times for Kids | Kaitlyn Regehr

this summer, technology secretary Peter Kyle revealed that he is contemplating a two-hour “screen time” limit for children’s use of social media apps. This approach is not just insufficient; it has become outdated.

While the timing of this announcement is appropriate, coinciding with the onset of summer holidays and the imperative for parents to oversee their children’s safety in digital spaces, it is rooted in older screen time recommendations. While it’s vital to think about limiting screen time, the suggested cap only addresses usage duration without considering quality. Thankfully, as someone who teaches digital literacy and is also a parent, I recognize there are ways to cultivate healthier habits for our children this summer, even if the government hasn’t fully adapted yet.

Screen time limits have dominated the discourse on digital engagement for parents, educators, and society over the past decade. This guidance emerged after research indicated that increased screen time correlates with a higher risk of obesity among children and adolescents. While this was beneficial advice for promoting physical health, it failed to robustly address how the nature and quality of online content impact mental health.

For instance, adhering to this guidance allows one child to enjoy CBeebies alongside their family, stimulating conversation, while another child is isolated with headphones, consuming algorithm-driven YouTube Shorts. The existing “Screen Time” guidance treats both scenarios equivalently. However, they are qualitatively distinct. In the first case, one child experiences interactive and communal viewing with a parent, fostering discussion and connection, while the other child’s viewing experience remains isolated and fragmented. They consume short-form content with limited narratives and character development, often lacking regulatory oversight.

YouTube has become a primary platform for our children’s screen time and is now the leading choice for Generation Alpha’s first television experience. Remarkably, 88% of UK children aged 3 to 17 are using the platform. Yet, YouTube is often overlooked in discussions about social media restrictions, including in Kyle’s statement.

Attempts have been made to differentiate between types of screen time, such as “passive” versus “active” engagement. The Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health aims for policies that emphasize habits and behavior, categorizing “active screen time as involving cognitive or physical engagement—like gaming or homework activities—while passive screen time entails low levels of interaction and intellectual involvement. Similarly, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry recommends engaging with children about what they watch, fostering opportunities for social, educational, and creative screen time. Unfortunately, these insights have not been fully embraced in public or political dialogues.

While encouraging intentional choices regarding children’s screen content, I do not imply that individual responsibility is the sole solution. We are experiencing a digital public health crisis, as highlighted by General Vivek Murthy, the U.S. Surgeon General, who noted that social media can heighten the risks of anxiety and depression in youth. There is an urgent need for comprehensive policies that tackle the technological and economic frameworks underpinning these platforms. This is where Kyle should focus his efforts.

Meanwhile, the proposals from Kyle should not rely on outdated public guidance. They must be rooted in a nuanced understanding of varied screen use, addressing both physical and mental health concerns while tackling systemic issues in digital platform design. Crucially, they must consider not just the quantity, but also the quality of children’s digital engagement.

Until such changes are made, the onus of responsibility falls on individuals—particularly parents—to ensure their children are learning, engaging, proactive, and safe during screen time. I know this may feel overwhelming. To help, here are some strategies to implement with my kids this summer.

  • For younger children, limited screen time is generally preferable. If screens are used, I recommend watching live TV on platforms like CBeebies or CBBC, emphasizing quality engagement.

  • Prioritize content that encourages active participation over passive consumption. Content that fosters creativity and dialogue supports cognitive engagement and enhances communication skills, often leading to meaningful discussions.

  • Begin instilling critical thinking about digital content early. Use tools like SightEngine to analyze images, helping to distinguish between real and potentially misleading content. This sparks conversation about online misinformation.

  • Engage older children in discussions about a healthy digital diet. Together, commit to actively seeking out positive content for 30 minutes each week, deliberately avoiding uninteresting or negatively skewed material. Teach them that even negative engagement, such as liking or commenting on unfavorable content, contributes to its visibility.

  • As a family, regularly declutter your digital spaces by removing content that no longer inspires or educates. This includes unfollowing unwanted accounts, personalities, and brands to refine your feed to what truly resonates with you.

  • Consider exploring alternative search engines as a family to minimize targeted ads. DuckDuckGo and Firefox Focus do not track users for advertising purposes, and Startpage allows users to utilize Google while maintaining privacy.

While the government may not effectively regulate digital technology, parents still hold the power to guide intentional screen use. By doing so, we can instill concepts of healthy and critical screen engagement from a young age.

  • Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr is the Programme Director for Digital Humanities at University College London, where she lectures on digital literacy and the ethical implications of social media and AI. She is also the author of Smartphone Nation: Exploring our obsession with screens and actionable solutions.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why Many Digital Natives Choose Not to Give Their Kids Smartphones: A Parent’s Perspective

In 2019, when Sophie* was 12 years old, her classmates shared “extreme and traumatic” videos featuring al-Qaeda beheadings, pornography, and bestiality. She recalls online games where adult players tried to persuade her to meet in person. Her father worked there, but reflecting back, she says, “There were no signs for my generation of parents.”

Now 18 and attending the University of Edinburgh, she didn’t permit her children to have smartphones until adulthood. “As a teenager, I would have been the strongest advocate for phone ownership, but my perspective changed completely,” she stated.

“You shouldn’t engage online until you’re an adult and understand the various ways people act respectfully to push their interests. It’s a fleeting message.”

Social media exacerbated bullying at Sophie’s school. Officials used an anonymous confession app to share hurtful comments. She also ponders what other time she might have wasted.

Sophie is one of many so-called digital natives who question the nearly unrestricted access to technology they grew up with. Recent polls indicate that nearly half of young people feel the internet is almost non-existent, with similar numbers favoring digital curfews; over three-quarters reported feeling worse about themselves after using social media.




Izzy Bouric, 24, with her flip phone, which helped her regain time and mental space. Photo: Magalidellport/Guardian

Meanwhile, the Netflix hit series has ignited discussions about the dangers children face on social media and the prevalence of online misogyny across different platforms.

Izzy Bourick, a 24-year-old artist from Brighton living in Paris, believes that platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Roblox have muddled the lines between children’s and adults’ spaces in recent years.

“I engaged with the online children’s game Club Penguin, where the environment was controlled to be child-friendly, banning inappropriate language.”

Nonetheless, Izzy stated, “I was definitely exposed to things I wasn’t ready for,” adding, “everyone from my generation has been in chat rooms with people much older than us.”

She permits kids to have smartphones from the age of 17. “It’s not fit for children, nor for those not equipped to handle it,” she explains, “it’s unsafe to navigate without guidance.”

She feels social media has become overwhelming, “cannibalized by advertising and businesses,” spreading misinformation on sensitive issues like mental health and neurological conditions. “Suddenly, my phone was inundating me with messages that I was doing everything wrong, only to turn around and pitch products to me.”

This shift left her anxious and frustrated, prompting her to choose a flip phone, which feels liberating and has helped her reclaim her time and mental clarity.




“I found myself in a moment of despair,” shares Tobias, 20, from Austria.

Tobias, 20 from Austria, got his first smartphone around 11 or 12, and noticed a change in his peers. “People would sit together but wouldn’t talk—everyone just scrolled on their phones.”

His school implemented a policy to turn off phones, but teachers quickly abandoned it. “There was always a buzz and the constant sound of notifications,” he recalled.

As a teenager, he found himself binge-watching videos on YouTube and Instagram. “After scrolling through short videos for hours and reflecting, ‘Wow, that was fast—I’m neglecting what I want to do,’ I recognized I was in a state of despair.”

Tobias became particularly concerned when his interest in first-person shooter games led to algorithm recommendations showcasing real firearms and violent content. He now believes, “It’s best for children and teens to limit their smartphone usage.”

Lethe, a 20-year-old paramedic student near Birmingham, England, allowed children to use smartphones only after age 16 and restricted their media access.

She received her first smartphone at 18 but quickly realized that it contributed to bullying among friends, reduced attention spans, and replaced meaningful conversations with endless scrolling on social media.

Two years after getting her first phone, she remarked, “It definitely changed me. I’m not good at being bored, and my attention span has decreased. I’m struggling to be present. Social media algorithms expose me to things I don’t wish to see.”

Nora, a project manager in Spain, restricts social media access until age 13 and limits usage while fostering open dialogue about risks with children. “When they encounter something distressing, I strive to create a trusting environment so they feel comfortable discussing it with me.”

She recalls a situation where, at 13, she and her peers began receiving messages from strangers on Google Messages, leading to inappropriate requests and a subsequent case of pedophilia.

She also remembers a classmate who bullied peers on messaging apps. “I faced some harsh messages myself,” she shared.

Nora later discovered that social media had worsened her struggles with eating disorders as she compared herself to other girls and engaged with harmful weight loss transformation videos. “Chasing likes on Instagram wasn’t healthy for me.”

Now, she worries about her 16-year-old brother. “His TikTok is filled with misogynistic concepts and toxic masculinity. His friends make harmful comments about women’s bodies. That wasn’t the environment for me and my friends.”

*Name changed

Source: www.theguardian.com

Beware: ‘Hello Mom!’ WhatsApp Scam Targeting Parents and Friends

“Hi Mom,” the opening message states. “I’ve misplaced my phone.” It unfolds into a distressing narrative: somehow, the sender has also been locked out of their bank account.

Fortunately, friends usually have access to phones. It was through their device that the message was revealed. Alternatively, they might request assistance with rent or direct payment to their landlord or for any urgent bills that have surfaced.

Messages can arrive via WhatsApp or text. Scammers don’t always impersonate children; they might pose as friends or even parents.

Data from Santander indicates that among bank customers, the impersonation of a son is the most effective scam, followed by a daughter, then a mother.

Chris Ainsley, the head of fraud risk management at the bank, notes that fraud is progressing at “broken speeds.” He remarks, “AI voice impersonation technology is now being utilized to create audio messages for WhatsApp and SMS, enhancing the realism of fraud.”

What does fraud look like?

WhatsApp ‘hi mum’ text scam screenshot. Photo: Santander

A seemingly friendly message from someone claiming to be close to you often comes from unknown numbers. If you don’t reply, they may persist before giving up. If you do respond, the scammer will typically engage in conversation but often with vague details.

They will quickly claim to need urgent funds for something and pressure you to act swiftly.

The “sender” may allege that their regular bank account has problems, instructing you to send money to an unfamiliar account.

WhatsApp ‘hi mum’ text scam screenshot. Photo: Santander

What the message asks for

money. They’ll claim they urgently need cash to buy a new phone or for living expenses.

WhatsApp ‘hi mum’ text scam screenshot Photo: Santander

The bank details they provide will likely belong to someone else. They will claim it belongs to “friends” or someone they owe, and the amount requested is usually not a round figure. These accounts belong to scammers or third parties used as money mules.

What to do

If you suspect that a loved one is in actual trouble, verify the situation. Reach out using their usual number. Don’t be alarmed if they don’t reply immediately.

You can ask questions that only they would know the answers to.

To protect yourself against future scams, consider establishing a family password that can be requested to confirm the sender’s identity.

WhatsApp ‘hi mum’ text scam screenshot Photo: Santander

If you have sent money, contact your bank right away to see if you can halt the transactions.

You can report suspicious WhatsApp messages through the app. Simply select the message and choose to report it.

Fraudulent texts can be forwarded to 7726 to report them to your telecommunications provider.

You can also report scams to Action Fraud.

Whenever prompted to transfer funds, always be truthful about the situation to ensure the sender’s legitimacy.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Kennedy Encourages New Parents to “Conduct Your Own Research” on Vaccines

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. advised new parents to “conduct their own research” prior to “conducting their own research” during a television interview regarding infant vaccinations.

In a conversation with talk show host Phil, Kennedy stated that aired on Merritt on Monday, the 100th day of the Trump administration. He reiterated his stance, saying, “To prevent the spread of measles, getting the vaccine is your best option.”

However, Kennedy maintained that the choice rests with individuals. By suggesting that the vaccine poses risks, he undermines decades of guidance from public health professionals, including officials from the CDC.

“We live in a democracy, and part of being a responsible parent is to do your own research,” he replied to questions from women in the audience regarding vaccine safety advice for new parents. “You should investigate strollers, the food they consume, and the medications they receive.”

The phrase “I did my research” has emerged as a significant cultural and political term during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pro-vaccination advocates have criticized individuals primarily from the political left who opted out of vaccination. This expression evolved into a meme and has appeared in mock gravestones at Halloween-themed cemeteries in liberal areas.

The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond promptly to requests for comments.

Kennedy’s remarks were made amidst the largest measles outbreak in the U.S. in nearly 25 years, which has resulted in the deaths of two young children and one adult.

Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician and vaccine authority at Philadelphia Children’s Hospital, remarked that while he often disagrees with Kennedy, “it’s perfectly reasonable to be skeptical about a vaccine.” However, parents who wish to research should be mindful of their information sources.

“When you talk about doing your own research, it’s important to consult individuals with expertise in the area, or at least seek information from credible online sources. This doesn’t mean relying solely on chat rooms or social media,” said Dr. Offit. He emphasized that while good information exists, “many poor sources can mislead you about your options, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exemplifies that.”

Another vaccine specialist, Dr. Peter Hotez from Baylor School of Medicine, contended that Kennedy was being misleading. “He claims people are doing their own research—what parents often download is a flood of misinformation, steering away from expert health advice toward dubious influences.”

Kennedy further suggested that measles vaccinations could lead to various illnesses without substantiation. “Would you like to stop measles?” he inquired. “Certainly, but does it cause other issues like seizures or autoimmune diseases? We don’t know. No one can answer that.”

In reality, studies indicate that with rare exceptions, vaccinated individuals are less likely than those infected to develop autoimmune illnesses, concluding that vaccines “not only shield patients from infections but also from complications, including autoimmune symptoms.”

Kennedy’s statements in the interview were generally flawed. He proclaimed, “New medications are approved by external panels, not by the FDA or CDC.”

This is inaccurate. While external expert panels advise the FDA on controversial drug approvals, only the FDA holds the authority to sanction or reject new medications, vaccines, and treatments; the CDC does not partake in this process.

“Kennedy must understand the role of the FDA in drug development and marketing decisions,” asserted Dr. Robert Califf, the FDA’s commissioner under President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Kennedy also erroneously asserted that vaccines were not subjected to safety evaluations prior to or following approval. “There is no initial safety research, and there’s no monitoring system afterward,” he claimed. “Vaccines are the only medical products exempt from pre-licensure safety assessments.”

In fact, the FDA licenses vaccines after an extensive year-long process involving thorough lab and animal testing, followed by human trials. Rigorous research on vaccine safety and efficacy is mandated. Typically, thousands participate in large clinical trials, as emphasized by Dr. Peter Marks, head of the vaccine division, who recently announced his resignation.

“I am uncertain about the origin of this misconception,” remarked Dr. Marks, critical of Kennedy. “Vaccines undergo extensive safety evaluations. Since they are administered to healthy individuals, safety is of utmost importance.”

Upon licensing, vaccines are monitored through various databases. Vaccine Safety Data Links employ electronic health records nationwide to detect unusual side effects, including rare myocarditis cases reported in young men post-COVID-19 vaccination.

Another system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, established in 1990 as the “National Early Warning System,” relies on reports from both patients and healthcare providers. Many vaccine skeptics, including Kennedy, have cited Vaers data to argue that vaccines are harmful, but it is not intended to ascertain causality regarding health issues; rather, it flags potential concerns for further investigation.

The FDA operates an additional safety monitoring program known as BEST, focusing on biologics effectiveness and safety initiatives.

Dr. Sean O’Leary, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Infectious Diseases Committee, stated that it is incorrect to assert that federal officials do not surveil vaccine safety. “I am uncertain about the source of this claim,” he noted.

He added, “We recognize various rare adverse events. If it becomes evident that the risks approach or surpass the benefits, the vaccine will be withdrawn from the market.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

Parents face difficult decisions regarding smartphones, says English Children’s Commissioner

Parents in England are urged to make tough decisions about their children’s smartphone use rather than trying to be their friends, according to Dame Rachel de Souza. She emphasized the importance of setting boundaries and considering examples of responsible phone use.

Speaking to the Sunday Times, de Souza stressed the need for parents to prioritize their children’s well-being. She advised against giving in to children’s demands for more screen time, highlighting the importance of making tough decisions for their long-term benefit.

She added that parents should provide love, understanding, support, and boundaries, encouraging high aspirations while also setting limits. A recent survey suggested that a quarter of children in the UK spend over four hours a day on internet-enabled devices.

De Souza also emphasized the importance of having open conversations with children about their online activities and monitoring the content they are exposed to. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is considering implementing smartphone bans in some schools to address concerns about the impact of social media on children.

While guidelines currently suggest banning phones during lessons, there is no clear enforcement strategy for breaks and lunches. De Souza’s survey of state schools found that the majority already limit mobile phone use during the day.

She believes that schools play a role in addressing these issues but acknowledges that parents must also take responsibility for monitoring their children’s digital activities. Conservative leader Kemi Badenok has questioned the government’s stance on child well-being and school bills related to phone bans.

Overall, there is growing awareness of the need to balance children’s online activities with real-world interactions and boundaries to ensure their well-being.

Source: www.theguardian.com

My parents found popcorn in my hair and it turned into a magical meme from Minecraft movie games

tDuring his week I took my son Zack with me to watch a new Minecraft movie. This is not a surprising statement in the world of highly video game brands of cinemas in the 21st century. At least, it’s not yet.

As we’ve seen in many bewildered news reports over the past few days, Minecraft films quickly created a community of extremely enthusiastic and enthusiastic fans. Spurred by Tiktok Meme posts, a huge portion of the film’s audience screams and sings to the song, citing important lines when they happen. At one key moment when the game’s rare character, the zombie chicken jockey, is introduced, they absolutely go crazy, throwing drinks and throwing popcorn. Escorted from a police screening.

Our small independent cinema in Fromm had a little more calm reaction, but there was still a line of teenagers who saw all of Tiktok posts screaming about them all. It was loud enough for cinemas to post on Facebook about antisocial behaviour and illegality of recordings in the film.

There is much to unfold here about the exclusive nature of internet culture, cinema etiquette, and the online community’s transition to physical space. Most of the audience’s reactions were fine. It’s a deliberately a Daft film made for fans, and it’s thrilling to celebrate fandom with like-minded peers in a crowded space. The film itself always rewards people who are immersed in fiction. We also enjoy finding a lot of Easter eggs (“Oh, that’s hero blin!”) and small cameos from Minecraft Youtubers and game developers. There are also some really funny moments of slapstick and sarcasm, depending on the committed performances from Jack Black and Jason Momoa.

Flying as high as the popcorn in the movie… a Minnecraft movie. Photo: Warner Bros./AP

But for Zack, who is 19 and with autism, and for many of the little kids in the auditorium, the atmosphere can be confused and a bit intimidating. Although screenings for Marvel films such as Avengers: Endgame and Spider-Man: No Way Home were compared to wild responses, mostly spurred by events at FILM Infilm. We all understood why Captain America successfully caught Thor’s hammer and people cheered on.

With Minecraft films, the prompts for audience responses are primarily from memes and are a branch of inexplicable internet comedy in its nature. The joke is that you can see jokes from other people who get jokes. Out of context, memes are private jokes where you are. Perhaps the closest analogy is the culture around rocky horror picture shows That legendary fan screening It features a water pistol and drug outfit at Fleapit Cinemas. However, these events were opt-in. Everyone knew what they were getting. I don’t know if the same can be said for all parents who leave my screening picking my screening from my hair.

But we really enjoyed watching the movie. When Zack was young and had a hard time communicating, Minnecraft was a precious outlet for him, allowing him to be creative and make friends. He still plays to this day. It was his comfortable blanket and it changed our lives – especially because I ended up writing a novel, a boy made with blocks, inspired by our experiences in the game. It was an emotional experience to hear that refined piano music in the film, share those jokes, and see what had a huge positive effect on my family portrayed on a huge screen among other fans.

Of course, teenagers are Assumption To be confused and intimidating – that’s their job. You can’t wander around by handing over an uneasy generation, saying, “They’re pranks so let’s ban them from the cinemas.” Also, during these challenging times for the film industry, filmmakers need to find ways to engage with teenage audiences who are out, whether it is due to the cost, social anxiety, and the all-inclusive nature of digital culture. Minecraft movies are the most perfect unicorns in the entertainment business. A multi-million dollar blockbuster that has reached the most unreachable generation of modern history. Many studios get busy solving how to film this meme-soaked magic on a bottle.

Perhaps the film owners will be wise and organize their dedicated autism-friendly screening, or on the other side of the scale, embrace chaos and do a special fan night. They need to prepare to pay a little extra to the cleaning staff.

What to do

Like an old war comic… Commandos: Origin. Photo: Kalypso Media

Hundreds of years ago (well, 1998), my favorite example of the busy genre of real-time strategy at the time was Commandos. Commandos: Origin It is a rethink of the series, modernizing the intricately detailed isometric landscape of the original, focusing on stealth and sabotage. It’s like you’re in your own interactive version of an old war cartoon Warrior and Combat actionand I am ready to lose repeatedly trying to take the sniper to the Guard Tower without being discovered by the Nazis on the patrol.

Available at: PC, PS5, Xbox
Estimated playtime:
Over 20 hours

Skip past newsletter promotions

What to read

The Nintendo Switch 2 still wraps some specs. Photo: Richard Drew/AP
  • I have a polygon Some interesting follow-ons Since recently Nintendo Switch 2 Announcement: The console’s highly heralded group chat feature is not free. Instead, owners will have to pay a monthly fee to talk to their peers while playing.

  • Elsewhere, it was produced by the Digital Foundry team at Eurogamer Typically a good deep dive Inside Console technical specificationswe still don’t know much.

  • UsingGame development AI It continues to be debated This aftermath feature Talking to a game maker who has to deal with artificial intelligence is eye-opening and important.

What to click

Question block

They haven’t lost the plot… Dragon Ball Fighters. Photo: Namco Bandai

This week’s question comes from Stephen Man Blueski, asked:

“Fighting games tend to have some of the deepest stories. But there’s a stigma that fighting games are just a button-click competitive. What can developers and players do to break this stigma?”

I think this comes from the disconnect between the action in the fighting game and the content of the story. Usually, all stories occur with cutscenes and pre-match taunts, so players can feel separated from lore. Some fighting game designers have begun to draw more stories interactively to express the story using specific locations, costumes and movements. I think Injustice and Blazblue Do a good job with this during Namco’s anime-based fighter jets Dragon Ball and Naruto It really packs the ongoing plot into the fight. Fighting game developers may be able to consider splitting the match to enter story sequences, so players will invest more money in the story and understand the stakes. As for players, I have always found the fighting gaming community to be extremely welcome. That’s all they really need to do.

If you have a question blocking question or anything else to say about the newsletter, please click reply or email us at butingbuttons@theguardian.com.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents wield more control over their children’s gaming activities on Roblox than children themselves

Parents now have the ability to communicate with specific friends on Roblox, an online gaming platform popular among children, or restrict children from playing certain games.

This update is part of a series of safety enhancements designed to give parents more control over their child’s experience on the platform.

Starting Wednesday, parents and caregivers who verify their identity through ID or credit card will gain access to three new tools. The Friend Management Tool allows blocking individuals on the child’s friends list, preventing direct messaging with their accounts, and reporting rule-breaking users.

Parents can also adjust the content maturity level of their child’s account, manage their access to games, and view detailed screen time statistics.

Under new online safety regulations, tech companies must address harmful content on their platforms or face substantial fines.

Roblox, the UK’s most popular gaming platform among 8 to 12-year-olds, has faced concerns about bullying, grooming, and exposure to inappropriate content.

Matt Kaufman, Roblox’s chief safety officer, emphasized the company’s commitment to safety, striving to be the world’s safest online platform.

With over 80 million daily players, 40% under the age of 13, Roblox is one of the largest gaming platforms globally, surpassing the combined monthly users of Nintendo Switch and Sony PlayStation.

In the past year, Roblox introduced 40 safety updates, including restrictions on direct messaging for users under 13 and improved voice safety technology.

Andy Burrows, CEO of the Molly Rose Foundation, welcomed the safety improvements but highlighted the ongoing challenges with inappropriate content on Roblox.

He raised concerns about age-inappropriate games and communities on the platform, urging Roblox to address these issues for the safety of younger users.

Last month, Roblox’s co-founder and CEO, David Baszucki, expressed the platform’s focus on user protection and emphasized the importance of parental involvement in deciding whether children should use Roblox.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents take charge as UK government decides against banning smartphones in schools.

Daisy Greenwell has long felt that the idea of letting her eldest son do something inevitable. But until early last year, when her daughter was eight, it filled her with fear. When she spoke to other parents, “Everyone said, ‘Yes, that’s a nightmare, but there’s no choice,'” recalls Greenwell, 41.

She decided to test it. My friend Claire Fergnou shared concerns about the impact of social media on the addictive quality of smartphones and mental health, so I created a WhatsApp group to help develop a strategy. Then Greenwell lives in Suffolk, a countryside in eastern England; I posted her thoughts on Instagram.

“If we could switch social norms like giving your child a smartphone at 11am in our school, our town, our country, we could do it, like giving your child a smartphone at 11am,” she wrote. “What if they could hold off until they were 14 or 16?” she added a link to the WhatsApp group.

The post has gone viral. Within 24 hours, the group was oversubscribed for parents to participate. Today, more than 124,000 parents of children in UK schools have signature A pact created by the free childhood of smartphones, a charity founded by Greenwell, her husband Joe Riley and Ferniev. “I will act in the best interests of my kids and our community and wait until I get my smartphone until the end of my ninth year.” (The ninth year is equivalent to the eighth graders in America.)

Movement aligns with a A broader change in British attitudesmounts of harm caused by smartphone addiction and algorithm-driven social media as evidence. 1 investigation Last year, the majority of respondents (69%) felt that social media had negatively affected children under the age of 15.

Meanwhile, with the police Intelligence Services We warned about extreme and violent content torrents reaching children online. This is a trend that was examined during adolescence of hit television shows, where school men are accused of murder after being exposed to online misogyny. It’s become British Most of them were seen Show, and on Monday, Prime Minister Kiel Starmer met. The creator and I told her I had seen it on Downing Street with my son and daughter. But he also said, “This is not a challenge politicians can simply legislate.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

The introduction of AI to young children by parents and teachers: methods and rationale

sWith the introduction of ChatGpt in late 2022, generative artificial intelligence moved from adult users in office settings to college students in campus libraries and even teenagers in high school hallways. As the youngest among us start exploring AI technologies, parents and teachers are grappling with the responsibility of introducing children under 13 to these transformative tools. Though tools like Google’s Gemini and other AI models set age restrictions, many parents and teachers are taking it upon themselves to educate children about AI.

Inspired by stories of parents teaching their children AI skills to prepare them for success in school and beyond, we reached out to Guardian readers to learn how and why others are doing the same. While our original stories focused on parents, we also included responses from teachers, recognizing their role in preparing children for the future.

Some parents and teachers have embraced AI fully, integrating ChatGpt into everyday interactions with children, using it to explain concepts, answer questions, and share imaginative stories. Others approach AI cautiously, limiting its use to controlled settings due to the potential risks it may pose to young users.

On the other hand, some parents and teachers choose not to expose their children to AI at all, expressing concerns about potential harm and ethical implications that remain unresolved. While differing in their approaches, each perspective contributes valuable insights to the ongoing dialogue about AI education.

The responses below have been edited for brevity and clarity.

Parents Explain the World with AI’s Help

I’ve discovered that introducing AI to my children has been an unexpected joy of parenting. Instead of saying “Let’s google,” my 9 year old now asks, “Daddy, can you chat?” when he needs help with homework. He’s learning to seek guidance rather than just answers.

My 6 year old’s endless questions often test my patience. In those moments, AI comes to the rescue, keeping him engaged and imaginative with topics like dinosaurs and space. It’s a mental recharge for me.

With three daughters, we’ve moved from reading princess stories to creating our own imaginative adventures, thanks to AI.

– Matt, Consultant, 44, Palm Beach Gardens, FL

I use AI as an intellectual backup when I can’t answer my kids’ questions. We have AI voice assistants at home and in the car, helping us with random queries and homework tasks. It streamlines our discussions and keeps learning active. However, I caution my kids about the accuracy of AI responses, as they can sometimes be misleading.

– Graham, Writer, Lumberhurst Quarter

I incorporate AI tools into my daily interactions with my 3 year old, using them to explore nature and answer his questions about the world. I encourage his curiosity and engagement while limiting screen time and passive activities.

While AI is a part of our routine, it’s not the sole focus.

– Nate, Data Scientist, East Bay, California.

I’m introducing my eldest to Openai’s ChatGpt, portraying it as a creative assistant for generating ideas and resources. I teach her to approach AI skeptically and not to rely solely on its responses.

– Ben, 47, Entrepreneur, Germany

To showcase AI to my children, I use ChatGPT to generate stories and engage them in critical thinking by analyzing the authenticity of AI-generated content.

I also encourage them to question misleading information and develop a healthy skepticism towards online content.

– David, Software Developer, Ireland

For students struggling with writing, I recommend using AI for sentence-level feedback and grammar explanations, but caution against relying on AI to create complete essays.

– Jenny, English and Drama Teacher, Valencia, Spain

In my household, AI is used sparingly, with the children understanding it as a tool to enhance their learning and curiosity. We emphasize the importance of personal effort and creativity in achieving success.

– Anton, Fintech Director, Geneva

Rather than introducing AI directly, I stimulate my students’ imagination by using AI tools like Adobe Firefly to inspire descriptive writing and Character.ai to bring historical figures to life. I emphasize the creative potential of AI while also highlighting its limitations.

– Angie, Primary Teacher, Tunbridge Wells

I approach AI education as a generative tool, emphasizing its role as an aid rather than a replacement for imagination. By demonstrating AI’s creative capabilities, students learn to use it responsibly while appreciating its limitations.

– Adam, 28, High School Teacher, Christchurch, New Zealand

CEOpromotes Child Protecting parents from worrying about kids Roblox games

The platform’s CEO advises parents concerned about their children using Lobras not to allow them to use it.

Reports of bullying and grooming have surfaced, making the site the most popular among UK gamers aged 8 to 12, raising fears of exposure to explicit or harmful content.

David Basizakki, co-founder and CEO of Roblox, told BBC News that the platform is committed to safeguarding users and that millions have had positive experiences on the site.

However, he emphasized the importance of parental comfort and empowerment in making decisions regarding their children’s use of Roblox, mentioning the platform’s vigilance against negative behaviors and its collaboration with law enforcement when necessary.

Justin Roberts from Mumsnet highlighted the challenge parents face in monitoring their children’s online activities, especially with multiple children, expressing how managing their children’s Roblox use is a common struggle among forum users.

Roblox, a US-based company, boasts a large user base, surpassing the Nintendo Switch and Sony PlayStation combined, with over 80 million daily players in 2024, 40% of whom are under 13 years old.

The platform enforces consequences for misbehavior, utilizes advanced AI systems to detect problematic behaviors, and limits certain features for younger users to enhance safety.

Baszucki emphasized a zero-tolerance policy towards inappropriate content and shared that Roblox follows strict age-rating guidelines based on content and game titles.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Baszucki and Cassel founded Roblox in 2004, initially opening it to the public in 2006 after realizing its potential beyond educational use.

As the platform’s popularity grew, safety measures were introduced, marking a significant turning point when the digital currency Robux was launched, propelling Roblox to a $41 billion valuation.

Robux is used by players to acquire items and unlock content, with content creators earning a percentage of the fees and pricing adapting dynamically based on popularity.

Baszucki envisions Roblox as the future of communication, focusing on creating metaverse-style experiences where users interact through avatars in a virtual world, aiming to engage 10% of global gamers.

Source: www.theguardian.com

British parents sue TikTok over suspicions of child’s death related to data claims

Four British parents who are suing Tiktok for the alleged unlawful deaths of their children express concerns about the suspected deletion of their child’s data from social media platforms.

These parents have filed a lawsuit in the US claiming that four children died in 2022 after participating in the “Blackout Challenge,” a viral trend that emerged on social media in 2021.

A week after the lawsuit was filed, Tiktok executives mentioned that certain data had been deleted due to legal requirements. UK GDPR regulations mandate that platforms do not retain excessive personal data.

The parents were surprised by how quickly their child’s data was removed.

Isaac and Lisa Kennevan. Lisa expressed doubts on Tiktok’s claim of removing her son’s data.

“My initial reaction was that it’s a complete lie,” said Lisa Kennevan, whose son Isaac passed away at 13.

Liam Walsh remains skeptical about Tiktok deleting data on her daughter Maia, who passed away at 14, as the investigation is ongoing. He has issued a statement.

Ellen Room is advocating in Congress for the introduction of “Jules’ Law” in memory of her 12-year-old son Julian.

“If you have a physical diary in [your children’s] bedroom, I’m sure you’d read it to understand. Nowadays, they’ve moved online, and social media serves as a diary for kids. So why not examine their online diaries for potential answers?” she remarked.

Archie Battersbee and her mother, Hollie Dance. Dance has struggled to obtain access to Archie’s data despite him being under 13 when he passed away. Photo: Distribution materials

Hollie Dance should have automatic rights to the data, as her son Archie Battersbee was 12 years old, but she faces challenges in accessing it. “There are still three [of his] active accounts. I can see them myself,” she noted.

Tiktok has stated that searches related to dangerous challenges have been blocked since 2020. The platform aims to remove harmful content preemptively and direct users to safety resources.

Dance mentioned that she has screenshots of dangerous challenges that were easily accessible.

The parents expressed their wish to restrict their children’s access to social media and were unaware of the limited rights they have to their children’s data.

“Essentially, we’re handing the kids loaded guns,” Kennevan remarked. “A child’s brain isn’t fully developed until around 25. The amount of exposure to content isn’t healthy. They’ve witnessed harmful content, such as porn, at ages 10 and 11. They don’t need social media.”

Isaac Kennevan passed away at 13.

This year, the Online Safety Act was enforced, obliging platforms to take action against illegal or harmful content. Walsh expressed skepticism towards Ofcom.

Dance suggested that the organization should screen all videos before they are uploaded to the platform.

Walsh revealed that a US court exposed a video of her child, leading to a damaging impact on her mental state. She intends to press manslaughter charges against the company in UK courts.

Room explained that the family resorted to a US lawsuit after being unable to file a case in the UK due to legal constraints.

Ellen Room and her son Julian; Ellen highlighted how social media is akin to a child’s diary. Photo: Distribution materials

She emphasized on making a difference for other families and parents. “It’s challenging and emotionally draining, but we’re going to make an impact here,” she mentioned.

In the UK, youth suicide charity papyrus Contact 0800 068 4141 or email pat@papyrus-uk.org. Samaritan Contact Freephone 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie. In the US, National suicide prevention lifeline 988 or chatting for support. You can also text your 741741 home to connect with a text line counselor in crisis. Crisis Support Services in Australia Lifeline 13 1114. Other international helplines can be found at befriends.org

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why Safety Bills in the US Didn’t Pass, Leaving Desperate Parents to Protect Their Children on Social Media

wHEN Congress was postponed to the holiday in December. This is a groundbreaking bill aimed at overhauling how technology companies protect the youngest users. The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) introduced in 2022 was intended to be a massive calculation for Big Tech. Instead, the bill waned and died in the House despite sailing through the Senate in July with a 91-3 vote.

Kosa is passionately defended by families who say children have fallen victim to the harmful policies of social media platforms, and advocates who say bills that curb the unidentified power of big technology have been postponed for a long time is. They are seriously disappointed that a strong chance to check out Big Technology has failed due to Congress' indifference. However, human rights groups argued that the law could have led to unintended consequences that impacted freedom of speech online.

What is the Kids Online Safety Act?

Kosa was introduced nearly three years ago in the aftermath of a bomb revelation by former Facebook employee Frances Haugen, and the extent to which the social media platform's impact on younger users. Platforms like Instagram and Tiktok would have required that children be affected through design changes and address online risks to allow younger users to opt out of algorithmic recommendations.

“This is a basic product praise bill,” said Alix Fraser, director of the Council on Responsible Social Media Issues. “It's complicated because the internet is complex and social media is complex, but essentially it's just an effort to create basic product driving standards for these companies.”

The central and controversial element of the bill is its “duty of care” clause, declaring that businesses “have an obligation to use the platform to act in the best interests of minors,” and the regulatory authority It has declared it open to interpretation by They would have also requested that the platform implement measures to reduce harm by establishing “safeguards for minors.”

Critics argued that the lack of clear guidance on what constitutes harmful content encourages businesses to filter content more aggressively, resulting in unintended consequences for free speech. Delicate but important topics such as gun violence and racial justice can be considered potentially harmful and may subsequently be ruled out by the corporation itself. These censorship concerns are particularly prominent in the LGBTQ+ community, saying that opponents of the Kosa could be disproportionately affected by conservative regulators and reduce access to critical resources.

“Using Kosas we see a truly intentional but ultimately ambiguous bill that requires online services to adopt online services to take unspecified actions to keep children safe. A policy analyst at the Center for Democracy Technology, who opposes the law and receives money from technology donors such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft.

The complex history of the Kosa

When the bill was first introduced, over 90 human rights groups signed letters against it, highlighting these and other concerns. In response to such criticism, the bill's author published a revision in February 2024. Most notably, the state attorney general changed the enforcement of its “duty of care” provisions to the Federal Trade Commission. Following these changes, many organizations, including the Glaad, the Human Rights Campaign and the Trevor project, have withdrawn their opposition, saying the amendments “significantly reduce the risk of the matter.” [Kosa] It has been misused to suppress LGBTQ+ resources and to curb young people's access to online communities. ”

However, other civil rights groups have maintained their opposition, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the ACLU and the future battle, calling Kosa a “censorship bill” that harms vulnerable users and freedom of speech. They argued that the duty-of-care provision could easily be weaponized by conservative FTC chairmen against LGBTQ+ youth, as well as the state attorney general. These concerns are reflected in the appointment of Republican Andrew Ferguson, Trump's FTC chairman; Who said in the leaked statement He had planned to use his role to “fight the trans agenda.”

Concerns about how Ferguson will manage online content are “what LGBTQ youth wrote and called Congress hundreds of times over the past few years in this fight,” says Saraphilips of the Future Fight. Ta. “The situation they were afraid of has come to fruition. Anyone who ignores it is really just putting their heads in the sand.”

Opponents say that even if KOSA doesn't pass, they've already achieved a calm effect on content available on certain platforms. recently Report User MAG has found that hashtags for LGBTQ+-related topics are classified as “sensitive content” and are restricted from search. Laws like Kosa, Bhatia of the Center for Democracy Technology, said it doesn't take into account the complexity of the online landscape, and it's likely that the platform will lead preemptive censorship to avoid litigation.

“Children's safety holds an interesting and paradoxical position in technology policy, where children benefit greatly from the internet, as well as vulnerable actors,” she said. . “Using policy blunt instruments to protect them can often lead to consequences that don&#39t really take this into consideration.”

Supporters will make backlash at Kosa an aggressive lobbying from the tech industry, but fight for the future – two top opponents – EFF will be supported by large tech donors Not there. Meanwhile, the large tech companies have been split up by KOSA, with X, SNAP, Microsoft and Pinterest quietly supporting the bill, Meta and Google.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“The Kosa was a very robust law, but what's more robust is the power of big technology,” Fraser is the power of problem 1. “They hired all the lobbyists in town to take it down, and they succeeded with it.”

Fraser added that supporters are disappointed that Kosa didn&#39t pass, but “will not take a break until federal law is passed to protect children online.”

Potential revival of Kosa

Besides Ferguson as FTC Chairman, it is unclear what the changing composition of the new Trump administration and Congress will mean for the future of Kosa. Trump has not directly expressed his views on Kosa, but some of his close circles are Revealed support After last minute amendments to the 2024 bill Promoted by Elon Musk&#39s X.

The death of the Congress in Kosa may seem like the end of a winding and controversial path, but defenders on both sides of the fight say it&#39s too early to write legislative obituaries.

“We shouldn&#39t expect the Kosa to go quietly,” said Prem Trivedi, policy director at the Institute for Open Technology, which opposes Kosa. “Whether it&#39s being reintroduced or seeing if a different incarnation is introduced, it will continue to focus more broadly on online safety for children.”

Senator Richard Blumental, who co-authored the bill with Senator Marsha Blackburn, has promised to reintroduce it in future legislative sessions, and other defenders of the bill say they won&#39t give It’s.

“I want to talk about the worst days of their lives over and over again, in front of lawmakers, in front of staff, in front of the press, knowing something is known. I&#39ve worked with a lot of parents who think that, and to change,” Fraser said. “They don&#39t intend to stop.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents file lawsuit against Tiktok for alleged role in child’s death from “Blackout Challenge”

The parents of four teenagers in England have filed a lawsuit against Tiktok following the tragic death of their children.

Isaac Kennevan (13), Archie Buttersby (12), Julian “Juls” Sweeney (14), and 13-year-old Maia Walsh, who rose to fame on social media in 2021, tragically lost their lives in 2022 while attempting a dangerous “challenge,” as stated in the lawsuit.

The Social Media Victims Law Center based in the US lodged a wrongful death lawsuit against Tiktok and its parent company Baitedan on behalf of the grieving parents.

Matthew Bergman, the founding attorney for the Social Media Victims Law Center, revealed, “Three of the four children succumbed to self-stable after being exposed to the hazardous Tiktok Blackout Challenge, all from a similar city and demographic. This does not seem coincidental.”

Bergman further claimed, “Tiktok deliberately targets these vulnerable children with perilous content to boost engagement and profit. The deliberate business decision by Tiktok cost the lives of these four children.”

Tiktok has asserted that searches related to the challenge have been restricted since 2020 and they strive to ban and eliminate harmful content promptly. They also direct users to their safety center if they search for related keywords or videos.

The lawsuit, on behalf of Archie’s mother Holly Dance, Isaac’s mother Lisa Kennevan, Juls’ mother Ellenroom, and Maia’s father Liam Walsh, was filed in the Superior Court of Delaware.

The lawsuit accused Tiktok of marketing itself as a safe and fun platform for children while promoting dangerous and addictive content. Tiktok allegedly engaged children with risky challenges to increase revenue.

Tiktok dismissed claims that they allowed the Blackout Challenge on their platform, asserting that they are actively working to address such issues. However, other perilous challenges involving drugs, hot water, and fire have emerged on Tiktok.

The lawsuit also highlighted that parents believed Tiktok was harmless, catering to children’s entertainment, without anticipating mental health repercussions.

The Social Media Victims Law Center represents families affected by harmful social media content, aiming to prevent the promotion of harmful videos, including those depicting suicide or self-harm, especially among children.

One of the cases involved Tawainna Anderson suing Tiktok in 2022 after her daughter Naira, aged 10, participated in the Blackout Challenge. The appeals court reinstated her case in August 2024.

Archie’s cause of death was determined to be accidental experimentation at his home, with the Blackout Challenge cited as a potential factor among many others.

Juls’ mother is advocating for parents to have legal rights to access their children’s social media accounts following the tragic loss of her son in 2022.

Amendments to the Online Safety Law in the UK aim to compel social media platforms to shield children from dangerous challenges and stunt content while actively eradicating risky material.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Scientifically Determining Which Child Is Most Likely to Be the Favorite of Their Parents

Have you ever glanced around the dinner table and pondered about your parents’ favorite among your siblings? If you’re the youngest, you might want to look away.

A recent meta-analysis published in the Psychology Bulletin reveals that eldest daughters tend to receive preferential treatment from their parents.

Researchers examined 30 peer-reviewed journal articles and 14 databases, involving 19,469 participants, to explore how birth order, gender, temperament, and personality traits impact parental favoritism. The study showed that both mothers and fathers more often favored their daughters as compared to sons.

In terms of birth order, older siblings tended to receive more autonomy, which was viewed as preferential treatment. This favoritism was also evident in the amount of money spent on children and the level of control exerted by parents.

Children who exhibited responsible and organized traits were also more likely to be favored by their parents, indicating that parents may find them easier to manage and respond positively to.

Both mothers and fathers were more likely to favor their daughters over their sons. – Photo credit: Getty

“Parental differential treatment can have long-lasting effects on children,” stated lead author Dr. Alexander Jensen, an Associate Professor at Brigham Young University, USA.

“This study sheds light on which children are more susceptible to the impacts of favoritism, whether positive or negative.”

Jensen and his team also discovered that siblings receiving less favorable treatment often had poorer mental health and strained family relationships.

“It’s worth noting that this study is correlational and doesn’t explain why parents favor certain children,” Jensen added. “However, it does highlight areas where parents may need to be more mindful of their interactions with their children.”

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Are constant photo updates of my kids camping really necessary?

aAt 7 a.m. on Wednesday, I drop my kids off for a two-night school camp. The first large-scale school training camp. Children hold pillows under their arms and drag suitcases, barely able to support the wheels or weight. they are nervous. I was excited. Some people cry. By 7:45 a.m., they were loaded. Through the tinted windows of the bus, I saw my daughter settling down next to her friend, so I waved goodbye and headed to work.

The phone rings just before 10am. Parents were asked to download an app so they could be contacted while the school was away. The app's post features 10 photos of the class crammed onto a ferry and arriving at camp. I feel a sense of relief. I was worried about the bus arriving safely, which I knew was irrational, but I felt relieved when I saw my child being beaten by his friends and smiling at the camera. I did.

The phone rings again soon. And again. And again. By the end of the day, I had received 20 posts of up to 10 photos each, which I believe was the largest.

There are 12 more posts by noon the next day.

I keep unlocking my phone because my day is interrupted by mail after mail, not only from camp but also after-school care and other children's school days. . I swipe through the carousel of photos of kids playing and scan my own photos to make sure they're safe and happy. This is an ongoing record of my childhood that took place away from my physical supervision.

Does anyone really want this?


BIt is estimated that by the time the child turns 13 72 million pieces of data About them will be collected. 80% of children in developed countries Creates a digital footprint by age 2. Much of this is being blamed on premature access to social media, the subject of a new federal plan to restrict access for teenagers. “Sharing” – Excessive sharing of photos of one’s children online.

It's not hard to picture tweens scrolling through TikTok or smug parents posting Instagram photos of their toddler sleeping next to a laser-cut wooden sign proclaiming their age.

We have a broader and more intimate culture of documenting our children. About taking pictures of our children. Receive and request data about children. It is found in cribs, nurseries and schools. It's eating up our phone's memory. And it's almost inevitable.

of Australian community attitudes towards privacy survey was released last year and spoke to around 700 parents. Half of respondents said they felt they had control over their children's data privacy. Three in five said they had no choice but to enroll their child in a particular service. Almost all said their children had the right to grow up without being profiled or targeted.

But we record from their first day. It is an act of love, narcissism, habit, and insurance against forgetting. These creatures that we create, that we nurture, that we worship – why not capture each unreproducible, beautiful, funny, gentle expression, moment, footsteps? Even when taken uncontrollably and almost unconsciously, it still feels private. A typical Saturday for my family can result in up to 32 photos being taken. Old-fashioned roll of film.

There's something else too. Since our earliest days, we have been conditioned to believe that surveillance is safe. Without data, parents cannot guarantee the health of their children. Baby monitor – promising “Complete sense of security” – Livestream a video of your baby sleeping, as well as data about oxygen levels, heart rate, and sleep behavior, to your phone in one of the rooms or half a city away.

It appeals to a parent's most basic instinct: to protect their baby.

However, as Edith Cowan University researcher Dr. Donnell Holloway writes, “Dataification” of childhood expands as children receive education. Children today are “going through a huge change.”


“Photography at early learning centers has become a runaway train in some ways.” Photo: Dean Lewins/AAP

When a child enters daycare, an app asks for a bunch of photos to be downloaded, and some parents welcome it, while others simply accept it. These photos serve as a kind of continuing evidence of life and a demonstration of safety and good practices for early education providers. Most sites provide information about children throughout the day, with up-to-date information such as what was served for morning tea, lunch, and afternoon tea, how much they ate, when they went to bed, and which early learning curriculum touchstones they reached. I am posting a photo of. It can be a comfort and a source of joy. Once this expectation is established, the day you don't receive a photo can be worrying.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Early Education Consultant in 2019 Karen Hope writes on her industry blog:The Spoke says, “Photography in early learning centers has become, in some ways, a runaway train…a photo of a child in front of a puzzle is not necessarily evidence of learning, development, or engagement. How are you going to tell your family?” ? ”

It doesn't end with childcare alone.

“Schools play a major role in how children experience privacy on a daily basis,” the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Privacy wrote at the time. Reports published in 2021. The massive shift to online learning at the start of the pandemic sparked a technology boom in the classroom, adding that “the power disparity that existed between ed-tech companies and children, and between governments and children and parents'' Equilibrium has expanded even further.

One day during school camp, I received over 100 photos of children.

These posts evoke contradictory reflexes in me. First of all, I was relieved that she was safe. Second, leave her alone.


IIn the final section, which consists of 10 photos of the class returning by boat from the island, the daughter is not visible. For a moment, I felt uneasy. Was she left alone? Is she okay? This is an anxiety I would never have experienced otherwise. I would have worked alone. She is somewhere else, protected by people I trust. But on the contrary, I am worried. Until I found her behind photo 9. She's fine. Of course.

Expectations of information destroy healthy distance, healthy ignorance between children and parents. It may cause anxiety to parents. We are so burnt out that having to constantly evaluate and monitor our children doesn't help.

And it's an insult to a child's privacy.

Children now expect their intimate moments to be recorded. As a friend of mine pointed out, it's no longer “Mom, look at me!” it's “Mom, take a picture of me!”

They know to review their photos. My youngest daughter came home from daycare and was eager to watch her child. It was a hassle. It was a shitty photo.


Privacy is essential to children's development. Safety, absolutely. However, their privacy is being ignored and violated.

“Adult interpretations of children's privacy needs can hinder the healthy development of autonomy and independence and limit children's privacy in the name of protection,” the UN Special Rapporteur wrote. There is. “Adults' reliance on surveillance to protect children limits children's rights to privacy and autonomy.”

Privacy is critical to children's ability to develop self-esteem, self

Source: www.theguardian.com

Should Parents be Concerned About Roblox Safety? Exploring the Risks of Pushing the Button

RJust before last week's newsletter was published, a short selling firm called Hindenburg Research issued the following report. Highly critical report on Roblox. In it, they accuse public companies of inflating their metrics (and thus their valuations), and even more worryingly for the parents of the millions of children who use Roblox. He also called it a “pedophile's hellscape.'’ The report claims that there were some gruesome discoveries within the game. Researchers found chat rooms of people purporting to exchange images and videos of children, and users claiming to be children or teens offering such material in exchange for Robux, an in-game currency. I discovered it. roblox I strongly refuse The claims made by Hindenburg in his report.

For those unfamiliar with the title, Roblox is more of a platform than a game (or, as corporate communicators like to think of it, a metaverse). It claims 80 million daily users (though Hindenburg says this figure is inflated). Log in, customize your avatar, and from there you can dive into thousands of different “experiences” created by other users. From role-playing cities to pizza delivery mini-games to cops-and-robbers games to cops-and-robbers games and, unfortunately, much less, Public Bathroom Simulator (which the creators say was 12 years old before they realized bad people existed) It is a delicious dish that looks like the one that he made at the time of his death. Roblox games are created by players, so the site must be constantly moderated. The company's moderation team handles a huge amount of content every day.

It's important to recognize that Hindenburg has a vested interest in making Roblox a stock tank. Hindenburg has a short position in the company (meaning it stands to profit if the stock price falls). Several other companies I've seen their stocks crater after releasing a report on them. However, it is also possible to independently verify some of the claims made in the report. A very quick search of the platform reveals that these in-game chat groups that appear to be soliciting and trading images do indeed exist and are active. And the accounts with questionable usernames that reference child abuse and Jeffrey Epstein are genuine. Some of the specific games and accounts mentioned in Hindenburg's report last week have been removed by the company.

Roblox defended itself in a statement posted online, saying, “Every day, tens of millions of users of all ages have safe and positive experiences on Roblox, and we adhere to our community standards.” said. But any safety incident is terrifying. We take content and conduct that does not adhere to our standards on our platform very seriously. ” The company further added: “We are continually evolving and enhancing our safety approach to catch and prevent malicious and harmful activity, including text chat filters that block inappropriate words and phrases; , which includes disallowing image sharing between users on Roblox” (as further reported in this article in the Guardian).

If your kids are playing on a platform like Roblox, triple-check their settings. Photo: Phil Noble/Reuters

Of course, this isn't the first sensational report about Roblox. In recent years, articles in CNN, the Observer, Wired, and many other publications have found that there is a large amount of inappropriate content on the platform, and that child predators are There are also some proven cases of using Roblox for crafting. Last July, More from Bloomberg In one such case, a man was sentenced to 15 years in prison for grooming a minor and having her cross state lines to perform sex acts as part of a broader investigation into the platform's apparent flaws in moderation and child safety. He was sentenced in 2018.

Many parents are worried about what to do. Roblox is part of the daily online lives of millions of children, even if the figure of around 80 million daily users is inflated, as Hindenberg claims. Anyone who has children of school age knows that it is very widely used. Is Roblox dangerous for kids? Should they stop playing it immediately?

Despite everything presented in this and other reports over the past few years, I believe it is entirely possible for children to play Roblox safely. Appropriate parental controls are in place to limit or eliminate the extent to which strangers can contact your child. When used correctly. If I had kids playing Roblox, I'd be checking all of these settings over and over again to make sure the “friends list” feature was set to include only real-life friends. We also recommend supervising young children to minimize the likelihood that they will encounter or actually seek out the many inappropriate games that seem to regularly elude Roblox's management efforts. I'm very reluctant to let you play this game without it.

Basic online safety education is critical for all children who use the Internet. Given the multiple convictions of child predators who used Roblox to access children, it is impossible to deny the presence of pedophiles on the platform, but it is difficult to objectively assess the extent of it. It's difficult. Some of what Hindenburg highlights in his report seems to me more likely to be the product of an adolescent fringe master than an actual child predator. Roblox is full of teenagers who have grown up with the game. When you see 900 variations of the username Jeffrey Epstein, you don't necessarily see 900 active child abusers, you see 900 stupid 14-year-olds trying to be funny. .

Full disclosure: I don't let my kids play Roblox, and I have no intention of starting them. I don't believe that a publicly traded company can be trusted to put the interests and safety of children ahead of profits. Moderation is expensive and difficult. No one in the big tech industry is any closer to building a system to prevent harmful material from appearing on these types of open platforms, or to prevent people from exploiting harmful material for their own purposes. No. Legitimate safety concerns aside, rather than trying to squeeze money out of kids to pay for endless in-game cosmetics and “experiences,” it's simply better to serve kids' imaginations and curiosity. There are hundreds of great games.

Only offline games can completely eliminate this risk of children being exposed to inappropriate content. After just a few hours of exploring Roblox, one thing is abundantly clear. It's not hard to find something very problematic.

what to play

The wolf in the game Neva grows into a magnificent creature crowned with horns that protects you.

Neva, a game about a warrior and a she-wolf, surprised me. I've played so many beautiful, artistic indie platformers that it’s hard to find one that really makes me feel something. But there I was ugly crying in front of the TV after a few nights with Neva. It takes place over four seasons. The wolf starts out as a cub that you have to protect, but later grows into a magnificent creature with horns that can protect you. Use an elegant combination of jumps, double jumps, dashes, and strikes to explore an incredibly beautiful but horribly corrupt natural world and make multiple attempts to conquer the demons that poison it. Worth a few hours of anyone's life.

Available: PC, PS5, Nintendo Switch, Xbox
Approximate play time: 3-4 hours

Skip past newsletter promotions

what to read

The cause of the Alamo…Nintendo's new clock. Photo: Nintendo
  • On Friday, a group of people who worked on highly acclaimed psychology and political science research RPG Disco Elysium announced the creation of a new studio to work on the game's spiritual successor. Then, confusingly, another new studio was announced same thingThis time it comes with a trailer. And on the same day, a third group announced another spiritual successor. as one viral tweet “Disco Elysium splitting into three unions claiming succession is more of a commentary on communism than the game wanted.”

  • A premium book/magazine hybrid about video games. above, Released today. Guardian games correspondent Keith Stuart and I feature in issue one. Naturally, his article is about Sega arcade boards and mine is about Nintendo details.

  • game freakThe developer of Pokemon suffered a hack of almost unprecedented scale.: Details about unreleased Pokemon game and movie projects, employee information, source code, and details about the series' development. decades I'm there now.

  • To cap off a truly bizarre week of video game news: nintendo We have announced an alarm clock that watches over you while you are sleeping. It's called “Alarmo,” and it wakes you up with the not-so-gentle sounds of Mario, Splatoon, or Zelda, synchronized with your groggy morning movements. the available now For those willing to jump through a few hoops (and pay £90).

What to clickwww.theguardian.com

Thousands Rally for Smartphone-Free Childhood: British Parents Sound the Alarm

More than 4,000 parents have joined a group pledging to ban their young children from smartphones, amid growing concerns about online safety and the impact of social media on mental health.

The WhatsApp group ‘Smartphone Free Childhood’ responds to concerns about children’s smartphone use and the ‘norm’ of giving children smart devices when they attend secondary school, created by former school friends Clare Furnyhoff and Daisy Green. Founded by Well.

“I have children aged 7 and 9. Daisy has children of a similar age and we both feel really scared and anxious and now it’s 11 years old and it’s normal. I didn’t want him to have a smartphone at his age.”

Fernyhoff and Greenwell hope the campaign will encourage parents to delay giving their children smartphones until at least the age of 14 and ban them from accessing social media until the age of 16.

But what they had hoped would be a small group of friends “empowering each other” turned into a nationwide group after the group reached its 1,000-person capacity within 24 hours of Greenwell uploading the message. It turned into a campaign. Instagram post To promote it.

“We were completely surprised by this,” Fernyhough said. “I’ve gone completely crazy.”


Daisy Greenwell. Photo: Alastair Bartlett/Tilt Shift Creative

The pair encouraged people to form local groups to deal with the demand. “Before our eyes, within 30 minutes, 30 local groups were born across the country, and it continues to grow,” Fernyhoff said.

The group has been transformed into a community to allow more people to participate and currently has approximately 4,500 members.

Smartphones are exposing children to a “world they’re not ready for”, with access to pornography and content about self-harm and suicide, which can have a negative impact on children’s mental health, Furneyhough said. said. “I thought maybe they don’t need it. You don’t need a smartphone at that age. A brick phone can do everything you need.”

Ofcom research shows that 91% of children in the UK own a smartphone by the age of 11, and 44% by the age of 9.

“We thought we had extreme ideas, and that’s why we wanted to be in solidarity with each other, but what we realized was that we were actually pulling the lid on something. I mean, it’s like an open question. I came here by mistake, and people really need to talk about this, and a lot of people feel the same way we do. I feel like I can’t talk,” Fernyhoff said.

Brianna Gee’s mother, Esther Gee, earlier this week called for a complete ban on social media for under-16s, calling for a complete ban on social media access for under-16s, unless tech companies take steps to restrict access to harmful content. , said there would be more people with mental health problems.

Brianna was murdered on February 11, 2023, and her mother believes she was vulnerable after spending so much time online.

The goal is to change this norm, Fernyhow said, so that by the time children graduate from elementary school, the whole class will come together and say, “Let’s all delay this until at least 14 years old.” This means that all children in primary school go on to secondary school where they have a certain number of peers doing the same thing, reducing peer pressure.

“We don’t just want kids to go to middle school,” Fernyhoff said. “It’s a nightmare. No one would do that to their child.” But if 20%, 30%, even 50% of his children enroll because their parents made that decision. , they will be in a much better position.

“They can have the childhood they were meant to have, focus on learning, and enjoy the real world without having to spend their lives scrolling. We all know that’s not good for them. I know.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents Share Their Countermeasures as Children’s Mobile Phone Use Increases

Managing your child’s relationship with screens can be a minefield, from navigating TikTok trends to evading parental controls.

By age 11, 91% of UK children owned smartphones, while the data from Ofcom found that 80% of children between 9 and 16 used them daily to access the internet. In the US, research suggested that 42% of children owned a smartphone by age 10 and 91% by age 14.


The lockdown accelerated the already increasing trend of device use among children and adults. Post-pandemic, children’s screen time has increased, according to a BBC survey. Average US 11-14 year-olds spent up to nine hours a day in front of screens, according to the CDC.

Parents expressed dissatisfaction with the amount of time their children spent online and its effect on mood and concentration. Strategies for limiting screen time vary, ranging from using tools like Google’s Family Link to setting rules about when screens are allowed.

According to 2018 CDC data, the average 11- to 14-year-old in the United States spent nine hours in front of a screen each day. Photo: Grechanyuk Aleksandr/Alamy

Many parents struggle to monitor their child’s screen time due to work and other obligations. Some expressed concern about children spending excessive time on smartphones, while others found value in the educational content their children accessed.

// Rich Link content

The rise of smartphones has created challenges for young people, affecting their social lives and increasing pressure. Many parents strive to find a balance in their children’s device usage, acknowledging both the benefits and potential drawbacks.

// Rich Link content

Source: www.theguardian.com

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.