How Microgravity on the International Space Station Influences Bacteriophage and Host Coevolution

Microbiologists from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Rhodium Scientific have unveiled a groundbreaking discovery aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Their latest experiment reveals that the unique near-weightless environment of space significantly alters the interactions between bacteriophages (viruses that target bacteria) and their hosts.



The International Space Station, with Earth in the background. Image credit: NASA.

In this detailed study focused on bacteriophage-host dynamics in microgravity, University of Wisconsin-Madison researcher Phil Huss and his team analyzed the interaction of T7 phages with Escherichia coli bacteria cultivated in an orbiting laboratory.

The experiments highlighted that while microgravity slows the infection rate of viruses, it does not permanently inhibit their ability to infect.

Under normal Earth conditions, T7 phages typically infect and lyse Escherichia coli within 20 to 30 minutes.

However, in the microgravity setting, no measurable growth of the bacteriophages was observed during the initial hours of culture.

After 23 days, the bacteriophage started to grow normally, effectively reducing the bacterial count. This suggests that bacteriophage activity eventually overcame the initial delays caused by the microgravity environment.

Factors unique to microgravity, such as disrupted fluid convection and changes in bacterial physiology, appear to influence how bacteriophage particles encounter and infect bacterial hosts.

In the absence of gravity, the natural mixing of fluids that typically facilitates virus-bacteria contact may be hindered, thereby slowing down the initial infection stages.

To delve deeper into the evolutionary and molecular consequences of these altered interactions, researchers sequenced the genomes of both bacteriophages and bacteria post long-term culture.

The analysis revealed numerous emerging mutations in the genomes of both organisms, indicating adaptation to their unique conditions.

Intriguingly, different mutation patterns were identified in microgravity compared to those evolving under Earth’s gravity, highlighting that the space environment exerts distinct selective pressures on both bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts.

Further scrutiny focused on the bacteriophage’s receptor-binding proteins, essential for recognizing and infecting bacterial cells effectively.

Through a deep mutational scan, significant differences in the mutational profiles of these proteins were observed between microgravity and ground-based experiments, reflecting fundamental changes in adaptive capabilities.

In a remarkable find, the researchers utilized a library of receptor-binding protein variants selected in microgravity to create bacteriophage variants that are more efficient at infecting specific drug-resistant strains of Escherichia coli on Earth. This underscores the potential of space-based research to inform biotechnology.

“Our study provides initial insights into how microgravity influences phage-host interactions,” the researchers concluded.

“Investigating phage activity in non-terrestrial settings unveils new genetic determinants of fitness, paving the way for innovative phage engineering on Earth.”

“The success of this research will establish a foundation for future phage investigations aboard the ISS.”

For more details, refer to the study published in the online journal PLoS Biology.

_____

P. Hass et al. 2026. Microgravity reshapes bacteriophage-host coevolution on the International Space Station. PLoS Biol 24 (1): e3003568; doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003568

Source: www.sci.news

Exploring the Future of Forensic Medicine: Blood Droplets in Microgravity

High blood splatter

“Get ready!” This immortal motto of the Scout movement will come to the mind of many readers who read the paper “Dynamics of bloodstain patterns in microgravity environment: Pilot study observations on the next frontier of forensic medicine.”

Reader Sarah Rosenbaum flagged feedback on the study’s first clearly stated purpose: “Investigating the ultimate violent criminal acts that occur outside of the global environment.”

This is the most futuristic forensic science. “It’s almost here.” The most effective approach is joint criminal investigation between the United Kingdom and the United States. The researchers are from Staffordshire University and Hull University in the UK, and the University of Louisville in Kentucky and Roswell Police in Georgia in the US.

“We hypothesize that the calculated impact angles would be more accurate if gravity were removed as a force acting on the blood droplet in flight,” they write.

They performed tests, or rather flew, aboard a parabolic flight research airplane that took off and landed at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. (Fort Lauderdale, like many cities in Florida, is no stranger to blood splatter. We see a steady increase in the number of violent crimes According to statistics reported by the local police department’s crime analysis department, it will occur between 2020 and 2023.)

In the experiment, “a 1 cc syringe containing a blood analogue was used to inject the liquid onto a flight path approximately 20 cm long, which was intercepted by a 16.5 cm x 16.5 cm target.” [made of] Fifty pound paper adhered to foam board backing.

The study found that droplets that hit paper at a 90-degree angle behaved as predicted by the traditional forensic blood droplet equation. But while this is a blood-stirring challenge for forensic scientists and true crime enthusiasts alike, someone needs to come up with a better equation for predicting what will happen from the other angle.

Thinking: Inside the box

Seeing sometimes leads to believing. Feeling, hearing, and reasoning are equally powerful when combined.

Shorey Croom, Hanbei Chow, and Chaz Firestone of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, explain this in the magazine. PNAS How did they try to answer the question “?” “Can you tell what another person is trying to learn just by observing their movements?”

They filmed a volunteer shaking an opaque box and attempting to measure i) the number of objects hidden inside, or ii) the shape of the objects inside. He then asked others to watch the video and tried to determine “who is shaking because of the numbers and who is shaking because of the shapes.” Most observers were pretty good at recognizing who was shaking and why.

Back in 2017, Milte Plesier of Delft University in the Netherlands and Jeroen Smeets of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam spoke to attendees of the IEEE World Haptics Conference in Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany, about a project they called “How many objects are in this box?”

Their method was simple. “We investigated how accurately participants could determine the number of wooden balls inside a box by shaking it.” They found that while they were able to perform the task accurately, they systematically underestimated the number of more spheres. The larger numbers they tested were 4 and 5. The situation with larger quantities remains theoretically unknown.

stick to fruit

Many scientists will not be able to determine whether the metal sticks to the fruit.

Generally speaking, if properly persuaded, they will. News about this can be found at “Reversibly attaching metals and graphite to hydrogels and tissues” by Wenhao Xu, Faraz Burni, and Srinivasa Raghavan of the University of Maryland.

writing in diary ACS Central Science “We have discovered that hard conductors (such as metals and graphite) can be bonded to soft aqueous materials (such as hydrogels, fruit, and animal tissue) without the use of adhesives.” The adhesion is caused by a low direct current electric field… [This] It can also be achieved underwater, where normal adhesives cannot be used.

“The experiment is very simple,” the study says, anticipating that many people would be surprised by such a simple, hitherto essentially unknown effect.

Accidental genital glow

Faraz Alam sent us the results of his research with colleagues at Imperial College London, published in the journal 2013. PLoS One “This is the paper on which I accidentally made my genitals glow in the dark.” The title is “Non-invasive monitoring of Streptococcus pyogenes vaccine efficacy using intravital optical imaging”. Those reproductive organs belonged to mice.

This spurred feedback that reminded me of a paper on humans published in 1950 by P. A. MacDonald and M. Sidney Margolese. Obstetrics and gynecology questionnaire. They called it “Luminous phenomenon of female external genitalia”.

These are both examples of how scientists perceive the wonders of biology.

Mark Abrahams hosted the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony and co-founded the magazine Annals of Improbable Research. Previously, he was working on unusual uses of computers.his website is impossible.com.

Have a story for feedback?

You can email your article to Feedback at feedback@newscientist.com. Please enter your home address. This week's and past feedback can be found on our website.

Source: www.newscientist.com