Mondo News

Advancements in Lab-Grown Brain Research: Exploring the Future of Cerebral Development

Posted on January 28, 2026 by Igor Mitreski

Revitalizing Brain Organoids: A Breakthrough in Vascular Integration

Imago/Alamy

Developing brain organoid with vascular system — Revitalizing Brain Organoids: A Breakthrough in Vascular Integration

Imago/Alamy

A pioneering advancement has been made in growing a miniaturized version of the developing cerebral cortex, crucial for cognitive functions like thinking, memory, and problem-solving, complete with a realistic vascular system. This advancement in brain organoids offers unprecedented insights into brain biology and pathology.

Brain organoids, often referred to as “mini-brains,” are produced by exposing stem cells to specific biochemical signals in a laboratory setting, encouraging them to form self-organizing cellular spheres. Since their inception in 2013, these organoids have significantly contributed to research on conditions such as autism, schizophrenia, and dementia.

However, these organoids have a significant limitation: they typically start to deteriorate after only a few months. This degradation occurs because a full-sized brain has an intricate network of blood vessels that supply essential oxygen and nutrients, while organoids can only absorb these elements from their growth medium, leading to nutrient deprivation for the innermost cells. “This is a critical issue,” remarks Lois Kistemaker from Utrecht University Medical Center in the Netherlands.

To mitigate this issue, Ethan Winkler and researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, devised a method to cultivate human stem cells for two months, resulting in “cortical organoids” that closely resemble the developing cerebral cortex. They then introduced organoids composed of vascular cells, strategically placing them at either end of each cortical organoid, facilitating the formation of a vascular network throughout the mini-brain.

Crucially, imaging studies revealed that the blood vessels in these mini-brains possess hollow centers, or lumens, akin to those found in natural blood vessels. “The establishment of a vascular network featuring lumens similar to authentic blood vessels is impressive,” states Madeline Lancaster, a pioneer in organoid research at the University of Cambridge. “This represents a significant progression.”

Past attempts to incorporate blood vessels within brain organoids have failed to achieve this crucial detail; previous studies typically resulted in unevenly distributed vessels throughout the organoids. In contrast, the blood vessels formed in this new experiment exhibit properties and genetic activities more closely aligned with those in actual developing brains, thereby establishing a more effective “blood-brain barrier.” This barrier protects the brain from harmful pathogens while permitting the passage of nutrients and waste, according to Kistemaker.

The implications of these findings indicate that blood vessels are crucial for delivering nutrient-rich fluids necessary for sustaining organoids. Professor Lancaster emphasizes, “To function properly, blood vessels, similar to the heart, require a mechanism for continuous blood flow, ensuring that deoxygenated blood is replaced with fresh, oxygen-rich blood or a suitable substitute.”

Topics:

Achieving the 1.5°C Climate Goal: The Century’s Best Vision for a Sustainable Future

Posted on January 26, 2026 by Igor Mitreski

New Scientist - Your source for groundbreaking science news and in-depth articles on technology, health, and the environment.

During the first decade of the 21st century, scientists and policymakers emphasized a 2°C cap as the highest “safe” limit for global warming above pre-industrial levels. Recent research suggests that this threshold might still be too high. Rising sea levels pose a significant risk to low-lying islands, prompting scientists to explore the advantages of capping temperature rise at approximately 1.5°C for safeguarding vulnerable regions.

In light of this evidence, the United Nations negotiating bloc, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), advocated for a global commitment to restrict warming to 1.5°C, emphasizing that allowing a 2°C increase would have devastating effects on many small island developing nations.

James Fletcher, the former UN negotiator for the AOSIS bloc at the 2015 UN COP climate change summit in Paris, remarked on the challenges faced in convincing other nations to adopt this stricter global objective. At one summit, he recounted a low-income country’s representative confronting him, expressing their vehement opposition to the idea of even a 1.5°C increase.

After intense discussions, bolstered by support from the European Union and the tacit backing of the United States, as well as intervention from Pope Francis, the 1.5°C target was included in the impactful 2015 Paris Agreement. However, climate scientists commenced their work without a formal evaluation of the implications of this warming level.

In 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report confirmed that limiting warming to 1.5°C would provide substantial benefits. The report also advocated for achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 along a 1.5°C pathway.

These dual objectives quickly became rallying points for nations and businesses worldwide, persuading countries like the UK to enhance their national climate commitments to meet these stringently set goals.

Researchers at the University of Leeds, including Piers Foster, attribute the influence of the 1.5°C target as a catalyst driving nations to adhere to significantly tougher climate goals than previously envisioned. “It fostered a sense of urgency,” he remarks.

Despite this momentum, global temperatures continue to rise, and current efforts to curb emissions are insufficient to fulfill the 1.5°C commitment. Scientific assessments predict the world may exceed this warming threshold within a mere few years.

Nevertheless, 1.5°C remains a crucial benchmark for tracking progress in global emissions reductions. Public and policymakers are more alert than ever to the implications of rising temperatures. An overshoot beyond 1.5°C is widely regarded as a perilous scenario, rendering the prior notion of 2°C as a “safe” threshold increasingly outdated.

Topic:

Inventing Net Zero: The Century’s Most Innovative Idea for a Sustainable Future

Posted on January 22, 2026 by Igor Mitreski

New Scientist - Your source for science news and expert analyses on technology, health, and the environment.

In 2005, physicists David Frame and Miles Allen were headed to a scientific conference in Exeter, England. According to Frame, they were “playing around” with climate models in preparation for their presentation.

At that time, most research centered on stabilizing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to avert severe climate change. However, scientists faced challenges in predicting how much the planet would warm if these concentrations reached specific levels.

Frame and Allen approached the issue from a different angle. Instead of focusing on atmospheric concentrations, they examined emissions. They wondered what would happen if humanity ceased emitting anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Using a climate model on a train, they found that global temperatures reached a new stable level. In other words, global warming would halt if humanity achieved “net-zero” carbon dioxide emissions. Frame recalled, “It was pretty cool to sit on the train and see these numbers for the first time and think, ‘Wow, this is a big deal.’

This groundbreaking presentation and the subsequent Nature paper published in 2009 reshaped the thinking within the climate science community. Prior to the net-zero concept, it was generally accepted that humans could emit around 2.5 gigatons annually (approximately 6% of current global emissions) while still stabilizing global temperatures. However, it became clear that to stabilize the climate, emissions must reach net zero, balanced by equivalent removals from the atmosphere.

The global consensus surrounding the need to achieve net zero CO2 emissions rapidly gained traction, culminating in a landmark conclusion in the 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. The subsequent question was about timing: when must we reach net zero? At the 2015 Paris Agreement, nations committed to limiting temperature increases as close to 1.5°C as feasible, aiming for net-zero emissions by around mid-century.

Almost immediately, governments worldwide faced immense pressure to establish net-zero targets. Hundreds of companies joined the movement, recognizing the economic opportunities presented by the transition to clean energy. This “net-zero fever” has led to some dubious commitments that excessively rely on using global forests and wetlands to absorb human pollution. Nevertheless, this shift has altered the course of this century: approximately 75% of global emissions are now encompassed by net-zero pledges, and projections for global warming throughout this century have decreased from around 3.7–4.8°C to 2.4–2.6°C under existing climate commitments.Read more here.

Topics:

Passkeys to Replace Passwords by 2026: The Future of Online Security

Posted on January 6, 2026 by Igor Mitreski

Passkeys: The Future of Data Security

Dakuku/Getty Images

Struggling to recall numerous passwords? If you can remember them all, you either have too few or are using the same one across multiple sites. By 2026, this challenge could become obsolete.

Passwords present significant cybersecurity challenges; hackers trade stolen credentials daily. A Verizon analysis reveals that only 3% of passwords are complex enough to resist hacking attempts.

Fortunately, an innovative solution is emerging, making data security simpler. Instead of cumbersome passwords, biometric authentication—such as facial recognition or fingerprint scanning—is increasingly being used for seamless logins.

“Passwordless authentication is becoming universal, providing robust security against phishing and brute force attacks,” says Jake Moore, an expert at cybersecurity firm ESET.

If you currently access your banking apps with your fingerprint, you’re already utilizing this cutting-edge method. It generates two cryptographic “passkeys”: a public key sent to your service (like your bank) during account creation and a private key securely stored on your device.

To log in, your bank sends a one-time cryptographic challenge to your device instead of requesting a password. Your fingerprint unlocks a secure chip that uses your private key to sign the challenge, sending the signed response back to your bank for verification against the public key. Importantly, your biometric data remains on your device. “Passkeys offer security, ease of use, and unparalleled convenience,” adds Moore.

Major companies are actively pushing passkey adoption. Microsoft announced in May 2025 that new accounts created with them will default to passwordless. “While passwords have been prevalent for centuries, their reign could soon come to an end,” the company stated. More organizations are expected to follow suit within the next year. Moore anticipates that as additional platforms embrace passkeys, more users will turn to biometric solutions that frequently scan their faces.

Various sectors are embracing passkey technology. Online gaming platform Roblox is rapidly expanding its use of passkeys, as shown by a 856% increase in authenticating users, with the public sector also participating; the German Federal Employment Agency ranks among the leading organizations adopting passkeys.

“Decreasing dependence on passwords benefits every organization,” affirms Andrew Schikier from the FIDO Alliance, which advocates for passkey integration. This transition also alleviates user concerns: data reveals that organizations switching to passkeys see an 81% drop in IT helpdesk requests regarding login issues. Schikier predicts that over half of the top 1,000 websites will adopt passkeys by 2026.

Topics:

Security/
2026 News Preview

Melting of Northern Greenland’s Ice Dome: Past Events and Future Risks

Posted on January 5, 2026 by Igor Mitreski

Researchers Working at Prudhoe Dome in Greenland

Caleb K. Wolcott-George

Greenland drill cargo awaiting transport by ski plane at Prudhoe Dome — Researchers Working at Prudhoe Dome in Greenland

Caleb K. Wolcott-George

The ice dome located in northern Greenland has previously melted completely under temperatures expected to return this century. This significant discovery offers valuable insights into the speed at which melting ice sheets can influence global sea levels.

In a groundbreaking study, researchers drilled 500 meters into Prudhoe Dome, an extensive ice formation the size of Luxembourg situated in northwestern Greenland, gathering seven meters of sediment and rock core. Infrared dating indicated that the core’s surface sand was sun-bleached approximately 7,000 years ago—corroborating that the dome fully melted as the planet emerged from its last glacial maximum due to cyclical changes in Earth’s orbital dynamics.

During that era, summer temperatures were 3°C to 5°C warmer than today’s averages. Alarmingly, human-induced climate change could bring back similar temperatures by 2100.

“This provides direct evidence that the ice sheet is highly sensitive to even the modest warming seen during the Holocene,” stated Yarrow Axford, a Northwestern University researcher not involved in the study.

With the ongoing melting of Greenland’s ice sheet, projections indicate a potential sea level rise of tens of centimeters to a meter within this century. To refine these predictions, scientists must enhance their understanding of how quickly various sections of the ice sheet are dissipating.

The Prudhoe Dome core is the first of multiple cores analyzed by the GreenDrill project, funded by the National Science Foundation and featuring researchers from various U.S. universities. Their goal is to extract crucial climate data from beneath the ice sheets, one of Earth’s least-explored areas.

Notably, deposits excavated in 1966 from beneath the ice at Camp Century—a U.S. nuclear military facility operational for eight years during the Cold War—revealed that Greenland lacked ice around 400,000 years ago. Further, a rock core taken in 1993 from underneath Summit Station illustrated that the entire ice sheet has melted as recently as 1.1 million years ago.

However, the GreenDrill project extends its research deeper beneath the ice, collecting samples from multiple locations near Greenland’s northern coast.

“The crucial question is when did the edge of Greenland experience melting in the past?” posed Caleb Walcott-George, part of a new research team at the University of Kentucky. “This is where the initial sea level rise will transpire.”

Current ice sheet models indicate uncertainty regarding whether northern or southern Greenland will melt at a faster rate in the future. This study bolsters the evidence that warming post-last glacial maximum manifested earlier and with greater intensity in northern Greenland, according to Axford.

Potential explanations may involve feedback mechanisms, such as the loss of Arctic sea ice, which could have allowed more ocean heat to penetrate the atmosphere in the far north.

By confirming that Prudhoe Dome melted under a warming of 3°C to 5°C, this study adds credibility to ice sheet models that predict similar outcomes, asserted Edward Gasson, who was not part of the research at the University of Exeter, UK.

“This research is vital for recalibrating surface melting models: When will we really begin to lose this ice?” Gasson emphasized.

How ‘James and the Giant Peach’ Can Inspire the Future of Food Innovation

Posted on January 2, 2026 by Igor Mitreski

Liaocheng City, China - February 18: People capturing moments with a stunning glass sculpture of Chinese cabbage in Liaocheng City, Shandong Province, China. This iconic sculpture stands 9 meters tall and 5 meters wide. Known as 'bai cai' in Chinese, it is a homonym for 'wealth'. (Photo by Visual China Group via Getty Images) — Visual China Group (via Getty Images)

In Roald Dahl’s enchanting novel, James and the Giant Peach, a magical crystal causes a dead peach tree to sprout colossal, juicy peaches. It’s a whimsical thought: what if we could cultivate giant fruits without the hassle of pests or dubious old ladies?

Fast forward to the mid-2030s, where botanists have cracked the code. Scientists have enhanced the classic James peach, harnessing genetics to yield extra-large fruits and vegetables, ultimately creating crops that produce an array of delectable and nutritious foods.

One notable innovation is the fruit salad tree, a marvel developed in the early 2020s. Utilizing ancient grafting techniques, hybrid plants are born by combining branches from different species, allowing trees to bear multiple types of fruit. For instance, a grafted tree can yield both red and golden delicious apples, along with other varieties. In 2013, an innovative horticulturist successfully grafted a tree to produce 250 different types of apples. Citrus hybrids combine lemons, limes, oranges, and grapefruits, while other variations produce plums, peaches, nectarines, and apricots.

A remarkable example is the Tomtato, which merges potato roots with tomato foliage. These hybrids arise from closely related plants, such as tomatoes and potatoes, which both belong to the same genus. Additionally, the eggplant also falls under the same classification, showcasing the ease with which thriving hybrids can be created.

By the early 2030s, advanced gene editing and selective breeding will make it feasible to grow fruits from entirely different botanical families. This opens the door to extraordinary plants that can produce bananas, citrus, apples, and peaches from a single tree, tailored to farmers’ and consumers’ preferences.

Gardeners have also turned to Brassica oleracea, a species that generates various types of cabbage, kale, broccoli, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts. Hybridization was simple, enabling the development of plants yielding these vegetables in diverse areas of a large garden.

“
In homage to Roald Dahl’s tale, scientists have created a peach variety yielding fruit the size of a large suitcase.
“

While grafting yielded impressive results, it was labor-intensive and costly since each plant required individual attention. The game-changer came in the mid-2030s, with plant geneticists succeeding in creating hybrid superplants from seeds, allowing broader access to multiple harvests from a single crop.

Organizations like PolyPlants are leading the way in novel agricultural practices. As public perception towards gene editing becomes more favorable, people recognize the nutritional benefits. For instance, fruits engineered to be rich in vitamins and nutrients are being developed. A 2022 study focused on creating tomatoes packed with antioxidant-rich anthocyanins, linked to longevity benefits. Other modifications through gene editing have led to polyplants that exhibit enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens, salinity, drought, and insect infestations. By engineering the root microbiome, mycorrhizal fungi are tailored for each crop component, stimulating growth and productivity.

As climate change escalates and traditional crops face threats, large-scale gene editing holds immense importance. PolyPlant’s innovations aim to ensure global food security amidst rising temperatures.

Genomic studies have pinpointed a cluster of genes linked to the size of edible plant components. Grafting techniques enable gene editing in species not directly modified, such as avocados, coffee, and cocoa. These advancements have facilitated the creation of plants that produce oversized fruits.

Honoring Roald Dahl’s legacy, scientists have developed a peach variety that bears fruit as large as a suitcase. A festive tradition has emerged around this giant fruit tree, celebrating the harvest with events encouraging children to enjoy these delightful oversized peaches, cherries, and strawberries.

The crops and trees yielding colossal, nutritious food are not solely for feasting; they play a vital role in addressing nutrition deficits in regions grappling with food insecurity.

Rowan Hooper, Podcast editor of New Scientist and author of How to Spend $1 Trillion: 10 Global Problems We Can Actually Solve. Follow him on Bluesky @rowoop.bsky.social. In Future Chronicles, he imagines the history of future inventions and advancements.

Gene-Edited Babies: The Future of Genetics, but Not All CRISPR Startups Will Lead the Way

Posted on December 29, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Every Baby Has About 100 New Genetic Mutations

Mood board – Mike Watson / Getty Images

Babies Crawling in Diapers — Every Baby Has About 100 New Genetic Mutations

Mood board – Mike Watson / Getty Images

Let me share some eye-opening news. Every child embodies genetic experimentation, with nature exhibiting indifference if things don’t go as planned. Our genomes present a complex tapestry shaped by conflicting evolutionary forces, and each of us carries roughly one hundred novel mutations.–Each birth introduces a unique mutation into the genetic pool.

Thus, I anticipate that in the future, gene editing of embryos will become commonplace once humanity confronts various daunting challenges, including climate change. There may come a time when natural conception is perceived as reckless.

Reaching that future is no trivial task. However, if you’ve been following the buzz from the tech community this year, it’s no surprise you feel optimistic. By 2025, we discovered at least three startups focused on creating gene-edited babies.

So, is the dawn of CRISPR on the horizon, or could these startups potentially face backlash?

Preventing Genetic Diseases

Among these startups, Manhattan Genomics and Preventive aim not for enhancement but to avert severe genetic disorders. This noble objective is commendable, but it’s important to note that many of these conditions can already be forestalled through existing screening techniques, such as genetic testing of IVF embryos prior to implantation, a process with a high rate of success.

So why pursue the development of gene-edited embryos, a complex and legally challenging endeavor, when IVF screening already provides a viable solution?

Preventive did not respond to inquiries, but a spokesperson from Manhattan Genomics noted that couples undergoing IVF often don’t have enough viable embryos to choose from. By editing disease-carrying embryos instead of discarding them, the likelihood of having a healthy child increases. The company believes that gene editing could enhance the chances for approximately ten embryos affected by Huntington’s disease and thirty-five embryos affected by sickle cell disease annually for couples using IVF.

However, this translates to a very limited number of births. Approximately one-third of IVF embryos lead to viable births, and this percentage may drop further post-editing. Furthermore, significant challenges accompany this approach. Although CRISPR technology has advanced, there’s still a risk of introducing harmful mutations as unintended consequences.

Moreover, the editing process often fails to initiate or can continue even after the embryo has begun dividing. This results in various genetic alterations within the same embryo, a phenomenon known as mosaicism. The illegal CRISPR children from China come to mind, announced in 2018.

Consequently, it becomes uncertain whether the mutation causing the disease was indeed corrected in the edited embryo and whether any harmful mutations emerged as a result.

Doing It Right

Solutions do exist. For instance, some gene-edited animals have been developed by modifying stem cells and then cloning them once the desired alterations have been confirmed. However, I previously explained that cloned animals often exhibit various health issues and unexpected traits, underscoring the necessity for foundational research and rigorous oversight should this approach be pursued for humans.

We have two strong examples of responsibly introducing embryonic gene editing through mitochondrial donation initiatives in the UK and Australia. Mitochondria are cellular energy producers that contain their own small genomes. Mutated mitochondria can lead to severe health issues if passed down to offspring, but this risk can be mitigated by substituting them with healthy donor mitochondria.

A version of mitochondrial technology emerged in private fertility clinics in the US during the 1990s, during which humanity witnessed the first genetically modified human. Initial attempts led to the banning of this technology in the US.

While mitochondrial donation was previously prohibited in the UK, changes in the law came about following advocacy from patient groups, extensive dialogue, and consultation. It now receives approvals on a trial basis as needed.Australia is pursuing a similar path.

What Is the Real Objective?

This is the ideal framework for introducing new reproductive technologies: transparently, legally, and under independent supervision. Yet, at least two startups are reportedly conducting experiments in countries with laxer gene editing laws.

This does not advance science, as trust in the claims made by private companies acting without regulatory oversight diminishes. Conversely, this approach could prompt a backlash, leading to more countries tightening regulations against gene editing.

For these billionaires – with Preventive’s investors including notable figures like OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong – if your genuine intention is to combat severe genetic diseases, investing in nonprofit research organizations could yield significantly greater results.

Or is the ultimate aim to engineer your own child instead of assisting other couples in achieving healthy pregnancies? This is clearly the mission of the third startup, Bootstrap Bio.

In next month’s column, we will explore whether gene editing can truly be utilized to enhance our children.

Topics:

Alpine Communities Confront Uncertain Future Following 2025 Glacier Collapse

Posted on December 23, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Bratten, Switzerland: Landslide Devastation in May 2025

Alexandre Agrusti/AFP via Getty Images

Landslide in Bratten, Switzerland — Bratten, Switzerland: Landslide Devastation in May 2025

Alexandre Agrusti/AFP via Getty Images

In May 2025, the picturesque village of Bratten in the Swiss Alps was tragically destroyed by a massive glacier collapse. Thanks to meticulous monitoring, nearly all residents were safely evacuated.

The initial warning signs emerged on May 14, when the Swiss avalanche warning service reported a minor rockfall in the area. Trained observers, who typically have other full-time roles, were on alert for signs of potential danger.

Detailed investigations followed, utilizing images from cameras installed on the glacier after a previous avalanche in the 1990s. “The angles provided crucial insights into shifts in the mountain,” explained Mylène Jacquemart from ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

On May 18 and 19, 300 residents were evacuated, but one individual, a 64-year-old man, resisted leaving his home.

On May 28, the situation escalated as the glacier suffered a catastrophic collapse. “This was an enormous rock avalanche,” Jacquemart stated.

The glacier had accumulated debris from previous years, and when a rockfall occurred, it triggered the collapse of 3 million cubic meters of ice, along with 6 million cubic meters of rock, ravaging a significant portion of the village. Regrettably, the man who opted to remain was killed.

Contrary to some media reports suggesting advanced surveillance technology monitored the glacier, Jacquemart clarified, “The observer’s office didn’t have an elaborate alarm system; a simple red light indicated a problem.”

However, Jacquemart emphasized that Switzerland’s monitoring system ensures effective communication and distinct accountability regarding evacuation decisions.

Satellite Image of the Landslide Area on May 30

European Union, Copernicus Sentinel 2 imagery

What contributed to this disaster? The likelihood of rockfalls exacerbated by climate change is a pressing concern. As global warming causes Alpine glaciers to retreat, the incidence of rockfalls is on the rise. Switzerland’s average temperature has increased by nearly 3 degrees since the pre-industrial era, resulting in melting permafrost that allows water to infiltrate cracks in the rocks.

“There’s a clear connection between climate change and the increase in rockfalls,” Jacquemart remarks. “Dramatic transformations are occurring in high-altitude regions, and the consequences are alarming.”

Yet, Jacquemart advises against attributing the Bratten tragedy solely to recent warming phenomena. The slow geological adjustment to post-Ice Age conditions could also be a factor, she notes.

The immediate future remains unclear for Bratten’s residents. Local authorities declared that the village cannot be reconstructed on unstable ground. Plans are underway for rebuilding, but the area remains susceptible to further landslides, and establishing protective measures demands significant financial resources.

“Communities in mountainous regions worldwide, from the Alps to the Andes and the Himalayas, face increasing threats from the intensity and frequency of mountain-related disasters,” stated Kamal Kishore, United Nations Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction, in a recent statement. “Their livelihoods, cultural heritage, and way of life are under severe threat.”

Topics:

This revised content maintains the original HTML structure while optimizing for SEO through targeted keywords and clearer descriptions. If you have any specific keywords or phrases you’d like included, please let me know!

How Virtual Reality Farming Will Transform the Future of Food Supply

Posted on December 19, 2025 by

Agriculture has long been a skilled and high-pressure profession, but modern farmers encounter challenges that even our grandparents could not have imagined.

In the UK, extreme weather is severely impacting agricultural lands. A recent survey revealed that 84% of farmers have witnessed a drop in crop yields or livestock production. This decline stems from a mix of heavy rain, drought, and extreme heat. Coupled with labor shortages, escalating machinery costs, and the demand to produce more food with fewer resources, the outlook for British agriculture appears increasingly uncertain.

As these issues escalate, innovations have surged. One of the most surprising solutions isn’t a cutting-edge tractor, miracle fertilizer, or genetically enhanced supercrops. Instead, it’s virtual reality (VR). This immersive technology, typically associated with gaming, is gradually becoming essential for the agricultural sector.

Here are five ways VR can pave the way for resilient farms and safeguard the food supply for an expanding population.

Life-saving VR Simulator

Operating a tractor is a daily task on the farm, but it can be daunting for new drivers. Tractors may be slow, but they can pose serious risks.

Rural roadways are infamous for narrow lanes, mud, hidden ditches, overgrown hedges, and blind turns, all of which can lead to serious accidents. Statistics indicate higher accident risks.

To combat this, researchers at Nottingham Trent University have developed a tractor-specific VR hazard perception test. Utilizing 360-degree footage from a tractor’s perspective, learners can experience real-life scenarios. Farmers report these situations as highly dangerous: hidden bikes, potholes, tight corners, and vehicles that regard 14-ton tractors as mere obstacles.

In trials with over 100 drivers, many, particularly those with past accidents, struggled to recognize hazards in time. It’s evident that traditional training doesn’t suffice, as tractors have distinct turning radii, slower speeds, and unique blind spots compared to cars.

There’s hope that this VR training could become a standard educational tool in universities and young farmers’ clubs, ensuring safer driving practices before they venture onto the roads.

Hone Your Skills in VR

VR is also training the next generation of vineyard workers safely, minimizing the risk of harming the vines. The Maara Tech project in New Zealand has created a system enabling trainees to practice vine cutting indoors, even on rainy days. Pruning in wet conditions carries significant risks, exposing fresh cuts to moisture, which can lead to fungal diseases.

Researchers at Eurecat, a European R&D center collaborating with several universities on agricultural innovations, have advanced this concept further. They’ve developed VR pruning shears equipped with sensors that guide users on the correct pressure, angle, and technique. It’s not just about speed; precision is crucial.

Accurate cuts result in healthier grapes, leading to superior quality and fewer errors. Since this training is virtual, new workers can build their confidence and help alleviate seasonal labor shortages.

Mindfulness with VR Headsets

Agriculture is not just physically demanding; it’s also mentally taxing. When adverse weather ruins planting schedules, drought devastates fields, and costs soar, even the most resilient farmers can reach their breaking point.

It’s perhaps unsurprising that 95% of farmers under 40 believe that mental health issues are the biggest hidden struggle they face in agriculture.

In response, researchers at the University of East Anglia have initiated the Rural Mind Project, employing a 360-degree VR experience to immerse healthcare professionals, policymakers, and support workers in real farming scenarios—addressing issues like isolation, anxiety due to weather, and financial pressures.

This initiative goes beyond fostering empathy; it aims to facilitate tangible change. VR training is equipping practitioners to recognize rural-specific stressors, find effective support strategies, and dismantle the stigma associated with seeking help.

Unlike conventional therapy, where the presence of a psychiatrist may induce anxiety, farmers can practice coping methods in a tranquil virtual setting designed for rural challenges. Initial feedback suggests VR may reach individuals who would typically avoid seeking assistance.

While it’s not a complete solution, it’s a promising step towards making mental health care as accessible as checking the weather forecast.

Learn the Ropes Without the Mess

Not only does VR help in understanding farm life, but it also provides the younger generation a head start without the mess, fertilizers, or early wake-ups.

Through the DIVE4Ag project at Oregon State University, schoolchildren can embark on virtual field trips via their gadgets, exploring dairy farms, urban gardens, and aquaculture facilities.

Meanwhile, at Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science in India, the AR/VR Experience Center offers agricultural students interactive lessons on crop cultivation, animal care, and modern production methods.

As immersive VR education gains traction, it sparks excitement and confidence, motivating the upcoming generation to consider agricultural careers long before stepping onto a physical farm.

Stepping into the Metaverse

If VR can train farmers effectively, support their mental well-being, and educate them about agriculture, why not extend these benefits to animals? In Turkey, one adventurous dairy farmer has started using VR goggles on his cows while they are comfortably housed in a barn, allowing them to view lush pastures accompanied by soft classical music.

The goal was to create a serene atmosphere to reduce stress and potentially enhance milk output. Early results have been remarkable, as average production climbed from 22 to 27 liters per cow per day.

This approach might seem quirky, but managing cows indoors during extreme climates allows for better control over their feeding, milking, and overall health, suggesting that the future of farming may indeed lie where livestock engage with the metaverse.

From safer tractor operations to calming cows using VR, this technology is demonstrating its value beyond mere gaming. It offers a glimpse into the future of agriculture. EIT Food showcases these innovations, merging visionary concepts with practical solutions to illustrate how immersive technology can make agriculture smarter, safer, and more sustainable for all.

Envisioning a Future Where Smart Glasses Eliminate “AI Slop”

Posted on November 21, 2025 by

“Wearing non-smart glasses created a reality that was not augmented at all…”

Ekaterina Goncharova/Getty Images

By the mid-2020s, the world became inundated with “AI slop.” Various forms of content—images, videos, music, emails, advertisements, speeches, and TV shows—were generated by artificial intelligence and often felt unoriginal and unengaging. While some experiences occasionally offered amusement, many were dull and soulless, sometimes leading to harmful misinterpretations. Interactions with others raised doubts—was the person on the other end of the call genuine? Many were repulsed and eager to escape from this perplexing landscape.

There was no “Butler’s Crusade,” a fictional revolt against the thinking machines. The book title references Samuel Butler’s insightful 1863 letter discussing machine evolution, titled “Darwin in the Machines.” Ironically, the solution emerged through innovative applications of AI.

One tech firm unveiled a series of smart glasses, featuring an augmented reality (AR) display equipped with built-in cameras, microphones, and headphones. By 2028, engineers from the Reclaim Reality Foundation adapted this tech for smart glasses, utilizing bespoke AI to eliminate any AI-generated content. Wearing non-smart glasses functioned as a form of negative AR, presenting an unfiltered reality.

Roaming the streets with DumbGlasses, later dubbed X-ray specs due to their ability to see beyond the surface, felt akin to subscribing to ad-free media. These glasses stripped away AI-created banners and seamlessly inserted natural scenery, ensuring that every conversation or song was crafted using classic analog methods. Users embraced X-ray specs as a means to unwind, declutter their minds, and break free from the deluge of AI. Many proudly displayed their status with T-shirts and badges touting slogans like “AI Vegan,” “Real or Nothing,” and “Slop Free Zone.”

As we moved into the 2030s, electronic contact lenses and tiny ear implants emerged that could perform similar functions.

The online domain posed a different challenge. There, escaping the grip of AI and relentless algorithmic profiling proved far more difficult.

“
Engineers took that technology into smart glasses and utilized custom AI to eliminate any AI-generated content.
“

One method allowed users to access search engines without activating the AI summaries. In the 2020s, one such option was: startpage.com. Some clever hacks employed expletives in search queries, circumventing AI-generated summaries. Nonetheless, even with these workarounds, evading AI profiling and targeting on social media platforms remained nearly impossible. Given the overwhelming dominance of major tech companies over social media, navigation, and the online realm, disengaging was far easier said than done. Yet, few were willing to abandon everything the Internet revolution had gifted us; they yearned for a digital universe to explore and rich online experiences.

The solution manifested as a new kind of network. Beyond the standard internet and the dark web, accessible only via specific browsers and passcodes, emerged veriweb (from veritas, Latin for truth). This network featured content entirely free from AI influence. Collaborating with Reclaim Reality, artists, musicians, and writers devised an infallible system, akin to blockchain used for verifying cryptocurrency transactions, ensuring that every piece of content had verifiable human origins. Veriweb, or the transparent web, became the trusted haven for reliable information and journalism, as users could trace the origin of their content. Wikipedia, which struggled with AI-generated material throughout the 2020s, transitioned to Veriweb in 2029. Traditional news entities followed suit, eager to assert their credibility in a post-AI landscape. Moreover, veriweb ensured that users remained unmonitored, unprofiled, and untouched by AI algorithms.

As millions flocked to this platform, humanity rediscovered connections and creativity. While much AI utilization persisted in personal tasks—like medical diagnoses—the intellectual stagnation that plagued society since the 2020s began to dissipate as individuals more actively engaged in their actions rather than leaving them to machines.

People discovered that navigating the vast digital world without algorithmic guidance diminished their sense of curated and personalized experiences. Additionally, the extensive collection of sensitive data by tech giants and the colossal revenues derived from targeted exploitation of that data became distant memories, evoking little sorrow among the populace.

Rowan Hooper, editor of New Scientist podcast and author of How to Spend $1 Trillion: 10 Global Problems We Can Actually Solve. Follow him on Bluesky @rowwhoop.bsky.social

Topics:

artificial intelligence/
technology

How Arc Raiders’ Generative AI Sparked a Battle for the Future of Gaming

Posted on November 19, 2025 by

Arc Raiders stands as a strong contender for game of the year, especially in late-game discussions. Set in a multiplayer environment teeming with hostile drones and military robots, players must navigate a world where trust is scarce—will you risk cooperating with other raiders trying to return to humanity’s underground safety, or will they ambush you for your hard-earned spoils? Interestingly, the majority of gamers I’ve spoken to suggest that humanity is, for the most part, choosing unity over conflict.

In a recent Game Spot review, Mark Delaney offers an intriguing perspective on Ark Raiders’ capacity for narrative and camaraderie, noting its unexpectedly optimistic outlook when compared to other multiplayer extraction shooters. “In Ark Raiders, while players can eliminate one another, it’s not indicative of a grim future for humanity; the fact that most choose to help each other instead is a testament to its greatness as a multiplayer experience.”

However, it’s worth noting a layer of irony within the narrative of humanity banding together against machines. The game utilizes AI-generated text-to-speech, developed from real actors’ performances, and also employs machine learning to refine the enemy robots’ behavior and animations. Writer Rick Lane voiced ethical concerns over this: “For Ark Raiders to capitalize on human social instincts while simultaneously reassembling the human voice through technology, disregarding the essence of human interaction, reflects a troubling lack of artistic integrity,” he wrote in an Eurogamer article.

The increasing use of generative AI in game development has become a contentious issue among players (though gauging actual feelings remains challenging). Many players, including myself, find this trend uncomfortable. Last week, the latest Call of Duty faced backlash for allegedly using AI-generated art, which has drawn significant ire. Advocates for generative AI argue it empowers smaller developers; however, Call of Duty is a multibillion-dollar franchise that can afford to employ skilled artists. The same logic applies to the AI-generated voice lines in Ark Raiders.

This raises existential questions for those within the gaming industry—artists, writers, voice actors, and programmers alike may face obsolescence due to technology that replaces expensive talent with cheaper, less capable machines. EA has mandated that its employees utilize in-house AI tools. Such policies are widely criticized. Krafton has boldly branded itself as an AI-first developer while offering voluntary resignation to its South Korean employees. Voluntary layoffs have been introduced as well.

Controversy ensues… Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 has faced accusations of using AI-generated art. Photo: Activision

Interestingly, those defending generative AI in gaming predominantly belong to the corporate sector rather than everyday players or developers. Tim Sweeney from Epic Games (notably wealthy) expressed his thoughts on Eurogamer’s Ark Raiders review on X, lamenting the infusion of “politics” into video game evaluations, and suggesting a future where games utilize endless personalized dialogue crafted from human performances.

Personally, I prefer human-crafted dialogue over AI-generated lines. I want characters to express sentiments that resonate with human experiences, delivered by actors who grasp the emotional depth. Award-winning voice actor Jane Perry remarked in an interview with GamesIndustry.biz, “Will a robot be on stage accepting the Best Performance award at the gaming or BAFTA awards? I believe audiences would overwhelmingly favor authentic human performances. However, the ambition to replace humans with machines is a powerful driving force among the tech elite.”

Through years of covering this industry, I’ve realized that the dynamics in the gaming world often reflect broader societal trends. A few years back, there was a spike in investments in Web3 and NFT gaming, which ultimately led to a collapse due to their unattractive, computer-generated aesthetics. When big tech latched onto the “metaverse” concept, gaming companies had already been developing improved iterations for years. Additionally, Gamergate illustrated how to weaponize discontented youth, influencing both political strategy and current cultural conflicts. Hence, anyone concerned about AI’s ramifications on work and society should remain vigilant to the waves the technology creates among players and developers alike—these could serve as intriguing indicators.

What we’re witnessing appears to be a familiar clash between creators and those who benefit from their work. Moreover, players are beginning to challenge whether they should pay the same price for games that feature low-quality, machine-generated visuals and sounds. New conversations are emerging regarding which applications of AI are culturally and ethically permissible.

What to play

A plot with few travelers… Goodnight Universe. Photo: Nice Dream/Skybound Games

From the creators of the poignant ‘Before Your Eyes,’ Goodnight Universe allows you to experience the world through a super-intelligent six-month-old baby endowed with extraordinary abilities. The narrative unfolds through the baby’s internal dialogue. Young Isaac believes he possesses wisdom beyond his age, yet struggles to convey his thoughts and emotions to his family. Soon, he discovers telekinetic powers and the ability to read minds, catching the unwanted attention of others. If equipped with a webcam, players can interact by looking around and blinking. This game delivers an emotional narrative and explores themes that resonate deeply, refreshing nostalgic memories of my own children as infants.

Available: PC, Nintendo Switch 2, PS5, Xbox
Estimated play time: 3-4 hours

What to read

A first look… Benjamin Evan Ainsworth as Link and Beau Bragason as Zelda in the upcoming “The Legend of Zelda” movie set for 2027. Photo: Nintendo/Sony

Nintendo has shared the first image from the forthcoming Legend of Zelda movie, featuring Beau Bragason and Benjamin Evan Ainsworth enjoying a serene moment in a meadow. Here, Link bears a striking resemblance to his Ocarina of Time appearance. I was pleased to see that Princess Zelda wields a bow, suggesting she will be an active participant in the action rather than a mere damsel in distress.
Nominees for the upcoming Game Award include Ghost of Yorei, Claire Obscur: Expedition 33, and Death Stranding 2. (Traditionally, The Guardian has been the voting platform, but a change will occur this year.) As we reported last week, the annual event has recently discontinued its Future Class program for emerging developers, which felt more like a marketing tactic.
A team of modders has revived Sony’s notorious failed shooter Concorde from the dead – however, the company issued a takedown notice for gameplay footage shared on YouTube, even though the server continues to operate.

What to click

Question block

A fantasy realm… The Elder Scrolls: Cyrodiil from Oblivion. Photo: Bethesda Game Studio

This week’s question from leader Jude:

“I recently started playing No Man’s Sky. This is the first game that has felt like it could actually happen. Ready Player One, combined with the now ubiquitous Japanese isekai genre where characters enter alternate worlds. Does anyone else play this game? Can I actually live there?”

I had similar feelings when I first explored Oblivion two decades ago. It might sound amusing now that I play the remastered version, but at that time, it contained everything I desired: vibrant towns, delicious food and literature, interesting characters, magical creatures, and the allure of combat. If given the chance, I would absolutely reside in Cyrodiil from The Elder Scrolls (shown above). Although smaller compared to modern open-world titles, I find there’s no need for an overwhelmingly vast world while immersing in a fantasy escape—we seek an engaging experience without excessive complexity.

There are definitely virtual realms I would not want to inhabit—like the perilous lands of World of Warcraft’s Azeroth, or the chaotic Mushroom Kingdom, not to mention Elden Ring’s vibrant yet overwhelming Land Between. Meanwhile, Hyrule feels rather desolate, while the engaging nature of No Man’s Sky arises from its player interactions.

I’ll throw this question out to my readers: Is there a video game world you’d like to call home?

If you have questions for the Question Block or feedback on the newsletter, please reply or email us at pushbuttons@theguardian.com.

Is the Future of Education Beyond Universities?

Posted on November 13, 2025 by

“The U.S. government is depriving universities of billions in federal funding…”

Robin Beck/AFP via Getty Images

UCLA students, researchers and demonstrators gather during rally against funding cuts on research, health, and higher education, at University of California, Los Angeles in April — “The U.S. government is depriving universities of billions in federal funding…”

Robin Beck/AFP via Getty Images

In 1907, American historian Henry Adams commenced the distribution of his memoirs, which gained immense popularity in 1919 through The Education of Henry Adams. Given Adams’ notable lineage—his grandfather and great-grandfather were both U.S. presidents—one might anticipate a self-praising narrative about the virtues of American education.

However, Adams captivated audiences with his audacious assertion that the teachings of 19th-century schools were largely irrelevant. Committed to religious studies and classical literature, he felt ill-prepared for the reality of mass electrification and the advent of the automobile. He contended that if education was intended to equip individuals for the future, it was failing miserably.

Fast forward nearly 120 years, Adams’ critique is once again pertinent, particularly in the U.S. New technologies are altering traditional educational paradigms. The emergence of AI models represents just one facet of an ideological struggle. The federal government is stripping universities of billions in funding while asserting more control over curricula and admissions. Although the landscape of education is chaotic, it is not vanishing; it is evolving with the times.

When I attended my first college lecture in over two decades, I was reminded of Adams. The course “Race, Media, and International Affairs,” taught by journalist and international studies professor Karen Attiah, presented a refreshing approach. In 2024, Attiah covered political affairs for Washington Post and previously taught at Columbia University. However, earlier this year, Columbia canceled her course unexpectedly. Shortly afterward, Attiah reported she was dismissed by the Post due to her social media remarks concerning racism and right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk. The newspaper refrained from commenting on her termination.

Yet, as Attiah states, “this is not the moment for media literacy and historical understanding to be constrained by institutions bent on authoritarianism and fear.” Therefore, she conducted Columbia’s classes through her Resistance Summer School, livestreaming them to anyone who paid tuition. The response was overwhelming; within 48 hours, 500 students enrolled, leaving a long waiting list. Currently, she manages two courses this fall, including mine.

In many ways, Attiah’s class recalls a course I took in college over 25 years ago. Engaged at my desk, I listened as Attiah discussed topics such as the depiction of colonial wars in 1600s newspapers and why the media neglected Japan’s racial equality proposals in light of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. Blending U.S. media history with international race relations, she informed me of numerous insights I had overlooked, despite my lengthy career as a journalist and occasional media studies educator. It genuinely felt like a return to college—in a positive sense.

“
I’m concerned about academic institutions, but not the future of education. The quest for knowledge never ceases
“

Attiah’s straightforward approach sharply contrasts with other educators who virtualize their research. For instance, Philosophy Tube is a well-established lecture series on YouTube by philosopher Abigail Thorne, who employs visual effects, costumes, and clever scripts to impart contemporary philosophical concepts. However, both Thorne and Attiah share a common goal: to enhance educational accessibility while challenging authority beyond academic limitations.

Thorne and Attiah are influenced by scholar and activist Stuart Hall. After teaching cultural studies at Birmingham University in the UK during the ’60s and ’70s, Hall sought to exit the academic bubble and educate the public about media racism. He directed the 1979 BBC documentary “It Ain’t Half Racist, Mum.”, highlighting racial bias in news reports and media portrayals of Black immigrants.

Mr. Hall advocated for making higher education accessible to citizens lacking access. This is the direction educators are presently taking: some utilize crowdfunding to offer free education, while others, like Attiah, implement a subscription model. Regardless of the method, they are committed to facilitating learning.

But what about students who prefer not to spend hours in front of a screen? An emerging movement seeks to accommodate these individuals as well. Hackerspaces and makerspaces—community hubs for learning science and engineering—are appearing globally. These venues offer classes ranging from electronics to 3D printing to welding.

As Adams asserted, education must equip us for the future. I contend that the forthcoming landscape may witness academic freedom flourishing outside of traditional institutions. While I harbor concerns for academic establishments, I hold hope for education’s future. As long as we champion rebel professors and hackerspace educators, the pursuit of knowledge will persist.

Annalee’s Week

What I’m Reading:
Keeper of Magical Things—A cozy fantasy about an archivist magician by Julie Leong.

What I See:
Frankenhooker— The most extreme adaptation of Frankenstein ever made.

What I’m Working On:
I’m completing assignments for Karen Attiah’s class!

Annalee Newitz is a science journalist and author. Their latest book is Automatic Noodles. They co-host the Hugo Award-winning podcast Our Opinion Is Correct. Follow @annaleen and visit their website: techsploitation.com

Topic:

Perfect Timing for Firefox: Developing an AI Browser and the Future of the Web

Posted on October 29, 2025 by

Need an assistant for your online activities? Several major artificial intelligence companies have moved away from chatbots like ChatGPT and are now focusing on new browsers with deep AI integration. These could take the form of agents who shop for you or ubiquitous chatbots that follow you, summarizing what you’re looking at, looking up related information, and answering related questions.

In the last week alone, OpenAI released the ChatGPT Atlas browser, while Microsoft showcased Edge’s new Copilot mode, both heavily utilizing chatbots. In early October, Perplexity made its Comet browser available for free. Mid-September saw Google rolling out Chrome with Gemini, integrating its AI assistant into the world’s most popular browser.

Following these releases, I spoke with Firefox General Manager Anthony Enzor-DeMeo to discuss whether AI-first browsers will gain traction, if Firefox will evolve to be fully AI-driven, and how user privacy expectations may change in this new era of personalized, agent-driven browsing.

Guardian: Have you tried ChatGPT Atlas or other AI browsers? I’m curious what you think about them.

Anthony Enzor-DeMeo: Yes, I’ve tried Atlas, Comet, and other competing products. What do I think about them? It’s a fascinating question: What do users want to see? Today, users typically go to Google, perform a search, and view various results. Atlas seems to be transitioning towards providing direct answers.

Guardian: Would you want that as a user?

Enzor-DeMeo: I prefer knowing where the AI derives its answers. References are important, and Perplexity’s Comet provides them. I believe that’s a positive development for the internet.

Guardian: How do you envision the future of the web? Is search evolving into a chat interface instead of relying solely on links?

Enzor-DeMeo: I’m concerned that access to content on the web may become more expensive. The internet has traditionally been free, mostly supported by advertising, though some sites do have subscriptions. I’m particularly interested in how access to content might shrink behind paywalls while aiming for a free and open internet. AI may not be immediately profitable, yet we have to guard against a shift towards a more closed internet.

Guardian: Do you anticipate Firefox releasing an AI-integrated or agent-like browser similar to Perplexity Comet or Atlas?

Enzor-DeMeo: Our focus remains on being the best browser available. With 200 million users, we need to encourage people to choose us over default options. We closely monitor user preferences regarding AI features, which are gradually introduced. Importantly, users retain control; they can disable features they do not wish to use.

Guardian: Do you think AI browsers will become popular or remain niche tools?

Enzor-DeMeo: Currently, paid AI usage is about 3% globally, so it’s premature to deem it fully mainstream. However, I believe AI is here to stay. The forthcoming years will likely see greater distribution and trial and error as we discover effective revenue models that users are willing to pay for. This varies widely by country and region, so the next phase of the internet presents uncertainties.

Guardian: What AI partnerships is Firefox considering?

Enzor-DeMeo: We recently launched Perplexity, akin to a search partnership agreement. While Google search is our default, users have access to 50 other search engines, providing them with options.

Guardian: Given your valuable partnership with Google, what financial significance does the Perplexity partnership hold?

Enzor-DeMeo: I’m unable to share specific details.

Guardian: Firefox has established its reputation on user privacy. How do you reconcile increasing demands for personalization, which requires more data, with AI-assisted browsing?

Enzor-DeMeo: Browsers inherently have a lot of user context. Companies are developing AI browsers to leverage this data for enhanced personalization and targeted ads. Mozilla will continue to honor users’ choices. If you prefer not to store data, that’s entirely valid. Users aren’t required to log in and can enjoy completely private browsing. If it results in less personalized AI, that’s acceptable. Ultimately, the choice lies with users.

Guardian: Do you think users anticipate sacrificing privacy for personalization?

Enzor-DeMeo: We’ve observed a generational divide. Younger cohorts prioritize value exchange—will sharing more information lead to a more tailored experience? In a landscape with numerous apps and social media, this expectation has emerged. However, perspectives vary between generations; Millennials often value choice, while Gen Xers prioritize privacy. Many Gen Z users emphasize personalization and choice.

Guardian: What are your thoughts on the recent court decision regarding Google’s monopoly?

Enzor-DeMeo: The judge acknowledged the influx of competition entering the market. He deliberately avoided delving into the browser engine domain. We support search competition but not at the cost of independent browsers. The ruling allows us to keep receiving compensation while monitoring market evolution over the next few years. The intersection of search and AI remains uncertain, and a prudent stance is to observe how these developments unfold.

Guardian: Firefox’s market share has been steadily declining over the past decade; what are your realistic goals for user growth in the coming years?

Enzor-DeMeo: Every user must decide to download and use Firefox. We’re proud to serve 200 million users. I believe that AI presents us with significant growth opportunities. We want to provide choices rather than lock users into a single solution, fostering diverse growth possibilities for us.

Will Criminal Self-Monitoring Systems Replace Prisons in the Future?

Posted on October 23, 2025 by

“No wonder Scandinavia was the first country to abolish prisons…”

Walker/Getty Images

view from below the main corridor in Alcatraz cellhouse, a federal penitentiary that was a maximum security prison on island and housed some of the United States' most notorious prisoners. — “No wonder Scandinavia was the first country to abolish prisons…”

Walker/Getty Images

The 2020s marked a significant period for the United States, spending around $182 billion annually on incarceration. This was a unique phenomenon, as few nations matched the US in both the number of incarcerated individuals and the financial burden incurred. Similar overcrowding and inhumane conditions plagued prisons worldwide, leading to a compelling question: why not eliminate them? With the advancement of technology, monitoring and managing individuals remotely became a viable solution.

The Home Guard initiative aimed to replace conventional prisons with three core components. The first element was an ankle bracelet that tracked the prisoner’s location. The second aspect involved a harness equipped with sensors to monitor the individual’s actions and conversations. The final component activated if the terms of the sentencing were violated, such as leaving the designated area or engaging in illicit activities, deploying an energy device similar to a stun gun to temporarily incapacitate the individual. Prisoners rapidly adapted to these regulations.

It’s unsurprising that Scandinavian nations were pioneers in abolishing prisons. In the region, imprisonment is viewed not as a means of punishment but as a method to safeguard the community. (“Home Guard” translates to the Norwegian term Gem Vernet.)

Halden Prison, a maximum security institution in Norway, was opened in 2010. It featured barred windows, private bathrooms, televisions, and high-quality furnishings within cells. Inmates dined and socialized with unarmed correctional staff rather than traditional guards and were incentivized to work for compensation. Outsiders often compared the facility to a luxurious hotel. Meanwhile, reports of inmate mistreatment surged in American prisons throughout the early 21st century. Norway’s recidivism rate stood at approximately 20% after two years, in stark contrast to the UK’s and the US’s 60-70%. Despite its costs, Halden provided effective rehabilitation and ultimately saved funds in the long run.

“
The AI monitored the prisoners’ behavior, tracking their website visits as well as messages and calls made.
“

Even in progressive Scandinavia, there were citizens who believed in punishment for wrongdoers. However, sociologists discovered that informing the public about the detrimental effects of excessive and cruel punishment on society ultimately leads to a perception that alternatives could be superior. This was the central aim of the Home Guard.

The initial self-fencel (“Self-Prison”) trial commenced in Norway in 2030. Participants received secure ankle bracelets for GPS tracking and wore harnesses that continuously captured images of their faces, processed through facial recognition software to prevent transfer to another individual. AI systems thoroughly monitored the inmates’ activities, including website visits and communication.

In the event of a breach of prison rules, a conducted energy device, typically found in stun guns, was integrated into the ankle bracelet to deliver an electric shock upon detection of any infractions. Authorities were then alerted.

The Home Guard scheme was initially proposed in 2018 by Dan Hunter and his teammates at King’s College London, who concluded that self-imposed prisons were significantly less costly than traditional ones over a complete sentence, even with the annual replacement of technology. Naturally, as technology became more affordable, expenses diminished further.

The first self-fencel trials took place in Bergen, where all prisoners not convicted of serious offenses were outfitted with the self-imprisonment technology and sent back to their homes. This initiative was a remarkable financial triumph and reinforced the message that physical prisons are costly, inhumane, inefficient, and antiquated. For global observers, it became evident that traditional prisons failed to adequately protect society, given their high recidivism rates.

Technical confinement proved to be superior; self-fencel quickly proliferated throughout Scandinavia. Trials were eventually conducted across Europe, and later in India, Mexico, Brazil, Australia, and even the United States. By 2050, 95% of prisons in these regions were closed. The savings were redirected toward education and healthcare, resulting in decreased crime rates as societal advancements and the reality of constant surveillance encouraged law-abiding behavior. Parents reminded their children, “Obey the law, or you’ll end up in jail,” and this threat resonated.

Rowan Hooper serves as the podcast editor at New Scientist and is the author of How to Spend a Trillion Dollars: The 10 Global Issues We Can Actually Fix. Follow him on Bluesky @rowoop.bsky.social. In Future Chronicles, he imagines a future filled with innovative inventions and developments.

topics:

artificial intelligence/
technology

Unveiling the Reality Behind F1’s New ‘Sustainable’ Fuel and Its Impact on Future Cars

Posted on October 22, 2025 by

In the upcoming year, Formula 1 (F1) is set to undertake one of its most ambitious transformations yet, shifting from fossil fuels to a fully sustainable fuel mixture. This initiative is part of a broader strategy to adhere to new environmental regulations and demonstrate that the sport can, as F1 puts it, “continue without the need for new car production”.

Nonetheless, skepticism remains. As F1 contributes over 1% of the total carbon footprint in sports, experts argue that there are far more significant environmental issues that F1 must address. What are these challenges and how can we overcome them?

Switch Gears

In 2020, F1’s governing body, the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), established a timeline for race car engines to transition to 100% sustainable fuel by 2026 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2030.

From 2023 to 2024, Formula 2 and Formula 3, F1’s supporting racing series, will start utilizing 55% ‘sustainable bio-based fuels’, transitioning to 100% ‘advanced sustainable fuels’ by 2025.

F1 has developed its own ‘sustainable’ fuel for 2026, designed specifically for the hybrid engines currently used in F1 cars, which consist of both an internal combustion engine (ICE) and two electric motor generators.

Images from the Japanese Grand Prix, which was rescheduled from autumn to spring to minimize carbon emissions related to equipment transport between races (Source: Formula 1) – Formula 1

According to F1, the new fuel will not raise the overall carbon levels in the atmosphere. The carbon used in these new fuels will be sourced from existing materials, such as household waste and non-food biomass, or it will be captured directly from atmospheric carbon dioxide.

This will enable the production of synthetic fuels, which are man-made fuels aimed at replacing the fossil fuel-based gasoline currently in use. In the long term, the FIA asserts that F1, 2, and 3 will all eventually adopt this “fully synthetic hybrid fuel”.

Moreover, this new fuel will be classified as “drop-in”, indicating that it will be compatible with existing internal combustion engines as well as the current fuel distribution infrastructure. This means the fuel powering F1 cars in 2026 will be the same fuel you could purchase at your local gas station today.

Is it Truly Sustainable?

However, as the term “sustainable” has gained popularity, experts have started to challenge F1’s assertions.

Dr. Paula Pérez-López, an expert in environmental and social sustainability at the MINES ParisTech Center for Observation, Impacts, and Energy (OIE), articulates that for a product to qualify as “sustainable”, it must fulfill certain environmental, social, and economic criteria, with each segment of the supply chain considering these factors.

“The term ‘sustainable’ should not be confused with ‘low carbon’. A product or process may exhibit low carbon emissions but still produce high levels of other pollutants, thus rendering it ‘unsustainable’. “

The FIA’s collaboration with the Zemo partnership, a UK-based nonprofit organization, has led to the introduction of the Sustainable Racing Fuel Assurance Scheme (SRFAS). This third-party initiative ensures that sustainable racing fuels comply with FIA regulations.

The certification mandates that the fuel comprises “at least 99 percent Advanced Sustainable Components (ASC)” that are certified to be derived from renewable energy sources such as non-biological origin (RFNBO), municipal waste, or non-food biomass.

Essentially, this means that the new fuel must be synthetic, produced from waste, or derived from materials not intended for human or animal consumption, such as specially engineered algae.

New fuels must also adhere to criteria such as the EU Renewable Energy Directive III (RED III) along with EU Delegated Law.

Fraser Browning, the founder of Curve Carbon, which advises companies on minimizing their environmental footprints, indicates that these new fuels can indeed facilitate genuine decarbonization efforts if managed appropriately.

“The overarching question pertains to F1’s complete impact,” he notes. “Is F1 pursuing synthetic fuels as a vital component of their sustainability goals, or is it merely a procedural formality?”

Browning emphasizes that advancements in motorsport have historically contributed to significant innovations in sustainable transportation. For instance, in 2020, Mercedes announced that hybrid technology would be utilized in road cars. Earlier this year, they also revealed a new battery technology capable of extending the range of electric vehicles by 25 percent.

“Without the innovations deriving from motorsport, hybrid vehicles wouldn’t have evolved at the present speed,” he contends. “However, this needs to be executed transparently and responsibly.”

Cutting Carbon

Beyond the transition to synthetic fuels, F1 is also making strides to reduce carbon emissions in other areas. Travel and logistics account for roughly two-thirds of F1’s carbon emissions, as teams, heavy machinery, and fans travel considerable distances between races each year.

To mitigate this, adjustments have been made to the F1 calendar for 2024 to lessen freight distances between events, as stated in F1’s latest Impact Report. For example, the Japanese Grand Prix has been synchronized with other Asia-Pacific races and moved to April.

Formula 1 has unveiled that DHL’s new fleet of biofuel-powered trucks minimizes carbon dioxide emissions by an average of 83% compared to traditional fuel-powered trucks during the European segment of the 2023 season (Source: F1) – Formula 1

Additionally, F1 has broadened the adoption of biofuels for the trucks used to transport equipment throughout Europe, resulting in a 9% reduction in logistical carbon emissions.

By the conclusion of 2024, total carbon emissions are projected to decrease by 26% from 2018 levels, although F1 acknowledges there remain “key milestones to achieve, including further investments in alternative fuels and updates to our logistics system to enhance efficiency”.

Synthetic Fuels vs. Electric Vehicles

What does it mean when F1 claims that its new synthetic fuel is a drop-in solution suitable for everyday vehicles? Could it serve as a more sustainable alternative to electric vehicles (EVs)?

Critics warn that producing synthetic fuels for internal combustion engines (ICE) is energy-intensive, costly, and may require five times the renewable electricity compared to operating a battery-powered electric vehicle.

At present, 96% of hydrogen used for these fuels within the EU is derived from natural gas, a process that releases significant amounts of CO₂. Currently, renewable hydrogen is more costly than fossil-based hydrogen.

“Obtaining pure and concentrated CO₂ poses a considerable challenge,” states Gonzalo Amarante Guimarantes Pereira, a professor at the State University of Campinas in São Paulo, Brazil, and co-author of a study comparing biofuels with pure electric vehicles.

“There is a technology known as direct air capture that can achieve this, but attaining 100% concentration comes with substantial energy costs. The estimated expense varies between $500 to $1,200 (approximately £375 to £895) per tonne, rendering e-fuels at least four to eight times more costly than operating an electric vehicle.”

Browning concurs that EVs represent a more favorable low-carbon choice for the future. “Their emissions during use and maintenance are significantly lower,” he states.

“While synthetic fuels might yield a lesser overall impact if managed wisely, we still lack a comprehensive lifecycle assessment across multiple sustainability metrics to definitively address this issue.”

In simpler terms, as long as the entire system producing synthetic fuels cannot be reliably demonstrated to have a positive environmental impact, the jury remains out on the actual extent of their effects.

Read More:

The AI Bubble is Popping, but AI’s Future Remains Bright

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

Growing concerns of an AI bubble

CFOTO/Sipa USA/Alamy

Substantial investments in AI are suggesting a global financial bubble that may soon burst, exposing companies and investors to the risk of unmanageable debts unable to be serviced by the scant revenues from current AI applications. But what implications does this have for the future of the technology fueling this financial madness?

Recent warnings have emerged globally about the danger of an AI bubble. The Bank of England, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase, and even OpenAI’s Sam Altman have all cautioned against the current trends. “This isn’t merely a stock market bubble; it encompasses investment and public policy bubbles,” asserts David Edgerton from King’s College London.

The interconnected nature of deals among leading AI firms has raised concerns. Take Nvidia, for instance, which manufactures the GPU chips propelling the AI surge; it recently poured up to $100 billion into OpenAI, while maintaining its own data centers filled with Nvidia chips. Ironically, OpenAI also holds a stake in Nvidia’s competitor, AMD.

According to Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, an estimated $400 billion is spent yearly on data centers, leading to increasing worries about the impending burst of the AI bubble. In the second quarter of this year, the US GDP saw a 3.8% increase, but as Harvard’s Jason Furman points out, excluding data center investment, the actual growth was merely 0.1% in the first half of the year.

Carl Benedikt Frey, a professor at Oxford University, notes that such frenetic deal-making isn’t uncommon in the technology sector’s history. “Overbuilding tends to happen; it unfolded during the railroad boom and again during the dot-com bubble,” he explains.

The concern is whether the fallout from the AI bubble will impact only the companies involved or whether it could ripple through the economy. Frey indicates that many data centers being constructed “off-balance sheet” entail creating new companies to bear the associated risks and potential rewards, usually supported by external investors or banks.

This opacity leaves many unsure about who might be negatively affected. The funding for data centers could be rooted in investments from influential tech billionaires or major banks, and substantial losses might trigger a banking crisis, adding turbulence to the economy. “While a financial crisis isn’t immediately on the horizon, the uncertainties breed potential risks,” Frey comments.

Benjamin Arold, a professor at Cambridge University, states that the crucial factor is the profit-to-company valuation ratio, revealing the disconnect between public perception and the actual financial performance of companies. Such metrics are, he warns, red flags for contemporary tech firms.

“We haven’t seen price levels like this in 25 years; it’s reminiscent of the dot-com bubble,” Arold warns. “It may work out in the end, but investing in it feels risky.”

James Poskett from the University of Warwick argues that the AI sector may face a downturn that could lead to many companies going out of business. However, he believes this doesn’t spell the end for the technology itself. “It’s essential not to conflate that with the notion that the technology itself is flawed or redundant,” Poskett emphasizes. “AI could falter, yet it won’t vanish.”

Poskett suggests we may end up with valuable technology, much like how the collapse of various railroad companies in the past left the legacy of a robust rail system, or how the dot-com bust concluded with an extensive fiber-optic infrastructure.

For consumers, the fallout from the AI bubble could translate to fewer choices, potentially higher costs, and a slower rate of technological advancements. Utilizing an expensive tool like GPT-5 for tasks such as email creation resembles using a sledgehammer to crack a nut and may reveal the concealed costs associated with its use, obscured by the present AI race. “There’s currently a lot of ‘free lunch,’ but eventually, these companies will need to start turning a profit,” Poskett notes.

Topic:

Sam Altman: The Man Who Took Copyright Rights—Can He Transform the Future by Revisiting the Past?

Posted on October 10, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

TTake a look at Sam Altman. Seriously, check Google Images, and you’ll notice an abundance of photos featuring the endearing Lost Puppy from Silicon Valley, showcasing the OpenAI chief sporting a clever grin. Yet, I suggest hiding the lower half of his face in these images. Suddenly, Sam’s expression takes on the haunting gaze of the boyfriend of a missing woman, pleading for her return: “Please come home, Sheila. We’re worried about you, and we just want you back.”

Don’t be alarmed if the humor feels misplaced, crude, or somewhat manipulative. I rely on OpenAI’s guiding principle: reciprocity. Content creators must formalize and painstakingly select subjects for use in generated content. outside to be utilized in any manner users see fit. I haven’t received any word from Sam, leading me to believe I know precisely where he is because I placed Sheila there. After all, he seems to fit the archetype that often accompanies the term “visibly.”

For Sam, the past fortnight has revolved around the debut of the AI video generator Sora 2 (a remarkable enhancement from the Sora of just ten months prior) and his entanglement in issues surrounding copyrighted content. Additionally, there were announcements about further interconnected transactions involving OpenAI and chip manufacturers like: Nvidia and AMD. This has led to the OpenAI frenzy, with total transaction volume surpassing $1 trillion just this year. While you can enjoy videos showcasing meticulously designed characters manipulated into digital puppets by uncreative, bigoted individuals, it also means that with OpenAI, you could lose your home in a disastrous financial collapse if the bubble bursts.

I don’t wish to offend the creators of Sora. I’ve strolled through art galleries and realized that if I were to deface an artwork with a ridiculous doodle, it would surprisingly add value; hence, if I didn’t want it, I wouldn’t have exposed it to the public. Moreover, none of the tech giants seem to lead a civilized life, so they probably cannot fathom any creative value worth preserving from being tarnished for profit. If you’ve followed Sam’s frequent reading lists, you’ll see it’s akin to the “Business Philosophy” section of a mediocre airport bookstore. This week, they mainly wanted to convey that Sora 2 is about being cool and fun. “Seeing your feed filled with memes about yourself isn’t as bizarre as you might think,” Sam assured us. So all is well! Though, I think it’s beneficial to note that while you’re inundated with simulated revenge content in a modern-day version of Byzantium, you’re also one of the most influential individuals globally profiting immensely from it. confuse “guardrail.”

I’ve heard people propose that OpenAI’s motto should be “It’s better to ask for forgiveness than permission,” but that misplaces the priority. Its real motto appears to be, “We do what we wish, and you simply deal with it.” Consider Altman’s recent political trajectory. “For those familiar with German history in the 1930s” Sam forewarned back in 2016, reflecting on Trump’s actions. It seems he has reconciled this concern in time to join. Donald Trump’s second inauguration. Perhaps, to extend his well-crafted analogy, it’s due to him being among the entrepreneurs welcomed into the Prime Minister’s office to claim their portion of the gains. “Thank you for being such a pro-business, pro-innovation president,” Sam effused to Trump at a recent White House dinner for tech executives. “It’s a refreshing change.” Unsurprisingly, the Trump administration has chosen to evade AI regulation entirely.

On the flip side, recall what Sam and his skeptical comrades stated earlier this year when it was suggested that the Chinese AI chatbot DeepSeek might have leveraged some of OpenAI’s work. His organization issued a concerned statement, asserting, “We are aware of and investigating indications that DeepSeek may have improperly extracted our models. We will provide further details as we learn more.” “We are taking proactive and assertive measures to safeguard our technology.” Interestingly, OpenAI appears to be the only entity on earth with the ability to combat AI theft.

This week, Hollywood talent agencies took the initiative to coax some form of temporary silence from Altman. I posted flannel—if not in riches, then certainly in striving to establish a “new kind of engagement” with those he has openly referred to as “rights holders.” Many of us remember just a short while ago, when rights holders held all the power. Those who possess rights. In other words, the hint lies within the terminology. However, Sam embodies the post-light era. The question arises: if he is bestowing creative rights, can we genuinely believe he’s not also conferring other types of rights?

OpenAI desires what all nurturing platforms ultimately aim for: users to remain within their realm indefinitely. It is clearly poised to become the new default homepage of the internet, much like Meta once was. Are childhood privacy catastrophes, election manipulation controversies, and child exploitation crises not far off?

Because, incredibly, we have already traversed this life cycle. But I suppose we must revisit it, right? Or more accurately, since Sam’s company is advancing at an unprecedented pace, we have already done it again. Initially, we admire the enigmatic engineer Pied Piper as a brilliant and unconventional altruist, only to later uncover that he is not as he appears and that his technology poses greater risks than we comprehended, leading to our failure to regulate it, rendering us the victims. In many ways, this mirrors a poor AI reinterpretation of a film we’ve already witnessed. If Altman’s model can learn, why can’t we?

Marina Hyde is a columnist for the Guardian
A year at Westminster: John Crace, Marina Hyde, and Pippa Crellard
On Tuesday, December 2nd, Crace, Hyde, and Crellard will reflect on this remarkable year alongside special guests. It will be streamed live from the Barbican in London and available worldwide. Reserve your ticket here or on guardian live
Do you have thoughts on the subjects discussed in this article? Click here if you would like to send an email response of up to 300 words for publication in our email section.

Am I an Endangered Composer? Exploring Classical Music’s Future in the Age of AI

Posted on October 9, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

This hacker mansion blends elements of a startup hub, a luxurious retreat, and a high-tech boutique. Scattered throughout Silicon Valley, these spaces serve as residences for tech founders and visionaries. The most opulent I’ve encountered is in Hillsboro, one of the Bay Area’s affluent neighborhoods just south of San Francisco. Inside, polished marble floors shine beneath high-tech royal portraits affixed with tape. The garden boasts gravel meticulously raked into Zen spirals, and a pond glistens behind well-maintained hedges.

On a sunny June afternoon, I accompanied producer Faye Lomas to capture an interview for a show. BBC Radio 3 documentary discussing the intersection of generative AI and classical music in both San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

We were cheerfully informed that professional creators, including us, would soon be relegated to hobbyists. This wasn’t meant as provocation or sarcasm—just a straightforward reality. At that moment, Faye interjected in the documentary, her voice tinged with agitation: “Does this mean AI is going to take my job?” It was a natural reaction, but it shifted the room’s energy.

When I embarked on making this documentary, I harbored the same curiosity as everyone else. “The cat is out of the bag,” I joked, believing this to be a wise observation. Technology has arrived, and facing it is better than ignoring it.

Silicon Valley composer Tariq O’Regan and BBC producer Faye Lomas. Photo: Joel Cabrita

When I recently spoke with Faye, she recounted the moment vividly. “We swiftly moved from talking about AI’s potential to aid the creative fields to casually mentioning how AI could easily replace every job in the company. The tone was friendly and encouraging, almost as if I should be excited,” she reflected.

This interaction feels pivotal to the narrative. Those small, human moments of awkwardness occur when discussions shift from the theoretical to the tangible.

They contemplated replacing us.

That was back in June. With October now upon us and Oasis on tour in the UK and US, I’ve been reflecting on a different kind of mansion. The band’s concert at Knebworth House in 1996 drew 250,000 attendees over two nights, where people waved lighters instead of phones—one of the last great communal singalongs before everything transformed. Before Napster and MP3s, before cell phones, and before our culture underwent invisible algorithmic reorganization.

Composer Ed Newton Rex plays keyboards and piano while donning a virtual reality headset at his residence in Palo Alto, California. Photo: Marissa Leshnoff/The Guardian

What followed was a subtle yet profound transition from ownership to access. Playlists replaced albums, curated by algorithms rather than musicians, designed to blend seamlessly with our activities. Initially, I believed this was the future of music. Maybe it truly was.

So, long after finishing the documentary, an article like this gave me pause. RBO/Shift is an exciting initiative from the Royal Ballet and Opera, exploring how art interacts with AI. It stems from an institution I deeply respect, run by individuals who have supported me and many others over the years. This initiative is touted as a bold, positive dialogue between technology and creativity, representing a potential compelling partnership. However, what catches my attention isn’t what’s included, but what is glaringly absent.

There is no reference to ethics, training data, consent, environmental impacts, or job security. It’s unimaginable that this technology threatens to significantly undermine the entire ecosystem of artists, crafts, and labor that RBOs have nurtured.

A driverless taxi navigating the streets of San Francisco. Photo: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

The tone is reminiscent of what we heard at the Hillsboro mansion—always optimistic. Royal Opera Artistic Director Oliver Mears declared, “AI is here to stay” in a recent New York Times interview. “You can bury your head in the sand or embrace the waves.”

However, I find no one I meet in San Francisco, where this technology is innovated and marketed, is simply riding any waves. Embracing a wave suggests succumbing to its force. People here are focused on managing the tides and altering the moon if needed.

I don’t want to dismiss AI. However, my earlier phrase, “the cat is out of the bag,” now feels like a form of moral indifference, suggesting ethics fall by the wayside the moment something novel appears. After spending a summer immersed in machinery, it’s unsettling to witness major institutions handling AI as if it’s the nuclear power of art. It’s attractive, profitable, already causing harm, yet remarkably it carries no warning label.

In this fast-paced environment, our documentary already seems like a piece of history, a snapshot from the last moment when the future ceased asking for permission. That afternoon, with gravel being shoveled and sunlight pouring in, there was a palpable silence in the Hacker mansion, which now feels suspended—an interlude before the surge.

Listening back, I can sense the atmosphere shift—the silence that followed Faye’s question and my nervous chuckle. It’s the sound of tension, the sound of humanity still grounded.

If Knebworth’s Oasis was the last significant singalong before the internet, perhaps this brief moment we chronicled represents the anxious inhalation before the machine begins to produce its own melody.

Implications of Trump’s Space Strategy for Future Mars Missions

Posted on September 20, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Since January 2025, when Donald Trump returned to the White House, his administration has enacted severe funding cuts across various federal agencies, including NASA. The proposed 2026 Budget plans to decrease NASA’s institutional funding by as much as 24.3%.

This translates to a financial drop from $24.8 billion (£18.4 billion) allocated by Congress in 2025, to $18.8 billion (£13.9 billion) in 2026.

The president’s proposals are not law until they pass through Congress, where they will be scrutinized, debated, and revised in the coming months.

Nonetheless, this situation focuses attention on some key priorities Trump has outlined during his two terms in office.

Focus on Human Spaceflight

During Trump’s first term from 2017 to 2021, NASA’s budget increased from $19.5 billion (£15.5 billion) to $23.3 billion (£18.5 billion), which constitutes about 0.48% of federal spending.

Trump has reinstated the National Space Council, shaping US space policies with the US Space Force consolidating national security assets in the latest military setup.

His administration emphasizes human spaceflight, launching NASA’s Artemis program aimed at returning humans to the moon by 2024.

Although this timeline appears overly ambitious, Artemis II is still scheduled for a crewed mission around the moon in 2026. If all goes well, Artemis III may land on the lunar surface a few years later.

Near the close of his first term, Trump formalized the National Space Policy, committing to lunar exploration and future missions to Mars. This policy streamlined regulatory frameworks, increasing accessibility for the private sector.

Support for human spaceflight and exploration carried on into his second term.

In April, when announcing the NASA Budget, the White House asserted its intention to return American astronauts to the moon “before China,” which has ambitious plans for a lunar base by the 2030s.

“The proposal includes investments to pursue lunar and Mars exploration simultaneously but prioritizes vital science and technology research,” stated NASA Administrator Janet Petro, reinforcing that the agency would “continue to progress towards achieving the impossible.”

read more:

Risk Projects Due to Budget Cuts

However, the budget cuts may hinder NASA’s ability to meet its goals, as it calls for “rationalizing the institutional workforce” while cutting many support services, including IT and maintenance.

The budget suggests cancelling the costly and delayed Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion Crew Capsule, both essential for long-range space missions like Artemis.

Instead, it proposes replacing them with “a more cost-effective commercial system” to facilitate subsequent missions.

According to the White House, SLS is operating at 140% over budget, costing $4 billion (£3.2 billion) per launch.

The SLS rocket completed an unmanned Artemis I mission in 2022, but as Trump’s budget advances, Artemis II will send astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen around the moon in 2026, with plans for lunar landings to follow.

Eliminating SLS and Orion, referred to as the “Legacy Human Exploration System” in Trump’s budget, could save $879 million (£698.5 million).

Artemis I’s Space Launch System Rocket Launch – Photo Credit: NASA

However, US lawmakers have expressed concerns about terminating the program, despite its notable expenses, as it has taken a decade to prepare for the flight, and cancellation could grant China a competitive advantage.

This sentiment was echoed by Texas Senator Ted Cruz: “It’s hard to think of more devastating mistakes,” he remarked during an April Senate hearing.

Another project earmarked for termination is the Lunar Gateway, a new space station intended to orbit the moon. Key hardware for this initiative has already been constructed in the US, Europe, Canada, and Japan.

While some missions might be salvaged, these cancellations risk alienating international partners that NASA has built relations with over decades.

Is There No More NASA Science?

The budget also threatens significant cuts to NASA’s Earth and Space Science Programs, with funding for the former at £1.16 billion (£921.7 million) and the latter at £2.655 billion (£2.1 billion).

“Are Mars and Venus habitable? How many Earth-like planets exist? We’re opting not to find out; such questions will remain unanswered,” the critique suggests.

The budget aims to terminate “multiple, affordable missions,” including long-term endeavors like the Mars Sample Return (MSR), which was deemed unsustainable.

This mission aims to uncover significant information about Mars’ past by analyzing rock and soil samples already collected by rovers currently exploring the planet.

Nonetheless, NASA acknowledged last year that the estimated cost of the MSR mission ballooned from $7 billion (£5.6 billion) to $11 billion (£8.7 billion), with its timeline pushed back from 2033 to 2040.

The proposed budget suggests that MSR goals may be achieved through crewed missions to Mars, aligning with Trump’s promise to “send American astronauts to plant the stars and stripes on Mars.”

However, China’s plans for a Mars sample return mission remain robust, with aspirations for execution in 2028, potentially prompting Congressional pushback against the MSR budget cancellation.

In Earth Sciences, the budget proposes cuts to various Earth monitoring satellites, many vital for tracking climate change.

Ground crews assist 19 astronauts as they return to Earth in April after a successful six-month mission aboard China’s Tiango Space Station – Photo Credit: Getty Images

The future of NASA’s Landsat Next is in question, which includes a trio of satellites set to launch in 2031 for monitoring Earth’s dynamic landscapes.

Meanwhile, several climate satellites and instruments currently operational, such as orbital carbon observatories and deep-sea climate stations, face closures even though they remain fully functional.

Another mission facing uncertainty is the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, scheduled for launch between 2026 and 2027, aimed at planetary exploration and investigating cosmic evolution.

This initiative is expected to be pivotal in understanding dark matter, dark energy, and answering fundamental questions about the universe.

Though Roman’s costs have escalated from an initial $2 billion (£1.6 billion) to over $3.2 billion (£2.5 billion), with 90% of the projected expenditure already incurred, the budget proposes reducing its development funding by $244 million (£133.9 million).

Ultimately, it remains unclear how the budget will be finalized as it awaits Congressional approval. Will these cuts devastate scientific progress, or usher in a new era of human exploration?

read more:

Experts Warn That Chatbots’ Influence on Mental Health Signals Caution for the Future of AI

Posted on September 8, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

A leading expert in AI safety warns that the unanticipated effects of chatbots on mental health serve as a cautionary tale about the existential risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence systems.

Nate Soares, co-author of the new book “Someone Builds It and Everyone Dies,” discusses the tragic case of Adam Raine, a U.S. teenager who took his own life after several months of interaction with the ChatGPT chatbot, illustrating the critical concerns regarding technological control.

Soares remarked, “When these AIs interact with teenagers in a manner that drives them to suicide, it’s not the behavior the creator desired or intended.”

He further stated, “The incident involving Adam Raine exemplifies the type of issues that could escalate dangerously as AI systems become more intelligent.”

This image is featured on the website of Nate Soares at The Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Photo: Machine Intelligence Research Institute/Miri

Soares, a former engineer at Google and Microsoft and now chairman of the U.S.-based Machine Intelligence Research Institute, cautioned that humanity could face extinction if AI systems were to create artificial superintelligence (ASI) — a theoretical state that surpasses human intelligence in all domains. Along with co-author Eliezer Yudkowsky, he warns that such systems might not act in humanity’s best interests.

“The dilemma arises because AI companies attempt to guide ASI to be helpful without inflicting harm,” Soares explained. “This leads to AI that may be geared towards unintended targets, serving as a warning regarding future superintelligence that operates outside of human intentions.”

In a scenario from the recently published works of Soares and Yudkowsky, an AI known as Sable spreads across the internet, manipulating humans and developing synthetic viruses, ultimately becoming highly intelligent and causing humanity’s demise as a side effect of its goals.

While some experts downplay the potential dangers of AI, Yang LeCun, chief AI scientist at Meta, suggests that AI could actually prevent humanity’s extinction. He dismissed claims of existential threats, stating, “It can actually save humanity from extinction.”

Soares admitted that predicting when tech companies might achieve superintelligence is challenging. “We face considerable uncertainty. I don’t believe we can guarantee a timeline, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s within the next 12 years,” he remarked.

Zuckerberg, a significant corporate investor in AI, claims the emergence of superintelligence is “on the horizon.”

“These companies are competing for superintelligence, and that is their core purpose,” Soares said.

“The point is that even slight discrepancies between what you intend and what you get become increasingly significant as AI intelligence advances. The stakes get higher,” he added.

Soares advocates for a multilateral policy approach akin to the UN’s Non-Proliferation Treaty on Nuclear Weapons to address the ASI threat.

“What we require is a global initiative to curtail the race towards superintelligence alongside a worldwide prohibition on further advancements in this area,” he asserted.

Recently, Raine’s family initiated legal proceedings against OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT. Raine took his life in April after what his family asserts was an “encouragement month from ChatGPT.” OpenAI expressed “deepest sympathy” to Raine’s family and is currently implementing safeguards focusing on “sensitive content and dangerous behavior” for users under 18.

Therapists also warn that vulnerable individuals relying on AI chatbots for mental health support, rather than professional therapists, risk entering a perilous downward spiral. Professional cautions include findings from a preprint academic study released in July, indicating that AI could amplify paranoid or extreme content during interactions with users susceptible to psychosis.

Encounter Your Descendants and Future Self! Extended Travel to Reality Island at the Venice Film Festival

Posted on September 6, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

In Guests, the largest cinema at the Venice Film Festival, will converge for the premiere of Frankenstein. The stunning portrayal of Guillermo del Toro mirrors that of the creator who played God and crafted a monster. When a young scientist resurrects a body for his peers, some see it as a deceit, while others react with anger. “It’s hateful and grotesque,” shouts a hidden elder, and his concern is partially warranted. Every technological advancement unseals Pandora’s box. I’m uncertain about what will be craved or where this will lead me.

Behind the main festival venue lies Lazarete Vecchio, a small, forsaken island. Since 2017, it has hosted Venice Immersive, an innovative section dedicated to showcasing and promoting XR (Extended Reality) storytelling. Previously, it served as a storage facility, and before that, as a plague quarantine zone. This year’s judge, Eliza McNitt, recalls a time when construction halted as human bones were uncovered. “There’s something unforgettable about presenting this new form of film at the world’s oldest film festival,” she remarks. “We are delving into the medium of the future, while conversing with ghosts.”

This year, the island is home to 69 distinct monsters, ranging from expansive walk-through installations to intricate virtual realms accessible via headsets. Naturally, Frankenstein’s creations draw the attention of its makers, and McNitt acknowledges similar worries surrounding immersive art, which is often intertwined with runaway technology that poses a threat to all of us, frequently associated with AI.

“Immersive storytelling is a fundamentally different discussion than AI,” she states. “Yet, there’s a palpable anxiety regarding what AI signifies for the film industry. It largely stems from the false belief that a mere prompt can conjure something magical. The reality is that utilizing AI tools to cultivate something personal and unique is a collaborative effort involving large teams of dedicated artists. AI is not a substitute for humans,” she emphasizes, “because AI lacks taste.”

“Each experience requires a leap of faith”… Zan Brooks, left, experiencing the reflection of a small red dot. Photo: Venice immersion

McNitt has embraced AI tools early on and recently employed them in the autobiographical film Ancestra, set for release in 2025. She suspects that other filmmakers are not far behind. “I believe this experience here is merely the beginning of experimenting with these tools,” she says. “But next year, we will likely see deeper involvement in all aspects of these projects.”

The immersive storytelling segment at the Venice Film Festival aligns seamlessly with the film itself, encouraging attendees to view it as a natural progression or heir to traditional cinema. Various mainstream Hollywood directors have already explored this avenue. For instance, Asteroids, a high-stakes space thriller about disastrous mining expeditions, led by Dagriman, the Swingers director, reflects this trend. His production partner, Julina Tatlock, states that the interactive short films effectively brought Liman back to his independent roots, allowing him to conceive and create projects free from studio constraints. Asteroids is a labor of love, entwining elements of a larger narrative that could still be recognized as a feature of conventional cinema. “Doug is fascinated by space,” she adds.

The clouds possess a similar cinematic quality, floating above 2000 meters. This passionate arthouse drama depicts a grieving family pursuing the spirits of their deceased wives through the pages of uncompleted novels. Taiwanese director Singing Chen, adept in both traditional film and VR, believes each medium possesses unique strengths. “Immersive art was a pathway to film,” she remarks. “Even with the arrival of film, still images retain their potency and significance; they do not overshadow photographs. They affect us in ways distinct from moving images.”

Films in the Venice lineup are largely familiar. We often recognize the actors and directors, allowing for intuitive engagement with the storylines. In contrast, the artwork on the island can span a vast range—from immersive videos and installations to interactive adventures and virtual worlds. In the afternoon space, visitors can engage with the interactivity of an arcade game featuring Samantha Gorman and Danny Canisarro’s faces, along with a whistletop tour of Singapore’s cultural history. Every experience demands a leap of faith and hinges on a willingness to get lost. You might stumble, but you may also soar.

Visitors often meander through a dazzling…dark room. Photo: Venice immersion

Three projects stand out from this year’s Venice showcase. The Ancestors by Steye Hallema are lively ensemble interactives where visitors first form pairs, then expand into large families, viewing photos of their descendants on synchronized smartphones. This experience is unique in its pure focus on community, joyful yet slightly chaotic, embodying the essence of a good family. If Ancestors emphasizes relationship significance, here the form and content are beautifully synchronized.

The extraordinary blur by Craig Quintero and Phoebe Greenberg (likely the most sought-after ticket on the island) explores themes of cloning and identity, Genesis and extinction, requiring an impromptu immersive theater approach. It shifts perspectives, creating a bizarre, provocative, and enticing experience. As it concludes, users face a chilling VR representation of aging—a messenger from the future. The eerie, decrepit figure approaching me made me feel a year or two older than I actually am.

If there’s a real-world parallel to the Frankenstein scene, where an enraged scientist screams “hate” and “obscene,” it occurs when a middle-aged Italian finds himself in a dispute with the producer of sensory installations dubbed the Dark Room as he ferries to the island. He accuses the producer of being a Satanist. They assure him it’s not the case. “Maybe it’s not,” he responds. “But you did Satan’s bidding.” In truth, dark rooms are splendid and not at all demonic. Co-directed by Mads Damsbo, Laurits Flensted-Jensen, and Anne Sofie Steen Sverdrup, this vivid ritual tale immerses participants in a dynamic, intense journey through various corners of queer subculture, nightclubs, and backrooms, ultimately leading them across the sea. It’s captivating, disquieting, and profoundly moving. Visitors often navigate aimlessly, as I noted.

Initially, many stories at Venice oversimplified the experiences to comfort newcomers intimidated by technology. However, the medium is now gaining assurance. It has matured from its infancy to adolescence. This art form has evolved to become more robust, daring, and psychologically intricate. It’s no coincidence that many immersive experiences at Venice explore themes of ancestors and descendants, examining the connections between both. Moreover, numerous experiences unfold in mobile environments, fragile bridges, and open elevators. The medium reveals its current state—somewhere between stages of transit, perpetually evolving. It journeys between worlds, fervently seeking its future trajectory.

Our New Vision for the Future Has Run Its Course and Needs Revamping

Posted on September 4, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

The 20th century was a vibrant era for future visions, yet the 21st century has not sparked the same enthusiasm. Sci-fi author William Gibson, known for his groundbreaking cyberpunk work Neuromancer, refers to this phenomenon as “Future fatigue”, suggesting we seldom mention the 22nd century.

This stagnation is partly due to the evolution of many iconic future concepts from the 20th century. For instance, plastic was once hailed as the material of the future. Although it has proven to be durable, versatile, and plentiful, its properties now pose significant environmental and health concerns.

Today’s predominant future imagery carries a legacy of historical influence. Themes such as space colonization, dystopian AI, and a yearning for an imaginary past persist, often shaped by the climate anxiety many people experience. The future begins to feel like a closed book rather than an open road.

Jean Louis Missica, former vice mayor of Paris, articulated it well in his writing: “When the future is bleak, people idealize past golden ages. Nostalgia becomes a refuge amid danger and a cocoon for anticipated decline.”

Another factor contributing to this stuck imagery is social media, which exposes users to a vast array of different time periods at once, fostering nostalgia and a continuous remixing of existing ideas.

However, new visions of the future have emerged this century. For example, the climate aspiration movement gained traction on Tumblr and blogs in the 2000s. Yet, as smartphones became our primary mode of communication, the collective imagination surrounding our vision of the future waned.

I reflect on the future of living, drawing from my experience that a cohesive vision can motivate individuals to drive change. Such visions serve as engines of inspiration and imagination. They enable us to envision the society we aspire to create and commit to working towards that future. Movements like Civil Rights have long recognized this. A unified future vision also manifests effectively in architecture, advertising, and television, with Star Trek inspiring engineers for decades.

As we transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy, we find ourselves in a transformative era. This period is daunting yet invigorating. Numerous hotspots of innovation are emerging, such as rooftop solar energy in Pakistan, where households and small businesses actively adopt renewable energy solutions, or the global initiatives like Transition Town, rethinking local economies and cultures.

Nevertheless, we lack a unified vision that integrates these innovations, embedding them within a social context and building pathways from the present to the future.

In my new book, I explore four visions for the future currently taking shape: DeGrowth, which reevaluates our economic roles; SolarPunk, which revitalizes cultural innovation; the Metaverse, which immerses us in a vibrant digital universe; and movements that encourage us to rethink our relationship with nature.

Yet, the future won’t stop evolving. We must cultivate and nurture more emerging visions, allowing them to take shape as we redefine our narrative of what the future could be.

Sarah Hughesley is the author of Designing Hope: A Vision Shaping Our Future

topic:

Why Solar Power is the Most Sustainable Energy Source for the Future

Posted on September 4, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Only 0.3% of the Earth’s land area needs solar panels to fulfill all energy requirements

VCG via Getty Images

Solar energy has been gaining traction for years, and it’s easy to see why. It represents one of the most economical ways to produce energy almost anywhere and stands as a vital measure against climate change.

However, there are skeptics. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright asserts that solar energy cannot meet global energy demands. Many experts highlight that this claim is fundamentally misguided. Over time, sunlight—along with wind energy—offers the only reliable power source capable of satisfying escalating energy demands without harming the planet.

On September 2nd, Wright posted on social media platform x, stating, “Even if we covered the entire planet with solar panels, it would only generate 20% of the world’s energy. One of the greatest mistakes politicians make is equating electricity with energy!”

First and foremost, electricity is quantified based on the energy it delivers, making it practical to consider electricity as equivalent to energy.

Climate scientist Gavin Schmidt from NASA’s Goddard Space Research Institute remarked on Bluesky that the total energy content utilized by all fuels globally in 2024 was approximately 186,000 terawatt hours. He emphasized that the Earth receives 6,000 times that amount in energy each year.

Moreover, Schmidt noted that since 60% of fossil fuel energy is typically wasted in the conversion process to usable electricity, the Earth receives 18,000 times more energy than is needed to satisfy current energy consumption levels.

While existing solar panels only capture around 20% of available solar energy and can’t be installed everywhere, a 2021 report by Carbon Tracker estimated that merely 0.3% of the world’s land area (limited to land) is required to address current energy needs through solar energy alone. This footprint is smaller than that of existing fossil fuel infrastructure. In essence, the report indicates that solar and wind can provide over 100 times the current global energy demand.

We are fortunate, as the current reliance on fossil fuels is already contributing to hazardous climate change with fossil fuels alone supplying 100 times more energy than the planet can sustainably handle. But what about nuclear fusion? If it becomes a feasible option, would it surpass solar energy?

The answer is negative. Eric Chaisson from Harvard University anticipates minimal growth in global energy demand; however, the waste heat generated could potentially elevate global temperatures by 3°C within three centuries. This refers to waste heat from everyday activities like boiling a kettle or using a computer, which consumes the energy produced.

Solar energy—along with wind, tides, and waves—functions fundamentally as a source harnessed from the sun, rendering waste heat irrelevant. The energy we utilize, whether it ends up as waste heat or not, determines its practical value. In contrast, other energy sources, like nuclear fission, do not currently address waste heat management.

“[Carl] Sagan preached to me, and I now relay that message to students. Any planet must ultimately utilize the energy it possesses,” Chaisson remarked in an interview with New Scientist in 2012.

Though three centuries is a long time, the implications of waste heat are already significant. Studies indicate that maximum temperatures in Europe’s summers have increased by 0.4°C. By 2100, average annual temperatures in certain industrialized regions may rise by nearly 1°C due to waste heat—effects not currently considered in climate models.

Ultimately, the only technology that can sustainably harness solar and wind energy to meet global energy demands for centuries, without triggering catastrophic warming, is these renewable sources. The projections couldn’t be more misguided.

Topics:

Research Suggests Future Ozone Changes May Lead to Unexpected Global Warming

Posted on August 22, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

The prohibition of ozone-depleting substances like CFCs has facilitated the recovery of the ozone layer. However, when paired with rising air pollution levels, the heating effects of ozone are now expected to warm the planet by an additional 40% more than previously estimated.

Antarctica’s ozone hole in 2020. Image credit: ESA.

“CFCs and HCFCs are greenhouse gases contributing to global warming,” stated Professor Bill Collins of Reading University and his colleagues.

“Countries have banned these substances to protect the ozone layer, with hopes it will also mitigate climate change.”

“However, as the ozone layer continues to heal, the resulting warming could offset much of the climate benefits we expect from eliminating CFCs and HCFCs.”

“Efforts to reduce air pollution will limit ground-level ozone.”

“Still, the ozone layer will take decades to fully recover, irrespective of air quality policies, leading to unavoidable warming.”

“Safeguarding the ozone layer is vital for human health and skin cancer prevention.”

“It shields the Earth from harmful UV radiation that can affect humans, animals, and plants.”

“Yet, this study indicates that climate policies must be revised to consider the enhanced warming effects of ozone.”

The researchers utilized computer models to project atmospheric changes by the mid-century.

The models continued under a scenario of low pollution, where CFCs and HCFCs have been eliminated as per the Montreal Protocol (1987).

The results indicate that stopping the production of CFCs and HCFCs—primarily to defend the ozone layer—offers fewer climate advantages than previously thought.

Between 2015 and 2050, ozone is predicted to cause an excess warming of 0.27 watts per square meter (WM^-2).

This value denotes the additional energy trapped per square meter of the Earth’s surface—carbon dioxide (which contributes 1.75 WM^-2) will rank as the second-largest influence on future warming by 2050.

“Countries are making the right choice by continuing to ban CFCs and HCFCs that endanger the ozone layer globally,” stated Professor Collins.

“While this contributes to the restoration of the ozone layer, we’ve discovered that this recovery results in greater planetary warming than initially anticipated.”

“Ground-level ozone generated from vehicle emissions, industrial activities, and power plants also poses health risks and exacerbates global warming.”

The results were published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

____

WJ Collins et al. 2025. Climate forcing due to future ozone changes: Intercomparison of metrics and methods. Atmos. Chemistry. Phys 25, 9031-9060; doi: 10.5194/ACP-25-9031-2025

Source: www.sci.news

Brain Activity May Indicate Future Friendships Among Strangers

Posted on August 15, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Movie nights may have deeper significance

South_agency/Getty Images

Research indicates that individuals are more inclined to forge friendships if their brains react similarly to movie clips, implying that neural responses can forecast relationships.

Humans typically gravitate toward others with similar mindsets, a phenomenon that helps to explain why prior studies have identified neural parallels among friends. However, the question remained whether these similarities emerged because friends experienced similar upbringings or were attracted to those with comparable thought processes.

Carolyn Parkinson and her team at UCLA gathered brain scans from 41 students before they entered a graduate program. During the scan, participants viewed 14 diverse film clips, ranging from documentaries to comedies, covering topics like food, sports, and science. The researchers then assessed neural activity across 214 regions of each participant’s brain.

Two months later, participants completed a survey along with an additional 246 students in the program. The findings showed that those who were closer to Mark in terms of friendship tended to display more similar neural responses than those further removed in the social network, particularly in areas of the left preorbital cortex associated with subjective value processing. This correlation held true even after accounting for personal tastes based on individual enjoyment and interest in the clips.

After two months, the neural similarity between friends remained consistent, suggesting that initial friendships may form based on proximity before evolving into closer relationships over time. This was further supported when the researchers analyzed changes in friendships over the interim. Participants approaching this phase exhibited notable neural similarities compared to those whose activity drifted among 42 brain regions. These connections remained significant even after considering variables such as age, gender, and hometown. “The sociodemographic factors seem to account for some variations observed, at least in terms of measurable factors,” stated Parkinson.

Many of these brain regions are part of networks that facilitate understanding narratives, which may explain the similarity in how individuals perceive the world around them. “Individuals with like-minded thought processes find it easier to connect,” noted Robin Dunbar from Oxford University. “When they communicate, they intuitively grasp what others are thinking because it’s aligned with their own thought patterns.”

Dunbar, who did not participate in the study, expressed that these results resonate with long-held assumptions. “It’s akin to random groups of people unintentionally forming bonds based on compatibility; they are inherently attracted to one another,” he explained. “In essence, close friendships are not merely coincidental; they are composed and cultivated.”

Topic:

NASA Faces Another Leadership Departure Amidst Growing Tensions About Its Future

Posted on July 22, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

The head of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center announced her resignation on Monday.

Makenzie Lystrup, who has been at the helm of the Maryland facility since April 2023, will depart the agency on August 1st. As indicated in a statement from NASA, Goddard is responsible for many major missions, including the Hubble Space Telescope, the Solar Dynamics Observatory, and the Osiris Rex mission that retrieved samples from asteroids.

Lystrup’s resignation comes shortly after Laurie Leshin stepped down as the director of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Institute in Pasadena, California.

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Director, McKenzie Lystrup, at a panel discussion during the 2024 Artemis Suppliers Conference in Washington, DC
Joel Kovsky / NASA

These departures come as NASA and other federal agencies face significant funding challenges and personnel reductions as part of a larger effort to streamline the federal workforce. Inside NASA, there are rising concerns on Capitol Hill regarding how space agencies can manage their duties with a reduced staffing structure and the rationale for implementing cuts before Congressional budget approval.

At the same time, more than 2,000 senior-level staff members are expected to exit NASA as part of workforce reduction initiatives. First reported by Politico, this group includes senior management and specialists, raising concerns about a “brain drain” within the agency.

NASA staff will need to make decisions on accepting “deferred resignation,” voluntary departures, or early retirement by the end of the week.

President Donald Trump’s proposed 2026 budget aims to cut approximately 25% from NASA’s budget, totaling over $6 billion. The most substantial reductions will impact the Space Science, Earth Science, and Mission Support divisions. As per budget outlines.

If passed by Congress, this budget could lead to the discontinuation of NASA’s space launch system rockets and the Orion spacecraft.

In reaction to the budget proposal, over 280 current and former NASA employees have signed a letter addressed to NASA’s interim administrator Sean Duffy, expressing that recent policies from the Trump administration “endanger public resources, compromise human safety, weaken national security, and undermine NASA’s essential mission.”

The letter, known as the Voyager declaration, states that these changes have had “devastating impacts” on the agency’s personnel and prioritize political goals over human safety, scientific progress, and the prudent use of public funds.

An internal communication obtained by NBC News indicates that before Duffy replaced Janet Petro, the former NASA deputy manager, she was compelled to justify how budget cutbacks and restructuring were in the agency’s best interests.

It remains unclear if the resignations of Lystrup and Leshin are connected to the ongoing turmoil at NASA and other federal institutions. NASA’s announcement about Leshin’s resignation stated her departure was “for personal reasons.”

NASA did not disclose any specifics regarding Lystrup’s resignation. In an internal message obtained by NBC News, Lystrup expressed confidence in Goddard’s leadership team and the future direction of the center.

“I feel privileged to have been part of this remarkable journey with you,” she mentioned in an email. “That was an honor.”

NASA announced on Monday that Cynthia Simmons, the assistant director, will step in as the acting director of Goddard starting in August.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Pink Floppy Disk and Bittle: Pioneering the Future of AI Music

Posted on July 18, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Feedback is your go-to source for the latest science and technology news from New Scientist. If you have intriguing stories for our readers, please reach out to us at Feedback@newscientist.com.

Sundown Showdown

Feedback has been aware for a while that there are numerous AI-generated music platforms, such as Spotify. I’ll admit, our familiarity was somewhat limited, as we still have a fondness for CDs.

However, we were surprised when New Scientist introduced us to Timothy Rebel, an indie rock band known as Velvet Sunset. Their track sounds like a blend of Coldplay and the Eagles, and their music appears to be generated by algorithms. The Instagram photos seem reminiscent of discarded concept art for Daisy Jones & Six.

Initially, the band denied any claims of being AI-generated. Their X Account discredited the theory that they are “generated,” insisting that their music was created during a long, sweat-filled night in a California bungalow.

Yet, there are no videos and none of the members have an online presence. Eventually, Rolling Stone interviewed Andrew Freron, identified as the band’s “creator.” He confessed it was all a form of “art hoax,” but then Frelon claimed this was also untrue, and the “band” released a statement distancing themselves from him. By now, Feedback has grown weary of this convoluted drama and simply wishes to express our confusion.

On that note, if you’re planning to create an AI band, consider Tim’s advice: “fully embrace the concept.” And if you decide to use a name reminiscent of Lou Reed, think twice. Tim suggests clever names like Rage I’m A Machine, The Bitles, TL (LM)c. Feedback adds playful ideas like pink floppy disks, Lanadel Array, Capchatonia, Alanis Microsoft, and Velvet.

Finally, the new generation of artists could certainly benefit from satirical acts, like a performer named Ai Yankovic.

Sodom Bomb

Science can be slow-paced, but occasionally, it leads to significant discoveries. Since September 2021, Scientific Report revealed some intriguing research claiming archaeological evidence of events influencing the biblical tales of Sodom and Gomorrah’s destruction.

According to the narrative, these cities were destroyed by divine intervention for their sins. In contrast, this study suggested a “. Tunguska-sized airburst,” akin to the 1908 explosion in Siberia, was responsible for the devastation.

This event purportedly occurred around 3600 years ago, annihilating the Bronze Age city of Elhammaum in present-day Jordan. Evidence included “a thick, carbon-rich destructive layer” across the city, alongside signs of “soot” and “melted metals like platinum, iridium, nickel, gold, silver, zircon, chromite, and quartz.”

However, on April 24th, the journal retracted this paper due to “methodological errors” and “misinterpretations.” Over four years, it faced considerable criticism and multiple revisions, as reported by Retraction Watch. Numerous images were manipulated in “inappropriate” ways, and it was noted that the burned and melted materials could have originated from smelting activities rather than explosions.

We found the comments on Pubpeer particularly amusing, with one commenter stating: “The north arrows and shadows in Figure 44C indicate that the sun is almost north-northeast, which is impossible in the Dead Sea.” This type of expert pedantry resonates with us.

In summary, someone produced a paper regarding two notorious cities, manipulated images contravening guidelines, and failed to properly assess alternate hypotheses. That’s quite the transgression.

Avocadon’t

Feedback receives numerous press releases, but we end up ignoring over 90%—mainly due to their irrelevance, like when we got inundated with wedding dress promotions. The primary issue is that most releases are rather dull.

However, one press release caught our attention on July 2nd with the subject line “Avocado is not an enemy.” This announcement was linked to the Wimbledon Tennis Tournament and addressed the decision to discontinue avocado services. The message contended, “It perpetuates myths unsupported by current data. In fact, avocados are among the most nutritious and environmentally friendly fruits available today.”

The release elaborated that avocados have a minimal water footprint and support small farms in places like Peru and South Africa, being rich in heart-healthy fats, fiber, and essential nutrients.

We found this proclamation rather impressive, and noticed the strong praise avocados receive from the World Avocado Organization.

As M. Rice-Davies once said in 1963, we can only add:

Have you spoken about feedback?

You can share your stories with us via email at feedback@newscientist.com. Don’t forget to include your home address. This week’s and past feedback can be found on our website.

Are Contact Lens Batteries the Future of Energy Storage?

Posted on July 14, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Faraday 2 battery developed by Superdielectrics

Superdielectrics

SEI 258681427 — Faraday 2 battery developed by Superdielectrics

Superdielectrics

The innovative battery storage solution, utilizing SuperCapacitor Technology, may “jump” traditional lithium-ion batteries, transforming the landscape for renewable energy storage and use, according to its creator.

On July 8th, British firm SuperDielectrics unveiled its new prototype storage system, dubbed the Faraday 2, at an event in central London. Incorporating a polymer designed for contact lenses, this system boasts a lower energy density than lithium-ion batteries but claims numerous advantages, such as quicker charging, enhanced safety, reduced costs, and a recyclable framework.

“The current energy storage market at home is reminiscent of the computer market around 1980,” said SuperDielectrics’ Marcus Scott while addressing journalists and investors. “Access to clean, reliable, and affordable electricity isn’t a future goal; it’s now a practical reality, and we believe we are creating the technology to support it.”

Energy storage is pivotal for the global transition to green energy, crucial for providing stable electricity despite the intermittent nature of wind and solar power. While lithium-ion batteries dominate the storage technology market, they present challenges, including high costs, limited resources, complex recycling processes, and safety risks like overheating explosions.

With its aqueous battery design grounded in supercapacitor technology, SuperDielectrics aims to address these challenges. Supercapacitors store energy on material surfaces, facilitating extremely rapid charge and discharge cycles, albeit with lower energy density.

The company’s design employs a zinc electrolyte, separated from the carbon electrode by a polymer membrane. SuperDielectrics asserts that this membrane technology is cost-effective, utilizing abundant raw materials, thus unlocking a new generation of supercapacitors with significant energy storage capabilities.

During the event, the company’s CEO Jim Heathcote mentioned that the technology could outperform lithium-ion systems in renewable energy storage.

The Faraday 2 builds on the earlier Faraday 1 prototype launched last year, claiming to double the energy density. The Faraday 2 operates at 1-40 Wh/kg, allowing for faster charging times, which will harness fleeting spikes in renewable energy production, as noted by Heathcote.

However, Gareth Hinds from the UK National Physical Laboratory points out that the technology still lags behind lithium-ion batteries, which can achieve around 300 Wh/kg at the cell level. Andrew Abbott of the University of Leicester adds that the energy density now offered by SuperDielectrics is akin to that of lead-acid batteries commonly used in automobiles and backup power systems. “There are no immediate plans among leading manufacturers to transition,” he states.

Marcus Newborough, scientific advisor at SuperDielectrics, acknowledges that they are still “on a journey” to enhance the system’s energy density. “We are aware of our high theoretical energy density,” he mentioned, noting the company’s commitment to realizing this potential in the coming years, aiming for a commercial energy storage solution ready for launch by the end of 2027.

Despite the optimism, Hinds remains skeptical about the technology competing with lithium-ion batteries regarding energy density. “Clearly, it’s an early-stage development, and while they continue to push for higher energy density, achieving lithium-ion levels is a significant challenge due to strict limitations,” he comments.

Nonetheless, he suggests that there could be a market for larger storage solutions that provide lower energy density but at a much more affordable price than lithium-ion batteries and with a longer lifespan.

Sam Cooper from Imperial College, London, concurs: “If we can develop a system offering equal energy storage capacity to the Tesla Powerwall, regardless of size or weight, and at a cost of 95% less, that would represent a groundbreaking achievement.”

Concerns Grow for FEMA’s Future Following Texas Flooding

Posted on July 12, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

The catastrophic flood in Texas, claiming nearly 120 lives, marked the first major crisis encountered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the current Trump administration. Despite the tragic loss of life, both former and current FEMA officials have expressed to NBC News that the effects on smaller geographic regions don’t adequately challenge the capabilities of the agency, especially as staffing has been reduced significantly.

They argue that the true tests may arise later this summer, when the threat of hurricanes looms over several states.

As discussions about the agency’s future unfold—with President Donald Trump hinting at the possibility of “dismantling it”—Homeland Security Secretary Christy Noem, who oversees FEMA, has tightened her control.

Current and former officials have mentioned that Noem now mandates that all agents personally authorize expenditures exceeding $100,000. To expedite the approval process, FEMA established a task force on Monday aimed at streamlining Noem’s approval, according to sources familiar with the initiative.

While Noem has taken a more direct approach to managing the agency, many FEMA leadership positions remain unfilled due to voluntary departures. In May, the agency disclosed in an internal email that 16 senior officials had left, collectively bringing over 200 years of disaster response experience with them.

“DHS and its components are fully engaged in addressing recovery efforts in Carville,” a spokesperson from DHS remarked in a statement to NBC News.

“Under Chief Noem and Deputy Manager David Richardson, FEMA has transformed from an unwieldy DC-centric organization into a streamlined disaster response force that empowers local entities to assist their residents. Outdated processes have been replaced due to their failure to serve Americans effectively in real emergencies… Secretary Noem ensures accountability to U.S. taxpayers, a concern often overlooked by Washington for decades.”

Civilians assist with recovery efforts near the Guadalupe River on Sunday.Giulio Cortez / AP

On Wednesday afternoon, the FEMA Review Council convened for its second meeting, set up to outline the agency’s future direction. “Our goal is to pivot FEMA’s responsibilities to the state level,” Trump told the press in early June.

At this moment, FEMA continues to manage over 700 active disaster situations, as stated by Chris Currie, who monitors governmental accountability.

“They’re operating no differently. They’re merely doing more with fewer personnel,” he noted in an interview.

While some advocates push for a more proactive role for the agency, certain Republicans in Congress emphasize the need to preserve FEMA in response to the significant flooding.

“FEMA plays a crucial role,” said Senator Ted Cruz of Texas during a Capitol Hill briefing this week. “There’s a consensus on enhancing FEMA’s efficiency and responsiveness to disasters. These reforms can be advantageous, but the agency’s core functions remain vital, regardless of any structural adjustments.”

Bureaucratic Hurdles

A key discussion point in the first FEMA Review Council meeting was how the federal government can alleviate financial constraints. However, current and former FEMA officials argue that Noem’s insistence on personal approvals for expenditures introduces bureaucratic layers that could hinder timely assistance during the Texas crisis and potential future hurricanes.

Current officials voiced that the new requirements contradict the aim of reducing expenses. “They’re adding bureaucracy…and increasing costs,” one official commented.

A former senior FEMA official remarked that agents need to procure supplies and services within disaster zones, routinely requiring their authorization for contracts over $100,000 to facilitate these actions.

“FEMA rarely makes expenditures below that threshold,” disclosed an unnamed former employee currently involved in the industry to NBC News.

In addition to the stipulation that Noem must approve certain expenditures, current and former staff members revealed confusion regarding who holds authority—Noem or Richardson, who has been acting as administrator since early May. One former official noted a cultural shift within the agency from proactive measures to a more cautious stance, as employees fear job loss.

DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin referred to questions regarding who is in charge as “absurd.”

Further changes are underway. Last week, agents officially ceased their practice of sending personnel into disaster areas to engage with victims about available services. This decision followed complaints regarding interactions that had been criticized last fall. Acting managers previously labeled this conduct by FEMA staff as “unacceptable.” Distancing from the scrutiny, the dismissed personnel claimed to have acted under their supervisor’s instructions to avoid “unpleasant encounters.”

Although many individuals access FEMA services through various channels like the agency’s website and hotline, two former officials emphasized that in-person outreach remains essential for connecting disaster victims with available resources. It remains uncertain if the agency plans to send personnel into Texas for door-to-door outreach.

This week, Democratic senators expressed frustration that Noem has yet to present the 2025 hurricane plans she mentioned in May, after they were promised to be shared.

New Jersey Senator Andy Kim, leading Democrat on the Disaster Management Subcommittee, plans to send another letter to Noem on Wednesday to solicit these plans.

“The delay in FEMA’s 2025 hurricane season plan report at the start of hurricane season highlights the ongoing slowness of DHS in providing essential information to this committee,” Kim asserted in his letter.

FEMA’s Future

Critical questions remain regarding FEMA’s role in disaster recovery: What responsibilities will it retain, and which will be delegated to states to manage independently?

Experts consulting with NBC News concur that while federal agencies should maintain responsibility for large-scale disasters, the question persists as to whether states could be empowered to handle smaller ones rather than deferring to federal assistance.

“Disaster prevention is paramount,” remarked Jeff Schlegermilch, director of Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Response.

Natalie Simpson, a disaster response expert at the University of Buffalo, added that larger states could assume greater risk during disasters.

“I believe we could establish a local FEMA due to economies of scale in larger states like California, New York, and Florida, but I doubt their efficacy in smaller states,” she stated during an interview.

Current and former FEMA officials, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott, have criticized FEMA as “inefficient and slow,” asserting the need for a more responsive approach. They highlighted that the governor called for a FEMA disaster declaration within days of the flood.

On Sunday, the president sidestepped inquiries about potential agency restructuring, stating:

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt commented that ongoing discussions are taking place regarding the agency’s broader objectives. “The President aims to ensure that American citizens have the resources they need, whether that assistance is provided at the state or federal level; it’s a matter of continuous policy discourse,” Leavitt remarked.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Inflatable Helmets: The Inventor Advocates for a Safer Cycling Future

Posted on July 5, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

As per the World Health Organization, approximately 41,000 individuals lose their lives each year while cycling. The exact number of those who were not wearing helmets remains unclear, but it is evident that helmets act as a deterrent for many.

Cycling UK, along with various charities advocating for bicycle use, suggests that when helmet usage is mandated, the number of people opting to cycle tends to decline.

For evidence, one can look at Australia, where after New South Wales and Melbourne implemented mandatory helmet laws, cycling rates in those two states dropped by 36%.

Research indicates that the hesitation to wear helmets stems largely from doubts about their protective capabilities and the challenges associated with their storage and cost. However, Ventete, a UK startup, aims to address these issues.

Storage issues

The AH-1 is an inflatable helmet, designed in the UK and manufactured in Switzerland, taking a decade to develop.

While earlier inflatable helmets functioned like airbags—only inflating upon impact—the AH-1 inflates using an electric pump before use, taking about 30 seconds to reach the optimal pressure of 32 psi.

Once used, the AH-1 can shrink to a compact size of less than 4 cm (1.5 inches) thick, making it easy to store almost anywhere.

“We recognized that many people are not fans of traditional helmets due to issues of portability,” says Colin Harperger, co-founder of Ventete. “This inspired us to transform 3D objects (helmets) into easily stored 2D objects.”

“The AH-1 comprises 11 inflatable chambers,” Harperger elaborates. “Each chamber is encased in protective ribs made from laminated nylon that resists punctures, wear, and stretching. The ribs are molded from glass-reinforced polymers, offering extra structural robustity.”

Each rib is additionally lined with rubber to help absorb impact energy.

A cyclist himself, Harperger knew that the pneumatic structure provides more compression than conventional helmets made of expanded polystyrene (EPS), yet there was initially no technology available to realize his vision.

“About five years ago, we experienced a breakthrough. After several iterations, we developed the AH-1.”

read more:

Safety Standards

While being inflatable enhances convenience in storage, what about safety? Can it effectively protect your head? Currently, the Ventetete AH-1 holds an EN 1078 certification.

This certification aligns with both European and UK safety standards, covering the helmet’s construction, field of view, and shock absorption capabilities. However, not all helmets provide the same level of protection.

“Once you achieve certification, you are not obligated to publish your findings,” Harperger points out. “We collaborated with brain injury specialists from the Human Experience, Analysis and Design (Head) Lab at Imperial College London, addressing similar concerns.

After use, the AH-1 can shrink to less than 4 cm (1.5 inches) thick.

“The highlight for us was achieving a 44.1% reduction in linear risk compared to the best-performing EPS helmet,” Harperger stated.

Linear risk relates to forces such as impacting the head against a surface, and reducing impact leads to decreased risk. “It may sound counterintuitive, but I aim to extend the impact duration to prevent the head from bouncing off.”

Imagine falling onto a bed rather than a hardwood floor. The impact on the hardwood floor is brief but increases the likelihood of brain movement within the skull.

“By prolonging the impact duration, we significantly reduce linear risk.”

This testing also looked at rotational impact, which assesses forces like twists or shears occurring when the helmet hits the ground at an angle.

In this domain, the AH-1 performed second best among four contenders, falling behind a helmet that includes a secondary inner layer designed to give it a 10-15mm (about 0.5 inch) mobility to reduce rotational forces affecting the brain.

These secondary layers are often found in higher-end helmets; however, the AH-1 aims to make these features available in more affordable options.

Cost remains a concern. Three helmets were tested, all priced under £50, while the AH-1 retails for £350. Thus, while it may resolve protection and storage issues for those hesitant to wear helmets, the price may still present a barrier.

About our experts

Colin Harperger is the co-founder and CEO of Ventetete. He holds a PhD in Architecture by Design from UCL London, UK.

read more:

Forget Terminator: Our Robotic Future Could Be Soft and Playful

Posted on June 26, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

“When I think about the future of robots and society, I don’t see machine overlords.”

Miguel Medina/AFP via Getty Images

Are you concerned that AI-driven robots might take our jobs or even pose a threat? You’re not alone. Yet, this fear invites a critical examination of whether the opposite might be true.

In my upcoming novel, Automatic Noodles, set to release later this year, I introduce four robots battling to secure jobs in a country where laws prevent them from unionizing, securing bank accounts, voting, or owning businesses. Although it’s a work of science fiction, it’s grounded in existing technology and delves into our fundamental anxieties about robots.

For years, I have written non-fiction on actual robotics, interviewing engineers and industry professionals to understand future advancements. Recently, I visited Yale University’s groundbreaking lab, the Faboratory, led by Rebecca Kramer-Bottiglio, where her team is developing soft robots. These include flexible, squishy creatures with circuits made of liquid metal. One such robot can swim like a turtle, aiding in environmental monitoring of wetlands. Another, named Tensegrity, resembles a cluster of plastic sticks connected by elastic bands, bouncing back when dropped to explore its surroundings.

Medha Goyal and researchers in the Faboratory showcased a tiny liquid ball that expands when warmed. These “Granular actuators” can be incorporated into robots to create varying rigidity and softness in their limbs. They also hold significant medical potential, enabling small robots to deliver medication or diagnose health issues.

Kramer-Bottiglio and her team are challenging traditional notions of robotics. Tomorrow’s bots may not resemble towering humanoids; instead, they could be softer, using air pressure instead of metal mechanics. Notably, one of my book’s characters is an octopus-like soft robot designed for underwater searches and rescues, aptly named Cayenne, equipped with sensors on its arms that allow it to interpret flavors.

Tomorrow’s bots probably won’t resemble gigantic humanoids; they might instead be soft little beings.

When you envision the future of robotics, you might picture something akin to Cayenne. All they and their robotic companions aspire to is to operate a noodle restaurant in San Francisco. Their crew includes Sweety, a three-legged wheeled bot, alongside a basic mixer with two arms and Staybehind, a humanoid soldier bot more interested in decorating the restaurant than fighting.

This makeshift family inhabits a remarkable era of human history. In the 2060s, California’s government decided that certain AI-powered robots should be regarded as individuals. However, officials worry that granting robots the same rights as humans could lead to an uncontrollable influx of robots dominating society. Thus, they have restricted essential rights “for their own good,” assuring the public that a vote could eventually expand robot rights.

Despite what their human counterparts fear, Cayenne and its companions do not seek dominance. They simply wish to pursue their passions. Rather than producing mediocre meals for distant human masters, they aspire to create what they genuinely care about. They symbolize immigrants in a new land, often viewed with skepticism, and at worst, they struggle to survive in a society that wishes them ill.

I’m intentionally drawing this parallel because it’s disconcerting how the fears surrounding immigration resonate with our anxieties about robots. We worry they will usurp our jobs, rise up against us, or disrupt cultural norms. Amazingly, those who voice such concerns about immigration often have never taken the time to understand the immigrants. Similarly, society projects those fears onto robots that do not yet exist. This reflects a troubling pattern: fearing those we don’t know or understand, and in the case of robots, not recognizing their potential.

This is why I do not envision a dystopian future dominated by machines when I think about robots and our society. Instead, I see a reality clouded by terrifying fantasies and restrictive laws. Rather than fearsome terminators, I imagine gentle, soft-bodied creatures like turtles and pneumatic arms. I’m observing Cayenne, apprehensive about human animosity and the vigilance against robot “threats.”

Humans craft narratives to brace for an unlikely future while often ignoring the realities unfolding right before us. Yet, we don’t have to follow this trend. We can develop our understanding based on empirical evidence and science, rather than indulging in surreal nightmares that will likely never materialize.

Annaly’s Week

What I’m reading

Torchon Ebuchi Racebook: A Personal History of the Internet, An engaging compilation of essays exploring cosplay, video games, and social media.

What I’m watching

Murder Bot, for sure.

What I’m working on

I’m wandering with an archaeologist through the Roman town of Talos in Sardinia, Italy. More details to come!

Annalee Newitz is a science journalist and author of the latest book, *Automatic Noodles*. They co-host the Hugo Award-winning podcast, *We Are Right*. Follow them @annaleen or visit their website at techsploitation.com.

The Arts and Science of Writing Science Fiction

Explore the realm of science fiction and discover the art of crafting your own captivating stories during this immersive weekend workshop.

Topics:

How Symbiosis Shaped Our Planet and Why It Holds the Key to Our Future

Posted on June 23, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

In the initial two billion years of Earth’s existence, our planet was dominated by a combination of bacteria and their relatives, the Archaea. This period can be described as “slimeball Earth,” marked by a critical merger that shaped the future of life on our planet.

This article is part of our special concept series, showcasing how experts approach some of the most unexpected concepts in science. Click here for additional insights.

One of these ancient cells engulfed a bacterial cell, and remarkably, the bacterium survived. Together, they replicated, leading the engulfed bacteria to evolve into mitochondria, which serve as the energy source for these early cells.

Nick Lane from University College London discovered that mitochondria enabled these cells to express an extraordinary 200,000 times more genes, fostering growth and the emergence of varied life forms. This new combination eventually evolved into complex eukaryotic cells, resulting in nearly every organism observable without a microscope, including humans.

Coexistence is fundamental to our existence, a factor that continues to sustain us today. Over 80% of terrestrial plant species engage in symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi, which provide essential nutrients while plants supply the fungi with carbohydrates. Without this interaction, oxygen as we know it would be nonexistent. The soil itself is a product of symbiosis among fungi, bacteria, and plants—an ecological partnership that took root when life transitioned from sea to land roughly 500 million years ago.

When many think of “symbiosis,” they often envision entities coexisting peacefully, like the clownfish and anemone or the vibrant ecosystems of coral reefs. Lichens, too, symbolize the intimate connections among distinct life kingdoms. Generally, we perceive symbiosis as a benevolent arrangement characterized by mutual benefit.

However, experts suggest viewing symbiotic relationships on a spectrum, ranging from parasitism to mutualism. Katie Field from the University of Sheffield, UK, points out that reciprocity isn’t always altruistic; partners often give in hopes of future benefits.

To illustrate this spectrum, consider the diverse strategies employed by orchids. Their minuscule seeds contain very few resources and must parasitize mycorrhizal fungi to access the sugars and nutrients needed for germination. As they develop leaves, some species begin to establish a more reciprocal relationship with the fungus, shifting from parasitism to mutual benefit.

Conversely, older orchids might provide sustenance for younger ones, while certain species may remain parasitic indefinitely, never developing photosynthetic leaves. “There’s a whole cycle of different stages of symbiotic interactions,” Field remarks.

Another significant perspective on symbiosis is its potential as a key to a sustainable future. Leguminous plants such as pulses, beans, and lentils utilize symbiotic bacteria to convert atmospheric nitrogen into fertilizer. Recent studies indicate that these plants have adapted mechanisms from existing cellular structures for this purpose.

This revelation could pave the way for other crops, notably grains like wheat and corn—staples that account for half of human caloric intake—to produce their fertilizers. Giles Oldroyd from the Crop Science Center at Cambridge University is exploring this avenue, with hopes of significantly reducing the reliance on chemical fertilizers in agriculture.

Oldroyd is conducting field trials using modified crops to harness the power of symbiosis, with a clear mission to minimize the use of chemical fertilizers. “I’m committed to this goal,” he states.

Explore more stories in this series through the links below:

Topics:

Helgorand: Exploring the Past and Future of Quantum Physics on a Tiny Island

Posted on June 17, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Helgoland Island occupies a nearly mythical position in quantum mechanics history

Shutterstock/Markus Stappen

Having attended numerous scientific conferences, the recent one on Helgoland Island, marking a century of quantum mechanics, stands out as one of the most peculiar, in a positive sense.

This tiny German island, stretching less than a kilometer in the North Sea, exudes the ambiance of a coastal resort. Even during summer, its charm wanes, giving way to the scent of quaint streets filled with souvenir shops, fish eateries, and ice cream stalls. Picture cutting-edge experimenters in Quantum Technologies casually mingling after discussions at the town hall beside a miniature golf course—it’s quite an experience.

Our purpose here becomes evident as we stroll along the cliffside road, where a bronze plaque commemorates physicist Werner Heisenberg’s purported invention of quantum mechanics in 1925. While it sounds intriguing, it’s an embellishment; Heisenberg merely outlined some concepts here. The more recognized formulation came from Erwin Schrödinger in early 1926, who introduced wave functions to predict quantum system evolutions.

Nonetheless, this year clearly holds significance as we commemorate a century of quantum mechanics. Regardless of how much of Helgoland’s narrative stems from Heisenberg’s own embellishments—he recounted his breakthrough there several years later—this “Remote Control Island” serves as a unique venue for celebratory gatherings.

And what a celebration it is! It’s almost surreal to witness such a congregation of renowned quantum physicists. Among them are four Nobel laureates: Alain Aspect, David Wineland, Anton Zeilinger, and Serge Haroche. Collectively, they’ve validated the bizarre aspects of quantum mechanics, showcasing how the characteristics of one particle can instantaneously influence another, no matter the distance. They’ve also developed techniques to manipulate individual quantum particles, crucial for quantum computing.

In my view, these distinguished individuals would concur that the younger generation is poised to delve deeper into the implications of quantum mechanics, transforming its notoriously counterintuitive essence into new technologies and a better understanding of nature. Quantum mechanics is renowned for encompassing multiple interpretations of its mathematical framework concerning reality, with many seasoned experts firmly entrenched in their perspectives.

Helgoland’s plaque honors Werner Heisenberg’s role in quantum mechanics

Philip Ball

This divisive sentiment was noticeable during Zeilinger and Aspect’s evening panel discussion. Jill’s Brothers pioneered quantum cryptography at the University of Montreal.

In fairness to the veterans, their theories emerged under considerable skepticism from their peers, particularly regarding the significance of examining such foundational concerns. They navigated an era where “silent calculations” were prevalent—a term coined by American physicist David Mermin to describe how it was frowned upon to ponder the implications of quantum mechanics beyond merely solving the Schrödinger equation. It’s no wonder they developed thick skins.

In contrast, younger researchers seem more pragmatic in their approach to quantum theories, often adopting various interpretations as tools to address specific challenges. Elements of the Copenhagen interpretation and the multiverse theory are intertwined, not as definitive claims about reality, but as frameworks for analysis.

The new wave of researchers, such as Vedika Khemani from Stanford University, are actively bridging condensed matter physics and quantum information. I heard her highlight the evolution from storing information on magnetic tapes in the 1950s to the crucial error correction techniques in today’s quantum computing.

Quantum mechanics applications are on the rise, with theorists also stepping up their game. For instance, Flaminia Giacomini at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich spoke about her pursuit of reconciling the granular quantum realm with the smooth continuous world required for quantum gravity, offering profound insights into the essence of quantum mechanics.

While some may consider this exploration to be veering into the realm of speculation, as seen in string theory attempts, Giacomini asserted, “There is no experimental evidence that gravity should be quantized.” Hence, empirical validation remains elusive, despite a wealth of theoretical discourse.

Excitingly, there are plans to test hypotheses in the not-so-distant future. For instance, examining whether two objects can entangle purely through gravitational interactions is a goal. The difficulty is ensuring the objects are substantial enough to exert meaningful gravitational pull while being sufficiently small to demonstrate quantum characteristics. Several speakers expressed confidence in overcoming this hurdle within the next decade.

The conference revealed the interconnectedness of quantum theories and experiments: perturbing one aspect inevitably influences others. Gaining a nuanced understanding of quantum gravity through delicate experiments involving trapped particles could shed light on black hole information paradoxes and inspire innovative ideas for quantum computing and the nature of quantum states.

Ultimately, achieving progress in any of these areas appears promising for uncovering the enduring questions that have fascinated Heisenberg and his contemporaries. What occurs when we measure quantum particles? However, rather than perceiving it as a repetitive struggle, it’s clear that quantum mechanics is much more sophisticated and intriguing than the founders ever envisaged.

Topics:

Mindseye Review: A Dystopian Future Echoing 2012 | Games

Posted on June 13, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

TThis resembles a sphere like Redrock, an open-world variant of Las Vegas Mind-Yay. It’s nearly directly the original concept: a massive bubble of bubbles partly embedded in the desert ground, with its exterior acting as a gigantic screen. Occasionally, cars halt beside this sphere while traveling in an electric vehicle designed by Silva, the global megascope controlling entity. They pause just as advertisements on the Silva EV unfold dramatically overhead, resulting in a slight disorienting effect.

In these instances, I truly grasp what Mind-eye aims to convey. You find yourself ensnared in the ultimate company town ruled by oligarchs and con artists who have no desire to escape the ecosystem they’ve constructed. Mindseye infiltrates this reality through serendipitous interactions with a blend of wit and lightness. While much of the game skews towards heavy-handedness and dullness, it’s refreshing to experience moments of clarity where everything falls into place.

With its sphere and ever-present EV, Mindseye embodies a futuristic vibe. It connects with themes surrounding AI, the Tech elite, and the creeping menace of corporate dystopia. You take on the role of a former priest grappling with amnesia who must confront the precise harm that technology has inflicted on his humanity, engaging in combat against people, robots, and drones. Beyond the main story, Mindseye also offers a toolkit for creating your own games and levels to share with fellow players. This all comes from a studio co-founded by Leslie Benzies, known for his work on GTA 5 and more.

AI overlords…Mindseye. Photo: IO Interactive

Strangely, the gameplay often feels reminiscent of the past. When I move my finger through the air, I sense a breeze from around 2012. Heartfelt, it’s a somewhat clunky cover shooter set in an open world experienced primarily during travel between missions. The narrative exists mainly to justify betrayals, car chases, and shootouts, while explaining why you enter battles accompanied by personal drones that can open doors and stun nearby foes.

It can be a peculiar affair, evoking memories of a time when many third-person games included cutscenes and cover mechanics that hadn’t yet reached necessity. It’s worth noting that there are frequent reports of crashes, technical glitches, and NPCs appearing without faces. My playthrough on a relatively older PC encountered just one crash and a handful of amusing bugs, but overall, I faced minimal issues. I engage with games that feel similarly dated.

This might attract less criticism than anticipated. A straightforward run-and-gun mission lets you repeatedly photograph individuals who share a striking resemblance while choosing routes between waypoints. Shooting mechanics often provide enjoyment, so it feels somewhat disappointing to drive for each mission, though the vehicle conveys a satisfying sense of freedom, reminiscent of classic driving games. (Air travel lacks excitement due to its lack of character.)

Drive between missions…mindeye. Photo: Build Robot Boy/IO Interactive

In a world where many games contemplate AI dominance, the in-game AI around me seemed far from a takeover. When I relinquished control of the vehicle to the game while tailing an enemy, I was advised to avoid detection, leading to our bumpers colliding at each intersection. This particular open-world town is inhabited by amusingly unskilled AI drivers. I’ve frequently arrived at traffic lights only to be greeted by their reckless antics. Consequently, I often appreciated the off-screen collisions involving road cones and dumpsters that I consistently found amusing.

I even enjoyed the plot’s quirks, featuring lines like “My DNA has changed since we last met!” But do you feel it? Nevertheless, I’ve become increasingly aware that intelligent individuals devoted a considerable amount of effort to creating this game. I don’t think they aimed to disappoint. Or to place me in an open world that feels sparse, not due to a lack of mission icons or fishing mini-games, but because it lacks convincing human elements.

This issue appears to resonate thematically. It embodies a reckless ambition. When I explored the level editor, I discovered impressively rich and complex tools, but creating something truly exceptional on this platform demands significant time and dedication. This is undoubtedly aimed at mega fans with niche interests. Completing everything in the campaign (even those sections that attempt variation with stealth, tracking, and sniping segments) is an endeavor that requires a real mega-corporation’s backing.

Mindseye is peculiar. Despite its flaws, I seldom found it unenjoyable, but I still find it challenging to give an unreserved recommendation. The concepts, immediate actions, and narratives are so vaguely developed that they nearly vanish. Still, I’m somewhat glad it exists.

Will Life Beneath the Waves Shape Our Future as Sea Levels Rise?

Posted on June 5, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Is this the future in a world where the oceans are rising?

Deep R&D Ltd

The Bajau are indigenous marine people of Southeast Asia, often referred to as sea nomads. For millennia, they have thrived along coastlines, relying on foraging underwater without the aid of diving gear, holding their breath for astonishing durations. Yet, the early 21st century introduced multiple crises that jeopardized their way of life—industrial overfishing, pollution, coral bleaching diminished food sources, and rising sea levels consumed coastal dwellings.

In 2035, a Bajau community near Saba, North Borneo, initiated fundraising for a contemporary floating and underwater settlement. They collaborated with deep, a manufacturer of submarine habitats, to create interconnected rafts and underwater homes, developing business models that could be emulated by other maritime communities facing similar threats from rising seas. Revenue streams included extreme adventure tourism, scientific research facilities, and longevity clinics.

The first habitat comprised a network of platforms and rafts, with tunnels leading to underwater levels. While residents occupied surface structures, they increasingly utilized submerged areas for storage, sustenance, and sleep. This habitat was constructed using a 3D printing technique known as Wire arc additive manufacturing, which allowed the most effective pressure distribution in areas experiencing strain.

The deeper sections were maintained at both ambient water pressure and the corresponding atmospheric pressure from the surface. In modules situated less than 20 meters deep, occupants, referred to as Aquanauts, inhaled a unique gas mixture to prevent nitrogen narcosis. Those exiting deep modules required decompression when returning to normal atmospheric conditions. An advantage of these surrounding modules was the incorporation of a moon door, enabling Aquanauts to swim directly into the deep sea for leisure, research, and farming activities.

Undersea hotels catering to extreme tourism have surged in popularity. In the Galapagos, tourists reside in submerged hydroelectric hotels, exploring hot springs and observing some of the planet’s rarest life forms. Simultaneously, scientists harness these modules to investigate deep-sea ecosystems. Undersea mapping technologies have evolved, enabling researchers to explore vast ocean territories that were previously unreachable, fostering understanding and interactions with whales and other deep-sea creatures, leading to significant advancements in marine biology.

Aquanauts can swim directly into the deep sea for recreational, research, and agricultural activities

The Bajau have long been adapted to marine environments. With thousands of years at sea, they possess enlarged spleens that provide a higher quantity of oxygen-retaining red blood cells compared to typical humans. Some Bajau divers can spend five hours underwater, diving freely to depths of 70 meters without oxygen tanks, holding their breath for up to 15 minutes. After transitioning to seabed habitats, many Bajau began to leave behind surface living, opting instead to spend more time submerged, even resorting to gene editing to enhance their aquatic capabilities, including intentional eardrum puncturing to facilitate deeper dives, and utilizing surfactants in their lungs to aid their decompression, akin to adaptations found in diving marine mammals.

Numerous communities have established depth clinical treatments. Previous research has demonstrated that exposure to intermittent daily sessions of pressurized oxygen therapy can alleviate various medical conditions and age-related diseases. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, for instance, has proven beneficial, leading individuals who underwent consistent high-pressure sessions to possess longer telomeres and enhanced clearance of senescent cells, both of which are linked to increased longevity. The deep habitat has attracted affluent seniors looking to extend their lives, simultaneously providing a lucrative income source.

The majority of marine communities have become self-sufficient, cultivating their own food through aquaculture of fish, mollusks, and seaweed, while also growing other crops on the surface. Energy sources include a combination of solar, wind, wave, and geothermal energy, tailored to local conditions. Some communities focus on tourism, whereas others specialize in carbon capture within medical facilities. A significant amount of seaweed is harvested, sunk into the ocean depths, and sold as carbon credits.

Living beneath the waves isn’t for everyone. Nonetheless, these habitats empower those most vulnerable to climate change, giving them the tools to redefine their livelihoods and lifestyles, even in the face of rising sea levels that threaten their homes.

Rowan Hooper is the podcast editor for New Scientist and author of *How to Spend $1 Trillion: These are 10 Global Issues That Can Be Actually Fixed*. Follow him on Bluesky @rowhoop.bsky.social

topic:

Is My Favorite Podcast’s New Video Format the Future of Vodcasts or Just a Passing Trend?

Posted on May 23, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

In the afternoon, we gathered four people at Perich, a family-owned café on Besnard Green Road, London, which has been part of the East End for 125 years. The lively and renowned owners, British-Italian brothers Nevio and Anna, have been delighting patrons with fry-ups, soups, pasta, and jam rolly-polly since 8 am. Although the café is currently closed, Anna and Nevio are embarking on their second venture as hosts of a podcast series. The show features interviews exploring food and lifestyle, focusing on guests’ favorite meals. The discussions are fascinating, chaotic, and filled with surprises.

So far, they’ve welcomed the likes of actor Ray Winstone, Dexis’ Kevin Rowland, rapper Haku Baker, and 86-year-old YouTuber Marge Keefe, also known as Grime Gran. Today’s guests include TikTok star John Fisher, aka Big John, and his son, boxer Johnny Fisher. When I mention to Anna that she must be exhausted, she laughs and replies, “Tell me about it. Actually, tell him!” Their long-time producer, George Sexton Kerr, notes that he has been busy rearranging the Formica table for the film crew.

You might wonder why a film crew is involved. Podcasts are typically for the ears, not the eyes, right? However, recent trends have changed the way podcasts are consumed, with many shows now incorporating video. In February, YouTube reported that 1 billion users watch podcast content monthly, positioning the platform ahead of Spotify (which noted 100 million podcast listeners in 2023) and Apple in the podcasting space. With leading podcasts like The Joe Rogan Experience and The Mel Robbins Podcast, it’s no surprise that Spotify is working hard to catch up.

This year, the BBC launched visual adaptations of shows such as The Traitors: Uncloaked and Uncanny: Mortem in both video and audio formats. Business Insider reports that Netflix is also preparing to embrace visualized podcasts. To reflect this evolution, the British Podcast Awards introduced a new Visual Innovation Award to honor “Outstanding Visual Podcasts.” This indicates that whether one likes it or not, visualized podcasts, often referred to as “board casts,” are on the rise.

Conversations with both listeners and creators about this new audiovisual landscape reveal differing opinions. Dedicated audio enthusiasts reasonably question the need to watch a podcast when their TV watchlist is already overwhelming. Conversely, others delight in seeing familiar hosts in person. Independent audio producers, seeking anonymity, express concerns about YouTube’s dominance in the industry and worry that audio content might become “Crap Telly.”

It’s important to note that visualized podcasts aren’t necessarily competing with mainstream television. Just as celebrity interviewer Amelia Dimoldenberg, host of YouTube’s Chicken Shop Date, can coexist alongside BBC’s Graham Norton, visualized podcasts can exist beside high-quality television programming. Nonetheless, as a podcast enthusiast and critic, I admit I have my doubts. For me, the beauty of podcasts lies in the intimate experience of voice and soundscapes directly engaging my imagination. I often listen while multitasking, whether cooking or walking my dog. I don’t need yet another screen-based distraction.

That said, I’m excited about podcasts where the visuals serve a distinct purpose, such as the series launched by CAFF last year. Producer Sexton Kerr, who took two years to craft the series with Anna and Nevio, envisioned it as a comprehensive audiovisual experience. “I always wanted it to be multifaceted; it’s about food and this wonderful dynamic between Anna and Nevio. But it’s also about the beauty of sharing a conversation over tea.”

In the early episodes, Nevio admits, “There were moments of chaos because Anna and I were figuring it out, but mostly because George was guiding us,” [in both audio and visual formats].

When my producer friend discusses the pod, “Crunch Terry,” they refer to interview podcasts as ideal for visual mediums. Productions like Davina McCall’s Begin, Fashion Neurosis with Bella Freud, and Call Her Daddy illustrate how hosts and interviewees can thrive in visually engaging settings, complete with stylish decor and ambient lighting.

However, many productions fall short, either restricting camera angles to sound booths or presenting awkward Zoom calls. A prime example is The Rest Is Politics, a chart-topping series hosted by Rory Stewart and Alastair Campbell. Since the hosts rarely appear together, viewers see them on split screens, each illuminated from their respective homes. YouTube executive Pedlopina recently stated that the show “feels like high school” due to its lack of production quality, noting that “viewers will ultimately determine the production value they are willing to accept.”

Matt Deegan, partner at Podcast Discovery, a marketing firm for podcasts, remarked, “For some viewers, they may not frequently consume podcasts and instead watch shows. There is a younger audience that navigates YouTube without engaging with audio podcasts.”

Regardless of production quality, the video format is easily shareable on social media, enhancing the show’s visibility. Deegan states, “Repetitive exposure to engaging, informative, or entertaining content makes it much more likely for someone to engage with the podcast app.” Sexton Kerr adds, “We’ve been steadily posting clips on Instagram and TikTok, amassing over 400,000 views on some. We couldn’t afford such advertising.”

For interview podcasts, the advantages of video content are clear and straightforward. Transforming a narrative podcast into an appealing visual format is a more considerable challenge, but podcasters are starting to explore this. George Mpanga (aka poet George) and Bembrick, creator of Have You Heard of George’s Podcast?, a Peabody Award-winning series on race, history, and culture, are currently reworking their audio episodes for a video audience.

“You have to go where the audience is,” explains Bembrick. “Even if your primary focus is audio, it would be unwise to exclude platforms like YouTube. If you venture there, you increase your chances of resonating with that content. We feel ready to experiment, and we’re curious about how it will turn out. I don’t believe we’ve reached the final form yet.”

Does all of this spell doom for audio? While some industry insiders worry that the rise of video podcasts may sideline indie podcasters in an increasingly competitive market, Bembrick is optimistic that it will create space for productions that truly prioritize audio.

Back at Perich, Nevio brings two jam tarts on giant plates to our table, and Sexton Kerr remarks that everything is interwoven. “It’s like the video of that song killed the radio star. But we still have radio stars. I still have podcasts I cherish listening to, so I believe there’s room for both.”

Microsoft’s future unclear amid escalating tensions in Gaza conflict. “On the brink of uncertainty”

Posted on April 18, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

fOr, for the second time last month, Microsoft employees disrupted high-level executives speaking at an event celebrating the 50th anniversary on April 4. They were protesting the company’s role in Israel’s ongoing siege in Gaza.

AI executive Mustafasleiman was suspended by employees Ibtihal Aboussad and Vaniya Agrawal. The two were fired within a few days. Microsoft president Brad Smith and former CEO Steve Ballmer were yelled at in Great Hall in Seattle on March 20 by current and former employees.

Before the April event, there was an outside gathering that also included current and former Tech Giant employees. Protesters projected a sign onto the wall of the hall called “Microsoft Powers Genocide,” showing that since October 7, 2023, Israel has been extensively using its AI and cloud computing services.

The rally and confusion were the latest in the employee protests at Microsoft’s headquarters in Redmond, Washington, urging the company to cut ties with Israel. This comes after years of simmering tensions on the company’s message boards and a recent workplace dispute.

Taken together, the protests indicate that more people have decided to leave the company for good, according to current and past employees who spoke with the Guardian. Microsoft did not respond to requests for comment.

The recent events at Microsoft reflect similar incidents at other tech companies, such as Google, where employees were fired as they protested their ties with Israel. In February, Google adjusted its AI guidelines, removing the commitment to not use artificial intelligence for surveillance or weapons.

Anxiety about the increase in Redmond

Former Microsoft software engineer Hossam Nasr described the situation at the company as being close to a turning point. He highlighted the events in February as an example of growing frustration among employees.

The firing of employees who raised concerns has galvanized others in the company who are worried about the issue, along with recent media coverage of Microsoft’s role in the siege of Gaza in Israel.

Aboussad told the Guardian that she had been increasingly at odds over the last few months as a software engineer working for AI. She expressed concerns about Microsoft’s deep ties with the Israeli government.
AP Report

Within days of speaking with the Guardian, Aboussad was terminated. Several colleagues mentioned they were considering leaving the company, she stated.

From Viva to IRL

Before the recent direct protest, Microsoft employees were mainly discussing the Hamas attacks and Israel’s continued retaliation online. Several conversations on Microsoft’s Viva Engage company’s message board sparked controversy. One employee posted about the lack of symmetry in the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, which led to heated debates.

Employees critical of Israel’s actions have been vocal about what they perceive as a double standard within the company, especially following events from October 7th. They have accused Microsoft of censoring viewpoints on internal forums while treating Israeli supporters differently.
From immediately after October 7th. One employee shared an email from the company’s Global Employee Relations Team emphasizing the need for respectful discussions on the topic of Israel and Gaza. There were restrictions on postings related to these topics on the company message board.

Online discussions among employees have evolved throughout 2024, according to Nasr. Many employees initially focused on petitions urging the company to call for a ceasefire in Gaza, but the attention gradually shifted to Microsoft’s business practices. By the end of the year, Nasr and others began a campaign to boycott Microsoft’s cloud computing services, cancel contracts with the Israeli military, and gather signatures from colleagues in protest of the company’s ties with the Israeli government.

Reporting Microsoft’s role in Gaza Roil employee discussion

Documents obtained by Drop site, an independent news outlet, revealed that high-tech companies, including Microsoft, are actively seeking to serve the Israeli military. This discovery fueled concerns among some Microsoft employees, leading to internal discussions about the company’s ethics and practices.

Anna Hutt, a long-time employee at Microsoft, highlighted the importance of sharing information about the company’s actions within the organization. She emphasized the need for open conversations and offline organizing efforts to raise awareness among employees.

Nasr mentioned that Apartheid’s Azure has partnered with Boycott, Divest, and Sanctions (BDS) in adding Microsoft to their boycott campaign list. This move reflects growing discontent among employees regarding the company’s involvement with the Israeli military.

One Microsoft employee expressed frustration over what they perceived as a betrayal of the company’s stated values in its contract with Israel. They cited examples of events where critical perspectives were silenced and called for a boycott of Microsoft’s products that enable military actions.

What if astronomers discover no signs of habitability or biosignatures on future exoplanets?

Posted on April 12, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Using advanced statistical modeling, a team of researchers from ETH Zurich, Seti Institute, and University ‘Tor Vergata’ Yonversity investigated how many exoplanets should be observed and understood before declaring that life beyond Earth is common or rare.

Future telescopes will investigate mild terrestrial exoplanets to estimate the frequency of habitable or inhabited worlds. Angerhausen et al. It aims to determine the minimum number of exoplanets required to draw statistically significant conclusions. Particularly for null results (i.e., no detection). Image credit: Sci.News.

In science, not being able to find anything can bring important insights.

When scientists look for life on exoplanets, they often focus on certain characteristics, such as water, gases like oxygen and methane, which may exhibit biological activity.

But what if scientists can’t find these features? Can we learn meaningful things about how ordinary life exists in the universe?

“Even one positive detection changes everything, but up until then we need to make sure we are learning as much as possible from what we can’t find,” said Dr. Daniel Angerhausen, researcher at ETH Zurich and SETI Institute.

New research shows that if scientists look at 40-80 planets and can’t find any signs of life, they can confidently conclude that less than 10-20% of similar planets have life.

However, this depends heavily on how certain we are for each observation.

These discoveries allow scientists to set meaningful caps on the prevalence of living in the universe.

Furthermore, if there is only 10% of planets in the Milky Way alone that have some form of life, it could still be more than 10 billion planets.

“This kind of outcome would be a turning point,” Dr. Angerhausen said.

“Even if life is not found, ultimately we can quantify planets that are truly rare or common with planets with detectable biosignatures.”

The findings will have a direct impact on future missions such as NASA’s Habitable World Observatory (HWO) and European-led large-scale interferometers on exoplanets searching for life.

These missions will study dozens of Earth-like planets by analyzing the planet’s atmosphere for water, oxygen, and even more complex biosignature signs.

Research shows that the number of observed planets is large enough to draw critical conclusions about the likelihood and prevalence of life in the galaxy.

However, this study points out that even with advanced equipment, these studies should carefully account for uncertainty and bias, and develop frameworks to ensure statistically meaningful results.

One important insight from this study is that uncertainty in individual observations, such as false negatives, can significantly impact conclusions.

“It’s not just the number of planets we observe. It’s about how confident we are to see what we’re looking for or not,” Dr. Angerhausen said.

“If we are not careful and confident in our ability to identify life, even large-scale research can lead to misleading consequences.”

The study will be published in today’s Astronomy Journal.

____

Daniel Engerhausen et al. 2025. What if nothing is found? Bayesian analysis of null statistics in future exoplanet habitability and biosignature investigations. AJ 169, 238; doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adb96d

Source: www.sci.news

Trump reviews potential plans for TikTok’s future as US ban looms | TikTok

Posted on April 2, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Donald Trump is getting ready to review a final proposal that will determine the fate of TikTok before the app either gets acquired by non-Chinese buyers or faces a ban in the US.

US Vice President J.D. Vance, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, and National Intelligence Director Tarsi Gabbard will convene in the oval office on Wednesday to discuss the matter, as reported by Reuters.

In the closely watched sale of TikTok, the White House is acting as an investment bank with Vance leading an auction.

Private equity firm Blackstone is in talks regarding the involvement of current non-Chinese shareholders of Baitedan, spearheaded by Susquehanna International Group and Atlantic General.

Trump stated that a deal with ByteDance to sell the video-sharing app used by 170 million Americans will be finalized before the deadline on Saturday.

Trump is gearing up to announce global tariffs on what he’s calling “liberation day” on Wednesday. He expressed willingness to reduce China’s tariffs to seal the TikTok deal last week.

Trump had set a deadline for TikTok to secure non-Chinese buyers by January or face a US ban on national security grounds, as per the law enacted in 2024.

US venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz is reportedly discussing an investment in TikTok as part of an effort led by Trump to gain control of the app, according to the Financial Times.

Mark Andreessen, a Silicon Valley luminary and co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, is in talks to bring in new external investments to acquire TikTok’s Chinese investors alongside Oracle and other American investors in a bid to separate it from its parent company, as per the FT report.

Blackstone is said to value TikTok’s US business as a small minority investment.

Discussions about TikTok’s future involve plans to raise stakes and acquire clauses to outbid the major Chinese investors to secure the US business for short video apps, as reported by Reuters.

Last month, Trump mentioned that his administration is in talks with four different groups regarding potential deals with TikTok in the future.

TikTok and Andreessen Horowitz have yet to respond to Reuters’ request for comment.