U.S. Nuclear Weapons Agency Among 400 Organizations Targeted by Chinese Hackers, Reports Microsoft

Microsoft has revealed that investigations are underway indicating that Chinese “threat actors,” including state-sponsored hackers, are taking advantage of security flaws in SharePoint’s document sharing servers, impacting numerous government agencies and organizations.

Eye Security, a Dutch cybersecurity firm, reported that hackers have compromised around 400 institutions, businesses, and other entities, stating, “We anticipate an increase as the investigation continues.”

The majority of the affected parties are located in the United States. Bloomberg noted that one of the victims was a US agency responsible for overseeing the National Nuclear Security Agency, which manages nuclear weapons. This agency was among those affected.

According to Microsoft, three groups have been identified utilizing Chinese state-backed techniques, with a focus on exploiting newly disclosed vulnerabilities in internet-facing servers hosting the platform.

This announcement coincides with reports from the financial sector that Amazon has halted artificial intelligence labs in Shanghai. Additionally, consultancy firm McKinsey reported that Chinese companies are withdrawing from AI-related projects as geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing escalate.

Recently, Microsoft and IBM have scaled back their research and development initiatives in China, with US officials intensifying scrutiny on American companies involved in AI within the country.

In a blog post, Microsoft stated that the vulnerability is associated with an on-premises SharePoint server commonly utilized by businesses, not a cloud-based service.

Numerous large organizations employ SharePoint as a platform for document storage and collaboration, integrating seamlessly with other Microsoft products like Office and Outlook.

Microsoft indicated that the attacks commenced as early as July 7th, with hackers attempting to leverage the vulnerability for “early access to the target organization.”

This vulnerability permits an attacker to spoof authentication credentials and remotely execute malicious code on the server. Microsoft observed an attack that sent requests to a SharePoint server, potentially “enabling the theft of key material.”

In response, Microsoft has released a security update and recommended that all users of on-premises SharePoint systems apply it. They cautioned that hacking groups are continuing to target these systems, which they rated as having “high confidence” in terms of vulnerability.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Eye Security reported in a press release that “anomalous activity” was detected on a client’s on-premises SharePoint Server on the evening of July 18th. They subsequently scanned over 8,000 publicly accessible SharePoint servers across the globe, discovering numerous compromised systems and confirming that attackers were executing a coordinated mass exploitation campaign.

Microsoft stated that the linen typhoon has been focused on “intellectual property theft” since 2012, with primary targets including government, defense, strategic planning, and human rights-related organizations.

Since 2015, the Violet Typhoon has predominantly targeted former government and military personnel, NGOs, think tanks, academia, digital and print media, and sectors related to finance and health in the US, Europe, and East Asia.

Microsoft mentioned a third group, Storm-2603, which is situated in China, though no direct connection has been established between this group and other Chinese threat actors. They warned that “additional actors” could exploit the vulnerability to target on-premises SharePoint systems unless security updates are installed.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Harnessing AI: How Terrorist Organizations Like the Islamic State Fund and Adapt Their Operations

Counterterrorism officials have long assessed their approach to the utilization of terrorist organizations alongside digital tools and social media platforms, often likening their efforts to a whac-a-mole scenario.

Groups like the Islamic State and neo-Nazi organizations such as The Base harness digital tools to covertly gather finances, obtain 3D-printed weaponry, and disseminate these resources among their followers.

Over time, thwarting attacks and preserving an upper hand over such terrorist factions has progressed as more open-source resources have become accessible.

Currently, with artificial intelligence rapidly evolving, and now freely available as an app, security agents are in a race against time.

A source acquainted with the U.S. government’s counterterrorism initiatives informed the Guardian that several security agencies are deeply worried about how AI enhances the operational efficiency of hostile groups. The FBI refrained from commenting on the situation.

“Our research accurately forecasted the trends we are witnessing. Terrorists are leveraging AI to expedite their existing strategies rather than reinventing their operational frameworks,” remarks Adam Hadley, the founder and executive director of Tech Against Terrorism, an online counter-terrorism watchdog. He references the UN Anti-Terrorism Commission Secretariat (CTED).

“Future dangers encompass the potential for terrorists to utilize AI for rapid app and website development, essentially amplifying threats associated with pre-existing technologies rather than introducing entirely new categories of risk.”

So far, groups like IS and affiliated organizations have started to amplify their recruitment propaganda across diverse media formats, utilizing AI technologies such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT. This poses a more immediate risk as numerous sectors of employment prepare for potential upheavals, benefiting some of the wealthiest individuals globally while complicating public safety issues.

“Consider breaking news from the Islamic State. Today, it can be converted into an audio format,” states Mustafa Ayad, executive director for Africa, the Middle East, and Asia at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. “We’ve observed supporters establishing groups to bolster their efforts, and we also have a photo array generated in the center.”

Ayad continues, aligning with Hadley’s insights: “Much of AI’s impact enables pre-existing methods. It also enhances their propaganda and distribution capabilities, which is critically significant.”

The Islamic State is not merely curious about AI; it actively acknowledges the potential benefits it offers, even providing encrypted channels with a “Guide to AI Tools and Risks” for its supporters. A recent propaganda magazine elaborates on the future of AI and the necessity for the group to incorporate it into their operations.

“It’s become crucial for everyone to understand the intricacies of AI, irrespective of their field,” the article states. “[AI] is evolving into more than just technology; it is becoming a driving force in warfare.” The writer even posits that AI services could serve as “digital advisors” and “research assistants” for any member of the organization.

Within the perpetually active chat rooms used for communication among followers and recruits, discussions are emerging on various ways AI could be utilized as a resource, though some remain cautious. One user queried whether it was safe to use ChatGPT for “explosives practices,” expressing uncertainty about whether authorities were monitoring the platform. Privacy concerns have surfaced as chatbots are increasingly utilized.

“Are there any alternatives?” an online participant asked among supporters in the same chat room. “Ensure safety.”

However, another participant discovered a method to evade attention during monitoring. By omitting schematics and instructions for creating a “basic blueprint for remote vehicle prototypes using ChatGPT,” they shifted focus. Truck ramming has emerged as a tactic in recent assaults, as well as for followers and operatives. In March, an IS-linked account released a video featuring AI-generated bomb-making tutorials utilizing avatars for crafting recipes from household materials.

Far-right entities are similarly drawn to AI. Advising followers on creating misinformation memes, such as graphic content featuring Adolf Hitler.

Ayad emphasized that some of these AI-powered tools are advantageous for terrorist groups in enhancing their operational security, enabling them to communicate securely without attracting undue scrutiny.

Terrorist organizations continually strive to maximize and adapt digital spaces for their advancement, with AI representing the latest example. Since June 2014, when IS first commanded global attention amid dramatic live-tweeted accounts of mass executions in Mosul, they have undergone significant cyber operations. Following the establishment of their so-called caliphate, there was an organized response by both government entities and Silicon Valley to mitigate online presences. Western intelligence agencies have increasingly focused on encrypted messaging applications, particularly where 3D-printed firearms can be located, for surveillance and policing efforts.

Nonetheless, recent reductions in comprehensive global counterterrorism initiatives, including some from U.S. agencies, have undermined these efforts.

“The more urgent weakness lies in the deteriorating counterterrorism infrastructure,” Hadley remarked. “Standards have considerably declined as platforms and governments divert focus from this critical domain.”

Hadley is advocating for improved “content moderation” concerning AI-enabled materials, pressing companies like Meta and OpenAI to “enhance current mechanisms such as hash sharing and traditional detection methods.”

“Our vulnerabilities do not stem from new AI capabilities, but rather from the reduced resilience against established terrorist activities online,” he concluded.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Two Scientific Organizations Pledge Ongoing Efforts in U.S. Climate Assessments

On Friday, a prominent scientific organization announced its plans to release a pivotal report on climate change for the nation. This endeavor had been sidelined by the Trump administration, which dismissed numerous scientists involved in the effort.

The American Geophysical Union and the American Meteorological Society indicated that authors could opt to publish works initially drafted for evaluation in their respective journals.

Brandon Jones, program director for the National Science Foundation, stated, “It is essential to protect and prepare our community, our neighbors, and our children from the escalating risks associated with climate change. This collaboration opens a vital pathway for researchers to unite and provide the necessary science to address global climate change solutions.”

The National Climate Assessment represents a thorough review of current climate science, examining the impacts of climate change on the nation and outlining potential adaptation and mitigation strategies. Five editions have been published since 2000, with the sixth edition expected to be released in early 2028.

The new initiative will not replace the federal reports required by Congress, according to a statement from the American Geophysical Union and the American Meteorological Association.

The White House has not responded to a request for comment. Following the rejection of the authors of the National Climate Assessment, known as NCA6, the notification they received mentioned that “the scope of the report is currently being reassessed in accordance with the Global Change Research Act of 1990.” This law instituted the US Global Change Research Program in April, subsequently resulting in staff and funding cuts by the administration.

It remains uncertain whether the administration will move forward with a revised assessment, try to bypass Congress and cancel it entirely, or take an alternative approach.

Jason West, an environmental scientist at the University of North Carolina and former lead author on the Air Quality chapter in a past assessment, stated, “This effort cannot substitute for NCA6, which goes through extensive public and government reviews. However, it allows the team of authors who have already started their work the chance to finalize and publish their findings.”

The report’s authors had been preparing a chapter for nearly a year, addressing subjects like climate model updates and urban heat adaptation.

Scientists highlighted the unique breadth, depth, and rigor of national climate assessments, noting that the government’s role in publishing has historically added credibility and reliability to these reports.

Researchers expressed disappointment at the abrupt cancellation of their volunteer positions. For many, the announcement from the Science Association was a positive indication that their work could proceed, just as the authors of the first National Natural Assessment advocated for the publication of their efforts.

Costa Samaras, a civil engineer at Carnegie Mellon University and leader of the Climate Mitigation chapter, remarked via email, “The AGU/AMS initiatives can sustain the momentum of climate science in the wake of recent setbacks. It serves as a reminder that science will persist.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

Private Organizations Rise to Fill the Science Gap Left by Trump Administration Cuts

Following the rejection of numerous authors by the Trump administration for the upcoming national climate assessment, two scientific organizations have embarked on initiatives to publish special collections of climate change research.

Earlier this week, researchers were informed that their contributions would no longer be needed for the national climate assessment.

The future of this assessment is uncertain, and some authors have voiced concerns that its integrity is compromised, lacking scientific rigor or the ability to adequately convey the risks associated with climate change.

Robert Kopp, a professor of Earth and Planetary Science at Rutgers University and one of the authors affected by the recent decisions regarding the National Climate Assessment, commented:

In response to the administration’s actions, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the American Meteorological Society (AMS) announced on Friday their plans to curate a special collection focused on climate research, as stated in press releases from both organizations.

As per the news release, this collection will span over 20 peer-reviewed journals and aims to “sustain momentum” in the work relevant to the National Climate Assessment, in light of the author and staff rejections.

AGU President Brandon Jones noted in a statement that this special collection is not meant to serve as an “alternative” to the national climate assessment but represents “a unique opportunity to publish new research and reviews that could support climate assessments focused on the U.S.”

The White House has not commented on the rationale behind the rejection of National Climate Assessment authors or the administration’s plans moving forward.

The 1990 Global Change Research Act mandates the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) to submit reports to the President and Congress every four years, with national climate assessments previously satisfying this obligation. These reports summarize the best available science on climate change physics, its effects on the U.S., and societal adaptations. They also include localized climate forecasts for various regions to inform the public about community risks.

The latest assessment, published in 2023, comprised around 2,200 pages across 37 chapters. It highlighted that the lower 48 states have experienced an average warming of 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1970, alongside increasingly severe weather events and costly disasters.

“If you’re a state official, business leader, or a member of the public looking to understand the impacts of climate change on the economy, coastal areas, or human health,” Kopp stated:

The National Climate Assessment is a culmination of the efforts of hundreds of researchers volunteering their time, although it is organized by USGCRP staff. In April, the White House ceased funding for this organization.

“I have no insight into the plan; I don’t think anyone does,” Kopp remarked. “They have let go of all the authors and staff of the Global Change Research Program, leaving some government positions currently unfilled.”

The USGCRP website currently states, “We are reviewing the operation and structure of USGCRP.”

Kopp mentioned that the authors of the National Climate Assessment had dedicated about a year to summarizing the chapters intended for their 2027 report and evaluating relevant themes. This summary has already been submitted for review to the federal agency, and the authors are now considering how best to proceed with it.

“We cannot replicate the NCA unless there is an organization prepared to take charge and staff up,” Kopp concluded.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Environmental organizations gear up to combat incoming Trump administration

overview

  • Environmental groups are gearing up to resist the anticipated policy changes from the incoming Trump administration.
  • They foresee President Trump expanding oil and gas drilling and attempting to undo or scale back some of the legislation passed during Biden’s presidency.
  • Environmental groups are bracing for legal battles ahead and are seeking donations to support their efforts.

Environmental groups are preparing for pushback against the upcoming Trump administration, expecting swift policy changes compared to when Donald Trump took office in 2017.

Based on Trump’s past actions and recent campaign comments, experts predict that he will expand oil and gas drilling, reduce land conservation efforts, and possibly aim to reverse Biden-era legislation like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Curbing Inflation Act.

Environmentalists are concerned about Trump’s Cabinet picks, who are likely to support increased drilling activities as per Trump’s statements. Legal battles are on the horizon, with groups like the Center for Biological Diversity gearing up for potential fights against unlawful changes.

The Brookings Institution reported that Trump’s first administration made around 74 moves that were seen as detrimental to environmental policies, a number that might rise in the next term given Trump’s promise to change regulations significantly.

Environmental groups like NRDC and the Center for Biological Diversity are readying themselves for legal disputes and are actively seeking donations to fund their fight against expected environmental policy changes.

Trump’s transition team has not provided any comments on the matter.

Both NRDC and the Center for Biological Diversity have a track record of successfully challenging Trump’s policies in court, winning a significant percentage of the cases they engaged in.

Conservation groups are anticipating conflicts over protected federal lands, particularly in the Southwest, with past battles over Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah serving as examples of potential future clashes.

The sun sets over Monument Valley in the distance, seen from Bears Ears National Monument outside Blanding, Utah, in 2021.George Fry/Getty Images File

Source: www.nbcnews.com