Addressing Rising Childhood Obesity: Strategies Beyond Nutritional Deficiency

Ultra-processed foods might contribute to the growing obesity epidemic in children

UNICEF/UN0846048/Florence Gou

For the first time, a significant number of children worldwide are experiencing obesity rather than malnutrition. This trend signifies a critical shift in childhood nutrition. While many strategies exist to combat hunger, few address obesity specifically.

“Despite years of attempts to prevent obesity, particularly in children and adolescents, we are not achieving satisfactory outcomes,” notes Andrea Richardson from RAND, a California-based nonprofit research organization.

A new report by Harriet Torres from UNICEF Belgium and her team utilized data from a comprehensive study to evaluate the nutritional status of children aged 5 to 19. This initiative, called the Collaboration of Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factors, encompasses over 160 countries and territories, representing more than 90% of the global child population.

The findings indicate that global childhood obesity rates have nearly tripled since 2000, with around 9.4% of children classified as obese versus 9.2% who are undernourished. This marks a significant moment, as obesity now outnumbers nutritional deficiencies in children.

Most troubling is the sharp increase in obesity rates in low- and middle-income nations. “Over 80% of children facing overweight and obesity globally are from these regions,” highlighting that this is no longer merely a high-income issue; it’s a pervasive global concern.

This situation necessitates that governments and organizations rethink their strategies regarding childhood malnutrition. “We are observing not just nutritional deficiencies but all forms of malnutrition,” asserts Shivani Ghosh from Cornell University, New York. Unfortunately, effective methods to combat obesity are still lacking, unlike those available for hunger.

The UNICEF report criticizes the prevalence of ultra-processed foods in contributing to rising obesity rates among youth. These foods, made using industrial processes, typically contain additives and preservatives and are high in fats, sugars, and salts. Common examples include packaged snacks, candies, chips, and sodas. The report claims that ultra-processed foods contribute to at least half of the calorie intake for children in Australia, Canada, the U.S., and U.K., and about a third in some low- and middle-income countries such as Argentina and Mexico.

Numerous studies indicate that ultra-processed foods correlate positively with obesity rates. However, the policies aimed at reducing their consumption have seldom led to significant declines in obesity.

For instance, Mexico was the first country to impose a tax on certain high-calorie foods and sugar-sweetened drinks in 2014. Following this, sales for these items decreased, particularly among lower-income families. Adolescent obesity rates experienced only minimal change, notably impacting only teenage girls, similar to the outcome in the U.K. after a tax was levied on sugary drinks in 2018.

Conversely, Chile has implemented some of the strictest regulations regarding ultra-processed products. In 2016, it limited marketing for these foods and mandated warning labels for those high in calories, salt, saturated fats, and sugars. As a result, obesity rates among children aged 4-6 decreased by 1-3 percentage points within a year. However, the figures reverted to baseline by 2018, and in 2019, obesity rates in 14-year-olds rose by 2 percentage points, underlining the ineffectiveness of these measures.

Torless provides a different perspective, stating, “No single intervention is sufficient. Some countries are imposing soda taxes, others are labeling foods. While these efforts are commendable, a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach is essential for meaningful change.”

Thus, the report advocates for policies that enhance the availability and affordability of nutritious food, including grants and school meal programs. Furthermore, it highlights the critical role of nutritional education and poverty alleviation. “The same factors contributing to undernutrition parallel those causing overnutrition,” Richardson elaborates. “These issues stem from unsafe drinking water, lack of financial resources, and inadequate access to nutritious food.”

No nation has fully adopted all of UNICEF’s recommendations, leaving the question of their effectiveness in reducing obesity unanswered. “The underlying assumption is an increased consumption of unhealthy foods correlating with rising overweight and obesity rates,” remarks Ghosh. “This could partially explain the trends we’re seeing.”

However, other factors may also play a role, including stress, pollution, and even genetic factors.

“This truly needs to be seen as a major public health crisis,” concludes Richardson. “Our children are our future, and they deserve to be healthy. If they are not thriving, our future looks bleak.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

There is minimal nutritional variance between Baby-led weaning and spoon-feeding

Baby-led weaning can be a hassle

Oscar Wong/Getty Images

Babies who are hand-fed solid foods appear to take in the same number of calories as those spoon-fed pureed foods, suggesting that this type of 'baby-led weaning' may not have any particular nutritional advantages or disadvantages.

Despite its growing popularity, there is little scientific understanding of baby-led weaning, according to Kinsey Matzeler To investigate further, researchers at the University of Colorado asked the parents of 100 healthy 5-month-old infants living in the Denver, Colorado, area to report their infants' food and milk intake over a three-day period and also to weigh the food on their plates before and after meals to determine how much their infants had eaten.

Parents returned reports of their babies' food intake when they were 9 and 12 months old, and Matzeler and his team measured the babies' weight and size at each time point.

Using food records, the researchers identified 35 infants who were following a baby-led feeding system. Pureed foods account for less than 10% of total caloriesTo compare the groups, the team selected 35 normally breastfed babies who were matched to the babies in the Baby Lead weaning group for race, sex, and whether they were breastfed or formula-fed. Matzeler presented her findings June 30 at the 10th International Infant Nutrition Congress in Chicago, Illinois. American Society for Nutrition Annual Meeting.

The researchers found that daily energy intake, defined as calories per kilogram of the baby's body weight, was not significantly different between the two groups at any time point. The baby-led weaning infants consumed about 22 percent more protein than the other infants at 9 months of age, but this amount had returned to normal by 12 months of age.

At 9 and 12 months, infants who were fed solid foods were gaining weight relative to their age and height, but the differences were relatively small.

“Our experience is that if you were to show us the growth curves of babies weaned on baby powder and babies weaned the traditional way, you probably wouldn't be able to tell which was which,” Matzeler says, “and when you look at the babies, they're pretty similar.”

One key difference was that baby-led feeding was more common among mothers who attended college and whose families had higher annual incomes, suggesting a slight bias toward the middle class, perhaps because these parents can afford the time and money that baby-led feeding often requires, Matzeler says.

The results appear to contradict those of the UK study. Reduced energy intake when starting solid foods and Increased weight gainpictureInfants who drink electronic milk and also drink powdered milkHowever, the exact reason is unclear.

“Further research into feeding is needed to understand whether it has positive health outcomes for babies who follow this feeding style and whether these outcomes are truly due to the babies being fed, or to the socio-economic status of the parents who are more likely to follow this feeding style,” the researchers said. Joe Pierce At Sheffield Hallam University, UK.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com